Towards Flexible and Cognitive Production—Addressing the Production Challenges
Source abstract
Abstract
Globalization in the field of industry is fostering the need for cognitive production systems. To implement modern concepts that enable tools and systems for such a cognitive production system, several challenges on the shop floor level must first be resolved. This paper discusses the implementation of selected cognitive technologies on a real industrial case-study of a construction machine manufacturer. The partner company works on the concept of mass customization but utilizes manual labour for the high-variety assembly stations or lines. Sensing and guidance devices are used to provide information to the worker and also retrieve and monitor the working, with respecting data privacy policies. Next, a specified process of data contextualization, visual analytics, and causal discovery is used to extract useful information from the retrieved data via sensors. Communications and safety systems are explained further to complete the loop of implementation of cognitive entities on a manual assembly line. This deepened involvement of cognitive technologies are human-centered, rather than automated systems. The explained cognitive technologies enhance human interaction with the processes and ease the production methods. These concepts form a quintessential vision for an effective assembly line. This paper revolutionizes the existing industry 4.0 with an even-intensified human–machine interaction and moving towards cognitivity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems · Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Pro2Future GmbH, 4040 Linz, Austria
Funding
Graz University of Technology
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Industry 4.0—A glimpse10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034 ↗
2. Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing
3. Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: A review10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015 ↗
4. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 ↗
5. Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001 ↗
6. A Cloud-Based Monitoring System for Performance Assessment of Industrial Plants10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06638 ↗
7. Reliable Deep Learning and IoT-Based Monitoring System for Secure Computer Numerical Control Machines Against Cyber-Attacks With Experimental Verification10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3153471 ↗
8. Towards Secured Online Monitoring for Digitalized GIS Against Cyber-Attacks Based on IoT and Machine Learning10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3083499 ↗
9. Implementation of an Industry 4.0 system to optimally manage chemical plant operation10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.631 ↗
10. Optimally Managing Chemical Plant Operations: An Example Oriented by Industry 4.0 Paradigms10.1021/acs.iecr.1c00209 ↗
11. Elsisi, M., Tran, M.Q., Mahmoud, K., Mansour, D.E., Lehtonen, M., and Darwish, M.M.F. (2022). Effective IoT-based deep learning platform for online fault diagnosis of power transformers against cyberattacks and data uncertainties. Measurement, 190.10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110686 ↗
12. Hermann, M., Pentek, T., and Otto, B. (2016, January 5–8). Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.2016.488 ↗
13. Azevedo, A.I.R.L., and Santos, M.F. (2008). KDD, SEMMA and CRISP-DM: A parallel overview. IADS-DM.
14. Knapcikova, L., Balog, M., Perakovic, D., and Perisa, M. Adaptive Assembly Approach for E-Axles. Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Management of Manufacturing Systems.
15. Abdul Hadi, M., Brillinger, M., and Weinzerl, M. Parametric evaluation and cost analysis in an e-axle assembly layout. Proceedings of the 5th EAI International Conference on Management of Manufacturing Systems.
16. A classification of assembly line balancing problems10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.010 ↗
17. State-of-the-art exact and heuristic solution procedures for simple assembly line balancing10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.022 ↗
18. Boysen, N., Schulze, P., and Scholl, A. (2021). Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years?. Eur. J. Oper. Res.10.1016/j.ejor.2021.11.043 ↗
19. Multiple-source learning precedence graph concept for the automotive industry10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.034 ↗
20. On a learning precedence graph concept for the automotive industry10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.024 ↗
21. Pokorni, B., Popescu, D., and Constantinescu, C. (2022). Design of Cognitive Assistance Systems in Manual Assembly Based on Quality Function Deployment. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12083887 ↗
22. Guiza, O., Mayr-Dorn, C., Mayhofer, M., Egyed, A., Rieger, H., and Brandt, F. (2021, January 7–10). Recommending Assembly Work to Station Assignment Based on Historical Data. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 26th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Vasteras, Sweden.10.1109/ETFA45728.2021.9613480 ↗
23. Behrmann, E., and Rauwald, C. (2017, February 01). Mercedes Boots Robots From the Production Line. Available online: https://www.roboticstomorrow.com/story/2016/02/mercedes-boots-robots-from-the-production-line-/7727/.
24. Hull, D. (2018, June 19). Musk Says Excessive Automation Was ‘My Mistake’. Available online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-13/musk-tips-his-tesla-cap-to-humans-after-robots-undercut-model-3.
25. Wendemuth, A., and Biundo, S. (2012). A companion technology for cognitive technical systems. Cognitive Behavioural Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_7 ↗
26. Franova, C.M., and Sennersten, J.T.D. (2019, January 5–9). Cognitive Products: System Architecture and Operational Principles. Proceedings of the Cognitive 2019 Proceedings, Venice, Italy.
27. Haslgrübler, M., Gollan, B., and Ferscha, A. (2018). A Cognitive Assistance Framework for Supporting Human Workers in Industrial Tasks. IT Prof., 20.10.1109/MITP.2018.053891337 ↗
28. Haslgrübler, M., Gollan, B., Tomay, C., Ferscha, A., and Heftberger, J. Towards Skill Recognition using Eye-Hand Coordination in Industrial Production. Proceedings of the12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Rhodes, Greece, 5–7 June 2019.10.1145/3316782.3316784 ↗
29. Decision support model for implementing assistive technologies in assembly activities: A case study10.1080/00207543.2020.1856441 ↗
30. Sokolov, B., Ivanov, D., and Dolgui, A. (2020). Cloud Material Handling Systems: Conceptual Model and Cloud-Based Scheduling of Handling Activities. Scheduling in Industry 4.0 and Cloud Manufacturing, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-43177-8_1 ↗
31. A Benchmark Dataset for Depth Sensor Based Activity Recognition in a Manufacturing Process10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.159 ↗
32. Bleser, G., Damen, D., Behera, A., Hendeby, G., Mura, K., Miezal, M., Gee, A., Petersen, N., Maçães, G., and Domingues, H. (2015). Cognitive learning, monitoring and assistance of industrial workflows using egocentric sensor networks. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0127769 ↗
33. Cheng, C.F., Rashidi, A., Davenport, M.A., and Anderson, D. (2016, January 18–21). Audio Signal Processing for Activity Recognition of Construction Heavy Equipment. Proceedings of the ISARC International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Auburn, AL, USA.10.22260/ISARC2016/0078 ↗
34. Lenz, C., Sotzek, A., Röder, T., Radrich, H., Knoll, A., Huber, M., and Glasauer, S. (2011, January 25–30). Human workflow analysis using 3D occupancy grid hand tracking in a human-robot collaboration scenario. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/IROS.2011.6048188 ↗
35. Malaisé, A., Maurice, P., Colas, F., Charpillet, F., and Ivaldi, S. (2018, January 25–29). Activity Recognition With Multiple Wearable Sensors for Industrial Applications. Proceedings of the ACHI 2018—Eleventh International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, Rome, Italy.
36. Maekawa, T., Nakai, D., Ohara, K., and Namioka, Y. (2016, January 12–16). Toward Practical Factory Activity Recognition: Unsupervised Understanding of Repetitive Assembly Work in a Factory. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Heidelberg, Germany.10.1145/2971648.2971721 ↗
37. Campbell, T., Harper, J., Hartmann, B., and Paulos, E. (2018, June 19). Towards Digital Apprenticeship: Wearable Activity Recognition in the Workshop Setting. Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2015-172. Available online: http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2015/EECS-2015-172.html.
38. Reining, C., Schlangen, M., Hissmann, L., ten Hompel, M., Moya, F., and Fink, G.A. (2018, January 20–21). Attribute Representation for Human Activity Recognition of Manual Order Picking Activities. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction, Berlin, Germany.10.1145/3266157.3266214 ↗
39. Worker Activity Recognition in Smart Manufacturing Using IMU and sEMG Signals with Convolutional Neural Networks10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.152 ↗
40. Avrahami, D., Patel, M., Yamaura, Y., and Kratz, S. (2018, January 7–11). Below the Surface: Unobtrusive Activity Recognition for Work Surfaces Using RF-radar Sensing. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Tokyo, Japan.10.1145/3172944.3172962 ↗
41. Al-Naser, M., Ohashi, H., Ahmed, S., Nakamura, K., Akiyama, T., Sato, T., Nguyen, P., and Dengel, A. (2018, January 16–18). Hierarchical Model for Zero-shot Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence—Volume 2: ICAART, Madeira, Portugal.10.5220/0006595204780485 ↗
42. Vision-based action recognition of construction workers using dense trajectories10.1016/j.aei.2016.04.009 ↗
43. Makantasis, K., Doulamis, A., Doulamis, N., and Psychas, K. (2016, January 25–28). Deep learning based human behavior recognition in industrial workflows. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1109/ICIP.2016.7532630 ↗
44. Voulodimos, A., Grabner, H., Kosmopoulos, D., Van Gool, L., and Varvarigou, T. (2010, January 15–18). Robust Workflow Recognition Using Holistic Features and Outlier-Tolerant Fused Hidden Markov Models. Proceedings of the Artificial Neural Networks—ICANN 2010, Thessaloniki, Greece.10.1007/978-3-642-15819-3_71 ↗
45. Construction equipment activity recognition for simulation input modeling using mobile sensors and machine learning classifiers10.1016/j.aei.2015.03.001 ↗
46. Sopidis, G., Ahmad, A., Michael, H., and Ferscha, A. Micro-Activities Recognition and Macro Worksteps Classification for Industrial IoT Processes. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT’21), St. Gallen, Switzerland, 8–12 November 2021.10.1145/3494322.3494356 ↗
47. Keselman, L., Iselin Woodfill, J., Grunnet-Jepsen, A., and Bhowmik, A. (2017, January 21–26). Intel realsense stereoscopic depth cameras. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPRW.2017.167 ↗
48. Azadi, B., Haslgrübler, M., Sopidis, G., Murauer, M., Anzengruber, B., and Ferscha, A. (2019, January 5–7). Feasibility analysis of unsupervised industrial activity recognition based on a frequent micro action. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Rhodes, Greece.10.1145/3316782.3322749 ↗
49. Behavior modeling in industrial assembly lines using a wrist-worn inertial measurement unit10.1007/s12652-011-0061-3 ↗
50. Artificial Cognition in Production Systems10.1109/TASE.2010.2053534 ↗
51. Fantini, P., Tavola, G., Taisch, M., Barbosa, J., Leitao, P., Liu, Y., Sayed, M.S., and Lohse, N. (2016, January 23–26). Exploring the integration of the human as a flexibility factor in CPS enabled manufacturing environments: Methodology and results. Proceedings of the IECON 2016—42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Florence, Italy.10.1109/IECON.2016.7793579 ↗
52. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., and Scherer, R.J. (2013). Effective Construction Process Monitoring and Control through a Collaborative Cyber-Physical Approach. Collaborative Systems for Reindustrialization, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-40543-3 ↗
53. Aehnelt, M., and Bader, S. (2014, January 6–8). Tracking Assembly Processes and Providing Assistance in Smart Factories. Proceedings of the ICAART 2014: International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, Angers, France.
54. A cyber-physical system for production monitoring of manual manufacturing processes10.1007/s12008-018-0493-5 ↗
55. Legal and ethical issues of employee monitoring
56. Guiza, O., Mayr-Dorn, C., Weichhart, G., Mayhofer, M., Zangi, B.B., Egyed, A., Fanta, B., and Gieler, M. (2021, January 21–23). Monitoring of Human-Intensive Assembly Processes Based on Incomplete and Indirect Shopfloor Observations. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 19th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.10.1109/INDIN45523.2021.9557551 ↗
57. Guiza, O., Mayr-Dorn, C., Weichhart, G., Mayhofer, M., Zangi, B.B., Egyed, A., Fanta, B., and Gieler, M. (2021, January 21–23). Automated Deviation Detection for Partially-Observable Human-Intensive Assembly Processes. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 19th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.10.1109/INDIN45523.2021.9557502 ↗
58. Funk, M., Bächler, A., Bächler, L., Korn, O., Krieger, C., Heidenreich, T., and Schmidt, A. (2015, January 1–3). Comparing projected in-situ feedback at the manual assembly workplace with impaired workers. Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Corfu, Greece.10.1145/2769493.2769496 ↗
59. Funk, M., Kosch, T., Kettner, R., Korn, O., and Schmidt, A. (2016, January 18). Motioneap: An overview of 4 years of combining industrial assembly with augmented reality for industry 4.0. Proceedings of the Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Datadriven Business, Graz, Austria.
60. Dingler, T., and Schmidt, A. (2016). Peripheral displays to support human cognition. Peripheral Interaction, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-29523-7_8 ↗
61. Ziegler, J., Heinze, S., and Urbas, L. (2015, January 8–11). The potential of smartwatches to support mobile industrial maintenance tasks. Proceedings of the Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, Luxembourg.10.1109/ETFA.2015.7301479 ↗
62. Ong, S.K., and Nee, A.Y.C. (2013). Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing, Springer Science & Business Media.
63. Büttner, S., Funk, M., Sand, O., and Röcker, C. (July, January 29). Using head-mounted displays and in-situ projection for assistive systems: A comparison. Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Corfu Island, Greece.
64. Funk, M., Heusler, J., Akcay, E., Weiland, K., and Schmidt, A. (2016–1, January 29). Haptic, Auditory, or Visual?: Towards Optimal Error Feedback at Manual Assembly Workplaces. Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Corfu Island, Greece.10.1145/2910674.2910683 ↗
65. A study on visual, auditory, and haptic feedback for assembly tasks10.1162/105474604774048207 ↗
66. Wilson, J., Walker, B.N., Lindsay, J., Cambias, C., and Dellaert, F. (2007, January 11–13). Swan: System for wearable audio navigation. Proceedings of the 2007 11th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/ISWC.2007.4373786 ↗
67. Carter, T., Seah, S.A., Long, B., Drinkwater, B., and Subramanian, S. (2013). UltraHaptics: Multi-point mid-air haptic feedback for touch surfaces. Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM.10.1145/2501988.2502018 ↗
68. Berning, M., Braun, F., Riedel, T., and Beigl, M. (2015, January 7–11). ProximityHat: A head-worn system for subtle sensory augmentation with tactile stimulation. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Osaka, Japan.10.1145/2802083.2802088 ↗
69. Diener, V., Beigl, M., Budde, M., and Pescara, E. (2017, January 11–15). VibrationCap: Studying vibrotactile localization on the human head with an unobtrusive wearable tactile display. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Maui, HI, USA.10.1145/3123021.3123047 ↗
70. Haslgrübler, M., Fritz, P., Gollan, B., and Ferscha, A. (2017, January 22–25). Getting Through—Modality Selection in a Multi-Sensor-Actuator Industrial IoT Environment. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Internet of Things, Linz, Austria.10.1145/3131542.3131561 ↗
71. Madison, M., Barnhill, M., Napier, C., and Godin, J. (2015). NoSQL Database Technologies. J. Int. Technol. Inf. Manag., 24.10.58729/1941-6679.1032 ↗
72. Milenkovic, K., Mayer, S., Diwold, K., and Zehetner, J. (2019, January 3–5). Enabling Knowledge Management in Complex Industrial Processes Using Semantic Web Technology. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy, TAKE 2019, Vienna, Austria.
73. An Open Semantic Framework for the Industrial Internet of Things10.1109/MIS.2017.9 ↗
74. Thalmann, S., Gursch, H.G., Suschnigg, J., Gashi, M., Ennsbrunner, H., Fuchs, A.K., Schreck, T., Mutlu, B., Mangler, J., and Kappl, G. (2019, January 5–9). Cognitive Decision Support for Industrial Product Life Cycles: A Position Paper. Proceedings of the Cognitive 2019: The Eleventh International Conference on Advanced Cognitive Technologies and Applications, IARIA, Venice, Italy.
75. A survey of visualization for smart manufacturing10.1007/s12650-018-0530-2 ↗
76. Knowledge generation model for visual analytics10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346481 ↗
77. Suschnigg, J., Ziessler, F., Brillinger, M., Vukovic, M., Mangler, J., Schreck, T., and Thalmann, S. (2020, January 7–10). Industrial Production Process Improvement by a Process Engine Visual Analytics Dashboard. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2020.163 ↗
78. Abbas, A., Haslgrübler, M., Dogar, A.M., and Ferscha, A. (2021). Micro Activities Recognition in Uncontrolled Environments. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110327 ↗
79. State-of-the-art predictive maintenance techniques10.1109/TIM.2010.2047662 ↗
80. Gashi, M., Gursch, H., Hinterbichler, H., Pichler, S., Lindstaedt, S., and Thalmann, S. (2022). MEDEP: Maintenance Event Detection for Multivariate Time Series Based on the PELT Approach. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22082837 ↗
81. Sipos, R., Fradkin, D., Moerchen, F., and Wang, Z. (2014, January 24–27). Log-based predictive maintenance. In Proceeding of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2623330.2623340 ↗
82. Gashi, M., and Thalmann, S. (2019, January 9–10). Taking Complexity into Account: A Structured Literature Review on Multi-component Systems in the Context of Predictive Maintenance. Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.10.1007/978-3-030-44322-1_3 ↗
83. Gashi, M., Mutlu, B., Lindstaedt, S., and Thalmann, S. (2022;, January 3–7). Decision support for multi-component systems: Visualizing interdependencies for predictive maintenance. Proceedings of the 55rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Online.10.24251/HICSS.2022.211 ↗
84. Gashi, M., Mutlu, B., Lindstaedt, S., and Thalmann, S. (2022, January 24–28). No Time to Crash: Visualizing Interdependencies for Optimal Maintenance Scheduling. Proceedings of the Cognitive 2022: The Fourteenth International Conference on Advanced Cognitive Technologies and Applications, IARIA, Barcelona, Spain.
85. Leitner, L., Lagrange, A., and Endisch, C. (2016, January 12–15). End-of-line fault detection for combustion engines using one-class classification. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Banff, AB, Canada.10.1109/AIM.2016.7576768 ↗
86. Gashi, M., Ofner, P., Ennsbrunner, H., and Thalmann, S. (2021). Dealing with missing usage data in defect prediction: A case study of a welding supplier. Comput. Ind., 132.10.1016/j.compind.2021.103505 ↗
87. Gashi, M., Mutlu, B., Suschnigg, J., Ofner, P., Pichler, S., and Schreck, T. (2020, January 25–30). Interactive Visual Exploration of defect prediction in industrial setting through explainable models based on SHAP values. Proceedings of the IEEE VIS Poster Program, Virtual.
88. Vuković, M., and Thalmann, S. (2022). Causal Discovery in Manufacturing: A Structured Literature Review. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 6.10.3390/jmmp6010010 ↗
89. Illuminating the “black box”: A randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00064-9 ↗
90. Maier, M. (2014). Causal Discovery for Relational Domains: Representation, Reasoning, and Learning. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst].
91. Mooij, J.M., Peters, J., Janzing, D., Zscheischler, J., Schölkopf, B., Guyon, I., Statnikov, A., Mooij, M., and Mooij, S. (2016). Distinguishing Cause from Effect Using Observational Data: Methods and Benchmarks. arXiv.
92. Hund, L., and Schroeder, B. (2020). A causal perspective on reliability assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 195.10.1016/j.ress.2019.106678 ↗
93. Vukovic, M., Dhanoa, V., Jäger, M., Walchshofer, C., Küng, J., Krahwinkler, P., Mutlu, B., and Thalmann, S. (September, January 31). A Forecasting Model-Based Discovery of Causal Links of Key Influencing Performance Quality Indicators for Sinter Production Improvement. Proceedings of the 2020 AISTech Conference Proceedings, Cleveland, OH, USA.
94. Data-driven root cause diagnosis of faults in process industries10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.09.006 ↗
95. Fault detection and isolation of faults in a multivariate process with Bayesian network10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.06.001 ↗
96. Methods for root cause diagnosis of plant-wide oscillations10.1002/aic.14391 ↗
97. A data similarity based analysis to consequential alarms of industrial processes10.1016/j.jlp.2015.03.005 ↗
98. Knowledge discovery from observational data for process control using causal Bayesian networks10.1080/07408170600899532 ↗
99. Data-Driven Methods for the Detection of Causal Structures in Process Technology10.3390/machines2040255 ↗
100. Kraus, D., Diwold, K., and Leitgeb, E. (2021, January 17–19). Poster: RSSI-Based Antenna Evaluation for Robust BLE Communication in in-Car Environments. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, Delft, The Netherlands.