On the Patterns and Scaling Properties of the 2021–2022 Arkalochori Earthquake Sequence (Central Crete, Greece) Based on Seismological, Geophysical and Satellite Observations
Source abstract
Abstract
The 27 September 2021 damaging mainshock (Mw6.0) close to Arkalochori village is the strongest earthquake that was recorded during the instrumental period of seismicity in Central Crete (Greece). The mainshock was preceded by a significant number of foreshocks that lasted nearly four months. Maximum ground subsidence of about 18 cm was estimated from InSAR processing. The aftershock sequence is located in an almost NE-SW direction and divided into two main clusters, the southern and the northern ones. The foreshock activity, the deformation area, and the strongest aftershocks are located within the southern cluster. Based on body-wave travel times, a 3-D velocity model was developed, while using combined space and ground-based geodetic techniques, the co-seismic ground deformation is presented. Moreover, we examined the co-seismic static stress changes with respect to the aftershocks’ spatial distribution during the major events of the foreshocks, the Mw = 6.0 main event as well as the largest aftershock. Both the foreshock and the aftershock sequences obey the scaling law for the frequency-magnitude distribution as derived from the framework of non-extensive statistical physics (NESP). The aftershock production rate decays according to the modified Omori scaling law, exhibiting various Omori regimes due to the generation of secondary aftershock sequences. The analysis of the inter-event time distribution, based on NESP, further indicates asymptotic power-law scaling and long-range correlations among the events. The spatiotemporal evolution of the aftershock sequence indicates triggering by co-seismic stress transfer, while its slow migration towards the outer edges of the area of the aftershocks, related to the logarithm of time, further indicates a possible afterslip.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: earthquake and tectonic studies · Earthquake Detection and Analysis · Seismology and Earthquake Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Section of Geophysics–Geothermy, Department of Geology and Geoenvironment, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, GR 15784 Zografou, Athens, Greece
Institute of Physics of the Earth’s Interior and Geohazards, UNESCO Chair on Solid Earth Physics and Geohazards Risk Reduction, Hellenic Mediterranean University Research Center (HMURC), GR 73133 Chania, Crete, Greece
Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Romanou 3, GR 71004 Chania, Crete, Greece
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Seismotectonic Investigation of the area of Crete Island
2. The focal mechanism of earthquakes in the major area of Greece for the period 1947–1981
3. Three-dimensional model of Hellenic Arc deformation and origin of the Cretan uplift10.1029/2008JB005599 ↗
4. D’Amico, S. (2018). Seismic Deformation Derived from Moment Tensor Summation: Application Along the Hellenic Trench (Book Chapter). Moment Tensor Solutions, Springer International Publishing. Springer Natural Hazards.10.1007/978-3-319-77359-9 ↗
5. The Mw 6.7 12 October 2013 western Hellenic Arc main shock and its aftershock sequence: Implications for the slab properties10.1007/s00531-016-1294-3 ↗
6. Late Miocene to recent tectonic evolution of Crete (Greece): Geological observations and model analysis10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00184-X ↗
7. Thrust faults and extensional detachment faults in Cretan tectono-stratigraphy: Implications for Middle Miocene extension10.1016/j.tecto.2009.06.024 ↗
8. The tectonic development of a Neogene basin at the leading edge of the active European margin: The Heraklion basin, Crete, Greece10.1016/S0264-3707(00)00017-X ↗
9. Active faulting on the island of Crete (Greece)10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04749.x ↗
10. Middle-late quaternary geodynamics of Crete, southern Aegean, and seismotectonic implications10.12681/bgsg.11191 ↗
11. Ganas, A., Kourkouli, P., Briole, P., Moshou, A., Elias, P., and Parcharidis, I. (2018). Coseismic Displacements from Moderate-Size Earthquakes Mapped by Sentinel-1 Differential Interferometry: The Case of February 2017 Gulpinar Earthquake Sequence (Biga Peninsula, Turkey). Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10071089 ↗
12. Jusseret, S., and Sintubin, M. (2017). The palaeoseismological study of capable faults on Crete. Minoan Earthquakes-Breaking the Myth through Interdisciplinarity, Leuven University Press. [1st ed.].10.2307/j.ctt1whm9cf ↗
13. Vassilakis, E. (2006). Study of the Tectonic Structure of the Messara Basin, Central Crete, With the AID of Remote Sensing Techniques and G.I.S. [Ph.D. Thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens].
14. The 20 July 2017 M6.6 Kos Earthquake: Seismic and Geodetic Evidence for an Active North-Dipping Normal Fault at the Western End of the Gulf of Gökova (SE Aegean Sea)10.1007/s00024-019-02154-y ↗
15. Palaeoseismological analysis of the East Giouchtas fault, Heraklion basin, Crete (preliminary results)10.12681/bgsg.11756 ↗
16. The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) 1000–189910.1007/s10950-012-9335-2 ↗
17. Papazachos, B.C., and Papazachou, C.B. (2003). The Earthquakes of Greece, Ziti.
18. Guidoboni, E., and Comastri, A. (2005). Catalogue of Earthquakes and Tsunamis in the Mediterranean Area from the 11th to the 15th Century, INGV-SGA.
19. Vallianatos, F., Michas, G., Hloupis, G., and Chatzopoulos, G. (2022). The Evolution of Preseismic Patterns Related to the Central Crete (Mw6.0) Strong Earthquake on 27 September 2021 Revealed by Multiresolution Wavelets and Natural Time Analysis. Geosciences, 12.10.3390/geosciences12010033 ↗
20. ITSAK (2021). Arkalochori Earthquakes, Μ 6.0 on 27/09/2021 & Μ 5.3 on 28/09/2021: Preliminary Report—Recordings of the ITSAK Accelerometric Network and Damage on the Natural and Built Environment, ITSAK Research Unit.10.1158/1557-3265.ADI21-IA-09 ↗
21. The Crete Isl. (Greece) Mw6.0 Earthquake of 27 September 2021: Expecting the Unexpected10.3390/geohazards3010006 ↗
22. Vassilakis, E., Kaviris, G., Kapetanidis, V., Papageorgiou, E., Foumelis, M., Konsolaki, A., Petrakis, S., Evangelidis, C.P., Alexopoulos, J., and Karastathis, V. (2022). The 27 September 2021 Earthquake in Central Crete (Greece)—Detailed Analysis of the Earthquake Sequence and Indications for Contemporary Arc-Parallel Extension to the Hellenic Arc. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12062815 ↗
23. Ganas, A., Hamiel, Y., Serpetsidaki, A., Briole, P., Valkaniotis, S., Fassoulas, C., Piatibratova, O., Kranis, H., Tsironi, V., and Karamitros, I. (2022). The Arkalochori Mw = 5.9 Earthquake of 27 September 2021 Inside the Heraklion Basin: A Shallow, Blind Rupture Event Highlighting the Orthogonal Extension of Central Crete. Geosciences, 12.10.3390/geosciences12060220 ↗
24. Hellenic Mediterranean University Research Center (former Technological Educational Institute of Crete) (2006). Seismological Network of Crete, International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks. 10.7914/SN/HC.
25. The Virtual Seismologist in SeisComP3: A New Implementation Strategy for Earthquake Early Warning Algorithms10.1785/0220150235 ↗
26. Lee, W.H.K., and Lahr, J.C. (1975). HYP071 (Revised): A Computer Program for Determining Hypocenter, Magnitude, and First Motion Pattern of Local Earthquakes, U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 75-311.10.3133/ofr75311 ↗
27. Karakonstantis, A. (2017). 3-D Simulation of Crust and Upper Mantle Structure in the Broader Hellenic Area through Seismic Tomography. [Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geophysics-Geothermics, Faculty of Geology, University of Athens]. (In Greek).
28. Microseismic activity and seismotectonics of Heraklion Area (central Crete Island, Greece)10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00076-1 ↗
29. Seismicity at the convergent plate boundary offshore Crete, Greece, observed by an amphibian network10.1007/s10950-009-9170-2 ↗
30. Klein, F.W. (2002). User’s Guide to HYPOINVERSE-2000, a Fortran Program to Solve for Earthquake Locations and Magnitudes, 2002-171, United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey.10.3133/ofr02171 ↗
31. NOAfaults: A digital database for active faults in Greece10.12681/bgsg.11079 ↗
32. Waldhauser, F. (2001). hypoDD-A Program to Compute Double-Difference Hypocenter Locations, Open-File Report, 01-113, U.S. Geological Survey.10.3133/ofr01113 ↗
33. LOTOS code for local earthquake tomographic inversion: Benchmarks for testing tomographic algorithms10.1785/0120080013 ↗
34. Evidence for high fluid/melt content beneath Krakatau volcano (Indonesia) from local earthquake tomography10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.06.009 ↗
35. Tomographic inversion of local earthquake data from the Hengill–Grensdalur central volcano complex, Iceland10.1029/JB094iB12p17497 ↗
36. Geological and seismological evidence for NW-SE crustal extension at the southern margin of Heraklion Basin, Crete10.12681/bgsg.15004 ↗
37. Kassaras, I., Kapetanidis, V., Ganas, A., Tzanis, A., Kosma, C., Karakonstantis, A., Valkaniotis, S., Chailas, S., Kouskouna, V., and Papadimitriou, P. (2020). The New Seismotectonic Atlas of Greece (v1.0) and Its Implementation. Geosciences, 10.10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-2220 ↗
38. Curlander, J., and McDonough, R. (1991). Synthetic Aperture Radar: Systems and Signal Processing, John Wiley & Sons.
39. Recent advances in SAR interferometry time series analysis for measuring crustal deformation10.1016/j.tecto.2011.10.013 ↗
40. Radar interferometry: Limits and potential10.1109/36.214922 ↗
41. Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry10.1088/0266-5611/14/4/001 ↗
42. The role of space-based observation in understanding and responding to active tectonics and earthquakes10.1038/ncomms13844 ↗
43. A geospatial intelligence application to support post-disaster inspections based on local exposure information and on co-seismic DInSAR results: The case of the Durres (Albania) earthquake on November 26, 201910.1007/s11069-020-04120-7 ↗
44. Sakkas, V. (2021). Ground Deformation Modelling of the 2020 Mw6.9 Samos Earthquake (Greece) Based on InSAR and GNSS Data. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13091665 ↗
45. Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications10.1029/1998GL900033 ↗
46. Dach, R., Lutz, S., Walser, P., and Fridez, P. (2015). Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2; User Manual, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Bern Open Publishing.
47. The GPS velocity field of the Aegean. New observations, contribution of the earthquakes, crustal blocks model10.1093/gji/ggab089 ↗
48. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes
49. Coulomb stress change before and after 24.01.2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) Earthquake (Mw = 6.8) on the East Anatolian Fault Zone10.1007/s12517-021-09080-1 ↗
50. Coulomb 3.3 Graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching—User guide
51. Scholz, C. (2019). The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting, Cambridge University Press. [3rd ed.].10.1017/9781316681473 ↗
52. Pore pressure and poroelasticity effects in Coulomb stress analysis of earthquake interactions10.1029/2000JB000138 ↗
53. Lin, J., and Stein, R.S. (2004). Stress triggering in thrust and subduction earthquakes and stress interaction between the southern San Andreas and nearby thrust and strike-slip faults. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 109.10.1029/2003JB002607 ↗
54. Suppression of large earthquakes by stress shadows: A comparison of Coulomb and rate-and-state failure10.1029/98JB00793 ↗
55. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement10.1785/BSSA0840040974 ↗
56. Frequency of earthquakes in California10.1785/BSSA0340040185 ↗
57. Teleseismic b values; or, much ado about 1.010.1029/92JB01891 ↗
58. Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes10.1038/nature04094 ↗
59. Some discussion on aftershocks, foreshocks and earthquake swarms–the fracture of a semi-infinite body caused by an inner stress origand its relation to the earthquake phenomena (3rd paper)
60. Foreshocks and earthquake prediction10.1016/0040-1951(72)90070-4 ↗
61. Foreshocks and earthquake prediction10.1016/0040-1951(75)90038-4 ↗
62. Some characteristics of foreshocks and their possible relationship to earthquake prediction and premonitory slip on faults10.1029/JB084iB07p03596 ↗
63. A reinterpretation of the precursory seismic b-value anomaly from fracture mechanics10.1111/j.1365-246X.1989.tb05255.x ↗
64. Spatial and temporal evolution of b-values before large earthquakes in Taiwan10.1016/j.tecto.2012.02.004 ↗
65. Propagation of slow slip leading up to the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake10.1126/science.1215141 ↗
66. Decade-scale decrease b value prior to the M9-class 2011 Tohoku and 2004 Sumatra quakes10.1029/2012GL052997 ↗
67. Foreshock Patterns Preceding Great Earthquakes in the Subduction Zone of Chile10.1007/s00024-016-1337-5 ↗
68. Ouzounov, D., Pulinets, S., Hattori, K., and Taylor, P. (2018). Short-Term Foreshocks and Earthquake Prediction. AGU Geophysical Monograph Series Book, John Wiley and Sons Inc.. [1st ed.].10.1002/9781119156949 ↗
69. Minimum magnitude of complete reporting in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan10.1785/0119990114 ↗
70. Fragment-asperity interaction model for earthquakes10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.048501 ↗
71. Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics10.1007/BF01016429 ↗
72. Tsallis, C. (2009). Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics: Approaching a Complex World, Springer.
73. Nonextensive models for earthquakes10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026102 ↗
74. Tsallis-Based Nonextensive Analysis of the Southern California Seismicity10.3390/e13071267 ↗
75. Generalized statistical mechanics approaches to earthquakes and tectonics10.1098/rspa.2016.0497 ↗
76. Vallianatos, F., Michas, G., and Hloupis, G. (2021). Seismicity Patterns Prior to the Thessaly (Mw6. 3) Strong Earthquake on 3 March 2021 in Terms of Multiresolution Wavelets and Natural Time Analysis. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11090379 ↗
77. A non extensive statistical physics approach to the polarity reversals of the geomagnetic field10.1016/j.physa.2010.12.040 ↗
78. Is plate tectonics a case of non-extensive thermodynamics?10.1016/j.physa.2010.06.056 ↗
79. Statistical mechanics in earth physics and natural hazards10.2478/s11600-012-0037-5 ↗
80. Evidence of non-extensivity in the seismicity observed during the 2011–2012 unrest at the Santorini volcanic complex, Greece10.5194/nhess-13-177-2013 ↗
81. Evidence of non-extensive statistical physics of the lithospheric instability approaching the 2004 Sumatran-Andaman and 2011 Honshu mega-earthquakes10.1016/j.tecto.2013.01.009 ↗
82. Evidence of Nonextensive Statistical Physics behavior of the Hellenic Subduction Zone seismicity10.1016/j.tecto.2013.07.009 ↗
83. The earthquake intervent time distribution along the Hellenic subduction Zone
84. A Non-Extensive Statistical Physics View in the Spatiotemporal Properties of the 2003 (Mw6.2) Lefkada, Ionian Island Greece, Aftershock Sequence10.1007/s00024-013-0706-6 ↗
85. Global regionalized seismicity in view of Non-Extensive Statistical Physics10.1016/j.physa.2017.10.020 ↗
86. Chelidze, T., Telesca, L., and Elsevier, F. (2018). Non Extensive statistical Seismology: An overview. Complexity of Seismic Time Series, Elsevier. Measurement and Application.
87. On after-shocks of earthquakes
88. A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks
89. The Centenary of the Omori Formula for a Decay Law of Aftershock Activity10.4294/jpe1952.43.1 ↗
90. Estimation of the parameters in the modified Omori formula for aftershock frequencies by the maximum likelihood procedure10.4294/jpe1952.31.115 ↗
91. Limnios, N., Papadimitriou, E., and Tsaklidis, G. (2021). Scaling properties, multifractality and range of correlations in earthquake timeseries: Are earthquakes random?. Statistical Methods and Modeling of Seismogenesis, ISTE John Wiley.
92. Scale-free statistics of time interval between successive earthquakes10.1016/j.physa.2004.10.040 ↗
93. Non-extensivity and long-range correlations in the earthquake activity at the West Corinth rift (Greece)10.5194/npg-20-713-2013 ↗
94. Natural time analysis of critical phenomena: The case of acoustic emis-sions in triaxially deformed Etna basalt10.1016/j.physa.2013.06.051 ↗
95. Chochlaki, K., Michas, G., and Vallianatos, F. (2018). Complexity of the Yellowstone Park Volcanic Field Seismicity in Terms of Tsallis Entropy. Entropy, 20.10.3390/e20100721 ↗
96. A non-extensive statistical physics view to the spatiotemporal properties of the June 1995, Aigion earthquake (M6.2) aftershock sequence (West Corinth rift, Greece)10.2478/s11600-012-0011-2 ↗
97. Scaling properties of the Mw7.0 Samos (Greece), 2020 aftershock sequence10.1007/s11600-021-00579-5 ↗
98. Aftershock patterns of the 2021 Mw 6.3 Northern Thessaly (Greece) earthquake10.1007/s10950-021-10070-9 ↗
99. Migration of early aftershocks following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake10.1038/ngeo697 ↗
100. Aftershocks of the December 7, 2012 intraplate doublet neat the Japan Trench axis10.1186/1880-5981-66-24 ↗