A PCA-LSTM-Based Method for Fault Diagnosis and Data Recovery of Dry-Type Transformer Temperature Monitoring Sensor
Source abstract
Abstract
The failure that occurs during the dry-type transformer temperature monitoring sensor working will result in wrong data output, which may cause the monitor and monitoring background to respond incorrectly. To solve this problem, a fault diagnosis and data recovery algorithm based on principal component analysis (PCA), long short-term memory neural network (LSTM), and decision tree is proposed. It can realize the fault sensor location, fault diagnosis, and data recovery under dynamic processes. First, a set of temperature monitors was designed to collect the temperature inside the dry-type transformer in real-time by using the collected temperature data to build a PCA-based fault diagnosis model and a LSTM-based data recovery model. A fault location model based on a decision tree was constructed for five typical sensor fault types. Finally, the three models were constructed to obtain the sensor fault diagnosis and recovery algorithm. We then transplanted the algorithm to the temperature monitor. The experimental results showed that the recognition rate of the algorithm for different fault diagnoses of single- or multiple-sensors was above 96%. The diagnosis time was less than 1 ms. The recovery error was within 0.1 °C. The field experiments verified that the algorithm could significantly improve the stability of the monitor. Even if the sensor fails, it can also ensure that the dry-type transformer works within the normal range.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
GIS Technology Research Center of Resource and Environment in Western China, Ministry of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
School of Information Science and Technology, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
Dean’s Office, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) · Ten Thousand Talent Plans for Young Top-notch Talents of Yunnan Province
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. A novel double-stacked autoencoder for power transformers DGA signals with an imbalanced data structure10.1109/TIE.2021.3059543 ↗
2. Sun, Y., Xu, G., Li, N., Li, K., Liang, Y., Zhong, H., Zhang, L., and Liu, P. (2021). Hotspot Temperature Prediction of Dry-Type Transformers Based on Particle Filter Optimization with Support Vector Regression. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13081320 ↗
3. Development of a substation-area backup protective relay for smart substation10.1109/TSG.2016.2527687 ↗
4. Recent advances on SVM based fault diagnosis and process monitoring in complicated industrial processes10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.081 ↗
5. Water quality monitoring and control for aquaculture based on wireless sensor networks
6. Fault detection, diagnosis and recovery using Artificial Immune Systems: A review10.1016/j.engappai.2015.08.006 ↗
7. A generalized likelihood ratio approach to the detection and estimation of jumps in linear systems10.1109/TAC.1976.1101146 ↗
8. Yuqing, L., Tianshe, Y., Jian, L., Na, F., and Guan, W. (2016, January 7–10). A fault diagnosis method by multi sensor fusion for spacecraft control system sensors. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Harbin, China.10.1109/ICMA.2016.7558656 ↗
9. Deep PCA based real-time incipient fault detection and diagnosis methodology for electrical drive in high-speed trains10.1109/TVT.2018.2818538 ↗
10. Fault detection, identification and reconstruction of sensors in nuclear power plant with optimized PCA method10.1016/j.anucene.2017.11.009 ↗
11. Berriri, H., and Slama-Belkhodja, I. (2010, January 6–10). Enhanced parity equations method for sensor fault detection in electrical drives. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol), Nice, France.10.1109/SYSTOL.2010.5675967 ↗
12. Tolouei, H., and Shoorehdeli, M.A. (2017, January 2–4). Nonlinear parity approach to sensor fault detection in pH neutralization system. Proceedings of the 2017 Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Tehran, Iran.10.1109/IranianCEE.2017.7985165 ↗
13. Wang, B., Diao, M., and Zhang, H. (2014, January 3–6). Fault diagnosis and data recovery of sensor based on relevance vector machine. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Tianjin, China.10.1109/ICMA.2014.6885978 ↗
14. A Data-Driven Method of Engine Sensor on Line Fault Diagnosis and Recovery
15. Convolutional neural network–based data recovery method for structural health monitoring10.1177/1475921719897571 ↗
16. Orosz, T., Rassõlkin, A., Kallaste, A., Arsénio, P., Pánek, D., Kaska, J., and Karban, P. (2020). Robust Design Optimization and Emerging Technologies for Electrical Machines: Challenges and Open Problems. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10196653 ↗
17. Data-based line trip fault prediction in power systems using LSTM networks and SVM10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2785763 ↗
18. (2022, May 10). Electronic Thermostats for Transformers 2005, JB/T 7631-2005. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=SCSD000001038584&DbName=SCSD.
19. (2022, May 10). Power Transformers-Part 11: Dry-Type Transformers. China Electrical Equipment Industry Association, 2007. GB/T 1094.11-2007. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=SCSD000005138709&DbName=SCSD.
20. A review of fault detection and diagnosis methods for residential air conditioning systems10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106236 ↗
21. Sensor network data fault types10.1145/1525856.1525863 ↗
22. Distributed adaptive diagnosis of sensor faults using structural response data10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/105019 ↗
23. Measuring the prediction error. A comparison of cross-validation, bootstrap and covariance penalty methods10.1016/j.csda.2010.03.004 ↗
24. Dai, X., Qin, F., Gao, Z., Pan, K., and Busawon, K. (2015, January 22–24). Model-based on-line sensor fault detection in Wireless Sensor Actuator Networks. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Cambridge, UK.10.1109/INDIN.2015.7281794 ↗
25. Balzano, L., and Nowak, R. (2007, January 25–27). Blind calibration of sensor networks. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Cambridge, MA, USA.10.1109/IPSN.2007.4379667 ↗
26. Fault-tolerant control for an Internet-based three-tank system: Accommodation to sensor bias faults10.1109/TIE.2016.2623582 ↗