journal article·2022-05-25Open access

Effect of Chitosan Solution on Low-Cohesive Soil’s Shear Modulus G Determined through Resonant Column and Torsional Shearing Tests

Marta Bocheńska, Marcin Bujko, Ireneusz Dyka, Piotr Srokosz, Rafał Ossowski

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 11

Abstract

In this study the effect of using a biopolymer soil stabilizer on soil stiffness characteristics was investigated. Chitosan is a bio-waste material that is obtained by chemical treatment of chitin (a chemical component of fungi or crustaceans’ shells). Using chitosan solution as a soil stabilizer is based on the assumption that the biopolymer forms temporary bonds with soil particles. What is important is that these bonds are biodegradable, so the product does not leave any harmful waste and has high eco-compatibility. The biopolymer itself is a by-product of many industrial chemical processes, so its application is compliant with the goals of sustainable geotechnical engineering. The effect of chitosan on soil shear strength, permeability or surface erosion has already been investigated in several different studies. In this study specimens of low-cohesive soil stabilized with two different chitosan solutions were subject to cyclic loading (torsional shearing test) and dynamic loading (resonant column) to obtain soil shear modulus G as a function of strain values. It has been shown that chitosan solution added to medium-grained materials improves their shear modulus G substantially (up to 3 times) even for relatively low chitosan concentration solutions (1.5 g of chitosan per 1 kg of dry silica sand). The results obtained in this study and the known chitosan properties suggest that chitosan solutions can be a very effective and eco-friendly short-term stabilizer for temporary geotechnical structures, e.g., working platforms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microbial Applications in Construction Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Das, B.M. (1985). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, PWS Engineering.
2. Katra, I. (2020). Soil Erosion: Dust Control and Sand Stabilization. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10228044 ↗
3. Accelerated Strength Improvement of Silty Sand with Nontraditional Additives10.1177/0361198105193600105 ↗
4. Stabilization of Clay Soils with Nontraditional Additives10.3141/1819b-10 ↗
5. Stabilization of Sand Using Polymer Emulsions
6. Stabilization mechanisms of nontraditional additives10.3141/1989-49 ↗
7. Stabilization of Silty Sand with Nontraditional Additives10.3141/1787-07 ↗
8. A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124685 ↗
9. Eggshell Produced Limes: Innovative Materials for Soil Stabilization10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003418 ↗
10. Influence of crushed granulated blast furnace slag and calcined eggshell waste on mechanical properties of a compacted marl10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100244 ↗
11. Review on geotechnical engineering properties of sands treated by microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICO) and biopolymers10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118415 ↗
12. Biopolymers as a sustainable solution for the enhancement of soil mechanical properties10.1038/s41598-019-57135-x ↗
13. Combined and synergic effect of algerian natural fibres and biopolymers on the reinforcement of extruded raw earth10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123211 ↗
14. Natural additives and biopolymers for raw earth construction stabilization—A review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124507 ↗
15. Mendonça, A., Morais, P.V., Pires, A.C., Chung, A.P., and Oliveira, P.V. (2021). A Review on the Importance of Microbial Biopolymers Such as Xanthan Gum to Improve Soil Properties. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010170 ↗
16. Fatehi, H., Ong, D.E.L., Yu, J., and Chang, I. (2021). Biopolymers as Green Binders for Soil Improvement in Geotechnical Applications: A Review. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11070291 ↗
17. Shariatmadari, N., Reza, M., Tasuji, A., Ghadir, P., and Javadi, A. (2020, January 19–21). Experimental Study on the Effect of Chitosan Biopolymer on Sandy Soil Stabilization. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Unsaturated Soils, E3S Web of Conferences, Les Ulis, France.10.1051/e3sconf/202019506007 ↗
18. Review on biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) technology in geotechnical engineering practices10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100385 ↗
19. Chang, I., Im, J., and Cho, G.-C. (2016). Introduction of microbial biopolymers in soil treatment for future environmentally-friendly and sustainable geotechnical engineering. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8030251 ↗
20. Some geomechanical properties of a biopolymer treated medium sand10.1515/sggw-2017-0016 ↗
21. Investigation of soil stabilization using chitosan biopolymer10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.256 ↗
22. A Review of the Application of Biopolymers on Geotechnical Engineering and the Strengthening Mechanisms between Typical Biopolymers and Soils10.1155/2020/1465709 ↗
23. Performance of soils enhanced with eco-friendly biopolymers in unconfined compression strength tests and fatigue loading tests10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120039 ↗
24. Ni, J., Hao, G.-L., Chen, J.Q., Ma, L., and Geng, X.-Y. (2021). The Optimisation Analysis of Sand-Clay Mixtures Stabilised with Xanthan Gum Biopolymers. Sustainability, 13.10.31224/osf.io/vg7cn ↗
25. Santos, V., Marques, N., Maia, P., Lima, M., Franco, L., and Campos-Takaki, G. (2020). Seafood Waste as Attractive Source of Chitin and Chitosan Production and Their Applications Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21124290 ↗
26. Application of a chitosan flocculant to water treatment10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.07.039 ↗
27. Chitosan films and hydrogels of chlorhexidine gluconate for oral mucosal delivery10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00334-8 ↗
28. Comparative studies of tripolyphosphate and glutaraldehyde cross-linked chitosan-botanical pesticide nanoparticles and their agricultural applications10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.043 ↗
29. Chitosan/clay nanocomposite films as supports for enzyme immobilization: An innovative green approach for winemaking applications10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.08.005 ↗
30. Fabrication of Ultrathin CoMoO4 Nanosheet Modified with Chitosan and their Improved Performance in Energy Storage Device10.1039/C5DT00622H ↗
31. A biopolymer gel-decorated cobalt molybdate nanowafer: Effective graft polymer cross-linked with an organic acid for better energy storage10.1039/C5NJ02799C ↗
32. Applications and Properties of Chitosan10.1177/088391159200700406 ↗
33. Fundamentals and Applications of Chitosan
34. Jiménez-Gómez, C.P., and Cecilia, J.A. (2020). Chitosan: A Natural Biopolymer with a Wide and Varied Range of Applications. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25173981 ↗
35. A review on chitosan and chitosan-based bionanocomposites: Promising material for combatting global issues and its applications10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.023 ↗
36. Copper adsorption through chitosan immobilized on sand to demonstrate the feasibility for in situ soil decontamination10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.09.009 ↗
37. Ultrasonic P-wave reflection monitoring of soil erosion for erosion function apparatus10.1520/GTJ20150040 ↗
38. The potential use of chitosan as a biopolymer additive for enhanced mechanical properties and water resistance of earthen construction10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.218 ↗
39. Karimi, S. (1998). A Study of Geotechnical Applications of Biopolymer Treated Soils with an Emphasis on Silt. [Ph. D. Thesis, University of Southern California].
40. Improvement of surface erosion resistance of sand by microbial biopolymer formation10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001900 ↗
41. Geotechnical behavior of a beta-1,3/1,6-glucan biopolymer-treated residual soil10.12989/gae.2014.7.6.633 ↗
42. Wichtmann, T. (2016). Soil Behaviour under Cyclic Loading—Experimental Observations, Constitutive Description and Applications. [Ph.D. Thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology].
43. Influence of grain size distribution on dynamic shear modulus of sands10.1515/eng-2017-0036 ↗
44. Optical flow method for measuring deformation of soil specimen subjected to torsional shearing10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109064 ↗
45. Dynamic properties of gel-type biopolymer-treated sands evaluated by Resonant Column (RC) tests10.12989/gae.2017.12.5.815 ↗
46. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 ↗
47. Jiang, T., James, R., Kumbar, S.G., and Laurencin, C.T. (2014). Chitosan as a Biomaterial: Structure, Properties, and Applications in Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery. Natural and Synthetic Biomedical Polymers, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-396983-5.00005-3 ↗
48. (2012). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2700 kN-m/m3)) (Standard No. ASTM D1557–12e1).
49. Srokosz, P.E., Dyka, I., Bujko, M., and Bocheńska, M. (2021). A Modified Resonant Column Device for In-Depth Analysis of Vibration in Cohesive and Cohesionless Soils. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14206647 ↗
50. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Modulus and Damping of Soils by Fixed-Base Resonant Column Devices (Standard No. ASTM D4015–21).
51. Determination of Shear Modulus of Soil in the RC/TS Apparatus for Designing Offshore Wind Power Plant Foundations10.2478/pomr-2018-0098 ↗
52. A simplex method for function minimization10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 ↗
53. Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions10.1137/S1052623496303470 ↗