3D Convolution Recurrent Neural Networks for Multi-Label Earthquake Magnitude Classification
Source abstract
Abstract
We examine a classification task in which signals of naturally occurring earthquakes are categorized ranging from minor to major, based on their magnitude. Generalized to a single-label classification task, most prior investigations have focused on assessing whether an earthquake’s magnitude falls into the minor or large categories. This procedure is often not practical since the tremor it generates has a wide range of variation in the neighboring regions based on the distance, depth, type of surface, and several other factors. We present an integrated 3-dimensional convolutional recurrent neural network (3D-CNN-RNN) trained to classify the seismic waveforms into multiple categories based on the problem formulation. Recent studies demonstrate using artificial intelligence-based techniques in earthquake detection and location estimation tasks with progress in collecting seismic data. However, less work has been performed in classifying the seismic signals into single or multiple categories. We leverage the use of a benchmark dataset comprising of earthquake waveforms having different magnitude and present 3D-CNN-RNN, a highly scalable neural network for multi-label classification problems. End-to-end learning has become a conventional approach in audio and image-related classification studies. However, for seismic signals classification, it has yet to be established. In this study, we propose to deploy the trained model on personal seismometers to effectively categorize earthquakes and increase the response time by leveraging the data-centric approaches. For this purpose, firstly, we transform the existing benchmark dataset into a series of multi-label examples. Secondly, we develop a novel 3D-CNN-RNN model for multi-label seismic event classification. Finally, we validate and evaluate the learned model with unseen seismic waveforms instances and report whether a specific event is associated with a particular class or not. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority and effectiveness of the proposed approach on unseen data using the multi-label classifier.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Earthquake Detection and Analysis · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Systems and Control Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan
Honda Research Institute Japan Co., Ltd., 8-1, Honcho, Wako 351-0188, Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. A Review on Multi-Label Learning Algorithms10.1109/TKDE.2013.39 ↗
2. Survey on Multi-Output Learning
3. Liu, W., Wang, H., Shen, X., and Tsang, I. (2020). The Emerging Trends of Multi-Label Learning. arXiv.
4. Adeli, J.E., Zhang, A., and Taflanidis, A. (2014). Convolutional generative adversarial imputation networks for spatio-temporal missing data in storm surge simulations. arXiv.
5. ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning10.1016/j.patcog.2006.12.019 ↗
6. Hsu, D.J., Sham, M., Kakade, J.L., and Tong, Z. (2009, January 7–10). Multi-Label Prediction via Compressed Sensing. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Red Hook, NY, USA.
7. Gong, Y., Jia, Y., Leung, T., Toshev, A., and Ioffe, S. (2014, January 14–16). Deep Convolutional Ranking for Multilabel Image Annotation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Banff, AB, Canada.
8. HCP: A Flexible CNN Framework for Multi-Label Image Classification10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2491929 ↗
9. Wang, J., Yang, Y., Mao, J., Huang, Z., Huang, C., and Xu, W. (2016, January 27–30). CNN-RNN: A unified framework for multi-label image classification. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.251 ↗
10. Acoustic classification of multiple simultaneous bird species: A multi-instance multi-label approach10.1121/1.4707424 ↗
11. Multi-label learning with incomplete class assignments
12. Johnson, T. (2015, January 15). Effective Use of Word Order for Text Categorization with Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Denver, CO, USA.10.3115/v1/N15-1011 ↗
13. Joulin, T. (2017, January 19–23). Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, Spain. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/E17-2068.10.18653/v1/E17-2068 ↗
14. Prabhu, Y., and Varma, M. (2014, January 24–27). FastXML. Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2623330.2623651 ↗
15. Mousavi, S.M., Zhu, W., Sheng, Y., and Beroza, G.C. (2019). CRED: A Deep Residual Network of Convolutional and Recurrent Units for Earthquake Signal Detection. Sci. Rep., 9.10.1038/s41598-019-45748-1 ↗
16. Perol, T., Gharbi, M., and Denolle, M. (2018). Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location. Sci. Adv., 4.10.1126/sciadv.1700578 ↗
17. Detecting earthquakes: A novel deep learning-based approach for effective disaster response10.1007/s10489-021-02285-7 ↗
18. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, The MIT Press.
19. Meyers, R. (2014). Earthquake Magnitude. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, Springer.
20. Jung, M., and Chi, S. (2020). Human activity classification based on sound recognition and residual convolutional neural network. Autom. Constr., 114.10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103177 ↗
21. Li, G., Zhang, M., Li, J., Lv, F., and Tong, G. (2021). Efficient densely connected convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognit., 109.10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107610 ↗
22. Going Deeper With Contextual CNN for Hyperspectral Image Classification10.1109/TIP.2017.2725580 ↗
23. Accelerating Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Classification and Detection10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2502579 ↗
24. Evolving Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification10.1109/TEVC.2019.2916183 ↗
25. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
26. Scarpiniti, M., Comminiello, D., Uncini, A., and Lee, Y.-C. (2020, January 24–28). Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Audio Classification in Construction Sites. Proceedings of the 2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.23919/Eusipco47968.2020.9287802 ↗
27. A Sequence-to-Sequence Deep Learning Architecture Based on Bidirectional GRU for Type Recognition and Time Location of Combined Power Quality Disturbance10.1109/TII.2019.2895054 ↗
28. Light Gated Recurrent Units for Speech Recognition10.1109/TETCI.2017.2762739 ↗
29. STanford EArthquake Dataset (STEAD): A Global Data Set of Seismic Signals for AI10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947848 ↗
30. 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Human Action Recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2012.59 ↗
31. Chung, J., Çaglar, G., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling. arXiv.
32. Glorot, X., and Yoshua, B. (2010, January 13–15). Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Sardinia, Italy.
33. Shakeel, M., Itoyama, K., Nishida, K., and Nakadai, K. (2021, January 11–14). EMC: Earthquake Magnitudes Classification on Seismic Signals via Convolutional Recurrent Networks. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), Virtual.10.1109/IEEECONF49454.2021.9382696 ↗
34. Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163420 ↗
35. O’Shaughnessy, D. (1987). Speech Communications: Human and Machine (Addison-Wesley Series in Electrical Engineering), Addison-Wesley.
36. Diaz, J., Schimmel, M., Ruiz, M., and Carbonell, R. (2020). Seismometers Within Cities: A Tool to Connect Earth Sciences and Society. Front. Earth Sci., 8.10.3389/feart.2020.00009 ↗