Show source-provided references
1. Quasi-Static Nonlinear Seismic Assessment of a Fourth Century A.D. Roman Aqueduct in Istanbul, Turkey
10.3390/heritage4010025 ↗2. Equivalent mechanical models of sloshing fluid in arbitrary-section aqueducts
10.1002/eqe.1173 ↗7. Review of Liquid Sloshing Dynamics: Theory and Applications
10. Marefat M S. Seismic performance assessment of plain concrete arch bridges under near-field earthquakes using incremental dynamic analysis
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104170 ↗11. Evaluation of vertical seismic response for a large-scale beam-supported aqueduct
12. Deierlein, G.G., Krawinkler, H., and Cornell, C.A. (2003). A framework for performance-based earthquake engineering. Proceedings of 2003 Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier.
13. Porter, K.A. (2003, January 6–9). An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), San Francisco, CA, USA.
14. Moehle, J., and Deierlein, G.G. (2004, January 1–6). A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
15. Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments
17. Jalayer, F., and Cornell, C.A. (2004). A Technical Framework for Probability-Based Demand and Capacity Factor Design (DCFD) Seismic Formats, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. PEER Report 2003/08.
19. Crespi, P., Zucca, M., Longarini, N., and Giordano, N. (2020). Seismic Assessment of Six Typologies of Existing RC Bridges. Infrastructures, 5.
10.3390/infrastructures5060052 ↗24. Jalayer, F. (2003). Direct Probabilistic Seismic Analysis: Implementing Non-Linear Dynamic Assessments. [Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University].
25. Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments
10.1002/eqe.876 ↗27. Yuan, C.-Y. (2017). Study on the Structure-BCS Intelligent Control Methods for Mitigating the Vibration of Large-Scale Wind Turbines. [Ph.D. Thesis, Dalian University of Technology].
29. Seismic acceleration demand and fragility assessment of storage tanks installed in industrial steel moment-resisting frame structures
10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107016 ↗31. Simulation algorithm for spiral case structure in hydropower station
32. Hult, J., and Lemaitre, J. Description of Anisotropic Damage Application to Elasticity. Physical Non-Linearities in Structural Analysis, Proceedings of the IUTAM, Senlis, France, 27–30 May 1980, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-642-81582-9 ↗33. Aseismatic analysis of aqueduct structure for South to North Water Transfer Project
34. He, J.-T. (2007). Fluid-Structure Dynamic Coupling’s Analysis of Large Scale Aqueduct. [Master’s Thesis, Xi’an University of Technology].
35. Zhou, Z.-G. (2014). Study on the Pile-Soil-Aqueduct Interaction by Pseudo-Dynamic Test and Computational Analysis. [Ph.D. Thesis, Hunan University].
36. Applied Technology Council (1978). Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings: A Cooperative Effort with the Design Professions, Building Code Interests and the Research Community, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
40. Kanai, K. (1983). Engineering Seismology, University of Tokyo Press.
42. Seismic fragility assessment of SMA-bar restrained multi-span continuous highway bridge isolated by different laminated rubber bearings in medium to strong seismic risk zones
10.1007/s10518-012-9381-8 ↗44. Yu, X.-H. (2012). Probabilistic Seismic Fragility and Risk Analysis of Reinforce Concrete Frame Structures. [Ph.D. Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology].
45. Dutta, A., and Mander, J. (2002). Rapid and Detailed Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges, Technical Report for Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering.
46. American Society of Civil Engineers (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA. FEMA 356, Technical report for Federal Emergency Management Agency.
48. Vamvatsikos, D. (2002). Seismic Performance, Capacity and Reliability of Structures as Seen Through Incremental Dynamic Analysis. [Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University].
49. (1999). FEMA: HAZUS99 Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
50. Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measures
10.1002/eqe.700 ↗