journal article·2021-12-07Open access

Predicting Traffic Sign Retro-Reflectivity Degradation Using Deep Neural Networks

Abdolmaged Alkhulaifi, Arshad Jamal, Irfan Ahmad

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 24

Abstract

Traffic signs are essential for the safe and efficient movement of vehicles through the transportation network. Poor sign visibility can lead to accidents. One of the key properties used to measure the visibility of a traffic sign is retro-reflection, which indicates how much light a traffic sign reflects back to the driver. The retro-reflection of the traffic sign degrades over time until it reaches a point where the traffic sign has to be changed or repaired. Several studies have explored the idea of modeling the sign degradation level to help the authorities in effective scheduling of sign maintenance. However, previous studies utilized simpler models and proposed multiple models for different combinations of the sheeting type and color used for the traffic sign. In this study, we present a neural network based deep learning model for traffic sign retro-reflectivity prediction. Data utilized in this study was collected using a handheld retro-reflectometer GR3 from field surveys of traffic signs. Sign retro-reflective measurements (i.e., the RA values) were taken for different sign sheeting brands, grades, colors, orientation angles, observation angles, and aging periods. Feature-based sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify variables’ relative importance in determining retro-reflectivity. Results show that the sheeting color and observation angle were the most significant variables, whereas sign orientation was the least important. Considering all the features, RA prediction results obtained from one-hot encoding outperformed other models reported in the literature. The findings of this study demonstrate the feasibility and robustness of the proposed neural network based deep learning model in predicting the sign retro-reflectivity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Safety Warnings and Signage · Traffic and Road Safety · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Information and Computer Science, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Daman, Saudi Arabia

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Daman, Saudi Arabia

Interdisciplinary Research Center of Smart Mobility and Logistics (IRC-SML), King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Daman, Saudi Arabia

Interdisciplinary Research Center for Intelligent Secure Systems (IRC-ISS), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Daman, Saudi Arabia

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Model for Predicting Traffic Signs Functional Service Life–The Republic of Croatia Case Study10.7307/ptt.v29i3.2247 ↗
2. Minimum luminance of highway signs required by older drivers10.3141/1573-15 ↗
3. Jamal, A., Rahman, M.T., Al-Ahmadi, H.M., and Mansoor, U. (2020). The dilemma of road safety in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia: Consequences and prevention strategies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17010157 ↗
4. Evaluation of multiclass traffic sign detection and classification methods for US roadway asset inventory management10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000491 ↗
5. Kirk, A.R., Hunt, E.A., and Brooks, E.W. (2001). Factors Affecting Sign Retroreflectivity, Oregon Department of Transportation Research Group. Technical Report.
6. Black, K.L., McGee, H., Hussain, S., and Rennilson, J. (1991). Service Life of Retroreflective Traffic Signs, Federal Highway Administration. Technical Report FHWA-RD-90-091.
7. Wolshon, B., Degeyter, R., and Swargam, J. (2002, January 2–4). Analysis and predictive modeling of road sign retroreflectivity performance. Proceedings of the 16th Biennial Symposium on Visibility and Simulation, Iowa City, IA, USA.
8. Bischoff, A.L., and Bullock, D.M. (2002). Sign Retroreflectivity Study, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University. Technical Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/22.10.5703/1288284313313 ↗
9. Synthesis of sign deterioration rates across the United States10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:3(94) ↗
10. Retroreflectivity and deterioration characteristics of sheeting used for in-service guide signs10.1061/JHTRCQ.0000320 ↗
11. Analysis of in-service traffic sign retroreflectivity and deterioration rates in Texas10.3141/2258-11 ↗
12. Swargam, N. (2004). Development of a Neural Network Approach for the Assessment of the Performance of Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity. [Master’s Thesis, Louisiana State University].
13. Field performance analysis of traffic sign retroreflectivity
14. Predicting state of traffic signs using logistic regression10.7708/ijtte.2016.6(3).04 ↗
15. Rasdorf, W.J., Hummer, J.E., Harris, E.A., Immaneni, V.P.K., and Yeom, C. (2006). Designing an Efficient Nighttime Sign Inspection Procedure to Ensure Motorist Safety, North Carolina Department of Transportation.
16. Brimley, B., and Carlson, P.J. (2013, January 13–17). The current state of research on the long-term deterioration of traffic signs. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
17. Minimum retroreflectivity for overhead guide signs and street name signs10.3141/1794-05 ↗
18. Reductions in traffic sign retroreflectivity caused by frost and dew10.3141/1844-10 ↗
19. Determining the influence of factors on retroreflective properties of traffic signs
20. Factors Affecting Night-Time Visibility of Retroreflective Road Traffic Signs: A Review
21. Prediction of traffic sign vandalism that obstructs critical messages to drivers10.3846/16484142.2016.1252946 ↗
22. Recognition of retroreflective traffic signs by a vehicle camera system
23. Pavement markings: Identification of relevant covariates and controllable factors of retroreflectivity performance as a road safety measure10.1093/tse/tdaa034 ↗
24. Pike, A.M., and Carlson, P.J. (2014, January 12–16). Evaluation of sign sheeting service life in Wyoming. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
25. Huynh, N., Mullen, R., Pulver, Z., and Shiri, S. (2018). Sign Life Expectancy, Transport Research International Documentation (TRID).
26. Rasdorf, W.J., and Machado, P. (2019). Sign Replacement Strategy, Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University. Technical Report.
27. Predictive analytics for roadway maintenance: A review of current models, challenges, and opportunities10.28991/cej-2020-03091495 ↗
28. Analysis of Three Sign Management Program Case Studies10.1177/1087724X19862285 ↗
29. Hawkins, H. (2021). Research on Traffic Sign Retroreflective Sheeting Performance: A Synthesis of Practice, Minnesota Department of Transportation. Technical Report.
30. Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv.
31. Guo, C., and Berkhahn, F. (2016). Entity embeddings of categorical variables. arXiv.
32. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
33. Preston, H., Atkins, K.C., Lebens, M., and Jensen, M. (2014). Traffic Sign Life Expectancy, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Materials and Road Research. Technical Report.
34. Paniati, J., and Mace, D.J. (1993). Minimum Retroreflectivity Requirements for Traffic Signs, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Technical Report (FHWA-RD-93-077).
35. Sign retroreflectivity: Comparing results of nighttime visual inspections with application of minimum retroreflectivity values10.3141/1754-02 ↗