A New Perspective on Robot Ethics through Investigating Human–Robot Interactions with Older Adults
Source abstract
Abstract
This work explored the use of human–robot interaction research to investigate robot ethics. A longitudinal human–robot interaction study was conducted with self-reported healthy older adults to determine whether expression of artificial emotions by a social robot could result in emotional deception and emotional attachment. The findings from this study have highlighted that currently there appears to be no adequate tools, or the means, to determine the ethical impact and concerns ensuing from long-term interactions between social robots and older adults. This raises the question whether we should continue the fundamental development of social robots if we cannot determine their potential negative impact and whether we should shift our focus to the development of human–robot interaction assessment tools that provide more objective measures of ethical impact.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bristol Robotics Laboratory, Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
Department of Automatic Control & Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Funding
European Union
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Assisting operators in heavy industrial tasks: On the design of an optimized cooperative impedance fuzzy-controller with embedded safety rules10.3389/frobt.2019.00075 ↗
2. Keep healthcare workers safe: Application of teleoperated robot in isolation ward for COVID-19 prevention and control10.1186/s10033-020-00464-0 ↗
3. Design methodology of an active back-support exoskeleton with adaptable backbone-based kinematics10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102991 ↗
4. Marketing robot services in hospitality and tourism: The role of anthropomorphism10.1080/10548408.2019.1571983 ↗
5. van Maris, A. (2021). Ethical Implications of Artificial Expression of Emotion by Social Robots in Assistive Contexts. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of the West of England].
6. Evaluation of a companion robot for individuals with dementia: Quantitative findings of the MARIO project in an Irish residential care setting10.3928/00989134-20190531-01 ↗
7. Review of outcome measures in PARO robot intervention studies for dementia care10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.09.003 ↗
8. Robots for the people, by the people: Personalizing human–machine interaction10.1126/scirobotics.aat7451 ↗
9. Is it love or loneliness? Exploring the impact of everyday digital technology use on the wellbeing of older adults10.1017/S0144686X16001537 ↗
10. Hung, L., Liu, C., Woldum, E., Au-Yeung, A., Berndt, A., Wallsworth, C., Horne, N., Gregorio, M., Mann, J., and Chaudhury, H. (2019). The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: A scoping review. BMC Geriatr., 19.10.1186/s12877-019-1244-6 ↗
11. De Graaf, M.M.A. (2015). Living with Robots: Investigating the User Acceptance of Social Robots in Domestic Environments. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente].
12. Acute caffeine administration affects zebrafish response to a robotic stimulus10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.020 ↗
13. A comparison of individual learning and social learning in zebrafish through an ethorobotics approach10.3389/frobt.2019.00071 ↗
14. Fighting fish love robots: Mate discrimination in males of a highly territorial fish by using female-mimicking robotic cues10.1007/s10750-019-3899-6 ↗
15. Romano, D., and Stefanini, C. (2021). Unveiling social distancing mechanisms via a fish-robot hybrid interaction. Biol. Cybern., 1–9.10.1007/s00422-021-00867-9 ↗
16. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies10.1093/geront/gny046 ↗
17. Service innovation using social robot to reduce social vulnerability among older people in residential care facilities10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.009 ↗
18. World Health Organization (2015). World Report on Ageing and Health, World Health Organization.
19. Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6 ↗
20. The concept of ‘vulnerability’in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6 ↗
21. Robots, love, and sex: The ethics of building a love machine10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.31 ↗
22. In the hands of machines? The future of aged care10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6 ↗
23. Turkle, S. (2006). A nascent robotics culture: New complicities for companionship. Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics, Routledge.
24. Sharkey, A., and Sharkey, N. (2020). We need to talk about deception in social robotics!. Ethics Inf. Technol., 1–8.10.1007/s10676-020-09573-9 ↗
25. Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies10.1007/s10677-009-9186-2 ↗
26. Are Friends Electric? The Benefits and Risks of Human-Robot Relationships10.1016/j.isci.2020.101993 ↗
27. Carebots and caregivers: Sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century10.1007/s13347-011-0015-x ↗
28. van Wynsberghe, A. (2021). Responsible Robotics and Responsibility Attribution. Robotics, AI, and Humanity, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-54173-6_20 ↗
29. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 ↗
30. The use of care robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature10.1016/j.archger.2017.08.014 ↗
31. Designing ethical social robots—A longitudinal field study with older adults10.3389/frobt.2020.00001 ↗
32. Moral decision making in autonomous systems: Enforcement, moral emotions, dignity, trust, and deception10.1109/JPROC.2011.2173265 ↗
33. Robot Betrayal: A guide to the ethics of robotic deception10.1007/s10676-019-09520-3 ↗
34. Affective social robots10.1016/j.robot.2009.09.015 ↗
35. Humans, animals, and robots: A phenomenological approach to human–robot relations10.1007/s12369-010-0075-6 ↗
36. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other, Basic Books.
37. Media equation theory
38. Borenstein, J., and Arkin, R. (2019). Robots, ethics, and intimacy: The need for scientific research. On the Cognitive, Ethical, and Scientific Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-01800-9_16 ↗
39. Socially Assistive Robotics-Ethical Issues Related to Technology10.1109/MRA.2010.940150 ↗
40. Robots and human dignity: A consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5 ↗
41. A mass-produced sociable humanoid robot: Pepper: The first machine of its kind10.1109/MRA.2018.2833157 ↗
42. Carros, F., Meurer, J., Löffler, D., Unbehaun, D., Matthies, S., Koch, I., Wieching, R., Randall, D., Hassenzahl, M., and Wulf, V. (2020, January 25–30). Exploring Human-Robot Interaction with the Elderly: Results from a Ten-Week Case Study in a Care Home. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3313831.3376402 ↗
43. Unbehaun, D., Aal, K., Carros, F., Wieching, R., and Wulf, V. (2019, January 8–12). Creative and Cognitive Activities in Social Assistive Robots and Older Adults: Results from an Exploratory Field Study with Pepper. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: The International Venue on Practice-Centred Computing and the Design of Cooperation Technologies—Demos and Posters, Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies, Salzburg, Austria. Available online: https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3291.
44. Bechade, L., Dubuisson-Duplessis, G., Pittaro, G., Garcia, M., and Devillers, L. (2019). Towards metrics of evaluation of pepper robot as a social companion for the elderly. Advanced Social Interaction with Agents, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-92108-2_11 ↗
45. Allegra, D., Alessandro, F., Santoro, C., and Stanco, F. (2018, January 7–10). Experiences in Using the Pepper Robotic Platform for Museum Assistance Applications. Proceedings of the 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Athens, Greece.10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451777 ↗
46. Niemelä, M., Heikkilä, P., Lammi, H., and Oksman, V. (2019). A social robot in a shopping mall: Studies on acceptance and stakeholder expectations. Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-17107-0_7 ↗
47. Pot, E., Monceaux, J., Gelin, R., and Maisonnier, B. (October, January 27). Choregraphe: A graphical tool for humanoid robot programming. Proceedings of the RO-MAN 2009—The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan.10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326209 ↗
48. Van Maris, A., Zook, N., Caleb-Solly, P., Studley, M., Winfield, A., and Dogramadzi, S. (2018). Ethical considerations of (contextually) affective robot behaviour. Hybrid Worlds: Societal and Ethical Challenges, Proceedings of the International Conference on Robot Ethics and Standards (ICRES 2018), New York, NY, USA, 20–21 August 2018, Clawar Associate Ltd.
49. An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot10.1007/s12369-012-0173-8 ↗
50. Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The almere model10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5 ↗
51. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3 ↗
52. Consumer-product attachment: Measurement and design implications
53. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 ↗
54. When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The implicit positive and negative affect test (IPANAT)10.1037/a0016063 ↗
55. Deciphering the secret code: A new methodology for the cross-cultural analysis of nonverbal behavior10.3758/BRM.40.1.269 ↗
56. Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes
57. Frey, S., and Pool, J. (1976). A New Approach to the Analysis of Visible Behavior, Departement of Psychology, University of Bern.
58. A laboratory-based procedure for measuring emotional expression from natural speech10.3758/BRM.41.1.204 ↗
59. Prosodic analysis of neutral, stress-modified and rhymed speech in patients with Parkinson’s disease10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.12.011 ↗
60. Vinciarelli, A., Pantic, M., Bourlard, H., and Pentland, A. (2008, January 26–31). Social signal processing: State-of-the-art and future perspectives of an emerging domain. Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/1459359.1459573 ↗
61. Autonomic arousal in children of parents with and without social anxiety disorder: A high-risk study10.1111/jcpp.12563 ↗
62. Impact of trajectory profiles on user stress in close human–robot interaction10.1515/auto-2018-0004 ↗
63. Physiological and subjective evaluation of a human–robot object hand-over task10.1016/j.apergo.2010.12.005 ↗
64. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer
65. Reliability of ultra-short-term analysis as a surrogate of standard 5-min analysis of heart rate variability10.1089/tmj.2014.0104 ↗
66. Ultra-short-term heart rate variability indexes at rest and post-exercise in athletes: Evaluating the agreement with accepted recommendations
67. Kubios HRV–heart rate variability analysis software10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.024 ↗
68. Van Maris, A., Dogramadzi, S., Zook, N., Studley, M., Winfield, A., and Caleb-Solly, P. (2020, January 23–26). Speech Related Accessibility Issues in Social Robots. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Cambridge, UK.10.1145/3371382.3378379 ↗
69. Kahn, P.H., and Shen, S. (2017). NOC NOC, Who’s There? A New Ontological Category (NOC) for Social Robots. New Perspectives on Human Development, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316282755.008 ↗
70. Social robots on a global stage: Establishing a role for culture during human–robot interaction10.1007/s12369-020-00710-4 ↗
71. A conceptual framework to evaluate human–robot collaboration10.1007/s00170-020-05363-1 ↗