journal article·2021-09-17Open access

Mathematical Determination of the Upper and Lower Limits of the Diffuse Fraction at Any Site

Harry D. Kambezidis, Styliani I. Kampezidou, Dimitra Kampezidou

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 18

Abstract

A mathematical method for accurately determining the upper and lower diffuse-fraction (kd) limits that divide the sky into clear, intermediate, and overcast is developed. Fourteen sites around the world are selected for demonstrating the methodology. The upper and lower kd values for these sites are determined from scatter plots of direct-normal solar radiation vs. kd pairs over the typical meteorological year of each site. They vary between 0.73 and 0.80 for the upper and between 0.24 and 0.27 for the lower kd limits. Plots of sunshine duration (SSD) vs. kd are prepared for 12 of the 14 sites. These plots show a decreasing trend in SSD with increasing values of kd, as anticipated. According to local climatology, the number of the SSD values in each sky-condition classification varies from site-to-site.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics · Atmospheric aerosols and clouds · Impact of Light on Environment and Health

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Atmospheric Research Team, Institute of Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, GR-11810 Athens, Greece

Aerospace Systems Design Laboratory, Georgia Institute of Technology, 275 Ferst Dr NW, Atlanta, GA 30313, USA

Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, University of Umeå, S-90187 Umeå, Sweden

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Surface Energy Balance in the Ablation Zone of Midtdalsbreen, a Glacier in Southern Norway: Interannual Variability and the Effect of Clouds10.1029/2008JD010390 ↗
2. Measurements of the Exchange of Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) and Carbon Disulfide (CS 2) between Soil and Atmosphere in a Spruce Forest in Central Germany10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.022 ↗
3. The Concept of Essential Climate Variables in Support of Climate Research, Applications, and Policy10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00047.1 ↗
4. Current Trends in Solar Radiation Modeling: The Paradigm of MRM10.4172/2090-4541.1000e106 ↗
5. Estimation of Hourly Clearness Index and Diffuse Fraction Over Coastal and Sahel Regions of Nigeria Using NCEP/NCAR Satellite Data10.9734/jenrr/2021/v7i430195 ↗
6. Computing Global and Diffuse Solar Hourly Irradiation on Clear Sky. Review and Testing of 54 Models10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.010 ↗
7. Global, Direct and Diffuse Solar Radiation on Horizontal and Tilted Surfaces in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.032 ↗
8. Berrizbeitia, S.E., Gago, E.J., and Muneer, T. (2020). Empirical Models for the Estimation of Solar Sky-Diffuse Radiation. A Review and Experimental Analysis. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13030701 ↗
9. Computing Diffuse Fraction of Global Horizontal Solar Radiation: A Model Comparison10.1016/j.solener.2012.03.008 ↗
10. The Diffuse Fraction of Hourly Solar Radiation for Amman/Jordan10.1016/S0960-1481(97)00082-7 ↗
11. The Efficiency of a Typical Meteorological Year and Actual Climatic Data in the Analysis of Energy Demand in Buildings10.1177/0143624415573454 ↗
12. Generation of Typical Meteorological Years Using Genetic Algorithm for Different Energy Systems10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.052 ↗
13. Generation and Evaluation of Typical Meteorological Year Datasets for Greenhouse and External Conditions on the Mediterranean Coast10.1007/s00484-014-0920-7 ↗
14. Digging the METEOSAT Treasure-3 Decades of Solar Surface Radiation10.3390/rs70608067 ↗
15. A New Solar Radiation Database for Estimating PV Performance in Europe and Africa10.1016/j.solener.2012.03.006 ↗
16. Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN): Structure and Data Description (1992–2017)10.5194/essd-10-1491-2018 ↗
17. Extensive Validation of CM SAF Surface Radiation Products over Europe10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.013 ↗
18. Evaluation of Global Horizontal Irradiance Estimates from ERA5 and COSMO-REA6 Reanalyses Using Ground and Satellite-Based Data10.1016/j.solener.2018.02.059 ↗