journal article·2021-07-11Open access

Effects of Washing Solution, Washing Time, and Solid-Solution Rate on the Maximum Heavy Metals Removal Efficiency

Min-Suk Kim, Namin Koo, Jeong-Gyu Kim, Sang-Hwan Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 14

Abstract

In Korea, for heavy metal-contaminated soil, there are insufficient basic data as well as field application cases for soil washing. This study was conducted to suggest the significant factors and optimal operation conditions for the maximum heavy metal removal efficiency. Five types of washing solution [acid solution (HCl), citric acid, oxalic acid, EDTA, and CaCl2], washing time (10–360 min), and solid-solution ratio (1:2–1:100) were selected as significant operational factors. Non-observed effect concentration (NOEC) and central composite rotatable design (CCRD) were applied to derive the optimal conditions. The soil pH was slightly alkali, and it was highly contaminated by Cd (17.34 mg kg−1), Cu (307.76 mg kg−1), Pb (714.78 mg kg−1), and Zn (1755.47 mg kg−1), complexly. For all heavy metals, CaCl2, a neutral salt, was difficult to achieve the remediation goal. On the other hand, Cd, Cu, and Pb were removed successfully from the soil by acid solution, citric acid, oxalic acid, and EDTA. For Zn, only acid solution and oxalic acid could meet the remediation goal (300 mg kg−1). As the washing time increased, the heavy metal removal efficiency showed a tendency to increase overall. Especially, oxalic acid and acid solution were able to reach the highest efficiency point within 30 min, whereas citric acid and EDTA took 2 to 4 h at the longest. In the case of 1 M citric acid, through the CCRD experiment, optimal operation conditions (solid-solution ratio and washing time) could be deduced for each heavy metal. Furthermore, this series of processes can be utilized as a useful tool to find the optimal operating conditions and, at the same time, achieve the remediation goal.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heavy metals in environment · Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

OJEong Resilience Institute, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea

Forest Environment and Conservation Department, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Korea

Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea

Gyeongin Regional Office, Mine Reclamation Corporation, Seoul 03151, Korea

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. A comprehensive overview of elements in bioremediation10.1007/s11157-010-9215-6 ↗
2. Enzyme technology and biological remediation10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.010 ↗
3. Field test assessment of biological recovering agent for treating oil contaminated soil
4. Site remediation techniques supporting environmental restoration activities—A review10.1016/S0048-9697(96)05264-3 ↗
5. Remediation techniques for removal of heavy metals from the soil contaminated through different sources: A review10.1007/s11356-019-06967-1 ↗
6. Metal (Cu, Cd and Zn) removal and stabilization during multiple soil washing by saponin10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.10.027 ↗
7. Soil washing for metal removal: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field application10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.043 ↗
8. USEPA (1995). Contaminants and Remedial Options at Selected Metal Contaminated Sites, EPA/540.R-95/512.
9. Stability of heavy metals in soil washing residue with and without biochar addition under accelerated ageing10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.038 ↗
10. Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil washing residues with amino polycarboxylic acids10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.141 ↗
11. Riser-Roberts, E. (2020). Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils: Biological, Physical, and Chemical Processes, CRC Press.10.1201/9780367802547 ↗
12. Laboratory investigation of heavy metal removal by soil washing10.1080/10473289.1996.10467512 ↗
13. Kim, M.S., Lee, S.H., and Kim, J.G. (2020). Assessment of fraction and mobility of arsenic in soil near the mine waste dam. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12041480 ↗
14. Case of investigation and design of environment remediation of oil-contaminated soil/groundwater
15. Development of a pilot scale soil washing process
16. Surfactant enhanced in-situ soil flushing pilot test for the soil and groundwater remediation in an oil contaminated site
17. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology (2008). Method of Soil and Plant Analysis, Rural Development Administration.
18. Particle size analysis of soils—A comparsion of dry and wet sieving techniques10.1016/0379-0738(84)90186-5 ↗
19. ISO (1995). Soil Quality–Extraction of Trace Element Soluble in Aqua Regia, International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11466.
20. Heavy metal desorption studies on the artificially contaminated AL-QATIF soil
21. Factors affecting EDTA extraction of lead from lead-contaminated soils10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00155-3 ↗
22. Soil pollution and site remediation policies in China: A Review10.1139/er-2014-0073 ↗
23. Heavy metal contamination and health risk assessment in the vicinity of the abandoned Songcheon Au-Ag mine in Korea10.1016/j.gexplo.2007.04.008 ↗
24. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil-vegetables system: A multi-median analysis10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.064 ↗
25. Using soil heavy metal enrichment and mobility factors to determine potential uptake by vegetables10.17221/125/2010-PSE ↗
26. Remediation of soil contaminated with arsenic, zinc, and nickel by pilot-scale soil washing10.1002/ep.10101 ↗
27. The study of operating variables in soil washing with EDTA10.1016/j.envpol.2008.07.009 ↗
28. Effets of low-molecular-weight organic acids and residence time on desorption of Cu, Cd, and Pb from soils10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.06.010 ↗
29. Desorption of copper and cadmium from soils enhanced by organic acids10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.046 ↗
30. Oxalate extraction of Pb and Zn from polluted soils: Solubility limitations10.1080/10588339991339252 ↗
31. McBride, M.B. (1994). Environmental Soil Chemistry, Oxford Press.
32. Extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils using EDTA and HCl10.31026/j.eng.2015.01.04 ↗
33. Remediation of heavy metal contamination in OBOD site with soil washing: Selection of extractants
34. Some factors controlling the adsorption of potassium ions on clayey soils10.1016/j.clay.2004.06.003 ↗
35. Comparison of soil washing for heavy metal contaminated shooting range using various extracts
36. Wydro, U., Jabłońska-Trypuć, A., Hawrylik, E., Butarewicz, A., Rodziewicz, J., Janczukowicz, W., and Wołejko, E. (2021). Heavy metals behavior in soil/plant system after sewage sludge application. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14061584 ↗
37. A review of heavy metal contaminations in urban soils, urban road dusts and agricultural soils from China10.1016/j.microc.2009.09.014 ↗
38. Lead removal from soils via bench-scale soil washing techniques10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1995)121:10(700) ↗
39. Optimization of cadmium and zinc removal from contaminated soil by surfactants using mixture design and central composite rotatable design10.1007/s11270-020-04704-w ↗
40. Effects of the incorporation of phosphorus and iron into arsenic-spiked artificial soils on root growth of lettuce using response surface methodology10.1080/00103624.2012.756003 ↗