Nonionic Surfactant to Enhance the Performances of Alkaline–Surfactant–Polymer Flooding with a Low Salinity Constraint
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a nonionic surfactant in the anionic surfactant pair (ternary mixture) that influences the hydrophobicity of the alkaline–surfactant–polymer (ASP) slug within low-salinity formation water, an environment that constrains optimal designs of the salinity gradient and phase types. The hydrophobicity effectively reduced the optimum salinity, but achieving as much by mixing various surfactants has been challenging. We conducted a phase behavior test and a coreflooding test, and the results prove the effectiveness of the nonionic surfactant in enlarging the chemical applicability by making ASP flooding more hydrophobic. The proposed ASP mixture consisted of 0.2 wt% sodium carbonate, 0.25 wt% anionic surfactant pair, and 0.2 wt% nonionic surfactant, and 0.15 wt% hydrolyzed polyacrylamide. The nonionic surfactant decreased the optimum salinity to 1.1 wt% NaCl compared to the 1.7 wt% NaCl of the reference case with heavy alcohol present instead of the nonionic surfactant. The coreflooding test confirmed the field applicability of the nonionic surfactant by recovering more oil, with the proposed scheme producing up to 74% of residual oil after extensive waterflooding compared to 51% of cumulative oil recovery with the reference case. The nonionic surfactant led to a Winsor type III microemulsion with a 0.85 pore volume while the reference case had a 0.50 pore volume. The nonionic surfactant made ASP flooding more hydrophobic, maintained a separate phase of the surfactant between the oil and aqueous phases to achieve ultra-low interfacial tension, and recovered the oil effectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Petroleum Processing and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon 24341, Korea
Petroleum Engineering Department, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. EOR screening criteria revisited—Part 1: Introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects10.2118/35385-PA ↗
2. EOR screening criteria revisited—Part 2: Applications and impact of oil prices10.2118/39234-PA ↗
3. Petroleum systems of Indonesia10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.05.007 ↗
4. A comprehensive review of alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding10.1002/apj.1824 ↗
5. Microbial methane potential for the South Sumatra Basin coal: Formation water screening and coal substrate bioavailability10.1016/j.egypro.2015.01.051 ↗
6. Sumatra/Java oil families10.1144/GSL.SP.1997.126.01.11 ↗
7. Oil-oil correlation of the South Sumatra Basin reservoirs10.5897/JPGE2013.0162 ↗
8. ASP design for the Minnelusa formation under low-salinity conditions: Impacts of anhydrite on ASP performance10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.051 ↗
9. Recent advances in surfactant EOR10.2118/115386-PA ↗
10. Mixtures of anionic/cationic surfactants: A new approach for enhanced oil recovery in low-salinity, high-temperature sandstone reservoir10.2118/169051-PA ↗
11. Barnes, J.R., Smit, J., Smit, J., Shpakoff, G., Raney, K.H., and Puerto, M. (2008, January 20–23). Development of surfactants for chemical flooding at difficult reservoir conditions. Proceedings of the SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK, USA.10.2118/113313-MS ↗
12. Most common surfactants employed in chemical enhanced oil recovery10.1016/j.petlm.2016.11.007 ↗
13. Review of surfactant-assisted chemical enhanced oil recovery for carbonate reservoirs: Challenges and future perspectives10.1007/s12182-017-0198-6 ↗
14. An overview of chemical enhanced oil recovery: Recent advances and prospects10.1007/s40089-019-0272-8 ↗
15. Alkaline/surfactant/polymer flood: From the laboratory to the field10.2118/129164-PA ↗
16. Sagi, A.R., Puerto, M., Bian, Y., Miller, C.A., Hirasaki, G.J., Salehi, M., Thomas, C.P., and Kwan, J.T. (2013, January 8–10). Laboratory studies for surfactant flood in low-temperature, low-salinity fractured carbonate reservoir. Proceedings of the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/164062-MS ↗
17. Ben Shiau, B.J., Hsu, T.-P., Lohateeraparp, P., Rojas, M.R., Budhathoki, M., Raj, A., Wan, W., Bang, S., and Harwell, J.H. (2013, January 2–4). Recovery of oil from high salinity reservoir using chemical flooding: From laboratory to field tests. Proceedings of the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.2118/165251-MS ↗
18. Improving performances of double-chain single-head surfactants for SP flooding by combining with conventional anionic surfactants10.1080/01932691.2017.1300910 ↗
19. Performances of guerbet alcohol ethoxylates for surfactant–polymer flooding free of alkali10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01843 ↗
20. Experimental analysis to design optimum phase type and salinity gradient of alkaline surfactant polymer flooding at low saline reservoir10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.087 ↗
21. Novriansyah, A., Bae, W., Park, C., Permadi, A., and Riswati, S.S. (2020). Optimal design of alkaline–surfactant–polymer flooding under low salinity environment. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12030626 ↗
22. Measurement of microemulsion viscosity and its implications for chemical enhanced oil recovery10.2118/179672-PA ↗
23. New surfactants and cosolvents increase oil recovery and reduce cost10.2118/179702-PA ↗
24. Yang, H.T., Britton, C., Liyanage, P.J., Solairaj, S., Kim, H., Nguyen, Q.P., Weerasooriya, U., and Pope, G. (2010, January 24–28). Low-cost, high-performance chemicals for enhanced oil recovery. Proceedings of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, USA.10.2523/129978-MS ↗
25. How to attain an ultralow interfacial tension and a three-phase behavior with a surfactant formulation for enhanced oil recovery: A review. Part 2. performance improvement trends from Winsor’s premise to currently proposed inter- and intra-molecular mixtures10.1007/s11743-013-1485-x ↗
26. A review of gemini surfactants: Potential application in enhanced oil recovery10.1007/s11743-015-1776-5 ↗
27. Pandey, A. (2010, January 20–22). Refinement of chemical selection for the planned ASP pilot in Mangala field—Additional phase behaviour and coreflood studies. Proceedings of the SPE Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition, Mumbai, India.10.2118/129046-MS ↗
28. Nonionic surfactants containing propylene oxide10.1007/BF02663954 ↗
29. Adsorption and aggregation properties of homogeneous polyoxypropylene–polyoxyethylene alkyl ether type nonionic surfactants10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00104 ↗
30. Surfactant systems for EOR in high-temperature, high-salinity environments10.2118/129675-PA ↗
31. Adkins, S., Arachchilage, G.W.P., Solairaj, S., Lu, J., Weerasooriya, U., and Pope, G. (2012, January 14–18). Development of thermally and chemically stable large-hydrophobe alkoxy carboxylate surfactants. Proceedings of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, USA.10.2118/154256-MS ↗
32. Novel large-hydrophobe alkoxy carboxylate surfactants for enhanced oil recovery10.2118/154261-PA ↗
33. Barnes, J.R., Groen, K., On, A., Dubey, S.T., Reznik, C., Buijse, M.A., and Shepherd, A.G. (2012, January 14–18). Controlled hydrophobe branching to match surfactant to crude composition for chemical EOR. Proceedings of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, USA.10.2118/154084-MS ↗
34. A new type of renewable surfactants for enhanced oil recovery: Dialkylpolyoxyethylene ether methyl carboxyl betaines10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.11.018 ↗
35. Bounel, M., and Schechter, R.S. (2010). Microemulsions and Related Systems: Formulation, Solvency, and Physical Properties, Editions Technip.
36. Sheng, J.J. (2010). Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery: Theory and Practice, Gulf Professional Publishing.
37. Interfacial tensions and solubilizing ability of a microemulsion phase that coexists with oil and brine10.1016/0021-9797(79)90249-2 ↗
38. Effect of electrolyte and temperature on interfacial tensions of alkylbenzene sulfonate solutions10.1021/ef201982s ↗
39. Multiphase microemulsion systems