journal article·2020-01-29Open access

The ‘DEEP’ Landing Error Scoring System

Kim Hébert-Losier, Ivana Hanzlíková, Chen Zheng, Lee Streeter, Michael Mayo

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 3

Abstract

The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is an injury-risk screening tool used in sports; but scoring is time consuming, clinician-dependent, and generally inaccessible outside of elite sports. Our aim is to evidence that LESS scores can be automated using deep-learning-based computer vision combined with machine learning and compare the accuracy of LESS predictions using different video cropping and machine learning methods. Two-dimensional videos from 320 double-leg drop-jump landings with known LESS scores were analysed in OpenPose. Videos were cropped to key frames manually (clinician) and automatically (computer vision), and 42 kinematic features were extracted. A series of 10 × 10-fold cross-validation experiments were applied on full and balanced datasets to predict LESS scores. Random forest for regression outperformed linear and dummy regression models, yielding the lowest mean absolute error (1.23) and highest correlation (r = 0.63) between manual and automated scores. Sensitivity (0.82) and specificity (0.77) were reasonable for risk categorization (high-risk LESS ≥ 5 errors). Experiments using either a balanced (versus unbalanced) dataset or manual (versus automated) cropping method did not improve predictions. Further research on the automation would enhance the strength of the agreement between clinical and automated scores beyond its current levels, enabling quasi real-time scoring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports injuries and prevention · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports Performance and Training

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, Division of Health, Engineering, Computing and Science, University of Waikato, Tauranga 3116, New Zealand

School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Division of Health, Engineering, Computing and Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand

School of Engineering, Division of Health, Engineering, Computing and Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand

Funding

University of Waikato

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. One-leg hop kinematics 20years following anterior cruciate ligament rupture: Data revisited using functional data analysis10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.08.010 ↗
2. Curve analyses reveal altered knee, hip, and trunk kinematics during drop-jumps long after anterior cruciate ligament rupture10.1016/j.knee.2017.12.005 ↗
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of early reconstruction versus rehabilitation and delayed reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament tears10.1177/0363546514530866 ↗
4. Marked increase in the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in young females in New Zealand10.1111/ans.15404 ↗
5. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: Summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives
6. A meta-analysis of meta-analyses of the effectiveness of FIFA injury prevention programs in soccer10.1111/sms.13535 ↗
7. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 1, mechanisms and risk factors10.1177/0363546505284183 ↗
8. Stiff landings are associated with increased ACL injury risk in young female basketball and floorball players10.1177/0363546516665810 ↗
9. Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.202 ↗
10. The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics: The JUMP-ACL study10.1177/0363546509343200 ↗
11. Hanzlíková, I., and Hébert-Losier, K. (2020). Is the Landing Error Scoring System reliable and valid? A systematic review. Sports Health.10.1177/1941738119886593 ↗
12. The Landing Error Scoring System as a screening tool for an anterior cruciate ligament injury-prevention program in elite-youth soccer athletes10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.10 ↗
13. Concurrent criterion validity of a novel portable motion analysis system for assessing the landing error scoring system (LESS) test10.1080/14763141.2017.1412495 ↗
14. Reliability of clinician scoring of the landing error scoring system to assess jump-landing movement patterns10.1123/jsr.2013-0135 ↗
15. Automated quantification of the Landing Error Scoring System with a markerless motion-capture system10.4085/1062-6050-52.10.12 ↗
16. Cao, Z., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., and Sheikh, Y. (2017). Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2017.143 ↗
17. DeepLabCut: Markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y ↗
18. Deep learning tools for the measurement of animal behavior in neuroscience10.1016/j.conb.2019.10.008 ↗
19. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A., and Pal, C.J. (2016). The WEKA Workbench. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann. [4th ed.].
20. Inference for the Generalization Error10.1023/A:1024068626366 ↗
21. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies10.1177/096228029900800204 ↗
22. Which screening tools can predict injury to the lower extremities in team sports? A systematic review10.1007/BF03262295 ↗
23. Expert versus novice interrater reliability and criterion validity of the landing error scoring system10.1123/jsr.19.1.41 ↗
24. Cao, Z., Hidalgo, G., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., and Sheikh, Y. (2018). OpenPose: Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using Part Affinity Fields. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2017.143 ↗
25. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
26. Deep model compression for mobile platforms: A survey10.26599/TST.2018.9010103 ↗
27. Reliability and validity of observational risk screening in evaluating dynamic knee valgus10.2519/jospt.2009.3004 ↗
28. Physiotherapist agreement when visually rating movement quality during lower extremity functional screening tests10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.07.001 ↗
29. Innovations and pitfalls in the use of wearable devices in the prevention and rehabilitation of running related injuries10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.10.003 ↗
30. A review of wearable technology in medicine10.1177/0141076816663560 ↗
31. Technology in rehabilitation: Evaluating the single leg squat exercise with wearable inertial measurement units10.3414/ME16-02-0002 ↗
32. Evaluation of a two dimensional analysis method as a screening and evaluation tool for anterior cruciate ligament injury10.1136/bjsm.2005.018598 ↗
33. Utility of the frontal plane projection angle in females with patellofemoral pain10.2519/jospt.2008.2706 ↗
34. Validity and reliability of 2-Dimensional video-based assessment to analyze foot strike pattern and step rate during running: A systematic review10.1177/1941738119844795 ↗
35. A qualitative screening tool to identify athletes with ‘high-risk’ movement mechanics during cutting: The cutting movement assessment score (CMAS)10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.05.004 ↗
36. Tuck jump assessment for reducing Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury risk10.1123/att.13.5.39 ↗