journal article·2023-11-29Open access

Potential Benefits of Horizontal Wells for CO2 Injection to Enhance Storage Security and Reduce Leakage Risks

Marcos Vitor Barbosa Machado, Mojdeh Delshad, Kamy Sepehrnoori

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 23

Abstract

This study used numerical simulations of CO2 storage to identify the benefits of horizontal wells for geological carbon storage, such as enhancing CO2 trapped in porous media due to relative permeability and capillary hysteresis. Two injection schemes were tested: one using a vertical injector and the other employing a horizontal well. The results revealed two main findings. Firstly, the horizontal injection well effectively prevented or minimized CO2 penetration into the caprock across various sensitivity scenarios and over a thousand years of CO2 redistribution. Secondly, horizontal wells provided a safe approach to trapping CO2, increasing its entrapment as a residual phase by up to 19% within the storage site. This, in turn, reduced or prevented any unexpected events associated with CO2 leakage through the caprock. Additionally, the paper proposes a practical method for designing the optimal length of a horizontal well. This method considers a combination of two parameters: the additional CO2 that can be trapped using a horizontal well and the gravity number. In the case of the reservoir model of this study, a horizontal branch with a length of 2000 m was found to be the most effective design in enhancing CO2 entrapment and reducing CO2 buoyancy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro 20231-030, RJ, Brazil

Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Birol, D.F. (2022). World Energy Outlook 2022, IEA Publications.
2. Nghiem, L., Shrivastava, V., Kohse, B., Hassam, M., and Yang, C. (2009, January 16–18). Simulation of Trapping Processes for CO2 Storage in Saline Aquifers. Proceedings of the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.2118/2009-156 ↗
3. Evaluation of Trapping Mechanisms in Geologic CO2 Sequestration: Case Study of SACROC Northern Platform, a 35-Year CO2 Injection Site10.2475/04.2010.03 ↗
4. Modeling and Simulation of Carbon Sequestration at Cranfield Incorporating New Physical Models10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.03.019 ↗
5. Rackley, S.A. (2017). Carbon Capture and Storage, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-812041-5.00002-7 ↗
6. Hovorka, S. (2008). Optimization of Geological Environments for Carbon Dioxide Disposal in Saline Aquifers in the United States (Part One), University of Texas.10.2172/990445 ↗
7. Composite Confining Systems: Rethinking Geologic Seals for Permanent CO2 Sequestration10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103908 ↗
8. An Improved Model Calculating CO2 Solubility in Pure Water and Aqueous NaCl Solutions from 273 to 533 K and from 0 to 2000 Bar10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00263-2 ↗
9. Modelling CO2 Solubility in Pure Water and NaCl-Type Waters from 0 to 300 °C and from 1 to 300 Bar10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.12.007 ↗
10. Spiteri, E.J., Juanes, R., Blunt, M.J., and Orr, F.M. (2005, January 9). Relative Permeability Hysteresis: Trapping Models and Application to Geological CO2 Sequestration. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2118/96448-MS ↗
11. Risk Mitigation through the Optimization of Residual Gas and Solubility Trapping for CO2 Storage in Saline Aquifers10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.079 ↗
12. Design of Carbon Dioxide Storage in Aquifers10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.004 ↗
13. Using Natural CO2 Reservoir to Constrain Geochemical Models for CO2 Geological Sequestration10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.01.009 ↗
14. The Role of Hydrogeological and Geochemical Trapping in Sedimentary Basins for Secure Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.233.01.09 ↗
15. Sensitivity Study of Simulation Parameters Controlling CO2 Trapping Mechanisms in Saline Formations10.1007/s11242-011-9817-7 ↗
16. Effects of Permeability on CO2 Trapping Mechanisms and Buoyancy-Driven CO2 Migration in Saline Formations10.1029/2009WR007850 ↗
17. Effect of Well Orientation (Vertical vs. Horizontal) and Well Length on the Injection of CO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers10.1007/s11242-010-9686-5 ↗
18. Lessons Learned from 14 Years of CCS Operations: Sleipner, In Salah and Snøhvit10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.541 ↗
19. Evaluation and Development of Options for Remediation of CO2 Leakage into Groundwater Aquifers from Geologic Carbon Storage10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.12.002 ↗
20. Multi-Phase Flow Simulation of CO2 Leakage through a Fractured Caprock in Response to Mitigation Strategies10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.007 ↗
21. Geochemical Controls on CO2 Interactions with Deep Subsurface Shales: Implications for Geologic Carbon Sequestration10.1039/D1EM00109D ↗
22. Injectivity Assessment for CCS Field-Scale Projects with Considerations of Salt Deposition, Mineral Dissolution, Fines Migration, Hydrate Formation, and Non-Darcy Flow10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129148 ↗
23. Leakage Risk Assessment of a CO2 Storage Site: A Review10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103849 ↗
24. Active CO2 Reservoir Management for Carbon Storage: Analysis of Operational Strategies to Relieve Pressure Buildup and Improve Injectivity10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007 ↗
25. Multi-Lateral Horizontal Well with Dual-Tubing System to Improve CO2 Storage Security and Reduce CCS Cost10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120368 ↗
26. A Practical and Innovative Workflow to Support the Numerical Simulation of CO2 Storage in Large Field-Scale Models10.2118/215838-PA ↗
27. Drainage and Imbibition Relative Permeability Relationships for Supercritical CO2/Brine and H2S/Brine Systems in Intergranular Sandstone, Carbonate, Shale, and Anhydrite Rocks10.2118/99326-PA ↗
28. Capillary Pressure Characteristics of CO2-Brine-Sandstone Systems10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102876 ↗
29. Bennion, D.B., and Bachu, S. (2007, January 11). Permeability and Relative Permeability Measurements at Reservoir Conditions for CO2-Water Systems in Ultralow-Permeability Confining Caprocks. Proceedings of the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, London, UK.10.2118/106995-MS ↗
30. CMG (2022). GEM Compositional & Unconventional Simulator, Windows, CMG. (version 2022.10).
31. Balhoff, M. (2022). An Introduction to Multiphase, Multicomponent Reservoir Simulation, Elsevier. Developments in Petroleum Science.10.1016/B978-0-323-99235-0.00015-4 ↗
32. Machado, M.V.B. (2023). Numerical Petroleum Reservoir Modeling: Integrated Simulation Practice, PETROBRAS. [1st ed.]. (In Portuguese).
33. Phase Equilibria of Oil, Gas and Water/Brine Mixtures from a Cubic Equation of State and Henry’s Law10.1002/cjce.5450640319 ↗
34. Package FLUIDS 1. Computer Programs for Analysis of Fluid Inclusion Data and for Modelling Bulk Fluid Properties10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00268-1 ↗
35. CO2 Diffusion and Dispersion in Porous Media: Review of Advances in Experimental Measurements and Mathematical Models10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03552 ↗
36. Carbon Dioxide Storage Potential of Shales10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.03.003 ↗
37. Montegrossi, G., Cantucci, B., Piochi, M., Fusi, L., Misnan, M.S., Rashidi, M.R.A., Abu Bakar, Z.A., Tuan Harith, Z.Z., Bahri, N.H.S., and Hashim, N. (2022). CO2 Reaction-Diffusion Experiments in Shales and Carbonates. Minerals, 13.10.3390/min13010056 ↗
38. The Constitution and Fundamental Properties of Solids and Liquids10.1016/S0016-0032(17)90938-X ↗
39. Adsorption Characteristics of CH4 and CO2 in Shale at High Pressure and Temperature10.1021/acsomega.1c02921 ↗
40. Investigation for CO2 Adsorption and Wettability of Reservoir Rocks10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03366 ↗
41. Ambrose, R.J., Hartman, R.C., and Akkutlu, I.Y. (2011, January 27). Multi-Component Sorbed-Phase Considerations for Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations. Proceedings of the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.10.2118/141416-MS ↗
42. Hartman, R.C., Ambrose, R.J., Akkutlu, I.Y., and Clarkson, C.R. (2011, January 14). Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations Part II—Multi-Component Gas Adsorption Effects. Proceedings of the North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/144097-MS ↗
43. Competitive Adsorption Between CO2 and CH4 in Tight Sandstone and Its Influence on CO2-Injection Enhanced Gas Recovery (EGR)10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103530 ↗
44. Arri, L.E., Yee, D., Morgan, W.D., and Jeansonne, M.W. (1992, January 18). Modeling Coalbed Methane Production with Binary Gas Sorption. Proceedings of the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, WY, USA.10.2118/24363-MS ↗
45. Hall, F.E., Zhou, C., Gasem, K.A.M., Robinson, R.L., and Yee, D. (1994, January 8). Adsorption of Pure Methane, Nitrogen, and Carbon Dioxide and Their Binary Mixtures on Wet Fruitland Coal. Proceedings of the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Charleston, WV, USA.10.2118/29194-MS ↗
46. Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow from Rock Properties10.2118/1942-PA ↗
47. Carlson, F.M. (1981, January 4). Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis to the Nonwetting Phase. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.2118/10157-MS ↗
48. Jarrell, P.M., Fox, C., Stein, M., and Webb, S. (2002). Practical Aspects of CO2 Flooding, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME.10.2118/9781555630966 ↗
49. Review and Implications of Relative Permeability of CO2/Brine Systems and Residual Trapping of CO210.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.013 ↗
50. Parkhurst, D.L., Thorstenson, D.C., and Plummer, L.N. (1980). PHREEQE: A Computer Program for Geochemical Calculations.
51. Parkhurst, D.L., and Appelo, C.A.J. (2013). Description of Input and Examples for PHREEQC Version 3: A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations, U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6.10.3133/tm6A43 ↗
52. Role of Geochemical Reactions on Caprock Integrity during Underground Hydrogen Storage10.1016/j.est.2023.107414 ↗
53. The Effects of Gas-Fluid-Rock Interactions on CO2 Injection and Storage: Insights from Reactive Transport Modeling10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.233 ↗
54. Supercritical CO2 Uptake by Nonswelling Phyllosilicates10.1073/pnas.1710853114 ↗
55. Analytical Solution to Evaluate Salt Precipitation during CO2 Injection in Saline Aquifers10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.04.004 ↗
56. Zhou, D., Fayers, F.J., and Orr, F.M. (1994, January 17). Scaling of Multiphase Flow in Simple Heterogeneous Porous Media. Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, USA.10.2118/27833-MS ↗
57. Currenti, G., Cantucci, B., Montegrossi, G., Napoli, R., Misnan, M.S., Rashidi, M.R.A., Abu Bakar, Z.A., Harith, Z.Z.T., Bahri, N.H.S., and Hashim, N. (2023). CO2 Leakage Scenarios in Shale Overburden. Minerals, 13.10.3390/min13081016 ↗
58. Observational Evidence Confirms Modelling of the Long-Term Integrity of CO2-Reservoir Caprocks10.1038/ncomms12268 ↗
59. Efficient Field-Scale Simulation of Black Oil in a Naturally Fractured Reservoir through Discrete Fracture Networks and Homogenized Media10.2118/103901-PA ↗
60. Development of an Efficient Embedded Discrete Fracture Model for 3D Compositional Reservoir Simulation in Fractured Reservoirs10.2118/154246-PA ↗
61. Cavalcante Filho, J.S.d.A., Shakiba, M., Moinfar, A., and Sepehrnoori, K. (2015, January 23). Implementation of a Preprocessor for Embedded Discrete Fracture Modeling in an IMPEC Compositional Reservoir Simulator. Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, TX, USA.
62. Sepehrnoori, K., Xu, Y., and Yu, W. (2020). Embedded Discrete Fracture Modeling and Application in Reservoir Simulation, Elsevier. Developments in Petroleum Science.10.1016/B978-0-12-821872-3.00006-X ↗
63. Machado, M.V.B., Delshad, M., and Sepehrnoori, K. (2023). A Computationally Efficient Approach to Model Reactive Transport during CO2 Storage in Naturally Fractured Saline Aquifers. SSRN, 4520437.10.2139/ssrn.4520437 ↗
64. Estimativa Da Recarga de Água Subterrânea Utilizando o Método WTF Na Porção Continental Da Bacia Sedimentar de Campos, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil10.14295/ras.v35i3.30079 ↗
65. An Improved Method for Calculating Water Influx10.2118/1626-G ↗