Multicriteria Decision Making and Water Infrastructure: An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for a Sustainable Ranking of Investments
Source abstract
Abstract
The United Nations SDG6 goal of ensuring universal access to safe drinking water and sanitation by 2030 will require increased investment in the rehabilitation and maintenance of water infrastructure. In Italy, the water sector has not yet reached the performance of other European countries. The hierarchization of investments is essential for identifying priorities and efficiently allocating resources. This issue is part of the debate on the reconciliation of public and private needs in the management of water services. The present research proposes a model based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Taking into account the design alternatives considered optimal that contribute to the resolution of territorial criticalities, the model organizes them in a ranking that indicates the chronological priorities to be respected in the investments to be made. The evaluation criteria are set in compliance with the norms defined by the National Authority (ARERA). The model is tested on a water manager in the Campania region. Among the main results, it is found that the two extremes of the ranking are shared between the two actors involved in the investment strategy (the private operator and public regulator). The model represents an effective tool for identifying shared planning strategies between public and private operators.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Planning and Valuation · Water resources management and optimization · Multi-Criteria Decision Making
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Lo Sardo, D.C. (2022). I Servizi Pubblici a Rilevanza Ambientale: Aspetti Problematici e Prospettive di Riforma. [Ph.D. Thesis, Università degli Studi di Messina]. Available online: https://iris.unime.it/retrieve/b435715d-28ca-481b-846b-952505f7e9ac/Tesi_dottorato_%20Lo%20Sardo.pdf.
2. Multi-criteria group decision-making for optimal management of water supply with fuzzy ELECTRE-based outranking method10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110403 ↗
3. Urban hydrology and water management–present and future challenges10.1016/S1462-0758(99)00009-6 ↗
4. Earth dam site selection using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study in the west of Iran10.1007/s12517-012-0602-x ↗
5. Integrated water resources management (IWRM): An approach to face the challenges of the next century and to avert future crises10.1016/S0011-9164(99)00099-5 ↗
6. Water as a political good: Implications for investments10.1007/s10784-006-9013-3 ↗
7. International investments in the water sector10.1080/07900620802573759 ↗
8. Macchiaroli, M., Dolores, L., and De Mare, G. (2023). Design the Water Tariff Structure: Application and Assessment of a Model to Balance Sustainability, Cost Recovery and Wise Use. Water, 15.10.3390/w15071309 ↗
9. UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme (2023, March 30). The United Nations World Water Development report 2020: Water and Climate Change. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372876.
10. UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme (2023, March 31). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2021: Valuing Water. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375724.
11. Vitiello, M. (2020). Il Sistema Idrico Italiano: Un Confronto con i Principali Paesi Europei. [Bachelor’s Thesis, Luiss Guido Carli]. Available online: http://tesi.luiss.it/27541/1/218351_VITIELLO_MICHELE.pdf.
12. Il Sole 24 Ore (2023, March 30). Servono oltre 12 Miliardi D’investimenti sulla Rete Idrica. Available online: https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/servono-oltre-12-miliardi-d-investimenti-rete-idrica-AEcEtny.
13. Economic-Financial Sustainability and Risk Assessment in the Water Sector in Italy
14. Strategic implementation of infrastructure priority projects: Case study in Palestine10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:1(2) ↗
15. Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.083 ↗
16. Determination of an implementation order for IS projects10.1016/S0378-7206(96)01080-4 ↗
17. Implementation of new hybrid AHP–TOPSIS-2N method in sorting and prioritizing of an it CAPEX project portfolio10.1142/S0219622018500207 ↗
18. De Mare, G., Manganelli, B., and Nesticò, A. (2013). Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2013: 13th International Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 24–27 June 2013, Proceedings, Part II 13, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
19. Energy Efficiency in the Management of the Integrated Water Service. A Case Study on the White Certificates Incentive System10.1007/978-3-030-87010-2_14 ↗
20. Urban water management in Italy: An innovative model for the selection of water service infrastructures
21. A review of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP): An approach to water resource management in Thailand10.35762/AER.2015.37.3.2 ↗
22. A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management10.1007/s11269-006-9112-5 ↗
23. Multi-criteria decision support for annual rehabilitation programmes in drinking water networks10.2166/ws.2003.0084 ↗
24. Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.12.024 ↗
25. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for integrated water resources management (IWRM) in the Lake Poopo Basin, Bolivia10.1007/s11269-009-9551-x ↗
26. Development tendency analysis and evaluation of the water ecological carrying capacity in the Siping area of Jilin Province in China based on system dynamics and analytic hierarchy process10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.031 ↗
27. Evaluation of pollution prevention options in the municipal water cycle10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.057 ↗
28. A novel integrated decision support tool for sustainable water resources management in Singapore: Synergies between system dynamics and analytic hierarchy process10.1007/s11269-014-0876-8 ↗
29. An improved method for integrated water security assessment in the Yellow River basin, China10.1007/s00477-014-1012-2 ↗
30. Alamanos, A., Mylopoulos, N., Loukas, A., and Gaitanaros, D. (2018). An Integrated Multicriteria Analysis Tool for Evaluating Water Resource Management Strategies. Water, 10.10.3390/w10121795 ↗
31. Ranking foreign suppliers based on supply risk10.1108/13598540710826317 ↗
32. Grimaldi, M., Sebillo, M., Vitiello, G., and Pellecchia, V. (2020). Planning and Managing the Integrated Water System: A Spatial Decision Support System to Analyze the Infrastructure Performances. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12166432 ↗
33. A decision support system based on AHP for ranking strategies to manage emergencies on drinking water supply systems10.1007/s11269-020-02741-y ↗
34. Multi-criteria decision analysis in urban water asset management10.1080/1573062X.2021.1913613 ↗
35. Sarvari, H., Chan, D.W.M., Ashrafi, B., Olawumi, T.O., and Banaitiene, N. (2021). Prioritization of Contracting Methods for Water and Wastewater Projects Using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14227815 ↗
36. Cacal, J.C., Taboada, E.B., and Mehboob, M.S. (2023). Strategic Implementation of Integrated Water Resource Management in Selected Areas of Palawan: SWOT-AHP Method. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15042922 ↗
37. AHPSort: An AHP-based method for sorting problems10.1080/00207543.2012.657966 ↗
38. Robustness and information levels in case-based multiple criteria sorting10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.026 ↗
39. Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis
40. The ethnically and racially uneven role of water infrastructure spending in rural economic development10.1038/s44221-022-00007-y ↗
41. Fragmented Water Governance, Institutional Problems and Questionable Decisions10.1007/978-3-031-24019-5_4 ↗
42. Water Supply Infrastructure Investments Require Adaptive Financial Assessment: Evaluation of Coupled Financial and Water Supply Dynamics10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5863 ↗
43. Decision-making with multiple criteria using AHP and MAUT: An industrial application
44. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 ↗
45. Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4 ↗
46. The analytic hierarchy process—An exposition10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231 ↗
47. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process
48. Kut, P., and Pietrucha-Urbanik, K. (2022). Most Searched Topics in the Scientific Literature on Failures in Photovoltaic Installations. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15218108 ↗
49. Saaty, T.L. (1988). What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process?, Springer.10.13033/isahp.y1988.042 ↗
50. Saaty, T.L. (2001). Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, RWS Publications.10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2 ↗
51. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process10.1287/inte.24.6.19 ↗
52. Saaty, T.L., and Kearns, K.P. (2014). Analytical Planning: The Organization of System, Elsevier.
53. Pant, S., Kumar, A., Ram, M., Klochkov, Y., and Sharma, H.K. (2022). Consistency Indices in Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Review. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10081206 ↗
54. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 and safety parameters on energy project performance with an analytical hierarchy process10.1016/j.jup.2021.101210 ↗
55. An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H ↗
56. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 ↗
57. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process
58. The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.270 ↗
59. Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction