journal article·2023-02-06Open access

Evaluation of the Effects of Different Packaging Materials on the Quality Attributes of the Tomato Fruit

Sandile Sifiso Dladla, Tilahun Seyoum Workneh

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 4

Abstract

Post-harvest loss continues to be a significant problem in the food industry. Different packaging materials, designed to reduce fruit damage, are anticipated for various applications in the supply chain. Recently, stamped paper (SP) and expandable polystyrene (EPS) trays have been introduced as tomato retail packaging. Although the combination of paper trays and clear plastic are still not 100% biodegradable packaging, they are promising alternatives to the heavy utilisation of petrochemical-based polymers. This study investigated the effects of different packaging materials and storage conditions on the ‘Nema-Netta’ tomatoes’ quality attributes. The treatments consisted of a stamped paper (SP) + polyvinyl chloride (PVC), expandable polystyrene (EPS) + polyvinyl chloride (PVC), stamped paper (SP)+ flow wrap, expandable polystyrene (EPS) + flow wrap, polypropylene (PP), and unpackaged tomatoes stored at cold and ambient conditions. Firmness, physiological weight loss (PWL), pH value, titratable acidity (TA) and total sugars were evaluated at seven-day intervals, over 28 days. Temperature and relative humidity at cold storage ranged between 8–12 °C, 78–80% RH and 22–26 °C, 68–72% RH at ambient storage conditions. The packaging and storage conditions significantly affected the PWL, firmness, pH, TA and total sugars. Samples in the EPS Tray combined with the PVC wrap at cold storage maintained the quality of the tomatoes better than the other packaging. The combination of packaging and cold storage created an ideal environment for maintaining the quality of tomatoes. The relative differences between EPS Tray + PVC (non-biodegradable) and SP Tray + PVC (biodegradable) were less than 5% in multiple tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa

Bioresources Engineering, School of Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P.O. Box X01, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Tomato processing, lycopene and health benefits: A review
2. Efficiency of edible coating chitosan and cinnamic acid to prolong the shelf life of tomatoes10.47253/jtrss.v7i1.509 ↗
3. Identification of potential human urinary biomarkers for tomato juice intake by mass spectrometry-based metabolomics10.1007/s00394-019-01935-4 ↗
4. Tomato quality as influenced by preharvest factors10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.056 ↗
5. Genetic and metabolic effects of ripening mutations and vine detachment on tomato fruit quality10.1111/pbi.13176 ↗
6. Fruit Softening: Revisiting the Role of Pectin10.1016/j.tplants.2018.01.006 ↗
7. The Chemistry behind Tomato Quality
8. Nutritional Quality Parameters of the Fresh Red Tomato Varieties Cultivated in Organic System
9. Shelf life and proximate composition of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruits as influenced by storage methods10.4038/cjs.v47i4.7557 ↗
10. Assessment on post-harvest losses of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentem Mill.) in selected districts of East Shewa Zone of Ethiopia using a commodity system analysis methodology10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03749 ↗
11. Nutritional Composition, Physical Characteristics and Sanitary Quality of the Tomato Variety Mongol F1 from Burkina Faso
12. Experimental and numerical modelling comparison of thermal performance of expanded polystyrene and corrugated plastic packaging for fresh fish10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.09.017 ↗
13. Volatile non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) identified in recycled expanded polystyrene containers and their migration into food simulants10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100318 ↗
14. Effect of Packaging Methods on Postharvest Quality of Tah Tasai Chinese Cabbage (Brassica campestris var. narinosa) Baby Leaf Vegetable10.11002/kjfp.2012.19.1.001 ↗
15. Evaluation of tomato textural mechanical properties10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.03.007 ↗
16. AOAC (1984). Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical. [14th ed.].
17. Influence of preharvest application of fungicides on the postharvest quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.04.010 ↗
18. Effects of variety on the quality of tomato stored under ambient conditions10.1007/s13197-011-0378-0 ↗
19. Nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of four tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) farmer’ varieties in Northeastern Portugal homegardens10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.045 ↗
20. Effect of maturity stage on quality and shelf life of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.) using the refrigerator storage system
21. Effect of different packaging systems on the quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum var. Rio Grande) fruits during storage10.1111/j.1365-2621.2007.01649.x ↗
22. Effect of some packaging materials on quality attributes of tomato fruits (Solanum lycopersicum L.) during cold storage and after shelf life period
23. The Effects of Packaging Materials on Post Harvest Quality of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)
24. Effects of Storage Duration on Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)
25. Mechanical Properties of Tomato Fruits Under Storage Conditions
26. Feasibility and economic evaluation of low-cost evaporative cooling system in fruit and vegetables storage
27. Textural Modification of Processing Tomatoes10.1080/10408699891274192 ↗
28. Evaluation of a modified atmosphere packaging system in pallets to extend the shelf-life of the stored tomato at cooling temperature10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130309 ↗
29. Effect of packaging materials and storage environment on postharvest quality of papaya fruit10.1007/s13197-011-0607-6 ↗
30. Changes in pH, acids, sugars and other quality parameters during extended vine holding of ripe processing tomatoes10.1002/jsfa.4312 ↗
31. Effect of infield handling conditions and time to pre-cooling on the shelf-life and quality of tomatoes10.1590/1981-6723.01617 ↗
32. Effect of different plastic packaging on postharvest quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)10.26480/taec.01.2020.15.18 ↗
33. Chemical and nutritional quality changes of tomato during postharvest transportation and storage
34. Impacts of harvesting stages and pre-storage treatments on shelf life and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)10.1080/23311932.2020.1863620 ↗
35. Shehata, S.A., Abdelrahman, S.Z., Megahed, M.M.A., Abdeldaym, E.A., El-Mogy, M.M., and Abdelgawad, K.F. (2021). Extending Shelf Life and Maintaining Quality of Tomato Fruit by Calcium Chloride, Hydrogen Peroxide, Chitosan, and Ozonated Water. Horticulturae, 7.10.3390/horticulturae7090309 ↗
36. Influence of storage environment, maturity stage and pre-storage disinfection treatments on tomato fruit quality during winter in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa10.1007/s13197-017-2766-6 ↗
37. Giannakourou, M., and Tsironi, T. (2021). Application of Processing and Packaging Hurdles for Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables Preservation. Foods, 10.10.3390/foods10040830 ↗
38. Biodegradable packaging in the food industry
39. Cantwell, M., Nie, X., and Hong, G. (2009, January 8–12). Impact of storage conditions on grape tomato quality. Proceedings of the 6th ISHS Postharvest Symposium, Antalya, Turkey.
40. Physicochemical and nutraceutical properties of tomato powder as affected by pretreatments, drying methods, and storage period10.1080/10942912.2020.1758716 ↗
41. Postharvest UV-C treatment of tomato fruits: Changes in simple sugars and organic acids contents during storage10.1016/j.lwt.2015.08.055 ↗
42. Metabolic characterization of tomato fruit during preharvest development, ripening, and postharvest shelf-life10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.04.010 ↗