CNN Based Image Classification of Malicious UAVs
Source abstract
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or drones have found a wide range of useful applications in society over the past few years, but there has also been a growth in the use of UAVs for malicious purposes. One way to manage this issue is to allow reporting of malicious UAVs (e.g., through a smartphone application) with the report including a photo of the UAV. It would be useful to able to automatically identify the type of UAV within the image in terms of the manufacturer and specific product identification using a trained image classification model. In this paper, we discuss the collection of images for three popular UAVs at different elevations and different distances from the observer, and using different camera zoom levels. We then train 4 image classification models based upon Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) using this UAV image dataset and the concept of transfer learning from the well-known ImageNet database. The trained models can classify the type of UAV contained in unseen test images with up to approximately 81% accuracy (for the Resnet-18 model), even though 2 of the UAVs represented in the UAV image dataset are visually similar, and the fact that the UAV image dataset contains images of UAVs that are a significant distance from the observer. This provides a motivation to expand the study in the future to include more UAV types and other usage scenarios (e.g., UAVs carrying loads).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Neural Network Applications · Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia
School of Surveying and Built Environment, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia
School of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Emerging technologies and the use case: A multi-year study of drone adoption10.1002/joom.1196 ↗
2. Vattapparamban, E., Güvenç, I., Yurekli, A.I., Akkaya, K., and Uluağaç, S. (2016, January 5–9). Drones for smart cities: Issues in cybersecurity, privacy, and public safety. Proceedings of the International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Paphos, Cyprus.10.1109/IWCMC.2016.7577060 ↗
3. McTegg, S.J., Tarsha Kurdi, F., Simmons, S., and Gharineiat, Z. (2022). Comparative Approach of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Restrictions in Controlled Airspaces. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14040822 ↗
4. Security analysis of drones systems: Attacks, limitations, and recommendations10.1016/j.iot.2020.100218 ↗
5. Development of convolutional neural network and its application in image classification: A survey
6. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning10.1109/JPROC.2020.3004555 ↗
7. Machine learning-based drone detection and classification: State-of-the-art in research10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2942944 ↗
8. Distinguishing Malicious Drones Using Vision Transformer10.3390/ai3020016 ↗
9. Singha, S., and Aydin, B. (2021). Automated Drone Detection Using YOLOv4. Drones, 5.10.3390/drones5030095 ↗
10. Jamil, S., Rahman, M., Ullah, A., Badnava, S., Forsat, M., and Mirjavadi, S.S. (2020). Malicious UAV detection using integrated audio and visual features for public safety applications. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20143923 ↗
11. Liu, H., Wei, Z., Chen, Y., Pan, J., Lin, L., and Ren, Y. (2017, January 19). Drone detection based on an audio-assisted camera array. Proceedings of the IEEE Third International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM), Laguna Hills, CA, USA.10.1109/BigMM.2017.57 ↗
12. Acoustic spectral imaging and transfer learning for reliable bearing fault diagnosis under variable speed conditions10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.075 ↗
13. Zabin, M., Choi, H.J., and Uddin, J. (2022). Hybrid deep transfer learning architecture for industrial fault diagnosis using Hilbert transform and DCNN–LSTM. J. Supercomput., 1–20.10.1007/s11227-022-04830-8 ↗
14. Özel, M. (2022, December 03). Drone Dataset (UAV). Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/dasmehdixtr/drone-dataset-uav.
15. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
16. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
17. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
18. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.C. (2018, January 18–23). Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2018, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
19. Python Package Index (2022, October 29). Split-Folders 0.5.1. Available online: https://pypi.org/project/split-folders/.
20. (2022, October 29). ImageNet. Available online: https://www.image-net.org/.