Show source-provided references
1. Russell, S., and Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice Hall. [3rd ed.].
5. A Critical Review of Practices and Challenges in Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT: Toward Universal and Resilient Systems
10.1109/COMST.2018.2844742 ↗6. Shinde, P.P., and Shah, S. (2018, January 16–18). A Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computing, Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), Pune, India.
10.1109/ICCUBEA.2018.8697857 ↗7. An overview of security and privacy in smart cities’ IoT communications
10.1002/ett.3677 ↗8. Ahmed, M., Cox, D., Simpson, B., and Aloufi, A. (2022). ECU-IoFT: A Dataset for Analysing Cyber-Attacks on Internet of Flying Things. Appl. Sci., 12.
10.3390/app12041990 ↗9. Fagbola, F.I., and Venter, H.S. (2022). Smart Digital Forensic Readiness Model for Shadow IoT Devices. Appl. Sci., 12.
10.3390/app12020730 ↗10. Ashfaq, Z., Mumtaz, R., Rafay, A., Zaidi, S.M.H., Saleem, H., Mumtaz, S., Shahid, A., De Poorter, E., and Moerman, I. (2022). Embedded AI-Based Digi-Healthcare. Appl. Sci., 12.
10.3390/app12010519 ↗11. Applications of ML/DL in the management of smart cities and societies based on new trends in information technologies: A systematic literature review
10.1016/j.scs.2022.104089 ↗16. Shende, M.K., Salih, S.Q., Bokde, N.D., Scholz, M., Oudah, A.Y., and Yaseen, Z.M. (2022). Natural Time Series Parameters Forecasting: Validation of the Pattern-Sequence-Based Forecasting (PSF) Algorithm; A New Python Package. Appl. Sci., 12.
10.3390/app12126194 ↗17. Siddique, T., Mahmud, M.S., Keesee, A.M., Ngwira, C.M., and Connor, H. (2022). A Survey of Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Space Weather Prediction. Geosciences, 12.
10.3390/geosciences12010027 ↗19. Siddique, T., and Mahmud, M.S. (2021, January 1–2). Classification of fNIRS Data Under Uncertainty: A Bayesian Neural Network Approach. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on E-health Networking, Application & Services (HEALTHCOM), Shenzhen, China.
10.1109/HEALTHCOM49281.2021.9398971 ↗22. Optimal performance of hybrid energy system in the presence of electrical and heat storage systems under uncertainties using stochastic p-robust optimization technique
10.1016/j.scs.2022.103935 ↗23. Community decision-makers’ choice of multi-objective scheduling strategy for integrated energy considering multiple uncertainties and demand response
10.1016/j.scs.2022.103945 ↗24. Many-objective charging optimization for electric vehicles considering demand response and multi-uncertainties based on Markov chain and information gap decision theory
10.1016/j.scs.2021.103652 ↗26. Levi, D., Gispan, L., Giladi, N., and Fetaya, E. (2022). Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Tasks. Sensors, 22.
10.3390/s22155540 ↗28. Fotis, G., Vita, V., and Ekonomou, L. (2022). Machine Learning Techniques for the Prediction of the Magnetic and Electric Field of Electrostatic Discharges. Electronics, 11.
10.3390/electronics11121858 ↗29. Fotis, G., Vita, V., and Maris, T.I. (2022). Rise Time and Peak Current Measurement of ESD Current from Air Discharges with Uncertainty Calculation. Electronics, 11.
10.3390/electronics11162507 ↗30. Polužanski, V., Kartalović, N., and Nikolić, B. (2021). Impact of Power Transformer Oil-Temperature on the Measurement Uncertainty of All-Acoustic Non-Iterative Partial Discharge Location. Materials, 14.
10.3390/ma14061385 ↗31. Besharatifard, H., Hasanzadeh, S., Heydarian-Forushani, E., Alhelou, H.H., and Siano, P. (2022). Detection and Analysis of Partial Discharges in Oil-Immersed Power Transformers Using Low-Cost Acoustic Sensors. Appl. Sci., 12.
10.3390/app12063010 ↗32. ISO (2008). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measuremen, ISO.
33. European Accreditation (2013). EA-4/02 M (2013): Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration, European Accreditation.
34. Singapore Accreditation Council (2019). Guidance Notes EL 001: Guidelines on the Evaluation and Expression of Measurement Uncertainty for Electrical Testing Field.
35. Shalev-Shwartz, S., and Wexler, Y. (2016). Minimizing the Maximal Loss: How and Why?. arXiv.
37. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation
10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗39. Rashmi, K.V., and Gilad-Bachrach, R. (2015). DART: Dropouts meet Multiple Additive Regression Trees. arXiv.
40. Ahmed, Z., Amizadeh, S., Bilenko, M., Carr, R., Chin, W.-S., Dekel, Y., Dupre, X., Eskarveskiy, V., Filipi, S., and Finley, T. (2019, January 4–8). Machine learning at microsoft with ML.Net. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Anchorage, AK, USA.
10.1145/3292500.3330667 ↗