journal article·2022-06-05Open access

Intelligent Computer-Aided Model for Efficient Diagnosis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis 3D Imaging Using Deep Learning

Alaa M. Adel El-Shazli, Sherin M. Youssef, Abdel Hamid Soliman

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 11

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a highly promising 3D imaging modality for breast diagnosis. Tissue overlapping is a challenge with traditional 2D mammograms; however, since digital breast tomosynthesis can obtain three-dimensional images, tissue overlapping is reduced, making it easier for radiologists to detect abnormalities and resulting in improved and more accurate diagnosis. In this study, a new computer-aided multi-class diagnosis system is proposed that integrates DBT augmentation and colour feature map with a modified deep learning architecture (Mod_AlexNet). To the proposed modified deep learning architecture (Mod AlexNet), an optimization layer with multiple high performing optimizers is incorporated so that it can be evaluated and optimised using various optimization techniques. Two experimental scenarios are applied, the first scenario proposed a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) model that integrated DBT augmentation, image enhancement techniques and colour feature mapping with six deep learning models for feature extraction, including ResNet-18, AlexNet, GoogleNet, MobileNetV2, VGG-16 and DenseNet-201, to efficiently classify DBT slices. The second scenario compared the performance of the newly proposed Mod_AlexNet architecture and traditional AlexNet, using several optimization techniques and different evaluation performance metrics were computed. The optimization techniques included adaptive moment estimation (Adam), root mean squared propagation (RMSProp), and stochastic gradient descent with momentum (SGDM), for different batch sizes, including 32, 64 and 512. Experiments have been conducted on a large benchmark dataset of breast tomography scans. The performance of the first scenario was compared in terms of accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, runtime, and f1-score. While in the second scenario, performance was compared in terms of training accuracy, training loss, and test accuracy. In the first scenario, results demonstrated that AlexNet reported improvement rates of 1.69%, 5.13%, 6.13%, 4.79% and 1.6%, compared to ResNet-18, MobileNetV2, GoogleNet, DenseNet-201 and VGG16, respectively. Experimental analysis with different optimization techniques and batch sizes demonstrated that the proposed Mod_AlexNet architecture outperformed AlexNet in terms of test accuracy with improvement rates of 3.23%, 1.79% and 1.34% when compared using SGDM, Adam, and RMSProp optimizers, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computer Engineering Department, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT), Giza 12577, Egypt

Computer Engineering Department, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT), Alexandria 1029, Egypt

School of Digital, Technologies and Arts, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (WHO) (2022, April 01). Breast Cancer. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer.
2. National Health Service (NHS) (2022, April 01). Overview—Breast Cancer in Women, Available online: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/breast-cancer/.
3. Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis10.1016/j.gendis.2018.05.001 ↗
4. Study of Role of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis over Digital Mammography in the Assessment of BIRADS 3 Breast Lesions
5. Digital Mammography Imaging: Breast Tomosynthesis and Advanced Applications10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.009 ↗
6. Choi, Y., Shim, H., and Baek, J. (2018, January 10–17). Image Quality Enhancement of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images by Deblurring with Deep Residual Convolutional Neural Network. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings (NSS/MIC), Sydney, Australia.10.1109/NSSMIC.2018.8824402 ↗
7. Tsochatzidis, L., Costaridou, L., and Pratikakis, I. (2019). Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Mammograms—A Comparative Study. J. Imaging, 5.10.3390/jimaging5030037 ↗
8. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis data using convolutional neural networks and multiple instance learning10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.04.004 ↗
9. A Performance Comparison between Shallow and Deeper Neural Networks Supervised Classification of Tomosynthesis Breast Lesions Images10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.04.011 ↗
10. Evolutionary pruning of transfer learned deep convolutional neural network for breast cancer diagnosis in digital breast tomosynthesis10.1088/1361-6560/aabb5b ↗
11. Lesion Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis Using Efficient Deep Learning and Data Augmentation Techniques
12. Perez, L., and Wang, J. (2017). The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning. arXiv.
13. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. (2009, January 20–25). ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗
14. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
15. Deep Learning in Image Classification Using Residual Network (ResNet) Variants for Detection of Colorectal Cancer10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.025 ↗
16. Napoletano, P., Piccoli, F., and Schettini, R. (2018). Anomaly Detection in Nanofibrous Materials by CNN-Based Self-Similarity. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18010209 ↗
17. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
18. Alom, M.Z., Taha, T.M., Yakopcic, C., Westberg, S., Hasan, M., Esesn, B.C., Awwal, A.A., and Asari, V.K. (2018). The history began from alexnet: A comprehensive survey on deep learning approaches. arXiv.
19. Yan, S., Jing, L., and Wang, H. (2021). A New Individual Tree Species Recognition Method Based on a Convolutional Neural Network and High-Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13030479 ↗
20. IEEE Machine Learning Bootcamp (2022, May 16). Neural Networks and Computer Vision. Github.io., Available online: https://ieeeucsd.github.io/mlbootcamp/3.%20Neural%20Networks%20and%20Computer%20Vision/.
21. GoogleNet CNN Neural Network towards Chest CT-Coronavirus Medical Image Classification10.3844/jcssp.2020.620.625 ↗
22. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2015, January 7–12). Going Deeper with Convolutions. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
23. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2015). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
24. Howard, A.G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., and Adam, H. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv.
25. Face Mask Detection for COVID_19 Pandemic Using Pytorch in Deep Learning10.1088/1757-899X/1070/1/012061 ↗
26. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L. (2018, January 18–22). Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
27. Huang, G., Liu, Z., and Maaten, L. (2017, January 21–26). Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
28. Adugna, T., Xu, W., and Fan, J. (2022). Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Regional Land Cover Mapping Using Coarse Resolution FY-3C Images. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14030574 ↗
29. Buda, M., Saha, A., Walsh, R., Ghate, S., Li, N., Swiecicki, A., Lo, J.Y., Yang, J., and Mazurowski, M. (2020). Breast Cancer Screening—Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (BCS-DBT) [Data set]. Cancer Imaging Arch.
30. A Data Set and Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Masses and Architectural Distortions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19100 ↗
31. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 ↗
32. Medical Image Classification Based on Deep Features Extracted by Deep Model and Statistic Feature Fusion with Multilayer Perceptron10.1155/2018/2061516 ↗