Can Biochar Improve the Sustainability of Animal Production?
Source abstract
Abstract
Animal production is a significant contributor of organic and inorganic contaminants in air, soil, and water systems. These pollutants are present beginning in animal houses and impacts continue through manure storage, treatment, and land application. As the industry is expected to expand, there is still a lack of affordable, sustainable solutions to many environmental concerns in animal production. Biochar is a low-cost, sustainable biomaterial with many environmental remediation applications. Its physicochemical properties have been proven to provide environmental benefits via the adsorption of organic and inorganic contaminants, promote plant growth, improve soil quality, and provide a form of carbon sequestration. For these reasons, biochar has been researched regarding biochar production, and application methods to biological systems have a significant influence on the moisture content, pH, microbial communities, and carbon and nitrogen retention. There remain unanswered questions about how we can manipulate biochar via physical and chemical activation methods to enhance the performance for specific applications. This review article addresses the positive and negative impacts of biochar addition at various stages in animal production from feed intake to manure land application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques · Phosphorus and nutrient management · Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Prestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Funding
NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bioenergy Research Initiative (NCDA&CS BRI)
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Review: Trends for meat, milk and egg consumption for the next decades and the role played by livestock systems in the global production of proteins10.1016/j.animal.2021.100287 ↗
2. Dohlman, E., Hansen, J., and Boussios, D. (2021). USDA Agricultural Projections to 2030, USDA. OCE-2021-1.
3. Importance of Animals in Agricultural Sustainability and Food Security10.3945/jn.115.212217 ↗
4. Matlock, M., Thoma, G., Matlock, M., Boles, E., Leh, M., Sandefur, H., Bauista, R., and Ulrich, R. (2015). A Life Cycle Analysis of Land Use in US Pork Production, National Pork Board. Available online: https://porkcheckoff.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/11-133-MATLOCK-UofArk.pdf.
5. Land-based production of animal protein: Impacts, efficiency, and sustainability10.1111/nyas.12566 ↗
6. World Meteorological Organization (2022, March 01). Global Methane Assessment Released. Available online: https://public.wmo.int/en/media/news/global-methane-assessment-released.
7. Effects of Agriculture upon the Air Quality and Climate: Research, Policy, and Regulations10.1021/es8024403 ↗
8. Environmental Protection Agency (2022, March 01). Health and Environmental Effects of Particulate Matter (PM), Available online: https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-effects-particulate-matter-pm.
9. Environmental Protection Agency (2022, March 01). Overview of Greenhouse Gases, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases.
10. Environmental Protection Agency (2022, March 01). Volatile Organic Compounds’ Impact on Indoor Air Quality, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/volatile-organic-compounds-impact-indoor-air-quality.
11. Environmental Issues in Animal Agriculture
12. Pfost, D.L., Fulhage, C.D., and Hoehne, J.A. (2022, March 01). Odors from Livestock Operations: Causes and Possible Cures. Available online: https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/g1884.
13. Kalus, K., Koziel, J.A., and Opaliński, S. (2019). A Review of Biochar Properties and Their Utilization in Crop Agriculture and Livestock Production. NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. E Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9173494 ↗
14. Production and utilization of biochar: A review10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002 ↗
15. Biochar production and applications in agro and forestry systems: A review10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137775 ↗
16. Biochar production, activation and adsorptive applications: A review10.1007/s10311-020-01165-9 ↗
17. A review on biochar production from different biomass wastes by recent carbonization technologies and its sustainable applications10.1016/j.jece.2021.107017 ↗
18. Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: A review10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.122 ↗
19. Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: A review10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282 ↗
20. Textural and chemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use as a soil amendment10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.085 ↗
21. Adsorption characteristics of Cu (II) from aqueous solution onto biochar derived from swine manure10.1007/s11356-014-2627-z ↗
22. Slow pyrolysis as a measure for rapidly treating cow manure and the biochar characteristics10.1016/j.jaap.2017.01.008 ↗
23. Characteristics of tetracycline adsorption by cow manure biochar prepared at different pyrolysis temperatures10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121348 ↗
24. Super-activated biochar from poultry litter for high-performance supercapacitors10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.05.002 ↗
25. A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.071 ↗
26. Fate of nutrients during hydrothermal treatment of food waste10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125954 ↗
27. Minireview of potential applications of hydrochar derived from hydrothermal carbonization of biomass10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.026 ↗
28. Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.060 ↗
29. Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass: Effect of process conditions on hydrochar properties10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.022 ↗
30. Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for carbon rich material preparation: A review10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105384 ↗
31. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass: A Review10.3103/S0361521918020076 ↗
32. A review on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and plastic wastes to energy products10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105479 ↗
33. Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) and Pelletization of Two Arid Land Plants Bagasse for Energy Densification10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01176 ↗
34. Hydrothermal carbonization of organic wastes to carbonaceous solid fuel–A review of mechanisms and process parameters10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118472 ↗
35. A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion10.1016/j.joei.2018.12.003 ↗
36. Effect of hydrothermal carbonization on heavy metals in swine manure: Speciation, bioavailability, and environmental risk10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.073 ↗
37. Lentz, Z., Kolar, P., and Classen, J.J. (2019). Valorization of swine manure into hydrochars. Processes, 7.10.3390/pr7090560 ↗
38. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of different feedstocks to hydrochar as potential energy for the future world: A review10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126734 ↗
39. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of swine and chicken manure: Influence of cross-interaction on hydrochar and liquid characteristics10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147381 ↗
40. A review on biomass torrefaction process and product properties for energy applications10.1089/ind.2011.7.384 ↗
41. A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570 ↗
42. Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review10.1016/j.rser.2021.111645 ↗
43. Characterization of biomass wastes and its possibility of agriculture utilization due to biochar production by torrefaction process10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124302 ↗
44. Wet torrefaction of biomass for high quality solid fuel production: A review10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.097 ↗
45. Torrefaction of biomass: A review of production methods for biocoal from cultured and waste lignocellulosic feedstocks10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.068 ↗
46. Stępień, P., Świechowski, K., Hnat, M., Kugler, S., Stegenta-Dąbrowska, S., Koziel, J.A., Manczarski, P., and Białowiec, A. (2019). Waste to Carbon: Biocoal from Elephant Dung as New Cooking Fuel. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12224344 ↗
47. Torrefaction of non-lignocellulose biomass waste10.1002/cjce.20527 ↗
48. Torrefaction for Energy Valorization of Cattle Manure: Combustion Performance, Kinetics, Thermodynamics
49. Biochar modification to enhance sorption of inorganics from water10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.082 ↗
50. Steam and KOH activation of biochar: Experimental and modeling studies10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.06.047 ↗
51. Comprehensive review on production and utilization of biochar10.1007/s42452-019-0172-6 ↗
52. Chemical activation of biochar for energy and environmental applications: A comprehensive review10.1515/revce-2018-0003 ↗
53. Activation strategies for biochar to use as an efficient catalyst in various applications10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119205 ↗
54. A comprehensive review of engineered biochar: Production, characteristics, and environmental applications10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122462 ↗
55. Adsorbents from pine wood via K2CO3-assisted low temperature carbonization for adsorption of p-cresol10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.010 ↗
56. Ansanay, Y., Kolar, P., Sharma-Shivappa, R., Cheng, J., and Arellano, C. (2021). Pretreatment of switchgrass for production of glucose via sulfonic acid-impregnated activated carbon. Processes, 9.10.3390/pr9030504 ↗
57. Nitrogen-doped biochars as adsorbents for mitigation of heavy metals and organics from water: A review10.1007/s42773-022-00145-2 ↗
58. Production, characterization, activation and environmental applications of engineered biochar: A review10.1007/s10311-020-01167-7 ↗
59. Effect of surface area, micropores, secondary micropores, and mesopores volumes of activated carbons on reactive dyes adsorption from solution10.1081/SS-120027403 ↗
60. The role of biochar in organic waste composting and soil improvement: A review10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.003 ↗
61. Preparation of nano-biochar from conventional biorefineries for high-value applications10.1016/j.rser.2021.112057 ↗
62. Enaime, G., Baçaoui, A., Yaacoubi, A., and Lübken, M. (2020). Biochar for wastewater treatment—conversion technologies and applications. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10103492 ↗
63. Removing gaseous NH3 using biochar as an adsorbent10.3390/agriculture5040991 ↗
64. Removing ammonium from water using modified corn cob-biochar10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.050 ↗
65. Biochar-surface oxygenation with hydrogen peroxide10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.046 ↗
66. Development of biochar and activated carbon from cigarettes wastes and their applications in Pb2 adsorption10.1016/j.jece.2020.104980 ↗
67. Modification of biochar surface by air oxidation: Role of pyrolysis temperature10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.030 ↗
68. Removal of methylene blue from water using okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) mucilage modified biochar10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100689 ↗
69. Comparison of sorption and desorption studies of heavy metal ions from biochar and commercial active carbon10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.088 ↗
70. UMass Extension Crops, Dairy, Livestock and Equine Program (2022, March 01). Manure as a Nutrient Resource. Available online: https://ag.umass.edu/crops-dairy-livestock-equine/fact-sheets/manure-nutrient-resource.k.
71. Kalus, K., Konkol, D., Korczyński, M., Koziel, J.A., and Opaliński, S. (2020). Laying Hens Biochar Diet Supplementation—Effect on Performance, Excreta N Content, NH3 and VOCs Emissions, Egg Traits and Egg Consumers Acceptance. Collect. FAO Agric., 10.10.3390/agriculture10060237 ↗
72. Use of Biochar as Feed Supplements for Animal Farming10.1080/10643389.2020.1721980 ↗
73. The use of biochar in animal feeding10.7717/peerj.7373 ↗
74. Gastrointestinal Functionality in Animal Nutrition and Health: New Opportunities for Sustainable Animal Production10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.09.012 ↗
75. Assessing the Potential Use of a Feed Additive Based on Biochar on Broilers Feeding upon Productive Performance, pH of Digestive Organs, Cecum Fermentation and Bacterial Community10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115039 ↗
76. Role of Volatile Fatty Acids in Development of the Cecal Microflora in Broiler Chickens during Growth10.1128/AEM.66.6.2536-2540.2000 ↗
77. Prasai, T.P., Walsh, K.B., Bhattarai, S.P., Midmore, D.J., Van, T.T., Moore, R.J., and Stanley, D. (2016). Biochar, Bentonite and Zeolite Supplemented Feeding of Layer Chickens Alters Intestinal Microbiota and Reduces Campylobacter Load. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0154061 ↗
78. Willson, N.L., Van, T.T., Bhattarai, S.P., Courtice, J.M., McIntyre, J.R., Prasai, T.P., Moore, R.J., Walsh, K., and Stanley, D. (2019). Feed supplementation with biochar may reduce poultry pathogens, including Campylobacter hepaticus, the causative agent of Spotty Liver Disease. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0214471 ↗
79. Effect of Two Different Biochars as a Component of Compound Feed on Nutrient Digestibility and Performance Parameters in Growing Pigs10.3389/fanim.2021.633958 ↗
80. Effects of Bamboo Charcoal on the Growth Performance, Blood Characteristics and Noxious Gas Emission in Fattening Pigs10.1080/09712119.2012.738219 ↗
81. Effect of poultry litter biochar diet inclusion on feed manufacture and 4- to 21-d broiler performance10.3382/japr/pfv039 ↗
82. Manure from biochar, bentonite and zeolite feed supplemented poultry: Moisture retention and granulation properties10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.040 ↗
83. Kalus, K., Konkol, D., Korczyński, M., Koziel, J.A., and Opaliński, S. (2020). Effect of Biochar Diet Supplementation on Chicken Broilers Performance, NH3 and Odor Emissions and Meat Consumer Acceptance. Animals, 10.10.3390/ani10091539 ↗
84. Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., and Tempio, G. (2022, March 01). Tackling climate change through livestock—A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. Energy Information Administration—EIA—Independent Statistics and Analysis, Available online: https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/ghg_report/ghg_methane.php#:~:text=The%20major%20sources%20of%20U.S.
85. Interactions between Microbial Consortia in Biofilms: A Paradigm Shift in Rumen Microbial Ecology and Enteric Methane Mitigation10.1071/AN13381 ↗
86. Maurer, D.L., Koziel, J.A., Kalus, K., Andersen, D.S., and Opalinski, S. (2017). Pilot-Scale Testing of Non-Activated Biochar for Swine Manure Treatment and Mitigation of Ammonia, Hydrogen Sulfide, Odorous Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy, 9.10.3390/su9060929 ↗
87. Influence of Biochar and Liquid Smoke Additives from Cacao-Pod Husks on in Vitro Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.4.533.543 ↗
88. Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep10.2527/jas.2010-2947 ↗
89. Evaluation of Biochar Products at Two Inclusion Levels on Ruminal In Vitro Methane Production and Fermentation Parameters in a Timothy Hay-Based Diet
90. A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH4 Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota10.3389/fvets.2019.00308 ↗
91. Effects of Post-Pyrolysis Treated Biochars on Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation, and Rumen Microbiota of a Silage-Based Diet in an Artificial Rumen System (RUSITEC)10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114802 ↗
92. Biochar reduces enteric methane and improves growth and feed conversion in local “Yellow” cattle fed cassava root chips and fresh cassava foliage
93. Evaluation of Biochar as a Litter Amendment for Commercial Broiler Production10.3382/japr/pfz071 ↗
94. Evaluation of Surface-Applied Char on the Reduction of Ammonia Volatilization from Broiler Litter10.3382/japr.2010-00327 ↗
95. Effect of Pellet Quality and Biochar Litter Amendment on Male Turkey Performance10.1016/j.psj.2021.01.025 ↗
96. Efficacy of Different Biochars in Removing Odorous Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Emitted from Swine Manure10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02881 ↗
97. Use of biochar for the sorption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from cattle manure10.1007/s11356-020-09545-y ↗
98. Odour emissions from poultry litter—A review litter properties, odour formation and odorant emissions from porous materials10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.009 ↗
99. Granular biochar compared with activated carbon for wastewater treatment and resource recovery10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.059 ↗
100. Can Biochar Covers Reduce Emissions from Manure Lagoons While Capturing Nutrients?10.2134/jeq2016.12.0478 ↗