journal article·2022-05-10Open access

Quality Assurance for Performing Arts Education: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis Approach

Qingyun Li, Zihao (Michael) Li, Jie Han, Huimin Ma

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 10

Abstract

Senior management in tertiary institutions desires an efficient system that could help them assess and evaluate learning outcomes so that effective policies can be implemented to enhance teaching and learning. This gets intensified as broader issues arise and higher expectations are put on tertiary education—build a creative workforce and adapt to new technologies to analyze the large volume of teaching and learning data. Government and higher education policymakers have to rapidly adjust relevant policies to surmount the challenges from the pandemic and also to keep up with technological advancement. This demands a novel and efficient way for policymakers and senior management to see and gain insights from a large volume of data (e.g., student course and teacher evaluation). In this study, the researchers present such a system through various examples. The findings generated from this study contribute to the scholarship, and they provide a solution to senior management in tertiary institutions wanting to implement effective policies efficiently. The use of online analytical processing, virtual campus, online, and machine learning in education is growing. However, the use of these technology-enhanced approaches is rare in performing arts education. There has been no in-depth study, especially on technology-enhanced learning that leads to the improvement of teaching. This study utilizes a multi-dimensional analysis approach on the course student evaluation, a key aspect of the teaching and learning quality assurance for higher education. A novel analytical framework is developed and implemented at a leading performing arts university in Asia. It analyzes the course evaluation data of all courses (669 courses and 2664 responses) in the academic year 2018/2019 to make evidence-based recommendations. Such a framework provides an easy and effective visualization for senior management to identify courses that need closer scrutiny to ascertain whether and what areas of course enhancement measures are warranted.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Diverse Music Education Insights · Online Learning and Analytics · Flow Experience in Various Fields

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Management and Engineering, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221006, China

The Hong Kong Academy for Performing Arts, Hong Kong SAR, China

Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau

School of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong SAR, China

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Fostering student engagement in schools: International best practices10.1177/0143034317702947 ↗
2. New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109 ↗
3. Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., and Wylie, C. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 ↗
4. Osoian, C., Nistor, R., Zaharie, M., and Flueras, H. (2010, January 22–24). Improving higher education through student satisfaction surveys. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICETC.2010.5529347 ↗
5. Student evaluation surveys: Anonymous comments that offend or are unprofessional10.1007/s10734-014-9716-2 ↗
6. From performativity to professionalism: Lecturers’ responses to student feedback10.1080/13562510903050228 ↗
7. The changing nature of teaching and unit evaluations in Australian universities10.1108/09684881211240321 ↗
8. Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., and Stark, P. (2016). Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness. ScienceOpen Res., 1–11.10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1 ↗
9. Handle with care! An exploration of the potential risks associated with the publication and summative usage of student evaluation of teaching (SET) results10.1080/0309877X.2012.699514 ↗
10. Student evaluations of teaching: Teaching quantitative courses can be hazardous to one’s career10.7717/peerj.3299 ↗
11. University Students’ Expectations about the Elective Music Course
12. Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in music education research: An authentic analysis system for investigating authentic learning and teaching practice10.1177/0255761419830151 ↗
13. Improving music teaching and learning through online service: A case study of a synchronous online teaching internship10.1177/0255761415613534 ↗
14. Shifting from offline to online collaborative music-making, teaching and learning: Perceptions of Ethno artistic mentors10.1080/14613808.2021.1904865 ↗
15. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health10.1037/a0012801 ↗
16. Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., and Wylie, C. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 ↗
17. Student engagement in blended learning environments with lecture-based and problem-based instructional approaches
18. Student Engagement and Institutional Graduation Rates: Identifying High-Impact Educational Practices for Community Colleges10.1080/10668926.2012.719481 ↗
19. Fostering Student Engagement: Creative Problem-Solving in Small Group Facilitations10.22329/celt.v8i0.4227 ↗
20. Issues in performing arts teacher preparation program evaluation policy10.1080/10632913.2017.1287799 ↗
21. Visual learning analytics of educational data: A systematic literature review and research agenda10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.018 ↗
22. Applying learning analytics to program curriculum review10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0133 ↗
23. Moodle Data Retrieval for Educational Data Mining
24. Data Warehouse Technology for E-Learning10.1007/978-3-642-02196-1_1 ↗
25. Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact10.2307/41703503 ↗
26. Database.guide (2020, July 31). What Is OLTP?. Available online: https://database.guide/what-is-oltp/#:~:text=OLTP%20(Online%20Transactional%20Processing)%20is,a%20large%20number%20of%20users.
27. The relationship between ratings of teacher performance and student learning10.1016/0361-476X(90)90013-Q ↗
28. Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?10.1037/a0012840 ↗
29. Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860 ↗
30. Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of the literature10.1177/0273475308324086 ↗
31. Interpreting and using student ratings data: Guidance for faculty serving as administrators and on evaluation committees10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.12.004 ↗
32. Mutual Mentoring for Early-Career and Underrepresented Faculty: Model, Research, and Practice10.1007/s10755-016-9359-6 ↗
33. Mentoring as Assisted Performance: A pair of Chinese teachers working together10.1086/499698 ↗