journal article·2022-01-21Open access

ERT and GPR Prospecting Applied to Unsaturated and Subwater Analogue Archaeological Site in a Full Scale Laboratory

Luigi Capozzoli, Valeria Giampaolo, Gregory De Martino, Felice Perciante, Vincenzo Lapenna, Enzo Rizzo

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

Geophysical techniques are widely applied in the archaeological field to highlight variations of the physical behaviour of the subsoil due to the presence of ancient and buried remains., Considerable efforts are required to understand the complexity of the relationship between archaeological features and their geophysical response where saturated conditions occur. In the case of lacustrine and wetland scenarios, geophysical contrasts or electromagnetic signal attenuation effects drastically reduce the capabilities of the geophysical methodologies for the detection of structures in such conditions. To identify the capability of the electrical and electromagnetic methods in different water-saturated scenarios, an experimental activity was performed at the Hydrogeosite CNR laboratory. The test allowed us to analyze the limits and potentialities of an innovative approach based on the combined use of the ground-penetrating radar and 2D and 3D electrical resistivity tomographies. Results showed the effectiveness of the ground-penetrating radar for detecting archaeological remains also in quasi-saturated and underwater scenarios despite the em signal attenuation phenomena; whilst the results obtained involving the resistivity tomographies offered a new perspective for the archaeological purposes due to the use of the loop–loop shaped array. Moreover, the radar signal attenuation, resolution and depth of investigation do not allow to fully characterize the archaeological site as in the case of the scenarios with a limited geophysical contrast (i.e., water-saturated and arid scenarios). The experimental tests show that these limits can be only partially mitigated through the integration of the geophysical methodologies and further efforts are necessary for improving the results obtainable with an integrated use of the adopted geophysical methodologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Seismic Waves and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis, National Research Council, C.da S. Loja, 85050 Potenza, Italy

Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Integration of magnetometric, GPR and geoelectric measurements applied to the archaeological site of Viggiano (Southern Italy, Agri Valley-Basilicata)10.3997/1873-0604.2004025 ↗
2. Integration of remote sensing, geophysical surveys and arcaheological excavations for the study of a medieval mound (Tuscany, Italy)10.1002/arp.366 ↗
3. Integrated Geophysical and Archaeological Investigations of Aquinum in Frosinone, Italy10.1002/arp.409 ↗
4. Large-scale geophysical archaeological prospection pilot study at Viking Age and medieval sites in west Jutland, Denmark10.1002/arp.1576 ↗
5. Assessing the Condition of the Rock Mass over the Tunnel of Eupalinus in Samos (Greece) using both Conventional Geophysical Methods and Surface to Tunnel Electrical Resistivity Tomography10.1002/arp.1489 ↗
6. The Use of Geophysical Prospections to Map Ancient Hydraulic Works: The Triglio Underground Aqueduct (Apulia, Southern Italy)10.1002/arp.1541 ↗
7. Capozzoli, L., Catapano, I., De Martino, G., Gennarelli, G., Ludeno, G., Rizzo, E., Soldovieri, F., Uliano Scelza, F., and Zuchtriegel, G. (2020). The Discovery of a Buried Temple in Paestum: The Advantages of the Geophysical Multi-Sensor Application. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12172711 ↗
8. The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales10.1002/2015WR017016 ↗
9. Bowens, A. (2012). Underwater Archaeology—The NAS Guide to Principles and Practice, Nautical Archaeological Society. [2nd ed.].
10. Mc Carthy, J.K., Benjamin, J., Winton, T., and van Duivenvoorde, W. (2019). Quantifying Depth of Burial and Composition of Shallow Burie Archaeological Material: Integrated Sub-bottom Profiling and 3D Survey Approaches. 3D Recording and Interpretation for Maritime Archaeology, Springer.
11. Archaeological Applications of Low-Cost Integrated Sidescan Sonar/Single-Beam Echosounder Systems in Irish Inland Waterways10.1002/arp.1551 ↗
12. A Middle Palaeolithic site in the southern North Sea: Investigating the archaeology and palaeogeography of Area 24010.1002/jqs.2743 ↗
13. Integrated geophysical and (geo)archaeological explorations in wetlands10.1016/j.quaint.2018.04.008 ↗
14. Abramov, A., and Vasiliev, A. (2004, January 21–24). Underwater ground penetrating radar in archeological investigation below sea bottom. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, Delft, The Netherlands.
15. Under-water scene investigation using ground penetrating radar (GPR) in the search for a sunken jet ski, Northern Ireland10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71602-1 ↗
16. Integrating GPR and RIP methods for water surface detection of geological structures10.3319/TAO.2006.17.2.391(T) ↗
17. Underwater archaeological investigation using ground penetrating radar: A case analysis of Shanglinhu Yue Kiln sites (China)10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.04.018 ↗
18. Water penetrating radar10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126300 ↗
19. Sinkhole risk assessment by ERT: The case study of Sirino Lake (Basilicata, Italy)10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.028 ↗
20. Underwater ERT surveying in water with resistivity layering with example of application to site investigation for a rock tunnel in central Stockholm10.3997/1873-0604.2018007 ↗
21. Mc Carthy, J.K. (2019). Resolving Dimensions: A Comparison Between ERT Imaging and 3D Modelling of the Barge Crowie, South Australia. 3D Recording and Interpretation for Maritime Archaeology, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-03635-5 ↗
22. Practical considerations for shallow submerged archaeological prospection with 3-D electrical resistivity tomography
23. Apparent resistivity and spectral induced polarization in the submarine environment10.1590/S0001-37652001000300011 ↗
24. Delineation of fault zone beneath a riverbed by an electrical resistivity survey using a floating stream cable10.1071/EG05050 ↗
25. Freyer, P.A., Nyquist, J.E., and Toran, L.E. (2006). Use of underwater resistivity in the assessment of groundwater–surface water interaction within the burd run watershed. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 8, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society.10.4133/1.2923710 ↗
26. Losito, G., Aminti, P.L., Martelletti, L., Grandjean, J.-M., Mazzetti, A., Trova, A., and Benvenuti, G. (2007, January 11–14). Marine geoelectrical prospecting for soft structures characterization in shallow water: Field and laboratory test. Proceedings of the EAGE 69th Conference & Exhibition, London, UK.10.3997/2214-4609.201405103 ↗
27. Electrical resistivity imaging of the architecture of substream sediments10.1029/2008WR006968 ↗
28. Stream bottom resistivity tomography to map ground water discharge10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00432.x ↗
29. Marine electrical resistivity imaging of submarine groundwater discharge: Sensitivity analysis and application in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts, USA10.1007/s10040-009-0498-z ↗
30. Continuous resistivity profiling to delineate submarine groundwater discharge—Examples and limitations10.1190/1.2210056 ↗
31. Castilho, G., and Maia, D. (2008, January 6–10). A successful mixed land underwater 3D resistivity survey in an extremely challenging environment in Amazônia. Proceedings of the 21st EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.177.41 ↗
32. A new method for geoelectrical investigations underwater10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00140.x ↗
33. Aquatic electrical resistivity imaging of shallow-water wetlands10.1190/1.2750667 ↗
34. Inversion of Data from Electrical Resistivity Imaging Surveys in Water-Covered Areas10.1071/EG04266 ↗
35. First hydrogeophysical controlled experiments in the large lab-scale Hydrogeosite Laboratory (IMAA-CNR)
36. Capozzoli, L., Caputi, A., De Martino, G., Giampaolo, V., Luongo, R., Perciante, F., and Rizzo, E. (2015). Electrical and electromagnetic techniques applied to an archaeological framework reconstructed in laboratory. Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR), Proceedings of the 2015 8th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar, Firenze, Italy, 7–10 July 2015, IEEE.10.1109/IWAGPR.2015.7292655 ↗
37. Capozzoli, L., De Martino, G., Giampaolo, V., Perciante, F., and Rizzo, E. (2017). Geophysical techniques applied to investigate underwater structures. Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR), Proceedings of the 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar, Edimbourgh, Scotland, 28–30 June 2017, IEEE.10.1109/IWAGPR.2017.7996068 ↗
38. Ludeno, G., Capozzoli, L., Rizzo, E., Soldovieri, F., and Catapano, I. (2018). A Microwave Tomography Strategy for Underwater Imaging via Ground Penetrating Radar. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10091410 ↗
39. El-Qady, G., and Metwaly, M. (2019). Integrated Geophysical Techniques for Archaeological Remains: Real Cases and Full Scale Laboratory Example. Archaeogeophysics, Springer International Publishing AG, Part of Springer Nature. Chapter 13.
40. Goodman, D., and Piro, S. (2013). GPR Remote Sensing in Archaeology, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-31857-3 ↗
41. Daniels, D.J. (2004). Ground Penetrating Radar, The Institute of Electrical Engineers. [2nd ed.].10.1049/PBRA015E ↗
42. Ground penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02221.x ↗
43. Use of soil information to determine application of ground-penetrating radar10.1016/0926-9851(95)90033-0 ↗
44. Walther, E.G., Pitchford, A.M., and Olhoeft, G.R. (1986). A strategy for detecting subsurface organic contaminants. The Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water, Prevention, Detection and Restoration, National Water Well Association.
45. Searching for the History of the Ancient Basilicata: Archaeogeophysics Applied to the Roman Site of Forentum10.3390/heritage2020072 ↗
46. A communication on an archaeological radar experiment at Chaco Canyon, New Mexico
47. Ground penetrating radar survey at Wroxeter10.1002/1099-0763(200006)7:2<101::AID-ARP146>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
48. Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria: An approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data10.1002/arp.183 ↗
49. Ground-penetrating radar discovery at Petra, Jordan10.1017/S0003598X00090414 ↗
50. Multimethodological approach to study and characterise Forum Novum (Vescovio, Central Italy)10.1002/arp.235 ↗
51. The study and characterization of Emperor Traiano’s villa using high-resolution integrated geophysical surveys10.1002/arp.203 ↗
52. Magnetic Mapping, Ground Penetrating Radar Surveys and Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements for the Study of the Archaeological Site of Serra di Vaglio (Southern Italy)10.1016/j.jas.2003.10.011 ↗
53. Discovery of a 1st century AD Roman amphitheater and other structures at the Forum Novum by GPR10.4133/JEEG9.1.35 ↗
54. Extended comparison of different GPR systems and antenna configurations at the Roman site Carnuntum10.3997/1873-0604.2007021 ↗
55. Campana, S., and Piro, S. (2009). Seeing the Unseen—Geophysics and Landscape Archaeology, CRC Press.10.1201/9780203889558 ↗
56. From Celtiberians to Romans: Combined geophysical (3D GPR and fluxgate gradiometer) prospection for the archaeological characterization of Castro de la Magdalena (Leon, Spain)10.4000/archeosciences.1409 ↗
57. Three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar imaging of sedimentary structures, fractures, and archaeological features at submeter resolution10.1130/G20776.1 ↗
58. Full-resolution 3D imaging10.1190/1.1852780 ↗
59. Jol, H.M. (2009). Electromagnetic principles of ground penetrating radar. Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications, Elsevier.
60. Geophysical characterisation of Carlo’s V Castle (Crotone, Italy)10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.09.002 ↗
61. ArchaeoGeophysical methods in the Templo del Escalonado (Cahuachi, Nasca, Perù)10.3997/1873-0604.2010030 ↗
62. Geophysical survey and archaeological data at Masseria Grasso (BN, Italy)10.1007/s10712-018-9494-y ↗
63. Advances in GPR data acquisition and analysis for archaeology10.1093/gji/ggv121 ↗
64. Rubin, Y., and Hubbard, S.S. (2005). DC resistivity and induced polarization methods. Hydrogeophysics, Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3102-5 ↗
65. Using integrated 2D and 3D resistivity imaging methods for illustrating the mud-fluid conduits of the Wushanting mud volcanoes in southwestern Taiwan. Terr
66. Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00162.x ↗
67. Occams’ inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data10.1190/1.1442813 ↗
68. Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: A preliminary study10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb01159.x ↗
69. A large scale geophysical survey in the archaeological site of Europos (northern Greece)10.1016/0926-9851(94)90011-6 ↗
70. Cavity detection employing advanced geophysical techniques: A case study
71. Magnetic and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Investigations in a Roman Legionary Camp Site (Legio IV Scythica) in Zeugma, Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey10.1002/arp.332 ↗
72. Integrated geophysical survey to detect buried structures for archaeological prospecting. A case-history at Sabine Necropolis (Rome—Italy)10.3997/1873-0604.2007027 ↗
73. Quantifying tomb geometries in resistivity images using watershed algorithms10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.002 ↗
74. Marine electrical resistivity tomography for shipwreck detection in very shallow water: A case study from Agropoli (Salerno, Southern Italy)10.1016/j.jas.2010.03.004 ↗
75. The Ancient Roman Aqueduct of Karales (Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy): Applicability of Geophysics Methods to Finding the Underground Remains10.1002/arp.1471 ↗
76. A resistivity survey of a burial mound in the Valley of the Thracian Kings’10.1002/arp.273 ↗
77. Resistivity imaging survey of the Roman barrows at Bartlow, Cambridgeshire, UK10.1002/arp.287 ↗
78. Joint geophysical measurements to investigate the rossano of Vaglio archaeological site (Basilicata Region, Southern Italy)10.1016/j.jas.2010.03.021 ↗
79. 3D electrical prospection in the archaeological site El Pahñu, Hidalgo State, Central Mexico10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.034 ↗
80. Efficient 2D inversion of long ERT sections10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.03.022 ↗
81. Geophysical investigations in the archaeological site of Himera (Northern Sicily)10.3997/1873-0604.2007024 ↗
82. High resolution 3D ERT to help GPR data interpretation for researching archaeological items in a geologically complex subsurface10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.06.004 ↗
83. The role of integrated geophysical survey methods in the assessment of archaeological landscapes: The case of Portus10.1002/arp.358 ↗
84. GPR to constrain ERT data inversion in cavity searching: Theoretical and practical applications in archeology10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.11.006 ↗
85. Archaeological crop marks identified from Cosmo-SkyMed time series: The case of Han-Wei capital city, Luoyang, China10.1080/17538947.2016.1254686 ↗
86. Masini, N., Capozzoli, L., Chen, P., Chen, F., Romano, G., Lu, G., Tang, P., Sileo, M., Ge, Q., and Lasaponara, R. (2017). Towards an operational use of Remote Sensing in Archaeology in Henan (China): Archaeogeophysical investigations, approach and results in Kaifeng. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9080809 ↗
87. Urban Geophysical approach to characterize the subsoil of the main square in San Benedetto del Tronto town (Italy)10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.05.010 ↗
88. The pre-Roman hilltop settlement of Monte Torretta di Pietragalla: First results of the geophysical survey
89. Giovannoni, G. (1925). La Tecnica delle Costruzioni Presso i Romani, Società Editrice di Arte Illustrate.
90. Lugli, G. (1957). La Tecnica Edilizia Romana, Giovanni Bardi.
91. Adam, J.P. (1998). L’arte di Costruire Presso i Romani, Longanesi. Materiale e Tecniche.
92. Giuliani, C.F., and Ferretti, A.S. (1997). Opus cementicium. Il materiale e la tecnica costruttiva, Atti del seminario (Roma, facoltà di Ingegneria, 11/06/1997). Materie e Strutture, L’Erma di Bretschneider. fasc. 2–3.
93. Giuffrè, A. (1999). Letture sulla Meccanica delle Murature Storiche, Kappa Ed.
94. Le Pera, S. (1999). Come Costruivano Gli Antichi Romani: Brevi Note di Tecnica Edilizia, Palombi Editore.
95. Caleca, L. (2000). Architettura Tecnica, Flaccovio Editore.
96. Rocchietti, D. (2002). Aree Sepolcrali a Metaponto, Consiglio Regionale della Basilicata.
97. Giuliani, C.F. (2006). L’edilizia nell’Antichità, Carocci.
98. Advances in ERT inverse modelling
99. ResIPy, an intuitive open source software for complex geoelectrical inversion/modeling10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104423 ↗
100. Radar attenuation tomography using the centroid frequency downshift method10.1016/S0926-9851(98)00024-X ↗