journal article·2024-01

Modified Planar Sensors for Determination of Cefepime

E. G. Kulapina, R. K. Mursalov, O. I. Kulapina, V. D. Ankina, E. N. Cherdakova

Inorganic Materials· Volume 60· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Planar screen-printed potentiometric sensors sensitive to cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporine antibiotic, have been developed. Cefepime is an amphoteric antibiotic with the carboxyl and aminothiazole groups, which exists as a cation in strongly acidic media, a zwitterion in weakly acidic and neutral media, and an anion in alkaline media. The interval of pH 1.5–2.0 for obtaining the cationic electrode functions for the determination of cefepime has been established. The cefepime–tetraphenylborate associates have been used as electrode-active components; the optimum content of the latter for planar sensors is 2–3%. For the unmodified cefepime sensors, the electrode functions are linear in the range of 1 × 10–5–1 × 10–2 M, the angular coefficients are 50 ± 2 mV/pC, and the response time is 20 s. The role of the modifier, ZnO nanoparticles, in improving the electroanalytical properties of the sensors is shown. The introduction of a binary mixture of zinc oxide and cetylpyridinium chloride into carbon-based ink reduces the cefepime detection limit (1 × 10–6 M) and increases the angular coefficient (58 ± 1 mV/pC), the interval of linearity of the electrode functions (1 × 10–6–1 × 10–2 M), and the sensor response time (17 s). A surfactant used as an electrode surface co-modifier stabilizes the nanoparticle dispersion. The use of the modified screen-printed sensors for the cefepime determination in medicinal and biological media, in particular, in saliva, is demonstrated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Chauhan, N., Balayan, S., Gupta, S., et al., Enzyme-based sensing on nanohybrid film coated over FTO electrode for highly sensitive detection of antibiotics, Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng., 2021, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2469–2479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02618-310.1007/s00449-021-02618-3 ↗
2. Shahrokhian, S., Hosseini-Nassaba, N., and Ghalkhaniac, M., Construction of Pt nanoparticle-decorated graphene nanosheets and carbon nanospheres nanocomposite-modified electrodes: Application to ultrasensitive electrochemical determination of cefepime, RSC Adv., 2014, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 7786–7794. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra44309d10.1039/c3ra44309d ↗
3. Erkmen, C., Palabiyik, B.B., and Uslu, B., Sensitive electrochemical determination of Cefpirome in human urine using differential pulse voltammetry, Cumhuriyet Sci. J., 2021, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 593–601. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.90048310.17776/csj.900483 ↗
4. Kulapina, E.G., Kulapina, O.I., and Karenko, V.A., Potentiometric sensors for determination of cefepime in water and biological environments, Izv. Sarat. Univ. Nov. Ser., Ser. Khim. Biol. Ekol., 2016, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 138–143. https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9775-2016-16-2-138-14310.18500/1816-9775-2016-16-2-138-143 ↗
5. Papanna, R.K., Krishnegowda, J.B., and Nagaraja, P., Spectrophotometric method for the determination of cefepime, cefazolin sodium and cefalothin sodium in pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms by using ninhydrin, Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., 2015, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 194–199.
6. Hashim, H.J., Abood, N.K., and Nief, O.A., Spectroscopic estimation of cefepime by using batch, cloud point extraction and flow injection analysis methods, Egypt. J. Chem., 2021, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 6971–6800. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2021.62847.344010.21608/ejchem.2021.62847.3440 ↗
7. Farid, N.F. and Abdelwahab, N.S., New ecological method for determination of different β-lactams: application to real human plasma samples, RSC Adv., 2019, vol. 9, no. 34, pp. 19539–19548. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA02671A10.1039/C9RA02671A ↗
8. Abdel-Aziz, H., Tolba, M.M., El-Enany, N., et al., Green and sensitive spectrofluorimetric method for the determination of two cephalosporins in dosage forms, R. Soc. Open Sci., 2021, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 210329–210342. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.21032910.1098/rsos.210329 ↗
9. Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yan, Z., and Liao, S., Assay of ceftazidime and cefepime based on fluorescence quenching of carbon quantum dots, Lumenescence, 2015, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.287110.1002/bio.2871 ↗
10. Derayea, S.M., Hytham, M.A., Abdelmageed, O.H., and Haredy, A.M., New valid spectrofluorimetric method for determination of selected cephalosporins in different pharmaceutical formulations using safranin as fluorophore, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2016, vol. 153, pp. 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.10.00110.1016/j.saa.2015.10.001 ↗
11. El-Hamd, M.A., Alia, R., Haredy, A.M., et al., Application of Hantzsch reaction as a new method for spectrofluorimetric de termination of some cephalosporins, J. Appl. Pharm. Sci., 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 147–155. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2017.7022010.7324/JAPS.2017.70220 ↗
12. Legrand, T., Vodovar, D., Tournier, N., et al., Simultaneous determination of eight β-lactam antibiotics, amoxicillin, cefazolin, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cloxacillin, oxacillin, and piperacillin, in human plasma by using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detectio, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 2016, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 4734–4742. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00176-1610.1128/AAC.00176-16 ↗
13. Rehm, S. and Rentsch, K., HILIC LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of cefepime, imipenem and meropenem, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2020, vol. 186, pp. 113289–113296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.11328910.1016/j.jpba.2020.113289 ↗
14. Dabrowska, M., Opoka, W., and Starek, M., Determination of cefuroxime axetil and cefepime in biological materials by thin-layer chromatography—densitometry, J. Planar Chromatogr., 2017, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1556/1006.2017.30.4.910.1556/1006.2017.30.4.9 ↗
15. Bjergum, M.W., Barreto, E.F., Scheetz, M.H., et al., Stability and validation of a high-throughput LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin and tazobactam in Serum, J. Appl. Lab. Med., 2021, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1202–1212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfab03610.1093/jalm/jfab036 ↗
16. Bellouard, R., Deslandes, G., Morival, C., et al., Simultaneous determination of eight β-lactam antibiotics in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2020, vol. 178, pp. 112904–112912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2019.11290410.1016/j.jpba.2019.112904 ↗
17. Moorthy, G.S., Vedar, C., Zane, N.R., et al., Development and validation of a volumetric absorptive microsampling-liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method for the analysis of cefepime in human whole blood: Application to pediatric pharmacokinetic study, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2020, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 113002–113033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2019.11300210.1016/j.jpba.2019.113002 ↗
18. Kummer, M., Šestáková, N., Theurillat, R., and Thormann, W., Monitoring of cefepime in urine by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography with UV detection and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, J. Sep. Sci., 2018, vol. 41, no. 21, pp. 4067–4074. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.20180076310.1002/jssc.201800763 ↗
19. Al-Attas, A., Nasr, J.J., El-Enany, N., and Belal, F., A green capillary zone electrophoresis method for the simultaneous determination of piperacillin, tazobactam and cefepime in pharmaceutical formulations and human plasma, Biomed. Chromatogr., 2015, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1811–1818. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.350010.1002/bmc.3500 ↗
20. Saviano, M.A. and Lourenco, F.R., Rapid microbiological methods (RMMs) for evaluating the activity of cephalosporin antibiotics employing triphenyltetrazolium chloride, Talanta, 2018, vol. 185, pp. 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.04.02010.1016/j.talanta.2018.04.020 ↗
21. Kulapina, E.G., Kulapina, O.I., and Ankina, V.D., Screen-printed potentiometric sensors based on carbon materials for determining cefotaxime and cefuroxime, J. Anal. Chem., 2020, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106193482002010010.1134/S1061934820020100 ↗
22. Ali, R., Ali, H.R., Batakoushy, H.A., et al., A reductant colorimetric method for the rapid detection of certain cephalosporins via the production of gold and silver nanoparticles, Microchem. J., 2019, vol. 146, pp. 864–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.02.02310.1016/j.microc.2019.02.023 ↗
23. Kulapina, E.G., Tyutlikova, M.S., Kulapina, O.I., and Dubasova, A.E., Solid-contact potentiometric sensors for the determination of some cephalosporin antibiotics in pharmaceuticals and oral fluid, J. Anal. Chem., 2019, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106193481907012810.1134/S1061934819070128 ↗
24. Kulapina, E.G., Kulapina, O.I., Cherdakova, E.N., and Ankina, V.D., Potentiometric sensors sensitive to some cephalosporin antibiotics: Properties, application, J. Anal. Chem., 2022, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106193482208005610.1134/S1061934822080056 ↗
25. Pavón, E., Martín-Rodríguez, R., Perdigón, A., and Alba, M.D., New trends in nanoclay-modified sensors, Inorganics, 2021, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 43–66. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics906004310.3390/inorganics9060043 ↗
26. Ayad, M.F., Trabik, Y.A., Abdelrahman, M.H., et al., Potentiometric carbon quantum dots-based screen-printed arrays for nano-tracing gemifloxacin as a model fluoroquinolone implicated in antimicrobial resistance, Chemosensors, 2020, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 8–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors901000810.3390/chemosensors9010008 ↗
27. Shawky, A.M. and El-Tohamy, M.F., Highly functionalized modified metal oxides polymeric sensors for potentiometric determination of letrozole in commercial oral tablets and biosamples, Polymers, 2021, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1384–1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1309138410.3390/polym13091384 ↗
28. Govindasamy, M., Kumaravel, S., Ramalingam, R.J., et al., Facile synthesis of copper sulfide decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for high sensitive detection of toxic antibiotic in milk, Ultrason. Sonochem., 2019, vol. 52, pp. 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.12.01510.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.12.015 ↗
29. Shabani, R., Rizi, Z.L., and Moosavi, R., Selective potentiometric sensor for isoniazid ultra-trace determination based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode (Fe3O4/CPE), Int. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2018, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 241–249.
30. Veseli, A., Mullallari, F., Balidemaj, F., et al., Electrochemical determination of erythromycin in drinking water resources by surface modified screen-printed carbon electrodes, Microchem. J., 2019, vol. 148, pp. 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.04.08610.1016/j.microc.2019.04.086 ↗
31. Prinith, N.S. and Manjunatha, J.G., Surfactant modified electrochemical sensor for determination of anthrone—a cyclic voltammetry, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2019.05.00410.1016/j.mset.2019.05.004 ↗
32. Ziyatdinova, G., Ziganshina, E., and Budnikov, H., Electrooxidation of morin on glassy carbon electrode modified by carboxylated single-walled carbon nanotubes and surfactants, Electrochim. Acta, 2014, vol. 145, pp. 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.06210.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.062 ↗
33. Digua, K., Kauffmann, J.M., and Delplancke, J.L., Surfactant modified carbon paste electrode: Part 1: Electrochemical and microscopic characterization, Electroanalysis, 1994, vol. 6, nos. 5–6, pp. 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.114006051510.1002/elan.1140060515 ↗
34. Ali, T.A., Abd-Elaal, A.A., and Mohamed, G.G., Screen printed ion selective electrodes based on self-assembled thiol surfactant-gold-nanoparticles for determination of Cu (II) in different water samples, Microchem. J., 2021, vol. 160, p. 105693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.10569310.1016/j.microc.2020.105693 ↗
35. Ali, T.A. and Al-Sabagh, A., Synthesis of thiol amine surfactant for sensor fabrication to determine chromium (III) ions in different water samples, Egypt. J. Chem., 2020, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 177–185. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2020.37861.278010.21608/ejchem.2020.37861.2780 ↗
36. Ziyatdinova, G.K., Romashkina, S.A., Ziganshina, E.R., and Budnikov, H.C., Voltammetric determination of thymol on an electrode modified by coimmobilized carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes and surfactants, J. Anal. Chem., 2018, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106193481801014810.1134/S1061934818010148 ↗
37. Ziyatdinova, G.K. and Budnikov, H.C., Voltammetric determination of tartrazine on an electrode modified with cerium dioxide nanoparticles and cetyltriphenylphosphonium bromide, J. Anal. Chem., 2022, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 664–670. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106193482206017X10.1134/S106193482206017X ↗
38. Mashkovsky, M.D., Lekarstvennye sredstva (Medicines), Moscow: Novaya Volna, 2021.
39. Alekseev, V.G., Bioneorganicheskaya khimiya penitsillinov i tsefalosporinov (Bioinorganic Chemistry of Penicillins and Cephalosporins), Tver’: Tver. Gos. Univ., 2009.
40. Maryanov, B.M., Metod linearizatsii v instrumental’noi titrimetrii (Linearization Method in Instrumental Titrimetry), Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2001.
41. Belyustin, A.A., Potentsiometriya: fiziko-khimicheskiye osnovy i primeneniya (Potentiometry: Physical and Chemical Basics and Applications), St. Petersburg: Lan’, 2015.
42. Teubl, B.J., Stojkovic, B., Docter, D., et al., The effect of saliva on the fate of nanoparticles, Clin. Oral Invest., 2018, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2172-510.1007/s00784-017-2172-5 ↗
43. Savinov, S.S. and Anisimov, A.A., Effect of conditions for sampling of human saliva on the results of determination of macro and micronutrients, J. Anal. Chem., 2020, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106193482004013910.1134/S1061934820040139 ↗