journal article·2020-10-02Open access

A Numerical Evaluation of Structural Hot-Spot Stress Methods in Rib-To-Deck Joint of Orthotropic Steel Deck

Nouman Iqbal, Heng Fang, Ahsan Naseem, Muhammad Kashif, Hans De Backer

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 19

Abstract

This study numerically investigates the limitations of structural hot-spot stress (SHSS) methods and proposes a guideline for the calculation of hot-spot stresses, which can be used for the better evaluation of fatigue-related problems. Four different SHSS evaluation methods have been applied to the rib-to-deck (RD) welded joint in orthotropic steel deck (OSD). These methods are used to calculate SHSS at this critical joint utilizing finite element analyses (FEA) based software Siemens NX.12. The limitations and the accuracy of these methods have been observed under different element types and meshing techniques. Moreover, the effect of the nodal-averaging feature is being studied. Two types of governing stresses are produced by the application of Eurocode fatigue load model-4. Essentially, the bending in deck-plate produces highly non-linear stress at the deck-toe, and the membrane effect in rib-plate generates linear stress at the rib-toe. Guidelines are proposed considering different parameters on these two stress states by applying SHSS evaluation methods. In comparison to other SHSS approaches, the International Institute of Welding (IIW) quadratic stress extrapolation (QSE) method shows better results for solid single-element, and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) through thickness stress linearization (TTSL) method stands out in solid cubic-mesh technique. In general, shell elements have more consistent SHSS results as compared to solid elements for both stress states.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 60, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Niemi, E., Fricke, W., and Maddox, S.J. (2018). Structural Hot-Spot Stress Approach to Fatigue Analysis of Welded Components, IIW Collection, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-5568-3 ↗
2. (2005). EN 1993-1-9: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures—Part 1–9: Fatigue, Eurocode.
3. Hobbacher, A.F. (2016). IIW Collection Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-23757-2 ↗
4. Radaj, D., Sonsino, C.M., and Fricke, W. (2006). Fatigue Assessment of Welded Joints by Local Approaches (Second Edition), Woodhead Publishing.10.1201/9781439832806 ↗
5. Some new methods for predicting fatigue in welded joints10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00174-8 ↗
6. Lotsberg, I. (2016). Fatigue Design of Marine Structures, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316343982 ↗
7. Residual weld stresses in stiffener-to-deck plate weld of an orthotropic steel deck10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.05.015 ↗
8. Van Puymbroeck, E., Nagy, W., Schotte, K., Ul-Abdin, Z., and de Backer, H. (2019). Determination of residual welding stresses in a steel bridge component by finite element modeling of the incremental hole-drilling method. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9030536 ↗
9. Stress analyses and fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck joints in steel orthotropic decks10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.10.008 ↗
10. Fatigue Evaluation of Rib-to-Deck Welded Joints of Orthotropic Steel Bridge Deck10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000181 ↗
11. European Standards (2005). EN 1991-2: Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 2: Traffic Loads on Bridges, Eurocode.
12. Department of Energy (1990). Offshore Installations: Guidance on Design, Construction and Certification, H.M.S.O.
13. De Back, J. (1987). The Design Aspects and Fatigue Behaviour of Tubular Joints, Elsevier Science Publishers.
14. British Standards (2014). BS 7608:2014: Guide to Fatigue Design and Assessment of Steel Products, British Standards Institution.
15. Finite element methods for structural hot spot stress determination—A comparison of procedures10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.04.003 ↗
16. Wardenier, J. (1982). Hollow Section Joints, Delft University Press.
17. Marshall, P.W. (2013). Design of Welded Tubular Connections: Basis and Use of AWS Code Provisions, AWS Inc.
18. American Welding Society (2020). Structural Welding Code-Steel, an American National Standard, AWS Inc.. [24th ed.].
19. API (2014). API Recommended Practice 2A-WSD. Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms-Working Stress Design, API Publishers. [22nd ed.].
20. The ASME Code and 3D Stress Evaluation10.1115/1.2928784 ↗
21. ASME BPVC.VIII.2 (2017). ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, an International Code, Division 2 SECTION VIII Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, The ASME Publishers.
22. European Standards (2011). EN 1993-2: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures—Part 2: Steel Bridges, Eurocode.