journal article·2024-08-01Open access

Exploring Usability, Emotional Responses, Flow Experience, and Technology Acceptance in VR: A Comparative Analysis of Freeform Creativity and Goal-Directed Training

Yu-Min Fang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 15

Abstract

This study compared two virtual reality (VR) interaction modes and assessed differences in characteristics, namely usability, emotional responses, flow experience, technology acceptance, activity effectiveness, preference, and satisfaction, aiming to gain insights for proposing design suggestions. The two types of VR interaction examined were freeform creativity, which enabled users to autonomously explore and create using the Gravity Sketch drawing program, and goal-directed training, which involved structured task completion by using a VR dumbbell exercise program developed with Unity. This study involved 33 participants and revealed three key findings. First, both VR modes exhibited excellent results in terms of flow experience, technology acceptance, preference, and satisfaction and evoked strong positive emotions. They also demonstrated shared VR advantages, including overcoming screen constraints and facilitating three-dimensional spatial activities. Second, compared with goal-directed training, freeform creativity elicited greater levels of pleasure, evoked more intense emotional responses, and demonstrated superior performance across related indicators. Third, in terms of usability, goal-directed training surpassed freeform creativity, particularly in overall responsiveness, simplicity, and clarity of information presentation, and learnability, underscoring the importance of enhancing usability for complex tasks in VR application design. These findings offer valuable insights for crafting more appealing, practical, and user-friendly VR systems in the future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Flow Experience in Various Fields · Color perception and design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Design, National United University, Miaoli 36003, Taiwan

Funding

National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.003 ↗
2. Diemer, J., Alpers, G.W., Peperkorn, H.M., Shiban, Y., and Mühlberger, A. (2015). The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Front. Psychol., 6.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026 ↗
3. Comparison of the Usability and Flow Experience of an Exercise Promotion Virtual Reality Program for Different Age Groups10.1080/0144929X.2021.1938680 ↗
4. Fang, Y.M., and Kao, T.L. (2023). Comparisons of Emotional Responses, Flow Experiences, and Operational Performances in Traditional Parametric Computer-Aided Design Modeling and Virtual-Reality Free-Form Modeling. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13116568 ↗
5. Fang, Y.M., and Lin, C. (2019). The Usability Testing of VR Interface for Tourism Apps. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9163215 ↗
6. Krueger, M.K. (1991). Artificial Reality II, Addison-Wesley Professional.
7. Virtual reality: Opportunities and challenges
8. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety, Jossey-Bass.
9. Evaluating display fidelity and interaction fidelity in a virtual reality game10.1109/TVCG.2012.43 ↗
10. Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion is Enough?10.1109/MC.2007.257 ↗
11. A Model of Playfulness and Flow in Virtual Reality Interactions10.1162/1054746041944777 ↗
12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. (1992). Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, Cambridge University Press.
13. Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184 ↗
14. -L.; An, M.; Han, J.J.; Lee, J. Telepresence, Time Distortion, and Consumer Traits of Virtual Reality Shopping10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.056 ↗
15. Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence: Evidence from social media use10.1016/j.im.2016.05.001 ↗
16. França, A.C.P. (2018). de, J. Neto, P.
17. Soares, M.M. Methods and Procedures to Usability Testing in Virtual Reality Systems. Advances in Ergonomics in Design, Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Ergonomics in Design, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 17-21 July 2017, Springer.
18. An investigation of the efficacy of collaborative virtual reality systems for moderated remote usability testing10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.011 ↗
19. Hald, K., Rehm, M., and Moeslund, T.B. (2018, January 20–21). Testing Augmented Reality Systems for Spotting Sub-Surface Impurities. Proceedings of the IFIP Working Conference on Human Work Interaction Design, Proceedings of 5th IFIP WG 13.6 Working Conference, HWID 2018, Espoo, Finland.
20. Liu, Y.F., Yang, N., Li, A., Paterson, J., McPherson, D., Cheng, T., and Yang, A.Y. (2018, January 15–20). Usability Evaluation for Drone Mission Planning in Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1007/978-3-319-91584-5_25 ↗
21. An investigation of a healthcare management system with the use of multimodal interaction and 3D simulation: A technical note10.1108/17410391311289622 ↗
22. Tullis, T.S., and Stetson, J.N. (2004, January 7–11). A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability. Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Association (UPA) 2004 Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
23. Chin, J.P., Diehl, V.A., and Norman, K.L. (1988, January 15–19). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Washington, DC, USA.10.1145/57167.57203 ↗
24. Individual differences in autonomic response: Conditioned association or conditioned fear?10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01649.x ↗
25. Creighton, J.E., and Titchener, E.B. (1894). Lectures on Human and Animal Psychology, Aberdeen University Press.
26. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 ↗
27. Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.79 ↗
28. Ajzen and Fishbein’s theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: A confirmatory analysis10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.98 ↗
29. Lala, G. (2014, January 7–8). The emergence and development of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Proceedings of the Marketing from Information to Decision, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
30. Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 ↗
31. Reliability generalization of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intentions10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.01 ↗