Discrepancies in Cephalometric Analysis Results between Orthodontists and Radiologists and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Cephalometry is a crucial examination in orthodontic diagnostics and during the planning of orthognathic surgical procedures. The objective of this article was to compare cephalometric measurements conducted by different specialists and systems tailored for such measurements, as well as to evaluate the capabilities of artificial intelligence in this field. In January 2024, we conducted electronic searches in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) databases. In the Scopus database, the results were refined to titles, abstracts, and keywords, while in PubMed, they were narrowed down to titles and abstracts. In WoS, the results were refined only to abstracts. The search criteria were based on the following terms: (cephalometric) AND (analysis) AND (discrepancy) AND ((orthodontic) OR (radiologist)). A total of 263 articles were identified, of which 17 met the criteria and were incorporated into the review. The review allowed us to conclude that the accuracy of cephalometric measurements relied on the expertise of the operator—specialists with more experience exhibited greater precision compared to novices or individuals not specialized in orthodontics. Cephalometric measurement computer programs yielded outcomes that streamlined work processes, minimized human errors, and enhanced precision. A novel aspect involved the application of artificial intelligence, which also demonstrated high precision and a substantial reduction in working time, although its utilization still necessitates further enhancements. Further research was required to address these limitations and to optimize the incorporation of technology in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery practices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Radiography and Imaging · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Gabinet Ortodontyczny Piotr Smołka, Pomorska 32, 50-218 Wroclaw, Poland
Maxillofacial Surgery Ward, EMC Hospital, Pilczycka 144, 54-144 Wroclaw, Poland
Health Department, Academy of Applied Sciences, Academy of Silesius, Zamkowa 4, 58-300 Walbrzych, Poland
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Preclinical Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland
Oral Surgery Department, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland
Faculty of Dentistry, Medical University of Wroclaw, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland
Department of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Division of Facial Abnormalities, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland
Funding
Wroclaw Medical University
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgical Planning Using Three-Dimensional Virtual Techniques Compared with Conventional Two-Dimensional Techniques: A Systematic Review
2. Accuracy of Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2 ↗
3. Cone Beam Computed Tomography—Know Its Secrets
4. Comparison of Reliability in Anatomical Landmark Identification Using Two-Dimensional Digital Cephalometrics and Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Vivo10.1259/dmfr/81889955 ↗
5. The Reliability of Cephalometric Measurements in Oral and Maxillofacial Imaging: Cone Beam Computed Tomography versus Two-Dimensional Digital Cephalograms10.4103/0970-9290.191884 ↗
6. Li, C., Teixeira, H., Tanna, N., Zheng, Z., Chen, S.H.Y., Zou, M., and Chung, C.H. (2021). The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study. Diagnostics, 11.10.3390/diagnostics11122292 ↗
7. Gkantidis, N., Opacic, J., Kanavakis, G., Katsaros, C., and Halazonetis, D. (2023). Facial Asymmetry and Midsagittal Plane Definition in 3D: A Bias-Free, Automated Method. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0294528 ↗
8. Landmark-Based Midsagittal Plane Analysis in Patients with Facial Symmetry and Asymmetry Based on Cbct Analysis Tomography10.1007/s00056-018-0151-3 ↗
9. A Three-Dimensional Comparison of a Morphometric and Conventional Cephalometric Midsagittal Planes for Craniofacial Asymmetry10.1007/s00784-011-0512-4 ↗
10. Automated Localization of Mandibular Landmarks in the Construction of Mandibular Median Sagittal Plane10.1186/s40001-024-01681-2 ↗
11. Three-Dimensional Positioning of the Maxilla Using Novel Intermediate Splints in Maxilla-First Orthognathic Surgery for Correction of Skeletal Class III Deformity10.1007/s00784-024-05526-4 ↗
12. Value-Based Analysis of Virtual Versus Traditional Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery10.1097/SCS.0000000000006426 ↗
13. Does a Learning Curve Exist for Accuracy in Three-Dimensional Planning for Maxillary Positioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery?10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.005 ↗
14. Assessment of the Reliability and Repeatability of Landmarks Using 3-D Cephalometric Software10.1179/crn.2012.039 ↗
15. Reliability of Different Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarks in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review10.2319/042018-302.1 ↗
16. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Utilisation of Imaging Modalities in Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of in-Vitro Studies10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24221 ↗
17. Revolutionizing Dental Imaging: A Comprehensive Study on the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology
18. Applications, Functions, and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Restorative Dentistry: A Literature Review10.1111/jerd.13079 ↗
19. Comparison of Landmark Identification and Linear and Angular Measurements in Conventional and Digital Cephalometry
20. Are Orthodontic Landmarks and Variables in Digital Cephalometric Radiography Taken in Fixed and Natural Head Positions Reliable?10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.024 ↗
21. Wilkat, M., Liu, S., Schwerter, M., Schrader, F., Saigo, L., Karnatz, N., Kübler, N.R., and Rana, M. (2023). A New Approach to Virtual Occlusion in Orthognathic Surgery Planning Using Mixed Reality—A Technical Note and Review of the Literature. J. Pers. Med., 13.10.3390/jpm13121709 ↗
22. Zammit, D., Ettinger, R.E., Sanati-Mehrizy, P., and Susarla, S.M. (2023). Current Trends in Orthognathic Surgery. Medicina, 59.10.3390/medicina59122100 ↗
23. A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Virtual Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Based on Randomized Clinical Trials10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.005 ↗
24. Reliability of Natural Head Position in Orthodontic Diagnosis: A Cephalometric Study10.4103/0976-237X.96824 ↗
25. Reliability and Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarks Using CBCT: A Systematic Review10.1590/1678-775720140336 ↗
26. Evaluation of PICO as a Knowledge Representation for Clinical Questions
27. Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., and Brennan, S.E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, 372.10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗
28. Homa, K., Zakrzewski, W., Dobrzyński, W., Piszko, P.J., Piszko, A., Matys, J., Wiglusz, R.J., and Dobrzyński, M. (2024). Surface Functionalization of Titanium-Based Implants with a Nanohydroxyapatite Layer and Its Impact on Osteoblasts: A Systematic Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 15.10.3390/jfb15020045 ↗
29. Piszko, P.J., Piszko, A., Kiryk, J., Lubojański, A., Dobrzyński, W., Wiglusz, R.J., Matys, J., and Dobrzyński, M. (2024). The Influence of Fluoride Gels on the Physicochemical Properties of Tooth Tissues and Dental Materials—A Systematic Review. Gels, 10.10.3390/gels10020098 ↗
30. Murias, I., Grzech-Leśniak, K., Murias, A., Walicka-Cupryś, K., Dominiak, M., Deeb, J.G., and Matys, J. (2022). Efficacy of Various Laser Wavelengths in the Surgical Treatment of Ankyloglossia: A Systematic Review. Life, 12.10.3390/life12040558 ↗
31. Kowalski, J., Rygas, J., Homa, K., Dobrzyński, W., Wiglusz, R.J., Matys, J., and Dobrzyński, M. (2023). Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Gutta-Percha—A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14010388 ↗
32. Struzik, N., Wiśniewska, K., Piszko, P.J., Piszko, A., Kiryk, J., Matys, J., and Dobrzyński, M. (2024). SEM Studies Assessing the Efficacy of Laser Treatment for Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14031107 ↗
33. Matys, J., Kensy, J., Gedrange, T., Zawiślak, I., Grzech-Leśniak, K., and Dobrzyński, M. (2024). A Molecular Approach for Detecting Bacteria and Fungi in Healthcare Environment Aerosols: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25.10.3390/ijms25084154 ↗
34. Kensy, J., Dobrzyński, M., Wiench, R., Grzech-Leśniak, K., and Matys, J. (2021). Fibroblasts Adhesion to Laser-Modified Titanium Surfaces—A Systematic Review. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14237305 ↗
35. Rajewska, J., Kowalski, J., Matys, J., Dobrzyński, M., and Wiglusz, R.J. (2023). The Use of Lactide Polymers in Bone Tissue Regeneration in Dentistry—A Systematic Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.10.3390/jfb14020083 ↗
36. Rygas, J., Matys, J., Wawrzyńska, M., Szymonowicz, M., and Dobrzyński, M. (2023). The Use of Graphene Oxide in Orthodontics—A Systematic Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.10.3390/jfb14100500 ↗
37. Wiench, R., Skaba, D., Matys, J., and Grzech-Leśniak, K. (2021). Efficacy of Toluidine Blue—Mediated Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on Candida Spp. A Systematic Review. Antibiotics, 10.10.3390/antibiotics10040349 ↗
38. Effectiveness of Lasers and APDT in Elimination of Intraoral Halitosis: A Systematic Review Based on Clinical Trials10.1007/s10103-022-03656-3 ↗
39. Enhanced Speed and Precision of Measurement in a Computer-Assisted Digital Cephalometric Analysis System
40. The Integumental Profile: A Reflection of the Underlying Skeletal Configuration?10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70084-2 ↗
41. The Effects of Differences in Landmark Identification on the Cephalometric Measurements in Traditional Versus Digitized Cephalometry
42. Outcomes in Computer-Assisted Surgical Simulation for Orthognathic Surgery10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824cd46b ↗
43. Paraconsistent Artificial Neural Network as Auxiliary in Cephalometric Diagnosis10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.00994.x ↗
44. A Comparison of Cephalometric Measurements: A Picture Archiving and Communication System versus the Hand-Tracing Method-a Preliminary Study10.1093/ejo/cjq087 ↗
45. An Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Landmark Identification Using Scanned Cephalometric Images10.1093/ortho/28.3.221 ↗
46. Ceph-X: Development and Evaluation of 2D Cephalometric System10.1186/s12859-016-1370-5 ↗
47. Reliability and Validity of a Modified Lateral Cephalometric Analysis for Evaluation of Craniofacial Morphology and Growth in Patients with Clefts10.1097/00001665-200405000-00010 ↗
48. Evaluation and Comparison of Smartphone Application Tracing, Web Based Artificial Intelligence Tracing and Conventional Hand Tracing Methods10.1016/j.jormas.2022.07.017 ↗
49. Comparative Evaluation of CephNinja for Android and NemoCeph for Computer for Cephalometric Analysis: A Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Performance of CephNinja for Cephalometric Analysis10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_4_20 ↗
50. A Comparison of Hand-Tracing and Cephalometric Analysis Computer Programs with and without Advanced Features—Accuracy and Time Demands10.1093/ejo/cjq009 ↗
51. A Comparison of Scanned Lateral Cephalograms with Corresponding Original Radiographs10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.029 ↗
52. The Reliability and Reproducibility of an Android Cephalometric Smartphone Application in Comparison with the Conventional Method10.2319/042320-345.1 ↗
53. Automatic Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking via Deep Learning10.1177/00220345221112333 ↗
54. Evaluation and Comparison of Anatomical Landmark Detection Methods for Cephalometric X-ray Images: A Grand Challenge10.1109/TMI.2015.2412951 ↗
55. Accuracy of 3D Cephalometric Measurements Based on an Automatic Knowledge-Based Landmark Detection Algorithm10.1007/s11548-015-1334-7 ↗
56. Artificial Intelligence and Ethics in Dentistry: A Scoping Review10.1177/00220345211013808 ↗
57. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Restorative Dentistry: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.010 ↗
58. Shetty, S., Gali, S., Augustine, D., and Sowmya, S.V. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Systems in Dental Shade-Matching: A Systematic Review. J. Prosthodont., 1–14.10.1111/jopr.13805 ↗
59. Artificial Intelligence Models for Tooth-Supported Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.001 ↗
60. Ahmed, N., Abbasi, M.S., Zuberi, F., Qamar, W., Halim, M.S.B., Maqsood, A., and Alam, M.K. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Techniques: Analysis, Application, and Outcome in Dentistry—A Systematic Review. Biomed. Res. Int., 2021.10.1155/2021/9751564 ↗
61. Prasad, S., Arunachalam, S., Boillat, T., Ghoneima, A., Gandedkar, N., and Diar-Bakirly, S. (2023). Wearable Orofacial Technology and Orthodontics. Dent. J., 11.10.3390/dj11010024 ↗
62. Perrotti, G., Baccaglione, G., Clauser, T., Testarelli, L., Fabbro, M.D., and Testori, T. (2021). Total Face Approach (TFA): A Novel 3D Approach to Describe the Main Cephalometric Craniomaxillofacial Parameters. Methods Protoc., 4.10.3390/mps4010015 ↗
63. New 3-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.010 ↗
64. 3D Technology Used for Precision in Orthodontics
65. The Relationship between 3D Dentofacial Photogrammetry Measurements and Traditional Cephalometric Measurements10.2319/120317-825.1 ↗
66. Accuracy of Automated 3D Cephalometric Landmarks by Deep Learning Algorithms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1007/s11547-023-01629-2 ↗
67. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Best Practices Using Machine Learning to Assess Surgical Expertise in Virtual Reality Simulation10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.015 ↗
68. The Effect of Head Rotation on Cephalometric Radiographs10.1093/ejo/cjh098 ↗
69. Virtual and Traditional Surgical Planning in Orthognathic Surgery—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.07.007 ↗
70. Automated Detection of Cephalometric Landmarks Using Deep Neural Patchworks10.1259/dmfr.20230059 ↗
71. Accuracy of Linear Measurements Using Three Imaging Modalities: Two Lateral Cephalograms and One 3D Model from CBCT Data10.1093/ejo/cju036 ↗
72. Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review10.1111/ocr.12034 ↗