Investigating User Experience of an Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation Based on a Gesture-Based User Interface
Source abstract
Abstract
The affordability of equipment and availability of development tools have made immersive virtual reality (VR) popular across research fields. Gesture-based user interface has emerged as an alternative method to handheld controllers to interact with the virtual world using hand gestures. Moreover, a common goal for many VR applications is to elicit a sense of presence in users. Previous research has identified many factors that facilitate the evocation of presence in users of immersive VR applications. We investigated the user experience of Four Seasons, an immersive virtual reality simulation where the user interacts with a natural environment and animals with their hands using a gesture-based user interface (UI). We conducted a mixed-method user experience evaluation with 21 Korean adults (14 males, 7 females) who played Four Seasons. The participants filled in a questionnaire and answered interview questions regarding presence and experience with the gesture-based UI. The questionnaire results indicated high ratings for presence and gesture-based UI, with some issues related to the realism of interaction and lack of sensory feedback. By analyzing the interview responses, we identified 23 potential presence factors and proposed a classification for organizing presence factors based on the internal–external and dynamic–static dimensions. Finally, we derived a set of design principles based on the potential presence factors and demonstrated their usefulness for the heuristic evaluation of existing gesture-based immersive VR experiences. The results of this study can be used for designing and evaluating presence-evoking gesture-based VR experiences.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Action Observation and Synchronization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Digital Media, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Education of Korea · Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Virtual Reality in Tourism: A State-of-the-Art Review10.1108/TR-03-2017-0049 ↗
2. Research Progress on Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) in Tourism and Hospitality: A Critical Review of Publications from 2000 to 2018
3. What Is the Relationship between the Sense of Presence and Learning in Virtual Reality? A 24-Year Systematic Literature Review10.1162/pres_a_00350 ↗
4. A Scoping Review of Immersive Virtual Reality in STEM Education10.1109/TLT.2020.3019405 ↗
5. A Systematic Review of Immersive Virtual Reality Applications for Higher Education: Design Elements, Lessons Learned, and Research Agenda10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 ↗
6. Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation
7. Evaluation of a VR Prototype for Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Attentional Functions
8. (2024, May 08). International Society for Presence Research the Concept of Presence: Explication Statement. Available online: https://ispr.info/about-presence-2/about-presence/.
9. Louis, T., Troccaz, J., Rochet-Capellan, A., and Bérard, F. (2019, January 10–13). Is It Real? Measuring the Effect of Resolution, Latency, Frame Rate and Jitter on the Presence of Virtual Entities. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.10.1145/3343055.3359710 ↗
10. Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey10.1089/109493101300117884 ↗
11. Factors Affecting Sense of Presence in a Virtual Reality Social Environment: A Qualitative Study10.1089/cyber.2018.0128 ↗
12. Presence Equation: An Investigation into Cognitive Factors Underlying Presence10.1162/105474603322761315 ↗
13. A Systematic Literature Review on Vision Based Gesture Recognition Techniques10.1007/s11042-018-5971-z ↗
14. Huang, T.S. (1995, January 26–28). Hand Gesture Modeling, Analysis, and Synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Zurich, Switzerland.
15. Vision-Based Gesture Recognition: A Review
16. Manipulating Presence Influences the Magnitude of Virtual Reality Analgesia10.1016/j.pain.2004.06.013 ↗
17. Presence and Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Are Negatively Related: A Review10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00158 ↗
18. Mann, S. (2002). Adaptive and Learning Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control, John and Wiley and Sons.
19. Direct Manipulation Interfaces10.1207/s15327051hci0104_2 ↗
20. The Impact of Controller Naturalness on Spatial Presence, Gamer Enjoyment, and Perceived Realism in a Tennis Simulation Video Game10.1162/PRES_a_00053 ↗
21. Emerging NUI-Based Methods for User Authentication: A New Taxonomy and Survey10.1109/TBIOM.2019.2893297 ↗
22. Natural User Interface Model of Digital Comics- Focus of Hand Gesture Interface-10.17280/jdd.2013.13.3.032 ↗
23. The Effect of Gesture Based Interface on Presence Perception and Performance in the Virtual Reality Learning Environment10.29318/KER.23.1.2 ↗
24. Zimmerman, T.G., Lanier, J., Blanchard, C., Bryson, S., and Harvill, Y. (1986, January 5–9). A Hand Gesture Interface Device. Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/29933.275628 ↗
25. Guzsvinecz, T., Szucs, V., and Sik-Lanyi, C. (2019). Suitability of the Kinect Sensor and Leap Motion Controller—A Literature Review. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19051072 ↗
26. (2022, February 11). Ultraleap Digital Worlds That Feel Human. Available online: https://www.ultraleap.com/.
27. Hand Gesture Recognition with Focus on Leap Motion: An Overview, Real World Challenges and Future Directions10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120125 ↗
28. The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights10.1162/105474601300343603 ↗
29. The Factor Structure of the Presence Questionnaire10.1162/105474605323384654 ↗
30. The Role of Plausibility in the Experience of Spatial Presence in Virtual Environments10.3389/frvir.2020.00002 ↗
31. Empathy and Embodied Experience in Virtual Environment: To What Extent Can Virtual Reality Stimulate Empathy and Embodied Experience?10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012 ↗
32. Audio in VR: Effects of a Soundscape and Movement-Triggered Step Sounds on Presence10.3389/frobt.2020.00020 ↗
33. Context Analysis to Support Development of Virtual Reality Applications10.1007/s10055-004-0130-4 ↗
34. Telepresence via Television: Two Dimensions of Telepresence May Have Different Connections to Memory and Persuasion10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00073.x ↗
35. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 ↗
36. Saldana, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, SAGE Publications.
37. Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., Otero-González, I., Mikic-Fonte, F.A., and Llamas-Nistal, M. (2021). A Systematic Review of Commercial Smart Gloves: Current Status and Applications. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21082667 ↗
38. Talukdar, N., and Yu, S. (2021). Breaking the Psychological Distance: The Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality on Perceived Novelty and User Satisfaction. J. Strateg. Mark., 1–25.10.1080/0965254X.2021.1967428 ↗
39. Designing Engaging Games for Education: A Systematic Literature Review on Game Motivators and Design Principles10.1109/TLT.2020.3018503 ↗
40. Place Illusion and Plausibility Can Lead to Realistic Behaviour in Immersive Virtual Environments10.1098/rstb.2009.0138 ↗
41. Body in the Interactive Game: How Interface Embodiment Affects Physical Activity and Health Behavior Change10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.067 ↗
42. Sutcliffe, A. (2010). Designing for User Engagement: Aesthetic and Attractive User Interfaces, Springer. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics (SLHCI).10.1007/978-3-031-02188-6 ↗
43. Estimating Cybersickness from Virtual Reality Applications10.1007/s10055-020-00446-6 ↗
44. Why and How to Use Virtual Reality to Study Human Social Interaction: The Challenges of Exploring a New Research Landscape10.1111/bjop.12290 ↗
45. The Three Eras of Mobile Learning User Experience10.1007/978-3-319-94640-5_11 ↗
46. The Advantages of Virtual Reality in Skill Development Training Based on Project Comparison (2009–2018)
47. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View10.2307/30036540 ↗
48. Grand View Research (2023, December 06). Virtual Reality in Gaming Market Size Report. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/virtual-reality-in-gaming-market#.
49. Vosinakis, S., Koutsabasis, P., Makris, D., and Sagia, E. (2016, January 7–9). A Kinesthetic Approach to Digital Heritage Using Leap Motion: The Cycladic Sculpture Application. Proceedings of the 2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/VS-GAMES.2016.7590334 ↗
50. Bachmann, D., Weichert, F., and Rinkenauer, G. (2018). Review of Three-Dimensional Human-Computer Interaction with Focus on the Leap Motion Controller. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18072194 ↗
51. Zielasko, D., and Riecke, B.E. (2021). To Sit or Not to Sit in VR: Analyzing Influences and (Dis)Advantages of Posture and Embodied Interaction. Computers, 10.10.3390/computers10060073 ↗
52. Hearts, Clubs, Diamonds, Spades: Players Who Suit MUDs
53. Formative Evaluation of an Adaptive Game for Engaging Learners of Programming Concepts in K-1210.17083/ijsg.v5i2.220 ↗
54. How to Get There When You Are There Already? Defining Presence in Virtual Reality and the Importance of Perceived Realism10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628298 ↗
55. A Discussion of Cybersickness in Virtual Environments10.1145/333329.333344 ↗
56. Moon, J., Jeong, M., Oh, S., Laine, T.H., and Seo, J. (2022). Data Collection Framework for Context-Aware Virtual Reality Application Development in Unity: Case of Avatar Embodiment. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22124623 ↗
57. Lam, K.Y., Yang, L., Alhilal, A., Lee, L.-H., Tyson, G., and Hui, P. (2022, January 13–16). Human-Avatar Interaction in Metaverse: Framework for Full-Body Interaction. Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Multimedia in Asia, Tokyo Japan.10.1145/3551626.3564936 ↗
58. Survey on Hand-Based Haptic Interaction for Virtual Reality10.1109/TOH.2023.3266199 ↗
59. Kim, M., Jeon, C., and Kim, J. (2017). A Study on Immersion and Presence of a Portable Hand Haptic System for Immersive Virtual Reality. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17051141 ↗
60. Dirin, A., and Laine, T.H. (2023). The Influence of Virtual Character Design on Emotional Engagement in Immersive Virtual Reality: The Case of Feelings of Being. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12102321 ↗
61. Memory of Virtual Experiences: Role of Immersion, Emotion and Sense of Presence10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102506 ↗
62. Feeling Virtually Present Makes Me Happier: The Influence of Immersion, Sense of Presence, and Video Contents on Positive Emotion Induction10.1089/cyber.2022.0245 ↗
63. Dispelling the Gorilla Arm Syndrome: The Viability of Prolonged Gesture Interactions10.1007/978-3-319-57987-0_41 ↗
64. Rosyid, H.A., Pangestu, A.Y., and Akbar, M.I. (2021, January 2). Can Diegetic User Interface Improves Immersion in Role-Playing Games?. Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering (ICEEIE), Malang, Indonesia.10.1109/ICEEIE52663.2021.9616732 ↗