Seismic Resilience in Critical Infrastructures: A Power Station Preparedness Case Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The role of critical infrastructures in maintaining the functioning of the economy and society and ensuring national security, particularly their durability in delivering essential services during crises, including natural disasters such as earthquakes, is critical. This work introduces an analytical methodology to quantify potential earthquake damage to power stations and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of measures to enhance their seismic resistance. By employing fragility curves and probabilistic risk analyses, this approach provides a structured framework for the comprehensive assessment of risks and the identification of economically practical mitigation strategies. A detailed examination of strategies to protect critical power station components against seismic activity is presented, revealing that a minor investment relative to the overall project budget for earthquake-proofing measures is economically effective. This investment, representing a marginal fraction of 0.5% of the total project expenditure significantly reduces the seismic risk of power station failure by 36%. Reinforcing essential elements, including switching stations, water treatment facilities, and water tanks, is emphasized to ensure their continued operation during and after an earthquake. This research highlights the critical significance of integrating risk assessment with benefit-to-cost analysis in strategic decision-making processes, supporting the prioritization of investments in infrastructure enhancements. These enhancements promise substantial reductions of risks at minimal costs, thus protecting essential services against the impacts of natural disasters. This research contributes to state-of-the-art research in critical infrastructures resilience.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, 168, Jifeng E. Rd., Wufeng District, Taichung 41349, Taiwan
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Observatory Cumbria Intelligence (2010). Cumbria Floods November 2009: An Impact Assessment, Cumbria Intelligence Observatory Carlisle.
2. Loss and Damage Assessment in Critical Infrastructures Due to Extreme Events10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105587 ↗
3. Earthquakes in Turkey and Syria-Collaboration Is Needed to Mitigate Longer Terms Risks to Health10.1136/bmj.p559 ↗
4. Escalating Impacts of Climate Extremes on Critical Infrastructures in Europe10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.007 ↗
5. Impact of the 11 March 2011, Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami on the Chemical Industry10.1007/s11069-013-0607-0 ↗
6. Four Concepts for Resilience and the Implications for the Future of Resilience Engineering10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018 ↗
7. Bruno, M., and Clegg, R. (2015). A Foresight Review of Resilience Engineering. Lloyd’s Regist. Found. Rep. Ser.
8. Resilience Assessment of Complex Urban Systems to Natural Disasters: A New Literature Review10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015 ↗
9. (2014). The Rockefeller Foundation, City Resilience Framework. Rockefeller Found. ARUP, 928.
10. Indicator-Based Resilience Assessment for Critical Infrastructures—A Review10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106049 ↗
11. Urlainis, A., and Shohet, I.M. (2022). Seismic Risk Mitigation and Management for Critical Infrastructures Using an RMIR Indicator. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12101748 ↗
12. Fei, Z., Guo, X., Odongo, J.O., Ma, D., Ren, Y., Wu, J., Wang, W., and Zhu, J. (2023). A Seismic Fragility Assessment Method for Urban Function Spatial Units: A Case Study of Xuzhou City. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15108022 ↗
13. Mogheisi, M., Tavakoli, H., and Peyghaleh, E. (2023). Probability Assessment of the Seismic Risk of Highway Bridges with Various Structural Systems (Case Study: Tehran City). Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15129783 ↗
14. Rota, M., Zito, M., Dubini, P., and Nascimbene, R. (2023). On the Use of Accelerometric Data to Monitor the Seismic Performance of Non-Structural Elements in Existing Buildings: A Case Study. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13102651 ↗
15. Enhancing Ductility in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Concrete Sections: A Multi-Scale Investigation
16. Scenario-Based Resilience Assessment Framework for Critical Infrastructure Systems: Case Study for Seismic Resilience of Seaports10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.021 ↗
17. Risk and Resilience Assessment with Component Criticality Ranking of Electric Power Systems Subject to Earthquakes10.1109/JSYST.2019.2961356 ↗
18. Life-Cycle Cost-Based Risk Assessment of Aging Bridge Networks10.1080/15732479.2020.1845752 ↗
19. Forcellini, D. (2022). A Novel Methodology to Assess Seismic Resilience (SR) of Interconnected Infrastructures. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122412975 ↗
20. Rezvani, S.M.H.S., Falcão Silva, M.J., and de Almeida, N.M. (2024). The Risk-Informed Asset-Centric (RIACT) Urban Resilience Enhancement Process: An Outline and Pilot-Case Demonstrator for Earthquake Risk Mitigation in Portuguese Municipalities. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020634 ↗
21. Active Faulting in the Dead Sea Rift10.1016/0040-1951(81)90139-6 ↗
22. Baker, J., Bradley, B., and Stafford, P. (2021). Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108425056 ↗
23. (1998). Designing Structural Resistance to Earthquakes. 413 Part 3 (Standard No. Israel Standard-413-3). (In Hebrew).
24. (1998). Designing Structural Resistance to Earthquakes. 413 Part 5 (Standard No. Israel Standard-413-5). (In Hebrew).
25. Shaking Table Study on Liquefaction Behaviour of Different Saturated Sands Reinforced by Stone Columns10.1080/1064119X.2018.1492051 ↗
26. On the Variation of Mechanical Properties of Saturated Sand during Liquefaction Observed in Shaking Table Tests10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105946 ↗
27. Friedman, S., Salamon, A., Zveibil, D., Beton, R., and Katz, O. (2007). Assessment of Liquefaction Potential in the Zevulun Valley: A Geotechnical Perspective, Report GSI/09/2007.
28. Landslide Research in Kenya10.1016/S0899-5362(97)00017-1 ↗
29. The Environmental Impact of Landslides on the Population Living on the Eastern Footslopes of the Aberdare Ranges in Kenya: A Case Study of Maringa Village Landslide10.1007/s002540050423 ↗
30. Modelling Landslide Hazard, Soil Redistribution and Sediment Yield of Landslides on the Ugandan Footslopes of Mount Elgon10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.01.007 ↗
31. Landslides in a Densely Populated County at the Footslopes of Mount Elgon (Uganda): Characteristics and Causal Factors10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.07.004 ↗
32. Overview of Landslide Occurrences in Kenya: Causes, Mitigation, and Challenges10.1016/B978-0-444-59559-1.00020-7 ↗
33. Katz, A., and Almog, A. (2006). Landslide Risk Assessment Map for Northern Israel: A Comprehensive Overview at a 1:200,000 Scale, GSI/38/2006.
34. Coupling Numerical Modeling and Machine-Learning for Back Analysis of Cantilever Retaining Wall Failure
35. Lifshitz Sherzer, G., Grigorovitch, M., and Mitelman, A. (2024). Insights from LDPM Analysis on Retaining Wall Failure. Comput. Concr., 33.
36. Effects of Random Variations of Soil Properties on Site Amplification of Seismic Ground Motions10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00038-6 ↗
37. Effects of Site Conditions on Earthquake Ground Motion and Their Applications in Seismic Design in Loess Region10.1007/s11629-016-3921-7 ↗
38. Characterizing Nonlinear Effects in Vertical Site Response of Dry Soils Using KiK-Net Data10.1080/13632469.2022.2120112 ↗
39. Engineering-Oriented Ground-Motion Model for Israel10.1007/s10518-023-01651-9 ↗
40. Ewing, L. (2011). A Preliminary Report on Effects to the California Coast and Planning Implications, A Report to Coastal Commissioners.
41. (2024, April 10). NOAA On This Day: Great Alaska Earthquake and Tsunami, Available online: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/great-alaska-earthquake.
42. (2020). FEMA Hazus Earthquake Model Technical Manual.
43. (2003). ASCE Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings (Standard No. ASCE/SEI 31-03).
44. (2010). ASCE Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (Standard No. ASCE/SEI 7-10).
45. (2012). ASCE Tohoku Japan Tsunami of 11 March 2011–Performance of Structures, ASCE Monograph, American Society of Civil Engineers.
46. Baker, J.W. (2008). An Introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA). Bak. Res. Gr., 1–72.
47. (2022). FEMA Hazus Earthquake Model Technical Manual—Hazus 5.1.
48. Hamburger, R.O. (2014, January 21–25). FEMA P58 Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings. Proceedings of the NCEE 2014—10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, AK, USA.
49. Alliance American Lifelines (ALA) (2024, April 10). Seismic Fragility Formulations for Water Systems. Available online: https://www.americanlifelinesalliance.com/pdf/Part_1_Guideline.pdf.
50. Fragility Functions of Gas and Oil Networks
51. Seismic Fragility Curves for On-Grade Steel Tanks10.1193/1.1586140 ↗
52. Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis10.1193/021113EQS025M ↗
53. Rabi, R.R., Bianco, V., and Monti, G. (2021). Mechanical-Analytical Soil-Dependent Fragility Curves of Existing Rc Frames with Column-Driven Failures. Buildings, 11.10.3390/buildings11070278 ↗
54. A Machine Learning-Based Analysis for Predicting Fragility Curve Parameters of Buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105367 ↗
55. Urlainis, A., and Shohet, I.M. (2022). Development of Exclusive Seismic Fragility Curves for Critical Infrastructure: An Oil Pumping Station Case Study. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12060842 ↗
56. Klar, A., Meirova, T., Zaslavsky, Y., and Shapira, A. (2011). Spectral Acceleration Maps for Use in SI 413 Amendment No. 5. Geophys. Inst. Isr. Jerus. Isr.
57. Salamon, A., Netzer-Cohen, C., Zilberman, E., and Amit, R. (2014). Qualitative Evaluation of Earthquake Hazards for Archaeological and Historical Sites in Israel, Technical Report GSI/28/2014.
58. Preliminary Methodology for Qualitative Assessment of Earthquake Hazards to Historical Monuments in Israel10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.028 ↗
59. Katz, O., Hecht, H., and Almog, E. (2008). GSI/07/2008.10.15448/1980-3729.2001.14.3095 ↗
60. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2018). Hazus Flood Model User Guidance.
61. GCR, N. (2013). Development of NIST Measurement Science R&D Roadmap: Earthquake Risk Reduction in Buildings, The National Institute of Building Sciences.
62. Maffei, J.R. (1996). The Seismic Evaluation and Retrofitting of Bridges. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury].
63. Scholl, R.E. (1993). Reducing Seismic Hazards of Existing Buildings, DIANE Publishing.
64. Pull-Out Behavior of Adhesive Connections in URM Walls10.1193/011115EQS006M ↗
65. Experimental Study of a Large-Scale Ground Anchor System with FRP Tendon and RPC Grout Medium10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000537 ↗
66. Effects of Long-Term Dynamic Loading and Fluctuating Water Table on Helical Anchor Performance for Small Wind Tower Foundations10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000013 ↗
67. Seismic Risk Assessment of Power Substations
68. Pavel, F., and Vacareanu, R. (2022). Seismic Risk Assessment for Elements of the Electric Network in Romania. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12020244 ↗
69. Li, P., Li, X., Wang, X., and Wang, D. (2023). Seismic Resilience Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Frame Considering the Effect of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132312620 ↗
70. Urlainis, A., and Shohet, I.M. (2023). A Comprehensive Approach to Earthquake-Resilient Infrastructure: Integrating Maintenance with Seismic Fragility Curves. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13092265 ↗