journal article·2024-03-12Open access

Farmed Insect Frass as a Future Organic Fertilizer

Anna Nogalska, Sebastian Wojciech Przemieniecki, Sławomir Józef Krzebietke, Agnieszka Kosewska, Dariusz Załuski, Wojciech Jan Kozera, Piotr Jarosław Żarczyński

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

The aim of this incubation experiment was to evaluate the effect of Tenebrio molitor L. frass on selected chemical and microbiological properties of acid peat. The optimal rate of mealworm frass in the substrate for growing ornamental trees and shrubs was determined. Acid peat was fertilized with frass or urea at five nitrogen (N) rates: 0, 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg dm−3. Mineral N content and electrical conductivity increased, and calcium content decreased in peat with increasing N rates. Similarly to urea, frass increased the ammonification rate at the beginning of incubation and the nitrification rate from the second week of incubation. Higher frass rates increased the abundance of plant-available nutrients (N, P, Mg, K, and Na) in acid peat. Frass undesirably decreased the counts of bacteria with antagonistic activity against soil-borne plant pathogens. Regarding the abundance of functional genes, the optimal N rate was 100 mg dm−3, which promoted the growth of N-fixing and chitinolytic bacteria. Higher N rates promoted the development of aerobic spore-forming bacteria, which produce antibiotics that can be used as biocontrol agents. Moderate fertilizer rates contributed to N accumulation in bacterial biomass. These preliminary findings, which indicate that insect frass can partially replace mineral fertilizers, are promising and can be used in pot and field experiments testing various plant species.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Insect Utilization and Effects · Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 8, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

Department of Entomology, Phytopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Prawocheńskiego 17, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

Department of Biogeochemistry and Soil Science, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Seminaryjna 5, 85-326 Bydgoszcz, Poland

Funding

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry · Department of Entomology, Phytopathology, and Molecular Diagnostics · European Union

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Żuk-Gołaszewska, K., Gałęcki, R., Obremski, K., Smetana, S., Figiel, S., and Gołaszewski, J. (2022). Edible Insect Farming in the Context of the EU Regulations and Marketing—An Overview. Insects, 13.10.3390/insects13050446 ↗
2. How Many People on Our Planet Eat Insects: 2 Billion?10.3920/JIFF2021.x010 ↗
3. Gałęcki, R., Bakuła, T., and Gołaszewski, J. (2023). Foodborne Diseases in the Edible Insect Industry in Europe—New Challenges and Old Problems. Foods, 12.10.3390/foods12040770 ↗
4. European Commission (2021). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/882 of 1 June 2021 Authorising the Placing on the Market of Dried Tenebrio molitor Larva as a Novel Food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Amending Commission Implementing Commission Regulation. Off. J. Eur. Union, 194, 16–20.
5. European Commission (2017). Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/893 of 24 May 2017 Amending Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Annexes X, XIV and XV to Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 as Regards the Provisions on processed animal protein (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union, 138, 92–116.
6. European Commission (2023). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/5 of 3 January 2023 Authorising the Placing on the Market of Acheta Domesticus (House Cricket) Partially Defatted Powder as a Novel Food and Amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Off. J. Eur. Union.
7. Bioavailability of Nutrients from Edible Insects10.1016/j.cofs.2021.08.003 ↗
8. Evaluation of Tenebrio molitor Larvae as an Alternative Food Source10.1016/j.nfs.2020.10.001 ↗
9. Moruzzo, R., Riccioli, F., Espinosa Diaz, S., Secci, C., Poli, G., and Mancini, S. (2021). Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor): Potential and Challenges to Promote Circular Economy. Animals, 11.10.3390/ani11092568 ↗
10. Bordiean, A., Krzyżaniak, M., and Stolarski, M.J. (2022). Bioconversion Potential of Agro-Industrial Byproducts by Tenebrio molitor—Long-Term Results. Insects, 13.10.3390/insects13090810 ↗
11. Nava, A.L., Higareda, T.E., Barreto, C., Rodríguez, R., Márquez, I., and Palacios, M.L. (2020). Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, Ltd.
12. Prospects of Insects as Food and Feed10.1007/s13165-020-00290-7 ↗
13. Changes in the Gut Microbiome and Enzymatic Profile of Tenebrio molitor Larvae Biodegrading Cellulose, Polyethylene and Polystyrene Waste10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113265 ↗
14. Polyethylene, Polystyrene and Lignocellulose Wastes as Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) Diets and Their Impact on the Breeding Condition, Biometric Parameters, Metabolism, and Digestive Microbiome10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154758 ↗
15. Biodegradation and Mineralization of Polystyrene by Plastic-Eating Mealworms: Part 1. Chemical and Physical Characterization and Isotopic Tests10.1021/acs.est.5b02661 ↗
16. Biodegradation and Mineralization of Polystyrene by Plastic-Eating Mealworms: Part 2. Role of Gut Microorganisms10.1021/acs.est.5b02663 ↗
17. Biodegradation of Polystyrene Wastes in Yellow Mealworms (Larvae of Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus): Factors Affecting Biodegradation Rates and the Ability of Polystyrene-Fed Larvae to Complete Their Life Cycle10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.117 ↗
18. Confirmation of Biodegradation of Low-Density Polyethylene in Dark-versus Yellow-Mealworms (Larvae of Tenebrio obscurus versus Tenebrio molitor) via. Gut Microbe-Independent Depolymerization10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147915 ↗
19. Biometric, Chemical, and Microbiological Evaluation of Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings Fertilized with Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) Larvae Meal10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104037 ↗
20. Study on the Fertilizer Efficiency of the Frass of Temebrio molitor L
21. Potential Use of Mealworm Frass as a Fertilizer: Impact on Crop Growth and Soil Properties10.1038/s41598-020-61765-x ↗
22. Positive and Negative Impacts of Insect Frass Quality on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Plant Growth10.1007/s10144-011-0281-6 ↗
23. Insect Canopy Herbivory and Frass Deposition Affect Soil Nutrient Dynamics and Export in Oak Mesocosms10.1890/04-0003 ↗
24. Ingestion and Excretion of Nitrogen by Larvae of a Cabbage Armyworm: The Effects of Fertilizer Application10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00502.x ↗
25. Mealworm Frass as a Potential Biofertilizer and Abiotic Stress Tolerance-Inductor in Plants10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.04.016 ↗
26. Assessment of the Short-Term Fertilizer Potential of Mealworm Frass Using a Pot Experiment10.3389/fsufs.2021.714596 ↗
27. Adnan, M., Fahad, S., Khan, I.A., Saeed, M., Ihsan, M.Z., Saud, S., Riaz, M., Wang, D., and Wu, C. (2019). Integration of Poultry Manure and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Improved Availability of Ca Bound P in Calcareous Soils. 3 Biotech, 9.10.1007/s13205-019-1894-2 ↗
28. Insect Frass and Exuviae to Promote Plant Growth and Health10.1016/j.tplants.2022.01.007 ↗
29. Approaching Ecological Sustainability in the Emerging Insects-as-Food Industry10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.005 ↗
30. Joosten, H., and Clarke, D. (2002). Wise Use of Mires and Peatlands: Background and Principles Including a Framework for Decision-Making, International Mire Conservation Group.
31. Physical Properties of Three Sand Size Classes Amended with Inorganic Materials or Sphagnum Peat Moss for Putting Green Rootzones10.2135/cropsci2004.9000 ↗
32. Improved Water Saving In Nursery Production Using Sphagnum Peat10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.779.51 ↗
33. Synergistic Use of Peat and Charred Material in Growing Media—An Option to Reduce the Pressure on Peatlands?10.3846/16486897.2017.1284665 ↗
34. Choo, L.N.L.K., Ahmed, O.H., Razak, N.A., and Sekot, S. (2022). Improving Nitrogen Availability and Ananas comosus L. Merr Var. Moris Productivity in a Tropical Peat Soil Using Clinoptilolite Zeolite. Agronomy, 12.10.3390/agronomy12112750 ↗
35. Choo, L.N.L.K., Ahmed, O.H., Talib, S.A.A., Ghani, M.Z.A., and Sekot, S. (2020). Clinoptilolite Zeolite on Tropical Peat Soils Nutrient, Growth, Fruit Quality, and Yield of Carica papaya L. CV. Sekaki. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10091320 ↗
36. Influence of Liming and Fertilization on Lowbush Blueberry in Harvested Peat Field Condition10.1016/j.scienta.2011.06.031 ↗
37. Nogalska, A., Przemieniecki, S.W., Krzebietke, S.J., Załuski, D., Kosewska, A., Skwierawska, M., and Sienkiewicz, S. (2023). The Effect of Mealworm Frass on the Chemical and Microbiological Properties of Horticultural Peat in an Incubation Experiment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.10.3390/ijerph20010021 ↗
38. Bacterial Microbiome in Armillaria Ostoyae Rhizomorphs Inhabiting the Root Zone during Progressively Dying Scots Pine10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103929 ↗
39. Kosewska, O., Przemieniecki, S.W., and Nietupski, M. (2023). The Effect of Antibiotics on Bacteriome of Sitophilus Oryzae and Rhyzopertha Dominica as a Factor Determining the Success of Foraging: A Chance for Antibiotic Therapy in Grain Stores. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031576 ↗
40. TIBCO Software, Inc (2017). STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), TIBCO Software, Inc.
41. Classification and Clustering of Sequencing Data Using a Poisson Model10.1214/11-AOAS493 ↗
42. Przemiany Azotu w Podłożach z Uprawą Pomidora Szklarniowego (Nitrogen Conversion in Substrates for Greenhouse-Grown Tomatoes). Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej w Krakowie
43. Breś, W., Golcz, A., Komosa, A., and Kozik, E. (2012). Żywienie Roślin Ogrodniczych. Podstawy i Perspektywy (Nutritional Requirements of Horticultural Plants. Introduction and Prospects), PWRiL.
44. Substituting Urea by Organic Wastes for Improving Maize Yield in Alkaline Soil10.1080/01904167.2019.1659344 ↗
45. Effect of NPK Fertilization and Elemental Sulphur on Growth and Yield of Lowbush Blueberry10.2137/145960607781635859 ↗
46. Zydlik, Z., Zydlik, P., Kafkas, N.E., Yesil, B., and Cieśliński, S. (2022). Foliar Application of Some Macronutrients and Micronutrients Improves Yield and Fruit Quality of Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Horticulturae, 8.10.3390/horticulturae8070664 ↗
47. Aendekerk, T.G.L., Geers, F.A.M., and de Beuze, M. (2000). Adviesbasis Voor de Bemesting van Boomkwekerijgewassen, Vollegrondsteelt.
48. Davidson, H., Mecklenburg, R., and Peterson, C. (2000). Nursery Management: Administration and Culture, University Wisconsin.
49. Tao, C., Li, R., Xiong, W., Shen, Z., Liu, S., Wang, B., Ruan, Y., Geisen, S., Shen, Q., and Kowalchuk, G.A. (2020). Bio-Organic Fertilizers Stimulate Indigenous Soil Pseudomonas Populations to Enhance Plant Disease Suppression. Microbiome, 8.10.1186/s40168-020-00892-z ↗
50. Li, W., Mosongo, P.S., Dong, W., Timilsina, A., Sun, R., Wang, F., Walkiewicz, A., Liu, B., and Hu, C. (2023). Responses of Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Bacterial Communities to Experimental Freeze–Thaw Cycles in Contrasting Soil Types. Microorganisms, 11.10.3390/microorganisms11030593 ↗
51. An Assessment of the Lactic Acid-Producing Potential of Bacterial Strains Isolated from Food Waste10.3390/microbiolres13020022 ↗
52. Quantitative Response Relationships between Net Nitrogen Transformation Rates and Nitrogen Functional Genes during Artificial Vegetation Restoration Following Agricultural Abandonment10.1038/s41598-017-08016-8 ↗
53. Bacillus subtilis: A Plant-Growth Promoting Rhizobacterium That Also Impacts Biotic Stress10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004 ↗
54. Khan, N., Martínez-Hidalgo, P., Ice, T.A., Maymon, M., Humm, E.A., Nejat, N., Sanders, E.R., Kaplan, D., and Hirsch, A.M. (2018). Antifungal Activity of Bacillus Species against Fusarium and Analysis of the Potential Mechanisms Used in Biocontrol. Front. Microbiol., 9.10.3389/fmicb.2018.02363 ↗
55. Lacerda-Júnior, G.V., Noronha, M.F., Cabral, L., Delforno, T.P., De Sousa, S.T.P., Fernandes-Júnior, P.I., Melo, I.S., and Oliveira, V.M. (2019). Land Use and Seasonal Effects on the Soil Microbiome of a Brazilian Dry Forest. Front. Microbiol., 10.10.3389/fmicb.2019.00648 ↗
56. Three Genomes from the Phylum Acidobacteria Provide Insight into the Lifestyles of These Microorganisms in Soils10.1128/AEM.02294-08 ↗
57. Soil Microbial Biomass and Bacterial Diversity in Southern European Regions Vulnerable to Desertification10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109725 ↗
58. Rhodanobacter humi sp. Nov., an Acid-Tolerant and Alkalitolerant Gammaproteobacterium Isolated from Forest Soil10.1099/ijsem.0.001786 ↗
59. Rhodanobacter thiooxydans sp. Nov., Isolated from a Biofilm on Sulfur Particles Used in an Autotrophic Denitrification Process10.1099/ijs.0.65086-0 ↗
60. Dokdonella soli sp. Nov., a Gammaproteobacterium Isolated from Soil10.1099/ijs.0.005348-0 ↗
61. Gao, X., Wu, Z., Liu, R., Wu, J., Zeng, Q., and Qi, Y. (2019). Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Characteristics over Different Years of Sugarcane Ratooning in Consecutive Monoculture. BioMed Res. Int., 2019.10.1155/2019/4943150 ↗
62. Novel European Free-Living, Non-Diazotrophic Bradyrhizobium Isolates from Contrasting Soils That Lack Nodulation and Nitrogen Fixation Genes—A Genome Comparison10.1038/srep25858 ↗
63. Schneijderberg, M., Schmitz, L., Cheng, X., Polman, S., Franken, C., Geurts, R., and Bisseling, T. (2018). A Genetically and Functionally Diverse Group of Non-Diazotrophic Bradyrhizobium Spp. Colonizes the Root Endophytic Compartment of Arabidopsis Thaliana. BMC Plant Biol., 18.10.1186/s12870-018-1272-y ↗
64. Diversity of Bradyrhizobium in Non-Leguminous Sorghum Plants: B. ottawaense Isolates Unique in Genes for N2O Reductase and Lack of the Type VI Secretion System
65. Huang, Y., Xu, D., Huang, L.Y., Lou, Y.T., Muhadesi, J.B., Qian, H.C., Zhou, E.Z., Wang, B.J., Li, X.T., and Jiang, Z. (2021). Responses of Soil Microbiome to Steel Corrosion. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes, 7.10.1038/s41522-020-00175-3 ↗
66. Density and Distribution of Nitrifying Guilds in Rapid Sand Filters for Drinking Water Production: Dominance of Nitrospira spp10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.023 ↗
67. Kämpfer, P. (2021). Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria, Wiley.
68. Development of a System for Genetic Manipulation of the Facultative Methanotroph Methylocella Silvestris BL210.1016/B978-0-12-386905-0.00008-5 ↗
69. Giri, D.D., Singh, S.K., Giri, A., Dwivedi, H., and Kumar, A. (2021). Microbe Mediated Remediation of Environmental Contaminants, Elsevier.
70. Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Cereal Crops: Progress, Strategies, and Perspectives10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100499 ↗
71. Ca+ Requirement for Aerobic Nitrogen Fixation by Heterocystous Blue-Green Algae10.1104/pp.92.4.886 ↗
72. Probiotic Diversity Enhances Rhizosphere Microbiome Function and10.1128/mBio.01790-16 ↗
73. Denitrification within the genus Azospirillum and other associative bacteria10.1071/PP01071 ↗
74. Urease-Encoding Genes in Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria10.1128/AEM.70.4.2342-2348.2004 ↗
75. FungiQuant: A broad-coverage fungal quantitative real-time PCR assay
76. Antimicrobial peptide genes in Bacillus strains from plant environments
77. Improved assessment of denitrifying, N2-fixing, and total-community bacteria by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis using multiple restriction enzymes10.1128/AEM.71.4.2026-2035.2005 ↗
78. The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoa as a functional marker: Molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations10.1128/aem.63.12.4704-4712.1997 ↗
79. Real-time PCR quantitation of clostridia in feces of autistic children10.1128/AEM.70.11.6459-6465.2004 ↗
80. Reassessing PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes for community surveys of denitrifying bacteria with DGGE10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.011 ↗
81. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction10.1002/bit.20347 ↗