journal article·2023-08-31Open access

AI in Gravitational Wave Analysis, an Overview

Vincenzo Benedetto, Francesco Gissi, Gioele Ciaparrone, Luigi Troiano

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 17

Abstract

Gravitational wave research presents a range of intriguing challenges, each of which has driven significant progress in the field. Key research problems include glitch classification, glitch cancellation, gravitational wave denoising, binary black hole signal detection, gravitational wave bursts, and minor issues that contribute to the overall understanding of gravitational wave phenomena. This paper explores the applications of artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning techniques in addressing these challenges. The main goal of the paper is to provide an effective view of AI and deep learning usage for gravitational wave analysis. Thanks to the advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques, aided by GPUs and specialized software frameworks, these techniques have played a key role over the last decade in the identification, classification, and cancellation of gravitational wave signals, as presented in our results. This paper provides a comprehensive exploration of the adoption rate of these techniques, with reference to the software and hardware involved, their effectiveness, and potential limitations, offering insights into the advancements in the analysis of gravitational wave data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Earthquake Detection and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering (DING), University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy

Kebula s.r.l., 84084 Fisciano, Italy

Department of Management & Innovation Systems (DISA-MIS), University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW15091410.1088/0264-9381/33/13/134001 ↗
2. Classification of glitch waveforms in gravitational wave detector characterization10.1088/1742-6596/243/1/012006 ↗
3. Crust–core coupling in glitching and non-glitching pulsars10.1142/S0218271815300086 ↗
4. Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: A Review10.1017/pasa.2015.35 ↗
5. Konar, S., and Arjunwadkar, M. (2014). Glitch Statistics of Radio Pulsars: Multiple populations. arXiv.
6. Bayeswave: Bayesian inference for gravitational wave bursts and instrument glitches10.1088/0264-9381/32/13/135012 ↗
7. Data quality up to the third observing run of advanced LIGO: Gravity Spy glitch classifications10.1088/1361-6382/acb633 ↗
8. Principal components analysis (PCA)10.1016/0098-3004(93)90090-R ↗
9. Classification methods for noise transients in advanced gravitational-wave detectors10.1088/0264-9381/32/21/215012 ↗
10. Neural network aided GLITCH-BURST discrimination and GLITCH classification10.1142/S0129183113500848 ↗
11. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition10.1109/5.726791 ↗
12. Image-based deep learning for classification of noise transients in gravitational wave detectors10.1088/1361-6382/aab793 ↗
13. Fusco, A., Mejuto-Villa, E., Pinto, I., Principe, M., and Troiano, L. (2017, January 12–18). Glitch entomology. Proceedings of the 14th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, Rome, Italy.10.1142/9789813226609_0474 ↗
14. Mogushi, K., Quitzow-James, R., Cavaglià, M., Kulkarni, S., and Hayes, F. (2021). NNETFIX: An artificial neural network-based denoising engine for gravitational-wave signals. arXiv.10.1088/2632-2153/abea69 ↗
15. Shen, H., George, D., Huerta, E.A., and Zhao, Z. (2019, January 12–17). Denoising Gravitational Waves with Enhanced Deep Recurrent Denoising Auto-encoders. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2019—IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brighton, UK.10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683061 ↗
16. Gravitational wave denoising of binary black hole mergers with deep learning10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135081 ↗
17. Deep Learning for real-time gravitational wave detection and parameter estimation: Results with Advanced LIGO data10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12.053 ↗
18. Detection and classification of supernova gravitational wave signals: A deep learning approach10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043022 ↗
19. Enhancing gravitational-wave science with machine learning10.1088/2632-2153/abb93a ↗
20. Gravity Spy: Integrating advanced LIGO detector characterization, machine learning, and citizen science10.1088/1361-6382/aa5cea ↗
21. Real-Time Gravitational Wave Science with Neural Posterior Estimation10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.241103 ↗
22. Triangular Norms for Gravitational Wave Data Fusion10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2910453 ↗
23. Application of machine learning algorithms to the study of noise artifacts in gravitational-wave data10.1103/PhysRevD.88.062003 ↗
24. Classification methods for noise transients in advanced gravitational-wave detectors II: Performance tests on Advanced LIGO data10.1088/1361-6382/34/3/034002 ↗
25. Machine learning for Gravity Spy: Glitch classification and dataset10.1016/j.ins.2018.02.068 ↗
26. Bahaadini, S., Rohani, N., Coughlin, S., Zevin, M., Kalogera, V., and Katsaggelos, A.K. (2017). Deep Multi-view Models for Glitch Classification. arXiv.10.1109/ICASSP.2017.7952693 ↗
27. Efficient gravitational-wave glitch identification from environmental data through machine learning10.1103/PhysRevD.101.102003 ↗
28. Machine-learning nonstationary noise out of gravitational-wave detectors10.1103/PhysRevD.101.042003 ↗
29. Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. arXiv.10.3115/v1/D14-1179 ↗
30. Noise reduction in gravitational-wave data via deep learning10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033066 ↗
31. Implementing a search for aligned-spin neutron star-black hole systems with advanced ground based gravitational wave detectors10.1103/PhysRevD.90.082004 ↗
32. Nonlinear Noise Cleaning in Gravitational-Wave Detectors with Convolutional Neural Networks10.3389/frai.2022.811563 ↗
33. Improving the sensitivity of Advanced LIGO using noise subtraction10.1088/1361-6382/ab01c5 ↗
34. Improving astrophysical parameter estimation via offline noise subtraction for Advanced LIGO10.1103/PhysRevD.99.042001 ↗
35. Deep neural networks to enable real-time multimessenger astrophysics10.1103/PhysRevD.97.044039 ↗
36. Matching Matched Filtering with Deep Networks for Gravitational-Wave Astronomy10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.141103 ↗
37. The PyCBC search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence
38. Ranking candidate signals with machine learning in low-latency searches for gravitational waves from compact binary mergers10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083006 ↗
39. Classifier for gravitational-wave inspiral signals in nonideal single-detector data10.1103/PhysRevD.96.104015 ↗
40. Jiang, L., and Luo, Y. (2022, January 21–25). Convolutional Transformer for Fast and Accurate Gravitational Wave Detection. Proceedings of the 2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICPR56361.2022.9956104 ↗
41. Gravitational Wave Detection Based on Squeeze-and-excitation Shrinkage Networks and Multiple Detector Coherent SNR10.1088/1674-4527/ac846c ↗
42. Hu, J., Shen, L., Albanie, S., Sun, G., and Wu, E. (2019). Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
43. Inference-Optimized AI and High Performance Computing for Gravitational Wave Detection at Scale10.3389/frai.2022.828672 ↗
44. van den Oord, A., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., and Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016). WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio. arXiv.
45. Rapid identification of strongly lensed gravitational-wave events with machine learning10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124057 ↗
46. Moreno, E.A., Vlimant, J.R., Spiropulu, M., Borzyszkowski, B., and Pierini, M. (2021). Source-Agnostic Gravitational-Wave Detection with Recurrent Autoencoders. arXiv.10.1088/2632-2153/ac5385 ↗
47. Binary black hole population properties inferred from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo10.3847/2041-8213/ab3800 ↗
48. All-sky search for short gravitational-wave bursts in the first Advanced LIGO run10.1103/PhysRevD.95.042003 ↗
49. Advanced LIGO open data: A new resource for gravitational wave science
50. Transient gravitational waves from unmodeled sources and their detection with next-generation interferometers
51. Application of artificial neural network to search for gravitational-wave signals associated with short gamma-ray bursts10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/245002 ↗
52. Iess, A., Cuoco, E., Morawski, F., and Powell, J. (2020). Core-Collapse Supernova Gravitational-Wave Search and Deep Learning Classification. arXiv.10.1088/2632-2153/ab7d31 ↗
53. López, M., Drago, M., Di Palma, I., Ricci, F., and Cerdá-Durán, P. (2021, January 28–30). Deep learning algorithms for gravitational waves core-collapse supernova detection. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI), Lille, France.10.1109/CBMI50038.2021.9461885 ↗
54. Generalised gravitational wave burst generation with generative adversarial networks10.1088/1361-6382/ac09cc ↗
55. Rapid Generation of Fully Relativistic Extreme-Mass-Ratio-Inspiral Waveform Templates for LISA Data Analysis10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.051102 ↗
56. Deep generative models of gravitational waveforms via conditional autoencoder10.1103/PhysRevD.103.124051 ↗
57. Deep learning model on gravitational waveforms in merging and ringdown phases of binary black hole coalescences10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123023 ↗
58. GWitchHunters: Machine learning and citizen science to improve the performance of gravitational wave detector10.1016/j.nima.2022.167959 ↗
59. Generating transient noise artefacts in gravitational-wave detector data with generative adversarial networks10.1088/1361-6382/acb038 ↗
60. Unsupervised learning architecture for classifying the transient noise of interferometric gravitational-wave detectors10.1038/s41598-022-13329-4 ↗
61. Distinguishing double neutron star from neutron star-black hole binary populations with gravitational wave observations10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023025 ↗
62. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G.S., Davis, A., Dean, J., and Devin, M. (2023, August 01). TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems. Available online: tensorflow.org.
63. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
64. Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., and Antiga, L. (2019). PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library. arXiv.
65. Team, T.T.D., Al-Rfou, R., Alain, G., Almahairi, A., Angermueller, C., Bahdanau, D., Ballas, N., Bastien, F., Bayer, J., and Belikov, A. (2016). Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions. arXiv.