journal article·2023-05-05Open access

A Comparison of Deep Learning Algorithms for Anomaly Detection in Discrete Mechanical Systems

Francesco Morgan Bono, Luca Radicioni, Simone Cinquemani, Gianluca Bombaci

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

The application of intelligent systems for structural health monitoring is investigated. A change in the nominal configuration can be related to a structural defect that has to be monitored before it reaches a critical condition. Evidently, the ability to automatically detect changes in a structure is a very attractive feature. When there is no prior knowledge on the system, deep learning models could effectively detect a change and enhance the capability of determining the damage location. However, the acquisition of data related to damaged structures is not always practical. In this paper, two deep learning approaches, a physics-informed autoencoder and a simple data-driven autoencoder, are applied to a test rig consisting of a small four-storey building model. Modifications to the system are simulated by changing the stiffness of the springs. Both the machine learning algorithms outperform the traditional approach based on an experimental modal analysis. Moreover, the increased potential of the physics-informed neural networks to detect and locate damage is confirmed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Department, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Song, G., Wang, C., and Wang, B. (2017). Structural health monitoring (SHM) of civil structures. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7080789 ↗
2. State-of-the-art in structural health monitoring of large and complex civil infrastructures10.1007/s13349-015-0108-9 ↗
3. A review of vibration-based structural health monitoring with special emphasis on composite materials10.1177/0583102406065898 ↗
4. Farrar, C.R., and Worden, K. (2012). Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118443118 ↗
5. Fuzzy approach in modeling static and fatigue strength of composite materials and structures10.1016/j.neucom.2018.12.094 ↗
6. Use of neural networks in detection of structural damage10.1016/0045-7949(92)90132-J ↗
7. Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: A review10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00149-6 ↗
8. The vibration monitoring methods and signal processing techniques for structural health monitoring: A review10.1007/s11831-015-9145-0 ↗
9. Vibration-based structural health monitoring–concepts and applications10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.293-294.3 ↗
10. Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: From automated OMA to damage detection10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.011 ↗
11. Vibration-based structural health monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.07.004 ↗
12. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
13. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
14. Unsupervised structural damage detection technique based on a deep convolutional autoencoder10.1155/2021/6658575 ↗
15. A time series autoencoder for load identification via dimensionality reduction of sensor recordings
16. Structural damage identification based on unsupervised feature-extraction via Variational Auto-encoder10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107811 ↗
17. Faulty data detection and classification for bridge structural health monitoring via statistical and deep-learning approach10.1002/stc.2824 ↗
18. Do, J.S., Kareem, A.B., and Hur, J.W. (2023). LSTM-Autoencoder for Vibration Anomaly Detection in Vertical Carousel Storage and Retrieval System (VCSRS). Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23021009 ↗
19. Novelty Detection Using Sparse Auto-Encoders to Characterize Structural Vibration Responses10.1007/s13369-022-06732-6 ↗
20. Effects of synthetic data applied to artificial neural networks for fatigue life prediction in nodular cast iron10.1007/s40430-020-02747-y ↗
21. Deep learning of vortex-induced vibrations10.1017/jfm.2018.872 ↗
22. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1 ↗
23. A Physics-informed Neural Network for Wind Turbine Main Bearing Fatigue
24. Applications of Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Power Systems—A Review10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3162473 ↗
25. Teaching by active learning: A laboratory experience on fundamentals of vibrations10.1177/03064190221082033 ↗
26. Cheli, F., and Diana, G. (2015). Advanced Dynamics of Mechanical Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-18200-1 ↗
27. Ghali, A., Neville, A.M., and Brown, T.G. (2017). Structural Analysis, CRC Press.10.1201/9781315273006 ↗
28. Formulation of Rayleigh damping and its extensions10.1016/0045-7949(94)00611-6 ↗
29. Experimental modal analysis
30. Cunha, Á., and Caetano, E. (2006). Experimental modal analysis of civil engineering structures. Sound Vib., 40.
31. Structural damage detection based on static and modal analysis10.2514/3.25174 ↗
32. A novel approach for quality control of automated production lines working under highly inconsistent conditions10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106149 ↗
33. Zhang, Y. (2017, January 14–18). A better autoencoder for image: Convolutional autoencoder. Proceedings of the ICONIP17-DCEC, 2018, Guangzhou, China. Available online: http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/Tom.Gedeon/conf/ABCs2018/paper/ABCs2018_paper_58.pdf.
34. A survey of convolutional neural networks: Analysis, applications, and prospects10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3084827 ↗
35. Zhang, C., Song, D., Chen, Y., Feng, X., Lumezanu, C., Cheng, W., Ni, J., Zong, B., Chen, H., and Chawla, N.V. (February, January 27). A deep neural network for unsupervised anomaly detection and diagnosis in multivariate time series data. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial intelligence, Honolulu, HI, USA.
36. Improving neural networks with dropout
37. On Mean Absolute Error for Deep Neural Network Based Vector-to-Vector Regression10.1109/LSP.2020.3016837 ↗
38. Bono, F.M., Radicioni, L., Cinquemani, S., Benedetti, L., Cazzulani, G., Somaschini, C., and Belloli, M. (2023). A Deep Learning Approach to Detect Failures in Bridges Based on the Coherence of Signals. Future Internet, 15.10.3390/fi15040119 ↗
39. Physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
40. Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z ↗
41. Davis, P.J., and Rabinowitz, P. (2007). Methods of Numerical Integration, Courier Corporation.
42. Integrating time signals in frequency domain—Comparison with time domain integration10.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.004 ↗
43. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B., and Shevitz, D.W. (1996). Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: A Literature Review, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information.10.2172/249299 ↗