Prediction and Optimization of Blasting-Induced Ground Vibration in Open-Pit Mines Using Intelligent Algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
Prediction and parameter optimization are effective methods for mine personnel to control blast-induced ground vibration. However, the challenge of effective prediction and optimization lies in the multi-factor and multi-effect nature of open-pit blasting. This study proposes a hybrid intelligent model to predict ground vibrations using a least-squares support vector machine (LSSVM) optimized by a particle swarm algorithm (PSO). Meanwhile, multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) was used to optimize the blast design parameters by considering the vibration of particular areas and the bulk rate of blast fragmentation. To compare the prediction performance of PSO-LSSVM, a genetic-algorithm-optimized BP neural network (GA-BP), unoptimized LSSVM, and BP were used, by applying the same database. In addition, the root-mean-squared error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the correlation coefficient (r) were regarded as the evaluation indicators. Furthermore, the optimization results of the blasting parameters were obtained by quoting the established vibration prediction model and bulk rate proxy model in MOPSO and verified by field tests. The results indicated that the PSO-LSSVM model provided the highest efficiency in predicting vibrations with an RMSE of 1.954, MAE of 1.717, and r of 0.965. Furthermore, the blasting vibration can be controlled by using the two-objective optimization model to obtain the best blasting parameters. Consequently, this study can provide more specific recommendations for vibration hazard control.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Hongda Blasting Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510623, China
Funding
Central South University School-Enterprise Joint Project “Analysis of Blasting Production Data of Dahuang Mountain Tuff Mine and full operation chain optimization study” · Central South University-Hongda Blasting Engineering Group Postgraduate Joint Training Base
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artifificial neural network10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.03.004 ↗
2. Study on the prediction of blasting block size in Changjiushenshan chert mining
3. Assessment of blast-induced ground vibration at jinduicheng molybdenum open pit mine10.1007/s11053-020-09623-5 ↗
4. Prediction of backbreak in open-pit blasting operations using the machine learning method10.1007/s00603-012-0269-3 ↗
5. Green blasting policy: Simultaneous forecast of vertical and horizontal distribution of dust emissions using artificial causality-weighted neural network10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124562 ↗
6. Artificial neural network for prediction and control of blasting vibrations in Assiut (Egypt) limestone quarry10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.06.004 ↗
7. LM-based nerve network model for predicting burst degree
8. Prediction of blast-induced rock movement during bench blasting: Use of gray wolf optimizer and support vector regression10.1007/s11053-019-09593-3 ↗
9. A review of the influence of blast fragmentation on downstream processing of metal ores10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107743 ↗
10. Optimization of blasting-associated costs in surface mines using risk-based probabilistic integer programming and firefly algorithm10.1007/s11053-021-09935-0 ↗
11. Enhancement of taconite crushing and grinding through primary blasting10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00165-2 ↗
12. Predicting blast-induced outcomes using random forest models of multi-year blasting data from an open pit mine10.1007/s10064-019-01566-3 ↗
13. Development of a predictive model of fragmentation using drilling and blasting data in open pit mining
14. Reduction of the undesirable bench-blasting consequences with emphasis on ground vibration using a developed multi-objective stochastic programming10.1080/17480930.2016.1158964 ↗
15. A review of soft computing technology applications in several mining problems10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.019 ↗
16. A novel surrogate-assisted multi-objective optimization method for well control parameters based on tri-Training10.1007/s11053-021-09948-9 ↗
17. Integrated management of forest ecosystem services: An optimization model based on multi-objective analysis and metaheuristic approach10.1007/s11053-018-9413-4 ↗
18. Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artifificial neural net work based on particle swarm optimization10.1007/s12517-013-1174-0 ↗
19. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration intensity in open-pit mines using unmanned aerial vehicle and a novel intelligence system10.1007/s11053-019-09573-7 ↗
20. Prediction and minimization of blast-induced ground vibration using two robust meta-heuristic algorithms10.1007/s00366-017-0501-6 ↗
21. Analysis of ground vibration risk on mine infrastructures: Integrating fuzzy slack-based measure model and failure effects analysis10.1007/s13762-018-2008-0 ↗
22. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration in an open-pit mine by a novel hybrid model based on clustering and artifificial neural network10.1007/s11053-019-09470-z ↗
23. Estimation of blast-induced ground vibration through a soft computing framework10.1007/s00366-017-0508-z ↗
24. Empirical and probabilistic analysis of blast-induced ground vibrations10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.038 ↗
25. Development of a fuzzy model for predicting ground vibration caused by rock blasting in surface mining10.1177/1077546312437002 ↗
26. Ainalis, D., Kaufmann, O., Tshibangu, J.P., Verlinden, O., and Kouroussi, G. (2016, January 10–14). Assessing blast source pressure modelling approaches for the numerical simulation of ground vibrations. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Athens, Greece.
27. Prediction of ground vibration due to quarry blasting based on gene expression programming: A new model for peak particle velocity prediction10.1007/s13762-016-0979-2 ↗
28. Utilizing gradient boosted machine for the prediction of damage to residential structures owing to blasting vibrations of open pit mining10.1177/1077546314568172 ↗
29. Feasibility of ANFIS model for prediction of ground vibrations resulting from quarry blasting10.1007/s12665-015-4305-y ↗
30. Novel soft computing model for predicting blast-induced ground vibration in open-pit mines based on particle swarm optimization and XGBoost10.1007/s11053-019-09492-7 ↗
31. Neuro-fuzzy based approach for prediction of blast-induced ground vibration10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.03.023 ↗
32. Prediction of ground vibration induced by blasting operations through the use of the Bayesian Network and random forest models10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106390 ↗
33. Intelligent Prediction of blasting-induced ground vibration using ANFIS optimized by GA and PSO10.1007/s11053-019-09515-3 ↗
34. Minimization of blast-induced dust emission using gene-expression programming and grasshopper optimization algorithm: A smart mining solution based on blasting plan optimization10.1007/s10098-022-02327-9 ↗
35. Topal, E. (2019, January 2-4). The optimization of cemented hydraulic backfifill mixture design parameters for different strength conditions using artifificial intelligence algorithms. Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection—MPES 2019, Perth, WA, Australia.
36. Prediction of vibration velocity of bench blasting reflecting negative elevation effect
37. Yu, Z., Shi, X.Z., Zhou, J., Chen, X., and Qiu, X.Y. (2020). Effective assessment of blast-induced ground vibration using an optimized random forest model based on a harris hawks optimization algorithm. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041403 ↗
38. Predicting blast-induced air overpressure: A robust artificial intelligence system based on artificial neural networks and random forest10.1007/s11053-018-9424-1 ↗
39. Guo, J., Zhang, C., Xie, S., and Liu, Y. (2022). Research on the prediction model of blasting vibration velocity in the dahuangshan mine. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12125849 ↗
40. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the ICNN’95—International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia.
41. Least squares support vector machine classifiers10.1023/A:1018628609742 ↗
42. Improved PSO optimized LSSVM for liquid rocket engine fault detection
43. Komadja, G.C., Rana, A., Glodji, L.A., Anye, V., Jadaun, G., Onwualu, P.A., and Sawmliana, C. (2022). Assessing ground vibration caused by rock blasting in surface mines using machine-learning approaches: A comparison of CART, SVR and MARS. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141711060 ↗
44. Nguyen, H., Choi, Y., Bui, X.-N., and Nguyen-Thoi, T. (2020). Predicting Blast-induced ground vibration in open-pit mines using vibration sensors and support vector regression-based optimization algorithms. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20010132 ↗
45. Prediction of blasting vibration effects in open pit mine based on PSO-LSSVM model
46. Coello, C., and Lechuga, M.S. (2002, January 12–17). MOPSO: A proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC’02 (Cat. No.02TH8600), Honolulu, HI, USA.
47. Particle swarm optimization algorithm: An overview10.1007/s00500-016-2474-6 ↗
48. Multi-objective optimization of gas metal arc welding parameters and sequences for low-carbon steel(Q345D) T-joints10.1016/S1006-706X(17)30082-1 ↗
49. Research on block size prediction and blasting control technology for multiple-size stone mining
50. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
51. Seismic vulnerability analysis of arch dams based on GA-BP neural network
52. Blast vibration velocity prediction using GA-BP neural network
53. A time lag control algorithm for structural seismic response based on least squares support vector machine