Advanced Technologies for Geosite Visualization and Valorization: A Review
Source abstract
Abstract
This review attempts to summarize contributions by authors who, in the last decade, have dedicated their efforts to making geoheritage accessible to the public. Geoheritage is composed of geosites, which are, nowadays, real milestones on which field-based geological education can be conducted. However, the COVID-19 pandemic in particular has made it clear that a new paradigm is needed; a series of tools must be introduced and increasingly used to make it possible for potential users, be they academics, students, or the lay public, to experience geosites from locations that can be thousands of kilometers away. All these have been achieved over time by a wide range of evolving techniques and advanced technologies such as GIS tools, virtual reality applications and further innovative technologies such as WebGIS platforms accompanied by appropriate navigation tools (VR headsets and thumbsticks). The viewers, in this way, are provided with a complete view of a virtual geosite, which enables visualizing its characteristics at different scales. VR technologies, especially, have revealed a high degree of satisfaction, based on feedback collected from VR geosite visualization events, both by scientists, students and the general public, and could be the forefront of geosite visualization and valorization in the near future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Landslides and related hazards
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Human and Innovation Sciences, Insubria University, 21100 Como, Italy
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Milan-Bicocca University, 20126 Milan, Italy
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Evaluation of a Paleontological Museum as Geosite and Base for Geotourism. A Case Study10.3390/heritage4030067 ↗
2. Reynard, E., Coratza, P., and Regolini-Bissig, G. (2009). Geomorphosites, Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.
3. Volcanic Geoheritage10.1007/s12371-017-0257-9 ↗
4. Application of modern technologies in popularization of the Czech volcanic geoheritage10.1007/s12371-016-0208-x ↗
5. Holocene displacement field at an emerged oceanic transform-ridge junction: The Husavik-Flatey Fault—Gudfinnugja Fault system, North Iceland10.1016/j.jsg.2015.03.011 ↗
6. Frassi, C., Amorfini, A., Bartelletti, A., and Ottria, G. (2022). Popularizing Structural Geology: Exemplary Structural Geosites from the Apuan Alps UNESCO Global Geopark (Northern Apennines, Italy). Land, 11.10.3390/land11081282 ↗
7. Giant Garnet Crystals in Wollastonite–Grossularite–Diopside-Bearing Marbles from Tamarispa (NE Sardinia, Italy): Geosite Potential, Conservation, and Evaluation as Part of a Regional Environmental Resource10.1007/s12371-021-00622-3 ↗
8. Structure of regional dykes and local cone sheets in the Midhyrna-Lysuskard area, Snaefellsnes Peninsula (NW Iceland)10.1007/s00445-013-0764-8 ↗
9. Eberhard, R. (1997). Pattern and Process: Towards a Regional Approach to National Estate Assessment of Geodiversity, Environment Australia.
10. Geoheritage and geoconservation history, definition, scope and scale
11. Geoheritage conservation in Ethiopia: The case of the Simien mountains10.2478/v10117-012-0001-0 ↗
12. Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management10.1007/s12371-011-0046-9 ↗
13. Wimbledon, W.A.P., and Smith-Meyer, S. (2012). Geoheritage in Europe and Its Conservation, ProGEO.
14. Paleogeography as geological heritage: Developing geosite classification10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.06.005 ↗
15. Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: A review10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3 ↗
16. Reynard, E., and Brilha, J. (2018). Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00030-7 ↗
17. Pescatore, E., Bentivenga, M., and Giano, S.I. (2023). Geoheritage and Geoconservation: Some Remarks and Considerations. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15075823 ↗
18. Science education in a museum: Enhancing Earth Sciences literacy as a way to enhance public awareness of geological heritage10.1007/s12371-014-0105-0 ↗
19. Strategies and tools for improving Earth Science education and popularization in museums10.1007/s12371-016-0194-z ↗
20. Geoheritage promotion through an interactive exhibition: A case study from the Carnic Alps, NE Italy10.1007/s12371-018-0299-7 ↗
21. Geocultural Landscape and Sustainable Development at Apano Meria in Syros Island, Central Aegean Sea, Greece: An Ecomuseological Approach for the Promotion of Geological Heritage10.3390/heritage5030113 ↗
22. The European Geoparks Network. Geological heritage protection and local development10.18814/epiiugs/2004/v27i3/002 ↗
23. Geoparks—A tool for education, conservation and recreation
24. Newsome, D., and Dowling, R.K. (2010). Geotourism. The Tourism of Geology and Landscape, Goodfellow Publishers Ltd.10.23912/978-1-906884-09-3-21 ↗
25. Geo-education and geopark implementation in the Vulkaneifel European Geopark
26. Edutainment with basalt and volcanoes—The Rockeskyller Kopf example in the Westeifel Volcanic Field/Vulkaneifel European Geopark, Germany
27. Sustainability management of UNESCO global geoparks10.18052/www.scipress.com/SGG.2.44 ↗
28. Becerra-Ramírez, R., Gosálvez, R.U., Escobar, E., González, E., Serrano-Patón, M., and Guevara, D. (2020). Characterization and Geotourist Resources of the Campo de Calatrava Volcanic Region (Ciudad Real, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain) to Develop a UNESCO Global Geopark Project. Geosciences, 10.10.3390/geosciences10110441 ↗
29. Perotti, L., Bollati, I.M., Viani, C., Zanoletti, E., Caironi, V., Pelfini, M., and Giardino, M. (2020). Fieldtrips and virtual tours as geotourism resources: Examples from the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (NW Italy). Resources, 9.10.3390/resources9060063 ↗
30. Widawski, K., Oleśniewicz, P., Rozenkiewicz, A., Zareba, A., and Jandová, S. (2020). Protected Areas: Geotourist Attractiveness for Weekend Tourists Based on the Example of Gorcza Nski National Park in Poland. Resources, 9.10.3390/resources9040035 ↗
31. Xu, K., and Wu, W. (2022). Geoparks and geotourism in China: A sustainable approach to geoheritage conservation and local development: A review. Land, 11.10.3390/land11091493 ↗
32. Geomorphosites and geotourism
33. Newsome, D., and Dowling, R.K. (2010). Geotourism: The Tourism of Geology and Landscape, Goodfellow Publishers Ltd.10.23912/978-1-906884-09-3-21 ↗
34. Geotourism’s global growth10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7 ↗
35. The role of LGAPs (Local Geodiversity Action Plans) and Welsh RIGS as local drivers for geoconservation within geotourism in Wales10.1007/s12371-012-0054-4 ↗
36. Geotourism: A tool for sustainable development of geoheritage resources10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.622-623.1711 ↗
37. 3G’s for Modern Geotourism10.1007/s12371-011-0052-y ↗
38. Defining the nature and purpose of modern geotourism with particular reference to the United Kingdom and south-east Europe10.1007/s12371-011-0050-0 ↗
39. Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes10.2478/cjot-2013-0005 ↗
40. Volcanic geoheritage and geotourism perspectives in Hungary: A case of an UNESCO world heritage site, Tokaj wine region historic cultural landscape, Hungary10.1007/s12371-016-0205-0 ↗
41. Reynard, E., and Brilha, J. (2018). Geoheritage, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00030-7 ↗
42. Kubalíková, L. (2019). Assessing Geotourism Resources on a Local Level: A Case Study from Southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Resources, 8.10.3390/resources8030150 ↗
43. Beltrán-Yanes, E., Dóniz-Páez, J., and Esquivel-Sigut, I. (2020). Chinyero Volcanic Landscape Trail (Canary Islands, Spain): A Geotourism Proposal to Identify Natural and Cultural Heritage in Volcanic Areas. Geosciences, 10.10.3390/geosciences10110453 ↗
44. Zafeiropoulos, G., Drinia, H., Antonarakou, A., and Zouros, N. (2021). From geoheritage to geoeducation, geoethics and geotourism: A critical evaluation of the Greek region. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11090381 ↗
45. Geosites: A new conservation initiative10.18814/epiiugs/1996/v19i3/009 ↗
46. Geological world heritage. GEOSITES: A global comparative site inventory to enable prioritisation for conservation
47. Mapping geosites for geoheritage management: A methodological proposal for the regional park of Picos de Europa (León, Spain)10.1007/s00267-012-9915-5 ↗
48. Geotrails in the mixteca alta UNESCO Global Geopark, Oaxaca, Mexico
49. The Volcanic and Mining Geoheritage of San Pietro Island (Sulcis, Sardinia, Italy): The Potential for Geosite Valorization10.1007/s12371-019-00418-6 ↗
50. The Geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): A key of geoheritage assessment10.1007/s12371-009-0003-z ↗
51. Geomorphosites: Versatile Tools in Geoheritage Cultural Dissemination10.1007/s12371-019-00378-x ↗
52. Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: A methodological proposal applied to Brazil10.1007/s12371-010-0014-9 ↗
53. L’évaluation des géotopes
54. A method for assessing “scientific” and “additional values” of geomorphosites10.5194/gh-62-148-2007 ↗
55. Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of of geomorphosites
56. Coratza, P., and Panizza, M. (2009). Memorie Descrittive Della Carta Geologica d’Italia, ISPRA.
57. Zafeiropoulos, G., and Drinia, H. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Two Assessment Methods for the Geoeducational Values of Geosites: A Case Study from the Volcanic Island of Nisyros, SE Aegean Sea, Greece. Geosciences, 12.10.3390/geosciences12020082 ↗
58. Krokos, M., Bonali, F.L., Vitello, F., Varvara, A., Becciani, U., Russo, E., Marchese, F., Fallati, L., Nomikou, P., and Kearl, M. (2019). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 3–5 May 2019, SciTePress.
59. Immersive VR Experience of Redeveloped Post-Industrial Sites: The Example of “Zeche Holland” in Bochum-Wattenscheid10.1007/s42489-019-00030-2 ↗
60. Lütjens, M., Kersten, T., Dorschel, B., and Tschirschwitz, F. (2019). Virtual Reality in Cartography: Immersive 3D Visualization of the Arctic Clyde Inlet (Canada) Using Digital Elevation Models and Bathymetric Data. Multimodal Technol. Interact., 3.10.3390/mti3010009 ↗
61. UAV-based surveying in volcano-tectonics: An example from the Iceland rift10.1016/j.jsg.2019.02.004 ↗
62. Bonali, F.L., Tibaldi, A., Corti, N., Fallati, L., and Russo, E. (2020). through Massive Data Collection at Krafla Rift (NE Iceland) Owing to Drone-Based Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10196759 ↗
63. Stal, C., Bourgeois, J., De Maeyer, P., De Mulder, G., De Wulf, A., Goossens, R., Hendrickx, M., Reconstruction of Late Pleistocene-Holocene Deformation, Nuttens, T., and Stichelbaut, B. (2012, January 21–24). Test case on the quality analysis of structure from motion in airborne applications. Proceedings of the 32nd EARSeL Symposium: Advances in Geosciences, Mykonos, Greece.
64. Structure-from-Motion’photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021 ↗
65. Zekkos, D., Manousakis, J., Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, A., Clark, M., Knoper, L., Massey, C., Archibald, G., Greenwood, W., Hemphill-Haley, M., and Rathje, E. (2018, January 25–29). Structure-from-Motion based 3D mapping of landslides & fault rupture sites during 2016 Kaikoura earthquake reconnaissance. Proceedings of the 11th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
66. Soil liquefaction in seasonally frozen ground during the 2016 Mw 6. 6 Akto earthquake10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.024 ↗
67. High-resolution digital elevation modeling from TLS and UAV campaign reveals structural complexity at the 2014/2015 Holuhraun eruption site, Iceland10.3389/feart.2017.00059 ↗
68. Morphological and structural changes at the Merapi lava dome monitored in 2012–2015 using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.11.006 ↗
69. UAV-based remote sensing surveys of lava flow fields: A case study from Etna’s 1974 channel-fed lava flows10.1007/s00445-018-1192-6 ↗
70. UAVs for volcano monitoring: A new approach applied on an active lava flow on Mt. Etna (Italy), during the 27 February–02 March 2017 eruption10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.12.001 ↗
71. Earthquake induced geological hazard detection under hierarchical stripping classification framework in the Beichuan area10.1007/s10346-010-0201-4 ↗
72. Remote sensing for geotechnical earthquake reconnaissance10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.016 ↗
73. Monitoring active landslides in the Auckland region utilising UAV/structure-from-motion photogrammetry
74. Cignetti, M., Godone, D., Wrzesniak, A., and Giordan, D. (2019). Structure from motion multisource application for landslide characterization and monitoring: The champlas du col case study, sestriere, North-Western Italy. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19102364 ↗
75. Characterizing the catastrophic 2017 Mud Creek landslide, California, using repeat structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry10.1007/s10346-019-01160-4 ↗
76. Hashemi-Beni, L., Jones, J., Thompson, G., Johnson, C., and Gebrehiwot, A. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities for UAV-based digital elevation model generation for flood-risk management: A case of Princeville, North Carolina. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18113843 ↗
77. Detection and mapping of the geomorphic effects of flooding using UAV photogrammetry10.1007/s00024-018-1874-1 ↗
78. Using unmanned aerial vehicles and structure-from-motion photogrammetry to characterize sedimentary outcrops: An example from the Morrison Formation, Utah, USA10.1016/j.sedgeo.2017.03.013 ↗
79. Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.021 ↗
80. Real world–based immersive Virtual Reality for research, teaching and communication in volcanology10.1007/s00445-020-01376-6 ↗
81. Real time and the virtual outcrop improve geological field mapping10.1029/99EO00232 ↗
82. Building a virtual outcrop, extracting geological information from it, and sharing the results in Google Earth via OpenPlot and Photoscan: An example from the Khaviz Anticline (Iran)10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.013 ↗
83. Pasquaré Mariotto, F., and Bonali, F.L. (2021). Virtual Geosites as Innovative Tools for Geoheritage Popularization: A Case Study from Eastern Iceland. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11040149 ↗
84. The potential of web-based GIS10.1007/s10109-004-0133-4 ↗
85. Web-based GIS for managing and promoting tourism in sub-Saharan Africa10.1080/13683500.2019.1711028 ↗
86. Smartening up Participatory Cultural Tourism Planning in Historical City Centers10.1080/10630732.2018.1528540 ↗
87. Categorization and geovisualization of climate change strategies using an open-access WebGIS tool
88. Balla, D., Zichar, M., Tóth, R., Kiss, E., Karancsi, G., and Mester, T. (2020). Geovisualization Techniques of Spatial Environmental Data Using Different Visualization Tools. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10196701 ↗
89. Poux, F., Valembois, Q., Mattes, C., Kobbelt, L., and Billen, R. (2020). Initial User-Centered Design of a Virtual Reality Heritage System: Applications for Digital Tourism. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12162583 ↗
90. Jung, K., Nguyen, V., Piscarac, D., and Yoo, S. (2020). Meet the Virtual Jeju Dol Harubang—The Mixed VR/AR Application for Cultural Immersion in Korea’s Main Heritage. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9060367 ↗
91. Tourism and virtual reality (VR) in developing nations
92. Antoniou, V., Bonali, F.L., Nomikou, P., Tibaldi, A., Melissinos, P., Pasquaré Mariotto, F., Vitello, F.R., Krokos, M., and Whitworth, M. (2020). Integrating Virtual Reality and GIS Tools for Geological Mapping, Data Collection and Analysis: An Example from the Metaxa Mine, Santorini (Greece). Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10238317 ↗
93. A virtual tour of geological heritage: Valourising geodiversity using Google Earth and QR code10.1016/j.cageo.2013.07.020 ↗
94. 3D virtual itinerary for education using Google Earth as a tool for the recovery of the Geological Heritage of Natural áreas: Application in the Las Batuecas Valley Nature Park (Salamanca, Spain)10.3390/su6128567 ↗
95. New Digital Technologies Applied to the Management of Geoheritage10.1007/s12371-014-0118-8 ↗
96. An overview of new technologies applied to the management of geoheritage10.1007/s12371-014-0113-0 ↗
97. Tools and methods used to represent geological processes and geosites: Graphic and animated media as a means to popularize the scientific content and value of geoheritage
98. Digital Tools for Collection, Promotion and Visualisation of Geoscientific Data: Case Study of Seguret Valley (Piemonte, NW Italy)10.1007/s12371-014-0115-y ↗
99. Reynard, E., and Brilha, J. (2018). Geoheritage. Assessment, Protection and Management, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00030-7 ↗
100. Interactive Visual Media for Geomorphological Heritage Interpretation. Theoretical Approach and Examples10.1007/s12371-014-0107-y ↗