Patient and Parental Satisfaction following Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners and Elastodontic Appliances during Mixed Dentition: A Cross-Sectional Case–Control Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to assess patient and parental satisfaction following treatment during mixed dentition with two removable orthodontic devices: elastodontic appliances (EAs) and clear aligners (CAs). Consecutive patients below the age of 12 years who had completed the active phase of EA or CA therapy were recruited. A dedicated written questionnaire divided into four sections was used to measure parental and patient satisfaction regarding treatment experiences and treatment outcomes. The total sample included 56 subjects: 28 belonged to the EA group (7 girls and 21 boys; mean age 11 years); 28 belonged to the CA group (12 girls and 16 boys; mean age 9 years). Patients and parents of both the EA and CA groups were satisfied with the treatment experiences and outcomes. According to parental reporting, EA treatment was significantly more painful than CA therapy (p = 0.003), but this was not confirmed by the patients (p = 0.100). Both parents and patients reported EAs being significantly more difficult to wear than CAs (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Functional improvements were reported, including a reduction in grinding sounds in the CA group (p = 0.020) and breathing improvements in the EA group (p = 0.023). According to the parents, school life and social life were significantly improved in the CA group, as compared to the EA group (school life p < 0.001, social life p = 0.001). Finally, parents belonging to the CA group found that their child’s treatment was much shorter than expected (p = 0.003).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · dental development and anomalies · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthodontics, Medical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, 83303 Bratislava, Slovakia
Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
Department of Life Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. A New Definition for Oral Health Developed by the FDI World Dental Federation Opens the Door to a Universal Definition of Oral Health10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.11.010 ↗
2. Patient/Parent Expectations of Orthodontic Treatment
3. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): A Review of Generic and Condition-Specific Measures and a Discussion of Trends and Issues10.1111/hex.13254 ↗
4. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
5. Measuring Beliefs about Orthodontic Treatment: A Questionnaire Approach10.1111/j.1752-7325.1997.tb02978.x ↗
6. Factors Associated with Long-Term Patient Satisfaction10.2319/120909-708.1 ↗
7. Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction after Orthodontic Treatment
8. Satisfaction with Orthodontic Treatment Outcome10.2319/093013-710.1 ↗
9. Piloting a Patient-Based Questionnaire to Assess Patient Satisfaction with the Process of Orthodontic Treatment10.2319/060108-287.1 ↗
10. Orthodontic Care from the Patients’ Perspective: Perceptions of 27-Year-Olds10.1093/ejo/20.3.319 ↗
11. Do Orthodontic Research Outcomes Reflect Patient Values? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Involving Children10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.05.022 ↗
12. Factors Associated with Patient and Parent Satisfaction after Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.039 ↗
13. Prevalence of Malocclusion, Oral Parafunctions and Temporomandibular Disorder-Pain in Italian Schoolchildren: An Epidemiological Study10.1111/joor.12794 ↗
14. Is There an Association between Various Aspects of Oral Health in Southern Italy Children? An Epidemiological Study Assessing Dental Decays, Periodontal Status, Malocclusions and Temporomandibular Joint Function
15. Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need in Obese Adolescents10.1155/2015/876931 ↗
16. Nota, A., Caruso, S., Caruso, S., Sciarra, F.M., Marino, A., Daher, S., Pittari, L., Gatto, R., and Tecco, S. (2022). Rapid Maxillary Expansion in Pediatric Patients with Sleep-Disordered Breathing: Cephalometric Variations in Upper Airway’s Dimension. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12052469 ↗
17. Martina, S., Di Stefano, M.L., Paduano, F.P., Aiello, D., Valletta, R., and Paduano, S. (2020). Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance. Dent. J., 8.10.3390/dj8010027 ↗
18. Skeletal and Dental Effects of Class III Orthopaedic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1111/joor.12495 ↗
19. Class II Functional Orthopaedic Treatment: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews10.1111/joor.12295 ↗
20. Orthodontic Intervention in the Early Mixed Dentition: A Prospective, Controlled Study on the Effects of the Eruption Guidance Appliance10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.039 ↗
21. Outcome Assessment of Orthodontic Clear Aligner vs Fixed Appliance Treatment in a Teenage Population with Mild Malocclusions10.2319/122919-844.1 ↗
22. Pellegrino, M., Caruso, S., Cantile, T., Pellegrino, G., and Ferrazzano, G.F. (2020). Early Treatment of Anterior Crossbite with Eruption Guidance Appliance: A Case Report. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17103587 ↗
23. Fichera, G., Martina, S., Palazzo, G., Musumeci, R., Leonardi, R., Isola, G., and Lo Giudice, A. (2021). New Materials for Orthodontic Interceptive Treatment in Primary to Late Mixed Dentition. A Retrospective Study Using Elastodontic Devices. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14071695 ↗
24. Madariaga, A.C.P., Bucci, R., Rongo, R., Simeon, V., D’Antò, V., and Valletta, R. (2020). Impact of Fixed Orthodontic Appliance and Clear Aligners on the Periodontal Health: A Prospective Clinical Study. Dent. J., 8.10.3390/dj8010004 ↗
25. White Spot Lesions during Orthodontic Clear Aligner Therapy: A Scoping Review10.4103/jos.jos_170_21 ↗
26. Quinzi, V., Gallusi, G., Carli, E., Pepe, F., Rastelli, E., and Tecco, S. (2022). Elastodontic Devices in Orthodontics: An In-Vitro Study on Mechanical Deformation under Loading. Bioengineering, 9.10.3390/bioengineering9070282 ↗
27. Inchingolo, A.D., Patano, A., Coloccia, G., Ceci, S., Inchingolo, A.M., Marinelli, G., Malcangi, G., Montenegro, V., Laudadio, C., and Pede, C.D. (2022). The Efficacy of a New AMCOP® Elastodontic Protocol for Orthodontic Interceptive Treatment: A Case Series and Literature Overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19020988 ↗
28. Efficacy of Clear Aligners in Controlling Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review10.2319/061614-436.1 ↗
29. Does Clear Aligner Treatment Result in Different Patient Perceptions of Treatment Process and Outcomes Compared to Conventional/Traditional Fixed Appliance Treatment: A Literature Review10.1055/s-0041-1739441 ↗
30. Azaripour, A., Weusmann, J., Mahmoodi, B., Peppas, D., Gerhold-Ay, A., Van Noorden, C.J.F., and Willershausen, B. (2015). Braces versus Invisalign®: Gingival Parameters and Patients’ Satisfaction during Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Oral Health, 15.10.1186/s12903-015-0060-4 ↗
31. Comparison of Short-Term Oral Impacts Experienced by Patients Treated with Invisalign or Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances10.1159/000505459 ↗
32. Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Status after 2 Treatment Modalities: Invisalign and Conventional Fixed Appliances10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.013 ↗
33. Adolescent Patients’ Treatment Motivation and Satisfaction with Orthodontic Treatment. Do Possible Selves Matter?10.2319/120708-613.1 ↗
34. Patient and Parent Satisfaction Following Autotransplantation and Associated Orthodontic Treatment Delivered by an Interdisciplinary Team10.1007/s40368-013-0048-1 ↗
35. A Systematic Review of Faces Scales for the Self-Report of Pain Intensity in Children10.1542/peds.2010-1609 ↗
36. Mills, I., Frost, J., Cooper, C., Moles, D.R., and Kay, E. (2014). Patient-Centred Care in General Dental Practice--a Systematic Review of the Literature. BMC Oral Health, 14.10.1186/1472-6831-14-64 ↗
37. Patient-Centered Assessments: How Can They Be Used in Dental Clinical Trials?10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0075 ↗
38. Clinical Effectiveness of the Eruption Guidance Appliances in Treating Malocclusion in the Mixed Dentition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1111/ipd.12961 ↗
39. Efficiency, Effectiveness and Treatment Stability of Clear Aligners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1111/ocr.12177 ↗
40. Diagnosis and Management of Childhood Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome10.1542/peds.2012-1671 ↗
41. Effect of Orthopedic and Functional Orthodontic Treatment in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101730 ↗
42. Segù, M., Campagnoli, G., Di Blasio, M., Santagostini, A., Pollis, M., and Levrini, L. (2022). Pilot Study of a New Mandibular Advancement Device. Dent. J., 10.10.3390/dj10060099 ↗
43. Potential Risks of Orthodontic Therapy: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework10.1111/adj.12486 ↗
44. Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders and Oral Parafunctions in Adolescents from Public Schools in Southern Italy10.1080/08869634.2018.1556893 ↗
45. International Consensus on the Assessment of Bruxism: Report of a Work in Progress10.1111/joor.12663 ↗
46. Assessment of Oral Parafunctional Behaviors and Electromyographic Activities of the Masticatory Muscles in Young Female Patients with Orthodontic Invisalign Treatment
47. Occlusion, Orthodontics, and Temporomandibular Disorders: Cutting Edge of the Current Evidence10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.08.003 ↗
48. Timm, L.H., Farrag, G., Baxmann, M., and Schwendicke, F. (2021). Factors Influencing Patient Compliance during Clear Aligner Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10143103 ↗