journal article·2023-03-11Open access

The Application of Intelligent Data Models for Dementia Classification

Rabah AlShboul, Fadi Thabtah, Alexander James Walter Scott, Yun Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 6

Abstract

Background and Objective: Dementia is a broad term for a complex range of conditions that affect the brain, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Dementia affects a lot of people in the elderly community, hence there is a huge demand to better understand this condition by using cost effective and quick methods, such as neuropsychological tests, since pathological assessments are invasive and demand expensive resources. One of the promising initiatives that deals with dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), which includes cognitive tests, such as Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores. The aim of this research is to investigate non-invasive dementia indicators, such as cognitive features, that are typically diagnosed by clinical assessment within ADNI’s data to understand their effect on dementia. Methods: To achieve the aim, machine learning techniques have been utilized to classify patients into Cognitively Normal (CN), MCI, or having dementia, based on the sum of CDR scores (CDR-SB) besides demographic variables. Particularly, the performance of Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Decision Trees (C4.5), Probabilistic Naïve Bayes (NB), and Rule Induction (RIPPER) is measured with respect to different evaluation measures, including specificity, sensitivity, and harmonic mean (F-measure), among others, on a large number of cases and controls from the ADNI dataset. Results: The results indicate competitive performance when classifying subjects from the baseline selected variables using machine learning technology. Though we observed fairly good results across all machine learning algorithms utilized, there was still variation in the performance ability, indicating that some algorithms, such as NB and C4.5, are better suited to the task of classifying dementia status based on our baseline data. Conclusions: Using cognitive tests, such as CDR-SB scores, with demographic attributes to pinpoint to dementia using machine learning can be seen a less invasive approach that could be good for clinical use to aid in the diagnosis of dementia. This study gives an indication that a comprehensive assessment tool, such as CDR, may be adequate in assessing and assigning a dementia class to patients, upon their visit, in order to speed further clinical procedures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare · Machine Learning in Healthcare

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computer Science Department, Prince Hussein Bin Abdullah College for Information Technology, Al Al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan

ASD Tests, Auckland 0610, New Zealand

Manukau Institute of Technology, Auckland 0481, New Zealand

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. A Novel Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict the Conversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Disease Using Socio-Demographic Characteristics, Clinical Information, and Neuropsychological Measures10.3389/fneur.2019.00756 ↗
2. Detecting very early stages of dementia from normal aging with Machine Learning methods10.1007/BFb0029438 ↗
3. So, A., Hooshyar, D., Park, K.W., and Lim, H.S. (2017). Early Diagnosis of Dementia from Clinical Data by Machine Learning Techniques. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7070651 ↗
4. Alzheimer’s Association (2018). 2018 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer. Dement., 14, 367–429.10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.001 ↗
5. A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356 ↗
6. “Mini-Mental State”. A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 ↗
7. A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 ↗
8. The role of MRI in dementia
9. The emerging role of PET imaging in dementia10.12688/f1000research.11603.1 ↗
10. Qian, J., Wolters, F.J., Beiser, A., Haan, M., Ikram, M.A., Karlawish, J., Langbaum, J.B., Neuhaus, J.M., Reiman, E.M., and Roberts, J.S. (2017). APOE-related risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia for prevention trials: An analysis of four cohorts. PLoS Med., 14.10.1371/journal.pmed.1002254 ↗
11. Hall, M.A. (2020, April 10). Correlation-Based Feature Selection for Machine Learning. Available online: https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~mhall/thesis.pdf.
12. Kira, K., and Rendell, L.A. (1992, January 12–16). The feature selection problem: Traditional methods and a new algorithm. Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, CA, USA.
13. Hall, M.A., and Smith, L.A. (2020, November 02). Feature Selection for Machine Learning: Comparing a Correlation-Based Filter Approach to the Wrapper. Available online: http://new.aaai.org/Papers/FLAIRS/1999/FLAIRS99-042.pdf.
14. New DSM-V Neurocognitive Disorders Criteria and Their Impact on Diagnostic Classifications of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in a Memory Clinic Setting10.1016/j.jagp.2015.01.004 ↗
15. Mennella, H., and Heering, H. (2020, March 09). Dementia Assessment: Using the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale. Available online: https://www.ebscohost.com/assets-sample-content/Dementia_Assessment_-_Using_the_Clinical_Dementia_Rating_Scale.pdf.
16. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): Clinical characterization10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cb3e25 ↗
17. (2021, December 16). Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Available online: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/about/.
18. (2020, March 22). Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. TADPOLE Dataset 2017. Available online: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/tadpole-challenge-dataset-available/.
19. Aisen, P.S. (2011). Q&A: The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. BMC Med., 9.10.1186/1741-7015-9-101 ↗
20. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 3: Continued innovation for clinical trial improvement10.1016/j.jalz.2016.10.006 ↗
21. Tau as a Therapeutic Target for Alzheimer’s Disease10.2174/156720511796717195 ↗
22. Narkhede, S. (2022, May 23). Understanding Confusion Matrix. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-confusion-matrix-a9ad42dcfd62.
23. Data analysis, including statistics
24. Investigating the Performance of Naive- Bayes Classifiers and K- Nearest Neighbor Classifiers
25. The optimality of naive Bayes
26. Rish, I. (2001, January 4–10). An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. Proceedings of the IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Empirical Methods in Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, USA.
27. Cohen, W.W. (1995). Machine Learning Proceedings, Morgan Kaufmann.
28. Instance-based learning algorithms10.1007/BF00153759 ↗
29. Data Imbalance in Autism Pre-Diagnosis Classification Systems: An Experimental Study10.1142/S0219649220400146 ↗
30. Using Dual Neural Network Architecture to Detect the Risk of Dementia With Community Health Data: Algorithm Development and Validation Study
31. Quinlan, J.R. (1993). C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann.
32. An Introduction to ROC analysis10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 ↗
33. Clinical Prediction from Structural Brain MRI Scans: A Large-Scale Empirical Study10.1007/s12021-014-9238-1 ↗
34. Batmanghelich, N., Taskar, B., and Davatzikos, C. (2009). Information Processing in Medical Imaging: 21st International Conference, Springer.
35. Individual subject classification for Alzheimer’s disease based on incremental learning using a spatial frequency representation of cortical thickness data10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.085 ↗
36. Multivariate deformation-based analysis of brain atrophy to predict Alzheimer’s disease in mild cognitive impairment10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.008 ↗
37. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
38. Neighbourhood approximation using randomized forests10.1016/j.media.2013.04.013 ↗
39. The Relevance Voxel Machine (RVoxM): A Self-Tuning Bayesian Model for Informative Image-Based Prediction10.1109/TMI.2012.2216543 ↗
40. Neurodegenerative Diseases Target Large-Scale Human Brain Networks10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.024 ↗
41. Different multivariate techniques for automated classification of MRI data in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.11.005 ↗
42. MRI Measures of Alzheimer’s Disease and the AddNeuroMed Study10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05063.x ↗
43. The AddNeuroMed framework for multi-centre MRI assessment of Alzheimer’s disease: Experience from the first 24 months10.1002/gps.2491 ↗
44. AddNeuroMed and ADNI: Similar patterns of Alzheimer’s atrophy and automated MRI classification accuracy in Europe and North America10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.065 ↗
45. A parameter-efficient deep learning approach to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.031 ↗
46. Predicting clinical scores from magnetic resonance scans in Alzheimer’s disease10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.051 ↗
47. [P2–422]: Predicting cognitive test scores in alzheimer’s patients using multimodal longitudinal data10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1078 ↗
48. Miller, J., and Kauwe, J. (2020). Predicting Clinical Dementia Rating Using Blood RNA Levels. Genes, 11.10.3390/genes11060706 ↗
49. Item response theory analysis of the Clinical Dementia Rating10.1002/alz.12210 ↗
50. Detection of dementia progression from functional activities data using machine learning techniques10.3233/IDT-220054 ↗
51. Common dementia screening procedures: DSM-5 fulfilment and mapping to cognitive domains10.1504/IJBHR.2022.122019 ↗
52. Thabtah, F., Ong, S., and Peebles, D. (2022). Examining Cognitive Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease Progression Using Computational Intelligence. Healthcare, 10.10.3390/healthcare10102045 ↗