GEOBIA and Vegetation Indices in Extracting Olive Tree Canopies Based on Very High-Resolution UAV Multispectral Imagery
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent decades, precision agriculture and geospatial technologies have made it possible to ensure sustainability in an olive-growing sector. The main goal of this study is the extraction of olive tree canopies by comparing two approaches, the first of which is related to geographic object-based analysis (GEOBIA), while the second one is based on the use of vegetation indices (VIs). The research area is a micro-location within the Lun olives garden, on the island of Pag. The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a multispectral (MS) sensor was used for generating a very high-resolution (VHR) UAVMS model, while another mission was performed to create a VHR digital orthophoto (DOP). When implementing the GEOBIA approach in the extraction of the olive canopy, user-defined parameters and classification algorithms support vector machine (SVM), maximum likelihood classifier (MLC), and random trees classifier (RTC) were evaluated. The RTC algorithm achieved the highest overall accuracy (OA) of 0.7565 and kappa coefficient (KC) of 0.4615. The second approach included five different VIs models (NDVI, NDRE, GNDVI, MCARI2, and RDVI2) which are optimized using the proposed VITO (VI Threshold Optimizer) tool. The NDRE index model was selected as the most accurate one, according to the ROC accuracy measure with a result of 0.888 for the area under curve (AUC).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote Sensing in Agriculture · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Remote-Sensing Image Classification
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geography, University of Zadar, Trg Kneza Višeslava 9, 23000 Zadar, Croatia
Faculty of Agrobiotechnical Sciences, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
Funding
Croatian Science Foundation · Italy-Croatia cross-border cooperation program 2014–2020
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. Besnard, G., Hernández, P., Khadari, B., Dorado, G., and Savolainen, V. (2011). Genomic Profiling of Plastid DNA Variation in the Mediterranean Olive Tree. BMC Plant Biol., 11.10.1186/1471-2229-11-80 ↗
2. Centennial Olive Trees as a Reservoir of Genetic Diversity10.1093/aob/mcr194 ↗
3. Kostelenos, G., and Kiritsakis, A. (2017). Olive Tree History and Evolution. Olives and Olive Oil as Functional Foods, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781119135340.ch1 ↗
4. Plant-Pollinator Biodiversity and Pollination Services in a Complex Mediterranean Landscape10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.019 ↗
5. Land-Cover and Land-Use Change in a Mediterranean Landscape: A Spatial Analysis of Driving Forces Integrating Biophysical and Human Factors10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.02.001 ↗
6. Rodríguez Sousa, A.A., Barandica, J.M., Aguilera, P.A., and Rescia, A.J. (2020). Examining Potential Environmental Consequences of Climate Change and Other Driving Forces on the Sustainability of Spanish Olive Groves under a Socio-Ecological Approach. Agriculture, 10.10.3390/agriculture10110509 ↗
7. Fraga, H., Moriondo, M., Leolini, L., and Santos, J.A. (2020). Mediterranean Olive Orchards under Climate Change: A Review of Future Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11010056 ↗
8. Olive Groves: “The Life and Identity of the Mediterranean”10.1023/A:1022444005336 ↗
9. Synthesis of Bioluminescent Gold Nanoparticle–Luciferase Hybrid Systems for Technological Applications10.1007/s43630-021-00111-0 ↗
10. Čurović, Ž., Čurović, M., Spalević, V., Janic, M., Sestras, P., and Popović, S.G. (2019). Identification and Evaluation of Landscape as a Precondition for Planning Revitalization and Development of Mediterranean Rural Settlements—Case Study: Mrkovi Village, Bay of Kotor, Montenegro. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11072039 ↗
11. Olive Oil Tourism in the Euro-Mediterranean Area
12. Calera, A., Campos, I., Osann, A., D’Urso, G., and Menenti, M. (2017). Remote Sensing for Crop Water Management: From ET Modelling to Services for the End Users. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17051104 ↗
13. A Methodology Based on GEOBIA and WorldView-3 Imagery to Derive Vegetation Indices at Tree Crown Detail in Olive Orchards
14. Zha, H., Miao, Y., Wang, T., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Sun, W., Feng, Z., and Kusnierek, K. (2020). Improving Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing-Based Rice Nitrogen Nutrition Index Prediction with Machine Learning. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12020215 ↗
15. Current Status and Perspective of Remote Sensing Application in Crop Management10.5513/JCEA01/22.1.3042 ↗
16. Integrating Geospatial Technologies to Examine Urban Land Use Change: A Design Partnership
17. The Evolution of Geospatial Technology Calls for Changes in Geospatial Research, Education and Government Management
18. Geospatial Technologies and Digital Geomorphological Mapping: Concepts, Issues and Research10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.027 ↗
19. Marques, P., Pádua, L., Adão, T., Hruška, J., Peres, E., Sousa, A., and Sousa, J.J. (2019). UAV-Based Automatic Detection and Monitoring of Chestnut Trees. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11070855 ↗
20. Applications of Georeferenced High-Resolution Images Obtained with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Part I: Description of Image Acquisition and Processing10.1007/s11119-014-9355-8 ↗
21. Ronchetti, G., Mayer, A., Facchi, A., Ortuani, B., and Sona, G. (2020). Crop Row Detection through UAV Surveys to Optimize On-Farm Irrigation Management. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12121967 ↗
22. Martínez-Casasnovas, J.A., Sandonís-Pozo, L., Escolà, A., Arnó, J., and Llorens, J. (2021). Delineation of Management Zones in Hedgerow Almond Orchards Based on Vegetation Indices from UAV Images Validated by LiDAR-Derived Canopy Parameters. Agronomy, 12.10.3390/agronomy12010102 ↗
23. Hobart, M., Pflanz, M., Weltzien, C., and Schirrmann, M. (2020). Growth Height Determination of Tree Walls for Precise Monitoring in Apple Fruit Production Using UAV Photogrammetry. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12101656 ↗
24. Šiljeg, A., Domazetović, F., Marić, I., and Pandja, L. (2020). Quality Assessment of Worldview-3 Stereo Imagery Derived Models Over Millennial Olive Groves. International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-76374-9_5 ↗
25. Zhang, W., Gao, F., Jiang, N., Zhang, C., and Zhang, Y. (2022). High-Temporal-Resolution Forest Growth Monitoring Based on Segmented 3D Canopy Surface from UAV Aerial Photogrammetry. Drones, 6.10.3390/drones6070158 ↗
26. Stateras, D., and Kalivas, D. (2020). Assessment of Olive Tree Canopy Characteristics and Yield Forecast Model Using High Resolution UAV Imagery. Agriculture, 10.10.3390/agriculture10090385 ↗
27. Jurado, J.M., Ortega, L., Cubillas, J.J., and Feito, F.R. (2020). Multispectral Mapping on 3D Models and Multi-Temporal Monitoring for Individual Characterization of Olive Trees. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12071106 ↗
28. Advanced Methods of Plant Disease Detection. A Review10.1007/s13593-014-0246-1 ↗
29. Evolution or Revolution? The Rise of UAVs10.1109/MTAS.2006.1700021 ↗
30. Design of a Commercial Hybrid VTOL UAV System10.1007/s10846-013-9900-0 ↗
31. UAV & Satellite Synergies for Optical Remote Sensing Applications: A Literature Review10.1016/j.srs.2021.100019 ↗
32. Sozzi, M., Kayad, A., Gobbo, S., Cogato, A., Sartori, L., and Marinello, F. (2021). Economic Comparison of Satellite, Plane and UAV-Acquired NDVI Images for Site-Specific Nitrogen Application: Observations from Italy. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11112098 ↗
33. Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Remote Sensing and Scientific Research: Classification and Considerations of Use10.3390/rs4061671 ↗
34. UAS, Sensors, and Data Processing in Agroforestry: A Review towards Practical Applications10.1080/01431161.2017.1297548 ↗
35. Delavarpour, N., Koparan, C., Nowatzki, J., Bajwa, S., and Sun, X. (2021). A Technical Study on UAV Characteristics for Precision Agriculture Applications and Associated Practical Challenges. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13061204 ↗
36. Use of a Multispectral Uav Photogrammetry for Detection and Tracking of Forest Disturbance Dynamics
37. Fernández-Lozano, J., and Sanz-Ablanedo, E. (2021). Unraveling the Morphological Constraints on Roman Gold Mining Hydraulic Infrastructure in NW Spain. A UAV-Derived Photogrammetric and Multispectral Approach. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13020291 ↗
38. Monitoring Detailed Land Surface Changes Using an Airborne Multispectral Digital Camera System10.1109/36.536536 ↗
39. Simplified Radiometric Calibration for UAS-Mounted Multispectral Sensor10.1080/22797254.2018.1432293 ↗
40. Avola, G., Di Gennaro, S.F., Cantini, C., Riggi, E., Muratore, F., Tornambè, C., and Matese, A. (2019). Remotely Sensed Vegetation Indices to Discriminate Field-Grown Olive Cultivars. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11101242 ↗
41. Vegetation Indices, Remote Sensing and Forest Monitoring10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00507.x ↗
42. Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., and Della Spina, L. (2021). Monitoring Onion Crops Using Multispectral Imagery from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). New Metropolitan Perspectives, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4 ↗
43. Functional Equivalence of Spectral Vegetation Indices10.1016/0034-4257(84)90013-0 ↗
44. Interpreting Vegetation Indices10.1016/S0167-5877(05)80004-2 ↗
45. A Review of Vegetation Indices10.1080/02757259509532298 ↗
46. Potentials and Limits of Vegetation Indices for LAI and APAR Assessment10.1016/0034-4257(91)90009-U ↗
47. Significant Remote Sensing Vegetation Indices: A Review of Developments and Applications10.1155/2017/1353691 ↗
48. Evaluating Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices for Precision Farming Applications from UAV Images10.3390/rs70404026 ↗
49. Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis—Towards a New Paradigm10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.09.014 ↗
50. Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA): Emerging Trends and Future Opportunities10.1080/15481603.2018.1426092 ↗
51. Blaschke, T., Lang, S., and Hay, G.J. (2008). Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA): A New Name for a New Discipline. Object-Based Image Analysis: Spatial Concepts for Knowledge-Driven Remote Sensing Applications, Springer. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography.10.1007/978-3-540-77058-9 ↗
52. Deep Learning for Plant Identification Using Vein Morphological Patterns10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.003 ↗
53. Deep Learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
54. Jozdani, S.E., Johnson, B.A., and Chen, D. (2019). Comparing Deep Neural Networks, Ensemble Classifiers, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms for Object-Based Urban Land Use/Land Cover Classification. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11141713 ↗
55. The Ownership of Olive Trees in Lun (Island Pag) and the Principle superficies solo cedit
56. Janick, J. (2010). The Physiology of Adaptation and Yield Expression in Olive. Horticultural Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
57. Classification of Floodplain Vegetation by Data Fusion of Spectral (CASI) and LiDAR Data10.1080/01431160701241720 ↗
58. A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B ↗
59. Comparative Assessment of the Measures of Thematic Classification Accuracy10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.010 ↗
60. A Reappraisal of the kappa coefficient10.1016/0895-4356(88)90031-5 ↗
61. Statistical Methods in Epidemiology. v. Towards an Understanding of the Kappa Coefficient10.1080/096382800296575 ↗
62. Mapping Individual Tree Location, Height and Species in Broadleaved Deciduous Forest Using Airborne LIDAR and Multi-spectral Remotely Sensed Data10.1080/0143116042000298289 ↗
63. Šiljeg, A., Panđa, L., Domazetović, F., Marić, I., Gašparović, M., Borisov, M., and Milošević, R. (2022). Comparative Assessment of Pixel and Object-Based Approaches for Mapping of Olive Tree Crowns Based on UAV Multispectral Imagery. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14030757 ↗
64. The Use of the Area under the ROC Curve in the Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2 ↗
65. Krzanowski, W.J., and Hand, D.J. (2009). ROC Curves for Continuous Data, Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781439800225 ↗
66. A Simple Generalisation of the Area Under the ROC Curve for Multiple Class Classification Problems10.1023/A:1010920819831 ↗
67. Understanding AUC-ROC Curve
68. Comparison of GEOBIA classification algorithms based on Worldview-3 imagery in the extraction of coastal coniferous forest10.31298/sl.145.11-12.3 ↗
69. A Review of Supervised Object-Based Land-Cover Image Classification10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.06.001 ↗
70. Predicting Grain Yield in Rice Using Multi-Temporal Vegetation Indices from UAV-Based Multispectral and Digital Imagery10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.05.003 ↗
71. Comparison between Vegetation Indices for Detecting Spatial and Temporal Variabilities in Soybean Crop Using Canopy Sensors10.1007/s11119-019-09704-3 ↗
72. Detection of Irrigation Inhomogeneities in an Olive Grove Using the NDRE Vegetation Index Obtained from UAV Images10.1080/22797254.2019.1572459 ↗
73. Use of a Green Channel in Remote Sensing of Global Vegetation from EOS- MODIS10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00072-7 ↗
74. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Determination in Urban Areas by Full-Spectrum Photography10.3390/ecologies1010004 ↗
75. A Commentary Review on the Use of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in the Era of Popular Remote Sensing10.1007/s11676-020-01155-1 ↗