journal article·2022-12-30Open access

A Review Study on Total Ankle Replacement

Naudereh B. Noori, Jessica Yi Ouyang, Mohammad Noori, Wael A. Altabey

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 1

Abstract

Total ankle replacement (TAR) is the replacement of a damaged arthritic ankle joint with a prosthetic implant to eliminate the source of resultant pain and swelling. Historically, however, the ankle joint has been one of the most difficult joints to analyze and replicate for successful replacement due to its complex anatomy and multiplanar motion. Ankle fusion, the standard of care for end stage ankle arthritis, has excellent functional outcomes but results in loss of motion at the joint. TAR was first attempted in the 1970s and by the early 1990s, prosthesis designs more closely mirrored the natural anatomy of the ankle and TAR was no longer considered an experimental procedure. Although the outcomes of TAR have significantly improved over this short period of time, there are still many areas that warrant further investigation including (1) optimal patient selection, (2) number of prosthesis components, (3) bearing type, (4) revision rates and causes and (5) comprehensive finite element models (FEM) of the ankle. The main goal of this paper is to present a literature review on the background and evolution of TAR, the current state of practice and prosthesis types and challenges and directions for future improvement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Foot and Ankle Surgery · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Tendon Structure and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA

Southland Industries, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405, USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt

References (83)

Show source-provided references
1. Biomechanics of the ankle10.1016/j.mporth.2016.04.015 ↗
2. Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift10.2106/00004623-197658030-00010 ↗
3. Long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis10.1016/S1083-7515(02)00048-7 ↗
4. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis10.2106/00004623-200102000-00009 ↗
5. Total ankle replacement Design evolution and results
6. Damage patterns in polyethylene fixed bearings of retrieved total ankle replacements10.1016/j.fas.2020.06.012 ↗
7. Sagittal Ankle and Midfoot Range of Motion Before and After Revision Total Ankle Replacement: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis10.1053/j.jfas.2017.11.017 ↗
8. Abnormalities of gait caused by ankle arthritis are improved by ankle arthrodesis10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37614 ↗
9. Comparison of gait after total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis10.1177/1071100713490675 ↗
10. Total ankle arthroplasty: A historical perspective10.1016/S1083-7515(02)00061-X ↗
11. History and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty10.1093/bmb/ldn039 ↗
12. Total ankle replacement: Why, when and how?
13. Age-related outcome of mobile- bearing total ankle replacement10.3928/01477447-20170327-05 ↗
14. Total ankle arthroplasty10.5435/00124635-200205000-00002 ↗
15. Functional and clinical outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in elderly compared to younger patients10.1016/j.fas.2016.09.005 ↗
16. Effect of age on outcomes in total ankle arthroplasty10.1177/1071100715579717 ↗
17. Are there differences in gait mechanics in patients with a fixed versus mobile bearing total ankle arthroplasty?10.1007/s11999-017-5405-7 ↗
18. Martinelli, N., Baretta, S., Pagano, J., Bianchi, A., Villa, T., Casaroli, G., and Galbusera, F. (2017). Contact stresses, pressure and area in a fixed-bearing total ankle replacement: A finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord., 18.10.1186/s12891-017-1848-y ↗
19. An update on Total Ankle Replacement survivorship rates and future directions for patient selection10.1016/j.orthtr.2019.12.004 ↗
20. Total ankle replacement in patients under the age of 50. Should the indications be revised?10.1016/j.fas.2013.05.004 ↗
21. Total ankle replacement in juvenile chronic arthritis
22. Ankle range of motion following 3-component total ankle arthroplasty10.1177/1071100720955145 ↗
23. Role of total ankle arthroplasty in stiff ankles10.1177/1071100717718130 ↗
24. Role of Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Stiff Ankles–Long Term Follow-Up
25. What is the Impact of Body Mass Index Cutoffs on Total Knee Arthroplasty Complications?10.1016/j.arth.2021.12.024 ↗
26. Association between body mass index and thirty-day complications after total knee arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.038 ↗
27. The impact of obesity on the outcome of total ankle replacement
28. Total ankle replacement in obese patients: Component stability, weight change, and functional outcome in 118 consecutive patients10.3113/FAI.2011.0925 ↗
29. Ankle arthroplasty with preoperative coronal plane deformity: Short-term results10.1097/01.blo.0000132248.64290.52 ↗
30. Total ankle arthroplasty with severe preoperative varus deformity10.3928/01477447-20150402-91 ↗
31. Short-term results of total ankle arthroplasty for end-stage ankle arthritis with severe varus deformity10.1177/1071100713517102 ↗
32. Differences in outcomes following total ankle replacement in patients with neutral alignment compared with tibiotalar joint malalignment10.2106/JBJS.L.00404 ↗
33. Roberto, A.B., Mark, A.P., and Christopher, F.H. (2018). Current and Emerging Insights on Total Ankle Replacement. Podiatry Today. HMP Glob. Learn. Netw., Available online: https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/podiatry/current-and-emerging-insights-total-ankle-replacement.
34. STAR™ ankle: Long-term results10.3113/FAI.2011.0473 ↗
35. Long-term follow-up of mobile bearing total ankle arthroplasty in the United States10.1177/1071100714550654 ↗
36. The INBONE Total Ankle Replacement10.1053/j.oto.2010.09.001 ↗
37. Retrospective comparison between a two- and three-component ankle arthroplasty: Clinical and functional evaluation via gait analysis10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105180 ↗
38. Biomechanics of the natural, arthritic, and replaced human ankle joint10.1186/1757-1146-7-8 ↗
39. The motion between components in a mobile-bearing total ankle replacement measured by cone-beam CT scanning10.1016/j.fas.2021.04.002 ↗
40. Evaluating Component Migration After Modular Stem Fixed-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement10.1053/j.jfas.2014.06.028 ↗
41. Changes in ankle and foot kinematic after fixed-bearing total ankle replacement10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111060 ↗
42. Six-year results of the Rebalance mobile bearing total ankle replacement10.1016/j.fas.2020.02.004 ↗
43. Finite element analysis of stress and wear characterization in total ankle replacements10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.01.020 ↗
44. The Effect of Sagittal and Coronal Balance on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.007 ↗
45. Periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty10.1177/1071100713509247 ↗
46. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement10.1177/1071100719879680 ↗
47. Midterm results of the Salto Talaris total ankle arthroplasty10.1177/1071100717719756 ↗
48. Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement: One-stage revision ankle arthroplasty10.1007/s00064-017-0497-5 ↗
49. Revision Rates After Total Ankle Replacement: A Comparison of Clinical Studies and Arthroplasty Registers10.1177/10711007211053862 ↗
50. Quality measures for total ankle replacement, 30-day readmission and reoperation rates within 1 year of surgery: A data linkage study using the NJR data set10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011332 ↗
51. Analysis of early failure rate and its risk factor with 2157 total ankle replacements
52. Revision rate of total ankle replacement in patients younger than 50 years10.1016/j.fas.2017.07.1124 ↗
53. Dynamic Ultrasonography: A Cadaveric Model for Evaluating Aseptic Loosening of Total Ankle Arthroplasty10.1053/j.jfas.2013.02.015 ↗
54. Tri-Component, Mobile Bearing, Total Ankle Replacement: Mid-term Functional Outcome and Survival10.1053/j.jfas.2012.05.002 ↗
55. Management of Extensive Talar Osteolysis with Agility™ Total Ankle Replacement Systems Using Geometric Metal-reinforced Polymethylmethacrylate Cement Augmentation10.1053/j.jfas.2013.07.005 ↗
56. Computational Model Validation of Contact Mechanics in Total Ankle Arthroplasty10.1002/jor.24551 ↗
57. Experimental and finite element investigation of total ankle replacement: A review of literature and recommendations10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.019 ↗
58. Development and experimental validation of a finite element model of total ankle replacement10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.022 ↗
59. Finite element analysis of biomechanical effects of total ankle arthroplasty on the foot10.1016/j.jot.2017.12.003 ↗
60. Previous Surgery and the Temporal Evolution of Functional Outcomes and Complication Rates in Total Ankle Replacement10.1053/j.jfas.2021.10.009 ↗
61. The present state of ankle arthroplasty10.1016/j.fas.2008.05.008 ↗
62. Finite-element analysis of the influence of tibial implant fixation design of total ankle replacement on bone-implant interfacial biomechanical performance10.1177/2309499020966125 ↗
63. Finite element analysis of a total ankle replacement during the stance phase of gait10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.010 ↗
64. Impact of foot modeling on the quantification of the effect of total ankle replacement: A pilot study10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.12.027 ↗
65. Collet, A. (2021). Top Ankle Replacement Implants in the United States. IData Res., Available online: https://idataresearch.com/top-ankle-replacement-implants/.
66. Prospective study of the effect on gait of a two-component total ankle replacement10.1177/1071100713494378 ↗
67. Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Complications in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Single Surgeon’s Experience in Ninety-Seven Replacements10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.015 ↗
68. A review of the STAR prosthetic system and the biomechanical considerations in total ankle replacements10.1016/j.fas.2011.02.003 ↗
69. Intermediate to long-term outcomes of total ankle replacement with the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR)10.2106/JBJS.N.01077 ↗
70. Long-term results of Scandinavian total ankle replacement10.1177/1071100717698695 ↗
71. Design comparison of the INBONE I versus INBONE II total ankle system10.1177/1938640012473148 ↗
72. Radiographic outcomes of preoperative CT scan-derived patient-specific total ankle arthroplasty10.1177/1071100715585561 ↗
73. Accuracy and reproducibility using patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty10.1177/1071100716682086 ↗
74. Determining the cost-savings threshold and alignment accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle replacements10.1177/1071100716667505 ↗
75. Preliminary Report of a Hybrid Total Ankle Arthroplasty Combining a Stemmed Intramedullary Tibial Component With Chamfer-Cut Talar Dome10.1053/j.jfas.2021.12.005 ↗
76. Total ankle arthroplasty results using fixed bearing CT-guided patient specific implants in posttraumatic versus nontraumatic arthritis10.1016/j.fas.2021.03.015 ↗
77. Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement: Two-stage revision with bone augmentation of osseous defects and secondary prosthesis implantation10.1007/s00064-017-0500-1 ↗
78. Total ankle arthroplasty with a modern fixed-bearing system: The Salto Talaris prosthesis
79. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of the Salto Talaris total ankle arthroplasty10.1177/1071100720947030 ↗
80. Influence of geometry and depth of resections on bone support for total ankle replacement10.1177/1071100717712508 ↗
81. Early outcomes with the vantage total ankle prosthesis10.1016/j.fastrc.2021.100121 ↗
82. Short-Term Complications and Outcomes of the Cadence Total Ankle Arthroplasty10.1177/10711007211043853 ↗
83. DeOrio, J.K., Nunley, J.A., Easley, M., and Valerrabano, V. (2021). Vantage Total Ankle Replacement. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-69269-8_13 ↗