journal article·2022-09-24Open access

Erosion Resistant Hydrophobic Coatings for Passive Ice Protection of Aircraft

Naiheng Song, Ali Benmeddour

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 19

Abstract

Novel polymeric coatings, namely slippery polyurethane (SPU) coatings, with high surface hydrophobicity and superior erosion resistance against high speed solid particles and water droplets were successfully developed to protect the leading edge of fast moving aerodynamic structures, such as aircraft wings and rotor blades, against ice accretion. The coatings comprise newly synthesized surface-modifying polymers (SMPs) bearing fluorinated and polydimethylsiloxane branches at a loading level of 1–5 wt.%, based on the total resin solid, which showed good compatibility with the erosion-resistant polyurethane matrix (PU-R) and rendered effective surface hydrophobicity and slipperiness to the coatings, as evidenced by the high water contact angles of 100–115°. The coatings can be easily be sprayed or solution cast and cured at ambient temperature to provide highly durable thin coating films. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) investigation showed concentration of fluorine on the surface. The presence of 1–5 wt.% of SMPs in the polyurethane matrix slightly reduced the tensile modulus but had no significant impact on the tensile strength. All coating films exhibited good thermal stability with no material softening or degradation after heating at 121 °C for 24 h. DSC heating scans revealed no thermal transitions in the temperature range of −80 °C to 200 °C. Ice adhesion strength (IAS) tests using a static push rig in a cold room of −14 °C showed IAS as low as 220 kPa for the SPU coatings, which is much lower than that of PU-R (i.e., about 620 kPa). Sand erosion tests using 50 μm angular alumina particles at an impinging speed of 150 m/s and an impinging angle of 30° revealed very low erosion rates of ca. 100 μg/g sand for the coatings. Water droplet erosion tests at 175 m/s using 463 μm droplets with 42,000 impingements every minute showed no significant coating removal after 20 min of testing. The combination of the high surface hydrophobicity, low ice adhesion strength and superior erosion resistance makes the SPU coatings attractive for ice protection of aircraft structures, where the coatings’ erosion durability is of paramount importance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Icing and De-icing Technologies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Aerospace Research Center, National Research Council of Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada

Funding

National Research Council Canada · Canadian Department of National Defence–Royal Canadian Navy

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Yamazaki, M., Jemcov, A., and Sakaue, H. (2021). A Review on the Current Status of Icing Physics and Mitigation in Aviation. Aerospace, 8.10.3390/aerospace8070188 ↗
2. Federal Aviation Administration (1991). Aircraft Icing Handbook.
3. Federal Aviation Administration (2015). AC 91-74B Pilot Guide: Fight in Icing Conditions.
4. Federal Aviation Administration (1991). Aircraft Icing Handbook.
5. A survey of icephobic coatings and their potential use in a hybrid coating/active ice protection system for aerospace applications10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.01.002 ↗
6. He, Z., Zhuao, Y., Zhang, Z., and He, J. (2021). Design of icephobic surfaces by lowering ice adhesion strength: A mini review. Coatings, 11.10.3390/coatings11111343 ↗
7. Effect of wettability and surface roughness on ice adhesion strength of hydrophilic, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.101 ↗
8. Superhydrophobic nanocomposite surface topography and ice adhesion10.1021/am501640h ↗
9. Condensation and freezing of droplets on superhydrophoibc surfaces10.1016/j.cis.2013.10.018 ↗
10. Frost formation and ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1063/1.3524513 ↗
11. Supercooled water droplet impact on superhydrophobic surfaces with various roughness and temperature10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.01.076 ↗
12. Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance10.1021/nn302310q ↗
13. Bioinspired stimuli-responsive and antifreeze-secreting anti-icing coatings10.1002/admi.201400479 ↗
14. Bio-Inspired Icephobic Coatings for Aircraft Icing Mitigation: A Critical Review10.1002/9781119846703.ch7 ↗
15. Mechanism of frost formation on lubricant-impregnated surfaces10.1021/la400801s ↗
16. Icephobic surfaces induced by interfacial nonfrozen water10.1021/acsami.6b13773 ↗
17. Robust prototypical anti-icing coatings with a self-lubricating liquid water layer between ice and substrate10.1021/am401004t ↗
18. Bioinspired multifunctional anti-icing Hydrogel10.1016/j.matt.2019.12.017 ↗
19. A Family of Frost-Resistant and Icephobic Coatings10.1002/adma.202109930 ↗
20. Designing durable icephobic surfaces10.1126/sciadv.1501496 ↗
21. Stress-localized durable icephobic surfaces10.1039/C8MH01291A ↗
22. Low-interfacial toughness materials for effective large-scale deicing10.1126/science.aav1266 ↗
23. Development of a durable ice protective coating for use on rotorcraft10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103427 ↗
24. Evaluation of ice-adhesion strength on erosion resistant materials10.2514/1.J053516 ↗
25. Song, N. (2021). Erosion Protective Coatings for RCAF Helicopter Rotor Blades, The National Research Council of Canada. LTR-SMM-2021-0065.
26. Kool, N., Orchard, D.M., and Chevrette, G. (2018, January 25–29). Testing of elastomer icephobic coatings. Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.2514/6.2018-3656 ↗
27. Relationships between water wettability and ice adhesion10.1021/am1006035 ↗
28. Experimental investigation to evaluate the effect of PTFE nanostructured roughness on ice adhesion strength10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.03.009 ↗