journal article·2022-07-02Open access

Automated Geological Features Detection in 3D Seismic Data Using Semi-Supervised Learning

Hadyan Pratama, Abdul Halim Abdul Latiff

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 13

Abstract

A geological interpretation plays an important role to gain information about the structural and stratigraphic of hydrocarbon reservoirs. However, this is a time-consuming task due to the complexity and size of seismic data. We propose a semi-supervised learning technique to automatically and accurately delineate the geological features from 3D seismic data. To generate labeling data for training the supervised Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, we propose an efficient workflow based on unsupervised learning. This workflow utilized seismic attributes and KernelPCA to enhance the visualization of geological targets and clustering the features into binary classes using K-means approach. With this workflow, we are able to develop a data-driven model and reduce human subjectivity. We applied this technique in two cases with different geological settings. The synthetic data and the real seismic investigation from the A Field in the Malay Basin. From this application, we demonstrate that our CNN-based model is highly accurate and consistent with the previous manual interpretation in both cases. In addition to qualitatively evaluating the interpretations, we further extract the predicted result into a 3D geobody. This result could help the interpreter focus on tasks requiring human expertise and aid the model’s prediction in the next studies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Geological Modeling and Analysis · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geosciences, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia

Funding

UTP 3D true-amplitude target-oriented migration

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Barnes, A.E. (2016). Handbook of Poststack Seismic Attributes, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.9781560803324 ↗
2. Lines, L.R., and Newrick, R.T. (2004). Fundamentals of Geophysical Interpretation, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.9781560801726 ↗
3. Zhao, T., Verma, S., Qi, J., and Marfurt, K.J. (2015). Supervised and Unsupervised Learning: How Machines Can Assist Quantitative Seismic Interpretation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/segam2015-5924540.1 ↗
4. Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Seismic Interpretation10.1190/tle37070529.1 ↗
5. Zhang, Y.X., Liu, Y., Zhang, H.R., and Xue, H. (2019, January 3–6). Automatic Salt Dome Detection Using U-Net. Proceedings of the 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019, London, UK.10.3997/2214-4609.201901511 ↗
6. Shi, Y., Wu, X., and Fomel, S. (2018, January 14–19). Automatic Salt-Body Classification Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network. Proceedings of the 2018 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2018, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1190/segam2018-2997304.1 ↗
7. FaultSeg3D: Using Synthetic Data Sets to Train an End-to-End Convolutional Neural Network for 3D Seismic Fault Segmentation10.1190/geo2018-0646.1 ↗
8. Automated Fault Detection without Seismic Processing10.1190/tle36030208.1 ↗
9. Seismic Facies Analysis Using Machine Learning10.1190/geo2017-0595.1 ↗
10. Zhao, T. (2018, January 14–19). Seismic Facies Classification Using Different Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2018, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1190/segam2018-2997085.1 ↗
11. A Machine-Learning Benchmark for Facies Classification10.1190/INT-2018-0249.1 ↗
12. Dramsch, J.S., and Lüthje, M. (2018, January 14–19). Deep Learning Seismic Facies on State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures. Proceedings of the 2018 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2018, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1190/segam2018-2996783.1 ↗
13. Chopra, S., and Marfurt, K.J. (2019, January 22–24). Unsupervised Machine Learning Applications for Seismic Facies Classification. Proceedings of the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference 2019, URTC 2019, Denver, CO, USA.10.15530/urtec-2019-557 ↗
14. K-Means Clustering Using Principal Component Analysis to Automate Label Organization in Multi-Attribute Seismic Facies Analysis10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104555 ↗
15. Seismic Attribute Selection and Clustering to Detect and Classify Surface Waves in Multicomponent Seismic Data by Using k-Means Algorithm10.1190/tle36030239.1 ↗
16. Characterizing a Turbidite System in Canterbury Basin, New Zealand, Using Seismic Attributes and Distance-Preserving Self-Organizing Maps10.1190/INT-2015-0094.1 ↗
17. Puzyrev, V., and Elders, C. (2020, January 7–10). Deep Convolutional Autoencoder for Unsupervised Seismic Facies Classification. Proceedings of the EAGE/AAPG Digital Subsurface for Asia Pacific Conference 2020, Online.10.3997/2214-4609.202075024 ↗
18. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015, January 5–9). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
19. Deep Learning Network Optimization and Hyperparameter Tuning for Seismic Lithofacies Classification10.1190/tle40070514.1 ↗
20. Rezende, E., Ruppert, G., Carvalho, T., Ramos, F., and De Geus, P. (2017, January 18–21). Malicious Software Classification Using Transfer Learning of ResNet-50 Deep Neural Network. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, ICMLA 2017, Cancun, Mexico.10.1109/ICMLA.2017.00-19 ↗
21. Fehler, M., and Keliher, P.J. (2011). SEAM Phase 1: Challenges of Subsalt Imaging in Tertiary Basins, with Emphasis on Deepwater Gulf of Mexico, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.9781560802945 ↗
22. Petroleum Systems of the North Malay Basin10.7186/bgsm49200620 ↗
23. Bishop, M.G. (2002). Petroleum Systems of the Malay Basin Province, Malaysia.10.3133/ofr9950T ↗
24. Lin, L., Ismail, H., Abdul Kadir, M.F., and Tajuddin, M. (2016, January 14–16). Stratal Slicing: A Tool for Imaging Geologically Time-Equivalent Fluvial Architecture—A Field Case Study. Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bangkok, Thailand.
25. Architectural-Element Analysis: A New Method of Facies Analysis Applied to Fluvial Deposits10.1016/0012-8252(85)90001-7 ↗
26. Understanding Seismic Attributes10.1190/1.1444919 ↗
27. Seismic Attributes Add a New Dimension to Prospect Evaluation and Geomorphology Offshore Malaysia10.1190/tle33050536.1 ↗
28. Seismic Attributes for Enhancing Structural and Stratigraphic Features: Application to N-Field, Malay Basin, Malaysia10.7186/bgsm72202108 ↗
29. Fossen, H. (2016). Structural Geology, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107415096 ↗
30. Generating Variable Shapes of Salt Geobodies from Seismic Images and Prior Geological Knowledge10.1190/INT-2019-0032.1 ↗
31. Posamentier, H.W., Davies, R.J., Cartwright, J.A., and Wood, L.J. (2007). Seismic Geomorphology—An Overview. Seismic Geomorphology: Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production, The Geological Society of London.10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.277.01.01 ↗
32. Stratigraphic characterization of a fluvial reservoir using seismic attributes and spectral decomposition: An example from the Northern Malay Basin
33. Application of Seismic Attribute and Spectral Decomposition: Example of Fluvial System During Miocene in Field A., Malay Basin10.36478/jeasci.2019.1110.1121 ↗
34. Sun, X., Sun, S.Z., Tian, J., and Han, J. (2013, January 10–13). Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis on Seismic Denoising and Fluid Identification. Proceedings of the 75th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition 2013 Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013: Changing Frontiers, London, UK.10.3997/2214-4609.20130642 ↗
35. Seismic Attributes Optimization Based on Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA) and Application
36. Vapnik, V. (1998). The Support Vector Method of Function Estimation. Nonlinear Modeling, Springer.10.7551/mitpress/1130.003.0006 ↗
37. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume V, Weather Modification10.2307/2283488 ↗
38. Seismic Facies Analysis Based on Deep Convolutional Embedded Clustering10.1190/geo2018-0789.1 ↗
39. An Enhanced K-Means Clustering Algorithm for Pattern Discovery in Healthcare Data
40. Civitarese, D., Szwarcman, D., Brazil, E.V., and Zadrozny, B. (2019). Semantic Segmentation of Seismic Images. arXiv.
41. Deep Learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
42. Enyinna Nwankpa, C., Ijomah, W., Gachagan, A., and Marshall, S. (2018). Activation Functions: Comparison of Trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learning. arXiv.
43. Kingma, D.P., and Lei Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
44. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗
45. Ting, K.M. (2017). Confusion Matrix. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining, Springer Science and Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_50 ↗
46. Rezatofighi, H., Tsoi, N., Gwak, J., Sadeghian, A., Reid, I., and Savarese, S. (2019, January 15–20). Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and a Loss for Bounding Box Regression. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00075 ↗
47. Rezaei-Dastjerdehei, M.R., Mijani, A., and Fatemizadeh, E. (2020, January 26–27). Addressing Imbalance in Multi-Label Classification Using Weighted Cross Entropy Loss Function. Proceedings of the 27th National and 5th International Iranian Conference of Biomedical Engineering, ICBME 2020, Tehran, Iran.10.1109/ICBME51989.2020.9319440 ↗
48. Application of Seismic Attribute Analysis in Fluvial Seismic Geomorphology10.1007/s13202-019-00809-z ↗