Experimental Determination of Lamb-Wave Attenuation Coefficients
Source abstract
Abstract
This work determined the attenuation coefficients of Lamb waves of ten engineering materials and compared the results with calculated Lamb-wave attenuation coefficients, α–S and α–A. The Disperse program and a parametric method based on Disperse results were used for calculations. Bulk-wave attenuation coefficients, αL and αT, were required as input parameters to the Disperse calculations. The calculated α–S and α–A values were found to be dominated by the αT contribution. Often α–Ao coincided with αT. The values of αL and αT were previously obtained or newly measured. Attenuation measurement relied on Lamb-wave generation by pulsed excitation of ultrasonic transducers and on surface-displacement detection with point contact receivers. The frequency used ranged from 10 kHz to 1 MHz. A total of 14 sheet and plate samples were evaluated. Sample materials ranged from steel, Al, and silicate glass with low attenuation to polymers and a fiber composite with much higher attenuation. Experimentally obtained Lamb-wave attenuation coefficients, α–S and α–A, for symmetric and asymmetric modes, were mostly for the zeroth mode. Plots of α–So and α–Ao values against frequency were found to coincide reasonably well to theoretically calculated curves. This study confirmed that the Disperse program predicts Lamb-wave attenuation coefficients for elastically isotropic materials within the limitation of the contact ultrasonic techniques used. Further refinements in experimental methods are needed, as large deviations often occurred, especially at low and high frequencies. Methods of refinement are suggested. Displacement measurements were quantified using Rayleigh wave calibration. For signals below 300 kHz, 1-mV receiver output corresponded to 1-pm displacement. Peak displacements after 200-mm propagation were found to range from 10 pm to 1.5 nm. With the use of signal averaging, the point-contact sensor was capable of detecting 1-pm displacement with 40 dB signal-to-noise ratio and had equivalent noise of 4.3 fm/√Hz. Approximate expressions for α–So and α–Ao were obtained, and an empirical correlation was found between bulk-wave attenuation coefficients, i.e., αT = 2.79 αL, for over 150 materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Kishoni, D., Workman, G.L., and Moore, P.O. (2007). Nondestructive Testing Handbook, American Society for Nondestructive Testing. [3rd ed.]. Ultrasonic Testing.
2. Miller, R.K., Hill, E.v.K., and Moore, P.O. (2005). Nondestructive Testing Handbook, American Society for Nondestructive Testing. [3rd ed.]. Acoustic Emission Testing.
3. Boller, C., Chang, F.K., and Fujino, Y. (2009). Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, Wiley.10.1002/9780470061626 ↗
4. Guided waves’ dispersion curves in anisotropic viscoelastic single- and multi-layered media
5. Strategies for guided-wave structural health monitoring
6. Acoustic Emission Analysis10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10036-0 ↗
7. Elastic waveguides: History and the state of the art. I10.1007/s10958-009-9623-8 ↗
8. Elastic waveguides: History and the state of the art. II10.1007/s10958-010-9915-z ↗
9. Acoustic verification of structural integrity of Polaris chambers
10. The MONPAC system
11. Hutton, P.H., Jolly, W.D., and Vetrano, J.B. (1972). Acoustic emission for periodic and continuous flaw detection in pressure vessels. US-Japan Joint Symp. on Acoustic Emission, High Pressure Inst.
12. Graham, L.J., and Alers, G.A. (1975). Acoustic emission in the frequency domain. Monitoring Structural Integrity by Acoustic Emission, American Society for Testing and Materials. STP-571.10.1520/STP32243S ↗
13. Pollock, A.A. (1986). Classical wave theory in practical AE testing. Progress in AE III, The Japanese Society for Non-Destructive Inspection.
14. Ono, K. (2018). Review on structural health evaluation with acoustic emission. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8060958 ↗
15. Plate wave acoustic emission10.1121/1.401258 ↗
16. Far-field acoustic emission waves by three-dimensional finite element modeling of pencil-lead breaks on a thick plate
17. Wavelet transform of acoustic emission signals
18. (2003). AGU-Vallen Wavelet Program, Vallen Systeme.
19. Viktorov, I.A. (1967). Rayleigh and Lamb Waves, Physical Theory and Applications, Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-5681-1 ↗
20. Krautkramer, J., and Krautkramer, H. (1969). Ultrasonic Testing of Materials, Springer.
21. The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (1973). Ultrasonic Material Testing, Nikkan Kogyo.
22. The use of Lamb waves for the long-range inspection of large structures10.1016/0041-624X(96)00024-8 ↗
23. Defect detection in pipes using guided waves10.1016/S0041-624X(97)00038-3 ↗
24. Rapid long-range inspection of chemical plant pipework using guided waves
25. Goldstein, R.V., and Maugin, G.A. (2004). Disperse: A general purpose computer model for calculating elastic waveguide properties, with application to non-destructive testing. Surface Waves in Anisotropic and Laminated Bodies and Defects Detection, Kluwer.
26. Lowe, M. (2022, January 27). Disperse|Research Groups|Imperial College London. Available online: http://www.imperial.ac.uk/non-destructiveevaluation/products-and-services/disperse/.
27. Huber, A. (2022, January 27). The Dispersion Calculator: A Free Software for Calculating Dispersion Curves of Guided Waves in Multilayered Composites. Available online: https://www.dlr.de/zlp/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-14332/24874_read-61142/.
28. Nayfeh, A.H. (1995). Wave Propagation in Layered Anisotropic Media, Elsevier.
29. Kinra, V.K., and Wolfenden, A. (1992). Wave attenuation in fiber reinforced composites. Mechanics and Mechanisms of Material Damping, American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM STP 1169.
30. Guided wave dispersion curves for a bar with an arbitrary cross-section, a rod and rail example10.1016/S0041-624X(03)00097-0 ↗
31. Propagation of Lamb waves in anisotropic and absorbing plates: Theoretical derivation and experiments10.1063/1.1472913 ↗
32. The measurement of and Lamb wave attenuation to determine the normal and shear stiffnesses of a compressively loaded interface10.1121/1.1568754 ↗
33. Modeling wave propagation in damped waveguides of arbitrary cross-section10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.021 ↗
34. Schmidt, D., Sadri, H., Szewieczek, A., Sinapius, M., Wierach, P., Siegert, I., and Wendemuth, A. (2013). Characterization of Lamb wave attenuation mechanisms. Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2013, SPIE. Proc. SPIE 8695.10.1117/12.2009594 ↗
35. Kamal, A., Gresil, M., and Giurgiutiu, V. (2013, January 8–11). Comparative study of several methods for the calculation of ultrasonic guided waves in composites. Proceedings of the 54th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Boston, MA, USA.10.2514/6.2013-1901 ↗
36. Prediction of attenuated guided waves propagation in carbon fiber composites using Rayleigh damping model10.1177/1045389X14549870 ↗
37. Analysis of second-harmonic generation of Lamb modes using a modal analysis approach10.1063/1.1601312 ↗
38. Characteristics of second harmonic generation of Lamb waves in nonlinear elastic plates10.1121/1.3294714 ↗
39. Frequency dependence of second-harmonic generation in Lamb waves10.1007/s10921-014-0227-y ↗
40. Kundu, T. (2001). Non-contact detection of delaminations in impacted cross-ply CFRP using laser generated Lamb waves. Advanced Nondestructive Evaluation for Structural and Biological Health Monitoring, SPIE. Proc. SPIE 4335.
41. Fatigue crack detection in metallic structures with Lamb waves and 3D laser vibrometry10.1088/0957-0233/18/3/024 ↗
42. Olisa, S.C., Khan, M.A., and Starr, A. (2021). Review of current guided wave ultrasonic testing (GWUT) limitations and future directions. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21030811 ↗
43. (2022, April 10). Imperial College, London, UK. Available online: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/non-destructive-evaluation/publications/phd-theses/.
44. Ono, K. (2020). A comprehensive report on ultrasonic attenuation of engineering materials, including metals, ceramics, polymers, fiber-reinforced composites, wood, and rocks. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072230 ↗
45. Ono, K. (2020). Dynamic viscosity and transverse ultrasonic attenuation of engineering materials. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10155265 ↗
46. Prosser, W.H. (1987). Ultrasonic Characterization of the Nonlinear Elastic Properties of Unidirectional Graphite/Epoxy Composites, NASA-CR-4100, Johns Hopkins University.10.1016/B978-0-408-02348-1.50031-7 ↗
47. Roman, I., and Ono, K. (1984). Acoustic emission characterization of failure mechanisms in Woven roving glass-epoxy composites. Progress in Acoustic Emission II, Japanese Society for Non-Destructive Inspection.
48. Attenuation of Lamb waves in CFRP plates
49. Ono, K., Cho, H., Vallen, H., and M’Closkey, R.T. (2021). Transmission sensitivities of contact ultrasonic transducers and their applications. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21134396 ↗
50. Ono, K. (2019). Rayleigh wave calibration of acoustic emission sensors and ultrasonic transducers. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19143129 ↗
51. Lowe, M., and Pavlakovic, B. (2013). Disperse: A System for Generating Dispersion Curves, Imperial College. Users’ Manual, ver. 2.0.20a.
52. Structural health monitoring using scanning laser vibrometry: I. Lamb wave sensing10.1088/0964-1726/13/2/002 ↗