Current Trajectories and New Challenges for Visual Comfort Assessment in Building Design and Operation: A Critical Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Visual comfort can affect building occupants’ behaviour, productivity and health. It is highly dependent on the occupant and how they perform a task indoors. In that regard, an occupant centred approach is more suitable for evaluating the lighting perception of the indoor environment. Nevertheless, the process of rating and estimating the visual comfort makes a limited distinction between physiological differences (e.g., ageing eye, light sensitivity), field of view, and personal preferences, which have been proven to influence the occupants’ lighting needs to complete their tasks. Such features were not considered while establishing the visually comfortable conditions; perhaps due to the challenge of coupling the assumptions made during building design to the performance indicators monitored during building operation. This work focuses on reviewing literature findings on how the common design approach deviates from real building performance, particularly failing to prevent visual disturbances that can trigger the inefficient operation of building systems. Additionally, it is highlighted that redesigned visual comfort assessment methods and metrics are required to bridge the gap between the lighting environment ratings computed and surveyed. One possibility is to consider such physiological features that induce lighting experiences. Finally, it was deducted that it is important to target the occupants’ eye response to calibrate limit thresholds, propose occupant profiling, and that it is convenient to continuously monitor the occupants’ perception of indoor lighting conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Impact of Light on Environment and Health · Color perception and design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ABC Department, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 7a, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Funding
Slovenian Research Agency · Norwegian Research Centre · Politecnico di Milano
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Effects of Age, Season, Gender and Urban-Rural Status on Time-Activity: Canadian Human Activity Pattern Survey 2 (CHAPS 2)10.3390/ijerph110202108 ↗
2. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants10.1038/sj.jea.7500165 ↗
3. ANSI, and ASHRAE (2017). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55–2017: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, ASHRAE. Technical Report.
4. (2005). Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment—Analytical Determination and Interpretation of Thermal Comfort Using Calculation of the PMV and PPD Indices and Local Thermal Comfort Criteria (Standard No. ISO 7730:2005).
5. UN Environment Programme (2018, March 07). SDG11:Sustainable Cities and Communities Make Cities and Human Settlements Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable. Available online: https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/sustainable-development-goals/why-do-sustainable-development-goals-matter/goal-11.
6. Directive EPBD Recast (2010). Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union, 18, 2010.
7. Directive EE (2012). Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32. Off. J. Eur. Union, 315, 1–56.
8. Erhorn, H., and Erhorn-Kluttig, H. (2011). Terms and definitions for high performance buildings. Detailed Report for the Concerted Action, Energy Performance of Buildings, European Union.
9. The dark side of occupants’ behaviour on building energy use10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.009 ↗
10. Impacts of diversity in commercial building occupancy profiles on district energy demand and supply10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115594 ↗
11. Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: The big picture10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.006 ↗
12. Are ‘class A’ temperature requirements realistic or desirable?10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.03.014 ↗
13. Impact of available and perceived control on comfort and health in European offices10.1080/00038628.2012.744298 ↗
14. Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.021 ↗
15. The effect of indoor environmental quality on occupants’ perception of performance: A case study of refurbished historic buildings in Malaysia10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.10.003 ↗
16. Field study of the indoor environment in a Danish prison10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.10.025 ↗
17. The effect of building envelope on the thermal comfort and energy saving for high-rise buildings in hot-humid climate10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.055 ↗
18. Indicators for measuring satisfaction towards design quality of buildings
19. Dynamic operation of daylighting and shading systems: A literature review10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.246 ↗
20. Influence of shading control patterns on the energy assessment of office spaces10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.019 ↗
21. Development and implementation of an adaptive lighting and blinds control algorithm10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.027 ↗
22. Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds10.1191/1365782803li064oa ↗
23. Adding advanced behavioural models in whole building energy simulation: A study on the total energy impact of manual and automated lighting control10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.002 ↗
24. Lighting controls: A field study of office workers’ reactions10.1177/136578280103300202 ↗
25. Impact of building morphology and outdoor environment on light and thermal environment in campus buildings in cold region during winter10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108074 ↗
26. Analyzing occupants’ control over lighting systems in office settings using immersive virtual environments10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107823 ↗
27. Occupants interaction with electric lighting and shading systems in real single-occupied offices: Results from a monitoring campaign10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.03.015 ↗
28. Effects of occupancy and lighting use patterns on lighting energy consumption10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.034 ↗
29. The effectiveness of light switch reminders in reducing light usage10.1177/096032718701900304 ↗
30. Agent-Based Modeling of Occupants and Their Impact on Energy Use in Commercial Buildings10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000158 ↗
31. Circadian physiology of metabolism10.1126/science.aah4967 ↗
32. Circadian photoreception: Ageing and the eye’s important role in systemic health10.1136/bjo.2008.141747 ↗
33. Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects
34. Changes in Autonomic Function with Age: A Study of Pupillary Kinetics in Healthy Young and Old People10.1093/ageing/25.6.432 ↗
35. Aging and the efficiency of the pupillary mechanism10.1093/geronj/11.2.160 ↗
36. Review of Factors Influencing Discomfort Glare Perception from Daylight10.1080/15502724.2018.1428617 ↗
37. Workers’ awareness and indoor environmental quality in electricity-saving offices10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.09.022 ↗
38. One size does not fit all: Understanding user preferences for building automation systems10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.015 ↗
39. Occupancy data analytics and prediction: A case study10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.03.027 ↗
40. A bottom-up stochastic model to predict building occupants’ time-dependent activities10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.021 ↗
41. A context-aware method for building occupancy prediction10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.003 ↗
42. Predicting people’s presence in buildings: An empirically based model performance analysis10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.027 ↗
43. Occupancy schedules learning process through a data mining framework10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.11.065 ↗
44. Energy performance model development and occupancy number identification of institutional buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.12.018 ↗
45. Integrating probabilistic methods for describing occupant presence with building energy simulation models10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.042 ↗
46. Tracking the human–building interaction: A longitudinal field study of occupant behavior in air-conditioned offices10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.007 ↗
47. IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.084 ↗
48. Wagner, A., and O’Brien, L. (2018). Occupant Behaviour-Centric building Design and Operation EBC Annex 79 (Draft), International Energy Agency. Technical Report May.
49. Designing buildings for real occupants: An agent-based approach10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2116116 ↗
50. CIE (1997). Lighting Needs for the Partially Sighted, International Comission on Illumination (CIE). Technical Report.
51. Occupant Product
52. (2004). Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment—Determination of Metabolic Rate (Standard No. EN ISO 8996).
53. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30293-0 ↗
54. Ko, W.H., Kent, M.G., Schiavon, S., Levitt, B., and Betti, G. (2021). A Window View Quality Assessment Framework. Leukos, 1–26.10.1080/15502724.2021.1965889 ↗
55. The Early Years of Illuminating Engineering in Great Britain10.1177/147715355101600301 ↗
56. (2008). Lighting for Buildings—Part 2: Code of Practice for Daylighting (Standard No. BS 8206-2).
57. (2018). Daylight in Buildings (Standard No. European Standard EN 17037).
58. Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5 ↗
59. (2012). Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE) (Standard No. IES LM-83-12).
60. Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013 ↗
61. A statistical approach for the evaluation of thermal and visual comfort in free-running buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.013 ↗
62. (2011). Light and Lighting—Lighting of Work Places Part 1: Indoor Work Places (Standard No. EN 12464-1). pp. 1–57.
63. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017 ↗
64. Wienold, J. (2007). Dynamic simulation of blind control strategies for visual comfort and energy balance analysis. Building Simulation, IBPSA.
65. Simple tool to evaluate the impact of daylight on building energy consumption10.1016/j.solener.2008.03.001 ↗
66. Ward, G., and Shakespeare, R. (1998). Rendering with Radiance: The Art and Science of Lighting Visualization, SciX Open Publishing.
67. Discomfort glare: A formula to bridge differences10.1177/14771535790110020401 ↗
68. Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.020 ↗
69. Directive EE (2020). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/2155 of 14 October 2020 supplementing Directive (EU) 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing an optional common European Union scheme for rating the smart readiness of buildings. Off. J. Eur. Union, 431, 9–24.
70. Liu, Y., Colburn, A., and Inanici, M. (2018). Computing long-term daylighting simulations from high dynamic range imagery using deep neural networks. Building Performance Analysis Conference and SimBuild, Zillow Group, University of Washington.
71. Giovannini, L., Favoino, F., Lo Verso, V., Pellegrino, A., and Serra, V. (2018). A Simplified Approach for the Annual and Spatial Evaluation of the Comfort Classes of Daylight Glare Using Vertical Illuminances. Buildings, 8.10.3390/buildings8120171 ↗
72. Jones, N.L., and Reinhart, C.F. (2015, January 7–9). Fast daylight coefficient calculation using graphics hardware. Proceedings of the BS2015: 14th International Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, Hyderabad, India.
73. Ladybug-Tools (2022, March 09). Cross-Platform Python Libraries and Plugins for Grasshopper and Dynamo. Available online: https://www.ladybug.tools/.
74. Ladybug-Tools (2022, March 09). Pollination—Platform for Environmental Simulation. Available online: https://www.pollination.cloud/.
75. Jones, N.L., and Reinhart, C.F. (2014, January 7–10). Physically based global illumination calculation using graphics hardware. Proceedings of the eSim 2014: The Canadian Conference on Building Simulation, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
76. Cubic illumination10.1177/14771535970290010601 ↗
77. Research note: A practical approach to cubic illuminance measurement10.1177/1477153513498251 ↗
78. A new metric to predict perceived adequacy of illumination10.1177/1477153519828416 ↗
79. Degree of eye opening: A new discomfort glare indicator10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.010 ↗
80. Wide-field schematic eye models with gradient-index lens10.1364/JOSAA.24.002157 ↗
81. Reinhart, C.F. (2014). Daylighting Handbook I: Fundamentals, Designing with the Sun, Christoph Reinhart.
82. Pupil size as determined by adapting luminance10.1364/JOSA.42.000492 ↗
83. Relation of changes in pupil size to visual discomfort
84. The Pupillary Response and Discomfort Glare10.1080/00994480.1975.10748533 ↗
85. Investigation of the potential use of human eye pupil sizes to estimate visual sensations in the workplace environment10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.025 ↗
86. Measuring the task-evoked pupillary response with a remote eye tracker10.1145/1344471.1344489 ↗
87. Sarey, K.M., Andersen, M., Hart, B.M., Stoll, J., and Einhäuser, W. (2011). Integration of Eye-Tracking Methods in Visual Comfort Assessments, EPFL. CISBAT 11.
88. Revealing the relationships between luminous environment characteristics and physiological, ocular and performance measures: An experimental study10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106702 ↗
89. An Objective Measure of Discomfort Glare10.1080/00994480.1994.10748079 ↗
90. Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.006 ↗
91. A unified formula for light-adapted pupil size10.1167/12.10.12 ↗
92. Gaze and discomfort glare, Part 1: Development of a gaze-driven photometry10.1177/1477153516649016 ↗
93. Data-driven Soft Sensors in the process industry10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.12.012 ↗
94. Service innovation and smart analytics for Industry 4.0 and big data environment10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001 ↗
95. Understanding the indoor environment through mining sensory data—A case study10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.011 ↗
96. Poli, T., Mainini, A.G., Speroni, A., Cadena, J.D.B., and Moretti, N. (2020). The Effect of Real-Time Sensing of a Window on Energy Efficiency, Comfort, Health and User Behavior. Digital Transformation of the Design, Construction and Management Processes of the Built Environment, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-33570-0_26 ↗
97. Rinaldi, S., Bellagente, P., Ciribini, A.L.C., Tagliabue, L.C., Poli, T., Mainini, A.G., Speroni, A., Blanco Cadena, J.D., and Lupica Spagnolo, S. (2020). A Cognitive-Driven Building Renovation for Improving Energy Efficiency: The Experience of the ELISIR Project. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9040666 ↗
98. Should we design buildings that are less sensitive to occupant behaviour? A simulation study of effects of behaviour and design on office energy consumption10.1007/s12053-015-9422-7 ↗
99. On occupant-centric building performance metrics10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.028 ↗
100. Design Automation for Smart Building Systems10.1109/JPROC.2018.2856932 ↗