journal article·2022-03-23Open access

A Deep Learning-Based Integration Method for Hybrid Seismic Analysis of Building Structures: Numerical Validation

Nabil Mekaoui, Taiki Saito

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 7

Abstract

A hybrid seismic analysis computing the full nonlinear response of building structures is proposed and validated in this paper. Recurrent neural networks are trained to predict the nonlinear hysteretic response of isolation devices with deformation- and velocity-dependent behavior. Then, they are implemented in an explicit time integration method for time history analysis. A comprehensive framework is proposed to develop and test deep learning models considering the data framing, the network architecture, and the learning behavior. Hybrid seismic analyses of three base-isolated building models subjected to four ground motions with different properties were performed in order to check their efficiency. The small relative errors of computed results to those of the conventional analysis successfully validate the accuracy of the proposed analysis. Its computation time depends mainly on the ground motion duration and is considered negligible. The development of the machine learning model is more time-consuming but nonrepetitive since it can be saved and reused to analyze any new structure containing the same target components. The proposed hybrid seismic analysis overcomes the shortcomings of usual applications of machine learning in structural response prediction problems being limited to specific response quantity(s) of the same structure(s) used at the training process. By taking advantage of both mechanics-based and data-driven methods, results reveal that hybrid analysis is an efficient tool for building-response simulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi 441-8580, Japan

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Hysteresis Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Structures: State of the Art
2. A survey of direct time-integration methods in computational structural dynamics-I. Explicit methods10.1016/0045-7949(89)90314-3 ↗
3. A survey of direct time-integration methods in computational structural dynamics-II. Implicit methods10.1016/0045-7949(89)90315-5 ↗
4. Physics-guided convolutional neural network (PhyCNN) for data-driven seismic response modeling10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110704 ↗
5. Deep learning-based detection of structural damage using time-series data10.1080/15732479.2020.1815225 ↗
6. Real-time parameter identification of seismically excited building structures using response surface method and Bayesian optimization technique: Case study
7. The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state-of-the-art review10.1177/8755293020919419 ↗
8. Beam-column shear prediction using hybridized deep learning neural network with genetic algorithm10.1088/1755-1315/143/1/012025 ↗
9. Seismic drift demand estimation for steel moment frame buildings: From mechanics-based to data-driven models10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003004 ↗
10. DynNet: Physics-based neural architecture design for nonlinear structural response modeling and prediction10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111582 ↗
11. Brownlee, J. (2022, January 25). Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting. Machine Learning Mastery; 2020 v1.8. 555p. Available online: https://machinelearningmastery.com/deep-learning-for-time-series-forecasting/.
12. Deep long short-term memory networks for nonlinear structural seismic response prediction10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.05.006 ↗
13. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
14. Physics-informed multi-LSTM networks for metamodeling of nonlinear structures10.1016/j.cma.2020.113226 ↗
15. Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing10.1002/eqe.4290210106 ↗
16. Hybrid simulation: An early history10.1002/eqe.3274 ↗
17. Schellenberg, A.H., Mahin, S.A., and Fenves, G.L. (2009). Advanced Implementation of Hybrid Simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
18. Integration techniques for substructure pseudo dynamic test
19. Implicit-explicit finite elements in nonlinear transient analysis10.1016/0045-7825(79)90086-0 ↗
20. A method of computation for structural dynamics10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098 ↗
21. MLIT (2000). The Notification and Commentary on the Structural Calculation Procedures for Building with Seismic Isolation, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. (In Japanese).
22. Saito, T. (2022, January 25). Structural Earthquake Response Analysis, STERA_3D Version 11.0. Available online: http://www.rc.ace.tut.ac.jp/saito/software-e.html.
23. (2022, January 25). Lumped Mass Models (with Seismic Isolation). Available online: http://www.rc.ace.tut.ac.jp/saito/software_sample_SI02-e.html.
24. (2022, January 25). Colah’s Blog. Available online: https://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/.
25. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
26. Cho, K., Merrienboer, B.V., Bahdanau, D., and Bengio, Y. (, January October). On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-decoder approaches. Proceedings of the SSST-8, Eight Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation (W14-4012), Doha, Qatar.
27. (2022, January 25). Keras API Reference/Losses. Available online: https://keras.io/api/losses/.
28. (2022, January 25). Keras API Reference/Optimizers. Available online: https://keras.io/api/optimizers/.
29. Brownlee, J. (2022, January 25). Long Short-Term Memory Networks with Python. Machine Learning Mastery; 2020 v1.7. 245p. Available online: https://machinelearningmastery.com/lstms-with-python/.
30. Levine, Y., Sharir, O., and Shashua, A. (, January April–May). Benefits of depth for long-term memory of recurrent networks. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
31. Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (, January December). Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. Proceedings of the NIPS Deep Learning and Representation Learning Workshop, Montreal, QC, Canada.
32. Yang, S., Zhou, Y., and Yu, X. (, January June). LSTM and GRU neural network performance comparison study. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Electronic Communication and Artificial Intelligence (IWECAI), Qingdao, China.
33. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J.L. (, January May). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representation (ICLR), San Diego, CA, USA.
34. Smith, L.N. (, January March). Cyclical learning rates for training neural networks. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Santa Rosa, CA, USA.10.1109/WACV.2017.58 ↗
35. Li, H., Xu, Z., Taylor, G., Studer, C., and Goldstein, T. (, January May). Visualizing the loss landscape of neural nets. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Representation (ICLR), virtual only.
36. (2022, January 25). TensorFlow. Available online: https://www.tensorflow.org/.