A Predictive Pedestrian Crash Model Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
Every year in Italy, there are about 20,000 road accidents involving pedestrians, with a significant number of injuries and deaths. Out of these, about 30% occur at pedestrian crossings, where pedestrians should be protected the most. Here, we propose a new accident prediction model to improve pedestrian safety assessments that allows us to accurately identify the sites with the largest potential safety improvements and define the best treatments to be applied. The accident prediction model was developed using the ISTAT dataset, including information about the fatal and injurious crashes that occurred in Italy in a 5-year period. The model allowed us to estimate the risk level of a road section through a machine-learning approach. Gradient Boosting seems to be an appropriate tool to fit classification models for its flexibility that allows us to capture non-linear relationships that would be difficult to detect via a classical approach. The results show the ability of the model to perform an accurate analysis of the sites included in the dataset. The locations analyzed have been classified based on the potential risk in the following three classes: High, medium, and low. The proposed model represents a solid and reliable tool for practitioners to perform accident analysis with pedestrian involvement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Università di Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
World Food Programme—Research Assessment and Monitoring, 00127 Roma, Italy
Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, Università di Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
Funding
University of Florence
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. WHO—World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety, World Health Organization.
2. Khan, M.A.B., Grivna, M., Nauman, J., Soteriades, E.S., Cevik, A.A., Hashim, M.J., Govender, R., and Al Azeezi, S.R. (2020). Global Incidence and Mortality Patterns of Pedestrian Road Traffic Injuries by Sociodemographic Index, with Forecasting: Findings from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors 2017 Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.20944/preprints202002.0218.v1 ↗
3. European Commission (2020). Facts and figures pedestrians. European Road Safety Observatory, Directorate General for Transport, European Commission.
4. ACI-ISTAT (2020). Incidenti stradali in Italia. Report of ACI-ISTAT—Anno 2019, ACI. (In Italian).
5. WHO—World Health Organization (2013). Global Status Report on Road Safety: Supporting a Decade of Action, World Health Organization.
6. Pedestrian safety models for urban environments with high roadside activities10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104847 ↗
7. Use of Accident Prediction Models in Road Safety Management—An International Inquiry10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.397 ↗
8. Development of a transnational accident prediction model10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.143 ↗
9. Srinivasan, R., and Bauer, K. (2013). Safety Performance Function Development Guide: Developing Jurisdiction-Specific SPFs, Final Report, Report No. FSWA-SA-14-005.
10. AASHTO (2010). Highway Safety Manual, American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials. [1st ed.].
11. Development of pedestrian crash prediction model for a developing country using artificial neural network10.1080/17457300.2019.1627463 ↗
12. Models for predicting accidents at junctions where pedestrians and cyclists are involved. How well do they fit?10.1016/0001-4575(93)90001-D ↗
13. Comprehensive analysis of vehicle-pedestrian crashes at intersections in Florida10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.019 ↗
14. Association between Built Environment and Pedestrian Fatal Crash Risk in Delhi, India10.3141/2519-07 ↗
15. A mixed generalized ordered response model for examining pedestrian and bicyclist injury severity level in traffic crashes10.1016/j.aap.2007.11.010 ↗
16. The Built Environment and Traffic Safety: A Review of Empirical Evidence10.1177/0885412209335553 ↗
17. Synthesis of Studies on Speed and Safety10.3141/1779-12 ↗
18. The impact of speed and other variables on pedestrian safety in Maine10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00059-9 ↗
19. Development of accident prediction models for pedestrian crossings10.1051/matecconf/201823103002 ↗
20. A Gradient Boosting Crash Prediction Approach for Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Crash Analysis10.1155/2020/6751728 ↗
21. Truck accident models for interstates and two-lane rural roads
22. Analyses of rear-end crashes based on classification tree models10.1080/15389580600660062 ↗
23. Variable selection issues in tree-based regression models10.3141/2061-04 ↗
24. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2014). Highway Safety Manual Supplement, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Chapter 18.
25. Speed and safety10.3141/2103-02 ↗
26. Virtual testing of speed reduction schemes on urban collector roads10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.020 ↗
27. Drivers’ performance in response to engineering treatments at pedestrian crossings
28. Leaf, W.A., and Preusser, D.F. (1999). Literature Review on Vehicle Travel Speeds and Pedestrian Injuries.10.1037/e446312008-001 ↗
29. Tefft, B.C. (2011). Impact Speed and a Pedestrian’s Risk of Severe Injury or Death, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safatey.10.1037/e550422012-001 ↗
30. Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.003 ↗
31. Is 30 km/h a “safe” speed? Injury severity of pedestrian struck by a vehicle and the relation to travel speed and age10.1016/j.iatssr.2014.08.001 ↗
32. ISTAT (2020). File di Microdati per la Ricerca—MFR, 2014–2018, Istat—Istituto Nazionale di Statistica.
33. (2021, September 09). Google Cloud APIs. Available online: https://cloud.google.com/apis.
34. The strength of weak learnability10.1007/BF00116037 ↗
35. Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021 ↗
36. (2021, October 08). Yandex, catBoost Fit. Available online: https://catboost.ai/docs/concepts/python-reference_catboostclassifier_fit.html.
37. Catboost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features
38. CatBoost for big data: An interdisciplinary review10.1186/s40537-020-00369-8 ↗
39. A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms10.1007/s10462-020-09896-5 ↗
40. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, CNR (1998). Criteri per la Classificazione Della Rete Delle Strade Esistenti ai Sensi Dell’art. 13, Comma 4 e 5 del Nuovo Codice Della Strada, (In Italian).
41. Evaluation of Pedestrian Bridges and Pedestrian Safety in Jordan
42. Effects of road geometry and traffic volumes on rural roadway accident rates10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00033-1 ↗
43. Mathew, T., Joshi, G., Velaga, N., and Arkatkar, S. (2020). Pedestrian Accident Prediction Modelling—A Case Study in Thiruvananthapuram City. Transportation Research. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-981-32-9042-6 ↗
44. A stop safety index to address pedestrian safety around bus stops10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105017 ↗
45. Cycling injury risk in Britain: A case-crossover study of infrastructural and route environment correlates10.1016/j.aap.2021.106063 ↗