journal article·2021-11-22Open access

The Effect of Collagen-I Coatings of 3D Printed PCL Scaffolds for Bone Replacement on Three Different Cell Types

Lucas Weingärtner, Sergio H. Latorre, Dirk Velten, Anke Bernstein, Hagen Schmal, Michael Seidenstuecker

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 22

Abstract

Introduction The use of scaffolds in tissue engineering is becoming increasingly important as solutions need to be found to preserve human tissues such as bone or cartilage. Various factors, including cells, biomaterials, cell and tissue culture conditions, play a crucial role in tissue engineering. The in vivo environment of the cells exerts complex stimuli on the cells, thereby directly influencing cell behavior, including proliferation and differentiation. Therefore, to create suitable replacement or regeneration procedures for human tissues, the conditions of the cells’ natural environment should be well mimicked. Therefore, current research is trying to develop 3-dimensional scaffolds (scaffolds) that can elicit appropriate cellular responses and thus help the body regenerate or replace tissues. In this work, scaffolds were printed from the biomaterial polycaprolactone (PCL) on a 3D bioplotter. Biocompatibility testing was used to determine whether the printed scaffolds were suitable for use in tissue engineering. Material and Methods An Envisiontec 3D bioplotter was used to fabricate the scaffolds. For better cell-scaffold interaction, the printed polycaprolactone scaffolds were coated with type-I collagen. Three different cell types were then cultured on the scaffolds and various tests were used to investigate the biocompatibility of the scaffolds. Results Reproducible scaffolds could be printed from polycaprolactone. In addition, a coating process with collagen was developed, which significantly improved the cell-scaffold interaction. Biocompatibility tests showed that the PCL-collagen scaffolds are suitable for use with cells. The cells adhered to the surface of the scaffolds and as a result extensive cell growth was observed on the scaffolds. The inner part of the scaffolds, however, remained largely uninhabited. In the cytotoxicity studies, it was found that toxicity below 20% was present in some experimental runs. The determination of the compressive strength by means of the universal testing machine Z005 by ZWICK according to DIN EN ISO 604 of the scaffolds resulted in a value of 68.49 ± 0.47 MPa.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

G.E.R.N. Center of Tissue Replacement, Regeneration & Neogenesis, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center—Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany

Institute for Applied Biomechanics, Offenburg University, Badstraße 24, 77652 Offenburg, Germany

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Destatis (2020, September 02). Mitten im Demografischen Wandel. Available online: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Querschnitt/Demografischer-Wandel/demografie-mitten-im-wandel.html.
2. Eurostat (2020, March 13). European Union: Age Structure in the Member States in 2019. Available online: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/248981/umfrage/altersstruktur-in-den-eu-laendern/.
3. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005 ↗
4. Destatis (2020). Gesundheit—Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (Drg-Statistik) Operationen und Prozeduren der Vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern (4-Steller), Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis).
5. Eurostat (2020). Surgical Operations and Procedures Statistics, Eurostat.
6. Minimizing Stress Shielding and Cement Damage in Cemented Femoral Component of a Hip Prosthesis through Computational Design Optimization10.1155/2017/8437956 ↗
7. Fabrication and mechanical properties of PLLA/PCL/HA composites via a biomimetic, dip coating, and hot compression procedure10.1007/s10856-010-4051-3 ↗
8. Li, J., Chen, M., Wei, X., Hao, Y., and Wang, J. (2017). Evaluation of 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds Coated with Freeze-Dried Platelet-Rich Plasma for Bone Regeneration. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10070831 ↗
9. Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the Art and Future Trends10.1002/mabi.200400026 ↗
10. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
11. Tissue Engineering10.1126/science.8493529 ↗
12. Rider, P., Kačarević, Ž.P., Alkildani, S., Retnasingh, S., Schnettler, R., and Barbeck, M. (2018). Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19113308 ↗
13. Biocompatibility and biodegradation studies of PCL/β-TCP bone tissue scaffold fabricated by structural porogen method10.1007/s10856-012-4695-2 ↗
14. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
15. 3D- Printed Poly(ε-caprolactone) Scaffold Integrated with Cell-laden Chitosan Hydrogels for Bone Tissue Engineering10.1038/s41598-017-13838-7 ↗
16. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
17. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs10.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
18. Percoco, G., Uva, A.E., Fiorentino, M., Gattullo, M., Manghisi, V.M., and Boccaccio, A. (2020). Mechanobiological Approach to Design and Optimize Bone Tissue Scaffolds 3D Printed with Fused Deposition Modeling: A Feasibility Study. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13030648 ↗
19. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039 ↗
20. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
21. Biomaterial microarrays: Rapid, microscale screening of polymer–cell interaction10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.052 ↗
22. Koltzenburg, S., Maskos, M., and Nuyken, O. (2014). Polymere: Synthese, Eigenschaften und Anwendungen, Springer Spektrum. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-3-642-34773-3 ↗
23. Enhancement of osteosarcoma cell sensitivity to cisplatin using paclitaxel in the presence of hyperthermia10.3109/02656736.2013.775511 ↗
24. Methods for studying mlo-y4 osteocytes in collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds in the rotary cell culture system10.1080/03008207.2020.1764548 ↗
25. Somaiah, C., Kumar, A., Mawrie, D., Sharma, A., Patil, S.D., Bhattacharyya, J., Swaminathan, R., and Jaganathan, B.G. (2015). Collagen Promotes Higher Adhesion, Survival and Proliferation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0145068 ↗
26. Rapid microwave-assisted synthesis of gold loaded hydroxyapatite collagen nano-bio materials for drug delivery and tissue engineering application10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.016 ↗
27. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of bone formation using solid freeform fabrication-based bone morphogenic protein-2 releasing PCL/PLGA scaffolds10.1088/1748-6041/9/2/025008 ↗
28. Relations of the compressive properties of human cortical bone to histological structure and calcification10.1016/0021-9290(74)90064-5 ↗
29. Auer, J.A., and Stick, J.A. (2012). Chapter 77—Bone Grafts and Bone Replacements. Equine Surgery, W.B. Saunders. [4th ed.].10.1016/B978-1-4377-0867-7.00077-6 ↗
30. Tensile and Compressive Strength of Human Parietal Bone10.1152/jappl.1957.10.3.493 ↗