Open Loop Position Control of Soft Hydraulic Actuators for Minimally Invasive Surgery
Source abstract
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) presents many constraints on the design of robotic devices that can assist medical staff with a procedure. The limitations of conventional, rigid robotic devices have sparked interest in soft robotic devices for medical applications. However, problems still remain with the force exertion and positioning capabilities of soft robotic actuators, in conjunction with size restrictions necessary for MIS. In this article we present hydraulically actuated soft actuators that demonstrate highly repeatable open loop positioning and the ability to exert significant forces in the context of MIS. Open loop position control is achieved by changing the actuator volume, which causes contraction. In one degree of freedom (DOF) configurations, root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.471 mm, 1.506 mm, and 0.350 mm were recorded for a single actuator against gravity, a single actuator with a pulley, and a horizontal antagonistic configuration, respectively. Hysteresis values of 0.711 mm, 0.958 mm, and 0.515 mm were reported in these experiments. In addition, different numbers of soft actuators were used in configurations two and three DOFs to demonstrate position control. When deactivated, the soft actuators are low-profile and flexible as they are constructed from thin films. As such, a robot with a deployable structure and three soft actuators was constructed. The robot is therefore able to reversibly transition from low to high volume and stiffness, which has potential applications in MIS. A user successfully controlled the deployable robot in a circle tracing task.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Dielectric materials and actuators · Micro and Nano Robotics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Hamlyn Centre, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, UK
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W2 1PE, UK
Funding
NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Cancer Research UK (2021, August 06). Cancer Statistics.pdf. Available online: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statisticsby-cancer-type/bowel-cancer?{_}ga=2.48716070.1874981873.1550342994-90917021.1550342994{#}heading-Zero.
2. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912 ↗
3. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 201210.1002/ijc.29210 ↗
4. Management of colorectal laterally spreading tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1055/a-0732-487 ↗
5. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large serrated lesions in comparison with adenomas: A prospective multicentre study of 2000 lesions10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310249 ↗
6. Risk factors associated with difficult gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: Predicting difficult ESD10.1007/s00464-016-5149-6 ↗
7. Mylonas, G.P., Vitiello, V., Cundy, T.P., Darzi, A., and Yang, G.Z. (June, January 31). CYCLOPS: A versatile robotic tool for bimanual single-access and natural-orifice endoscopic surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, China.
8. Vrielink, T.J.C.O., Zhao, M., Darzi, A., and Mylonas, G.P. (2018, January 21–25). ESD CYCLOPS: A new robotic surgical system for GI surgery. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia.10.1109/ICRA.2018.8462698 ↗
9. Deployable, Variable Stiffness, Cable Driven Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery10.3389/frobt.2019.00141 ↗
10. Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research10.1080/11762320802557865 ↗
11. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots10.1038/nature14543 ↗
12. Multigait soft robot10.1073/pnas.1116564108 ↗
13. Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities10.1126/scirobotics.aah3690 ↗
14. Cianchetti, M., Ranzani, T., Gerboni, G., De Falco, I., Laschi, C., and Menciassi, A. (2013, January 3–7). STIFF-FLOP surgical manipulator: Mechanical design and experimental characterization of the single module. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/IROS.2013.6696866 ↗
15. Runciman, M., Darzi, A., and Mylonas, G. (2019). Soft Robotics in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Soft Robot., 6.10.3389/frobt.2019.00141 ↗
16. Soft Robotics: New Perspectives for Robot Bodyware and Control10.3389/fbioe.2014.00003 ↗
17. Elastic Inflatable Actuators for Soft Robotic Applications10.1002/adma.201604977 ↗
18. Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid-Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human-Robot Interaction10.1002/adem.201700016 ↗
19. Niiyama, R., Rus, D., and Kim, S. (June, January 31). Pouch Motors: Printable/inflatable soft actuators for robotics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, China.
20. Pouch Motors: Printable Soft Actuators Integrated with Computational Design10.1089/soro.2014.0023 ↗
21. Compact Flat Fabric Pneumatic Artificial Muscle (ffPAM) for Soft Wearable Robotic Devices10.1109/LRA.2021.3062012 ↗
22. Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles10.1109/70.481753 ↗
23. Nakamura, T., and Shinohara, H. (2007, January 10–14). Position and Force Control Based on Mathematical Models of Pneumatic Artificial Muscles Reinforced by Straight Glass Fibers. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, Italy.10.1109/ROBOT.2007.364151 ↗
24. The Concept and Design of Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscles10.1080/14399776.2001.10781119 ↗
25. Flat Inflatable Artificial Muscles with Large Stroke and Adjustable Force-Length Relations10.1109/TRO.2019.2961300 ↗
26. Peano-HASEL actuators: Muscle-mimetic, electrohydraulic transducers that linearly contract on activation10.1126/scirobotics.aar3276 ↗
27. Electrohydraulic Actuator for a Soft Gripper10.1089/soro.2019.0009 ↗
28. Merlet, J.P. (1996, January 22–28). Direct kinematics of planar parallel manipulators. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
29. Liquid Pouch Motors: Printable Planar Actuators Driven by Liquid-to-Gas Phase Change for Shape-Changing Interfaces10.1109/LRA.2020.2983681 ↗
30. Laser Pouch Motors: Selective and Wireless Activation of Soft Actuators by Laser-Powered Liquid-to-Gas Phase Change10.1109/LRA.2020.2982864 ↗
31. Lindenroth, L., Duriez, C., Back, J., Rhode, K., and Liu, H. (2017, January 24–28). Intrinsic force sensing capabilities in compliant robots comprising hydraulic actuation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/IROS.2017.8206125 ↗
32. Avery, J., Runciman, M., Darzi, A., and Mylonas, G. (2019, January 20–24). Shape sensing of variable stiffness soft robots using electrical impedance tomography. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793862 ↗
33. Proprioceptive Flexible Fluidic Actuators Using Conductive Working Fluids10.1089/soro.2017.0012 ↗