Gaze Behavior and Positioning of Referee Teams during Three-Point Shots in Basketball
Source abstract
Abstract
This study looks at the visual scan patterns of high-class basketball referees. Using mobile eye-tracking devices, referees’ gaze behavior was analyzed during the execution of three-point shots in the official pre-season games of Germany’s men’s professional basketball league. We evaluated the extent to which the referees fulfill the tasks assigned to them, where do they look, and to what extent does their gaze behavior overlap during a three-point shot. Results indicate that referees who are far away from the ball and are, therefore, not responsible for observing the actual shot, tend to comply with their areas of responsibility less often than referees standing nearer to the ball, i.e., they appear to observe the ball more than required (ball watching) at the expense of other areas that they are required to be observing at the beginning of the shooting process. However, referees spend a very small part of a three-point shot looking at the same areas of interest. This indicates that referee teams’ allocation of gaze is rather effective, remaining in line with FIBA recommendations and is presumably not the main cause for errors in officiating.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology · Sport Psychology and Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Exercise Training and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, Germany
School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Eastbourne BN20 7SR, UK
Funding
easyCredit Basketball Bundesliga
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Physical load and referees’ decision-making in sports games: A scoping review
2. Attention, perception, and action in a simulated decision-making task10.1123/jsep.2018-0177 ↗
3. Attentional and perceptual capabilities are affected by high physical load in a simulated soccer decision-making task
4. Tenenbaum, G., and Eklund, R.C. (2007). Anticipation and decision making: Exploring new horizons. Handbook of Sport Psychology, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118270011 ↗
5. Hüttermann, S., Noël, B., and Memmert, D. (2017). Evaluating erroneous offside calls in soccer. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0174358 ↗
6. Does visual attention impact on decision-making in complex dynamic events?10.1123/jsep.2017-0169 ↗
7. Noël, B., and Klatt, S. (2021). Seemingly uninvolved players’ impact on assistant referees’ offside decisions. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., online ahead of print.10.1123/jsep.2020-0132 ↗
8. The Difference in visual skills between expert versus novice soccer referees10.2478/v10078-009-0018-1 ↗
9. Coordinated gaze behaviour of handball referees: A practical exploration with focus on the methodical implementation
10. FIBA Central Board (2021, June 15). Three Person Officiating. Available online: www.basketball.org.mo/images/download/201408189091127.pdf.
11. Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.012 ↗
12. FIBA Central Board (2021, June 15). Frip Level 1 Home Study Book Refereeing Knowledge. Available online: http://www.basketref.com/documents/fiba_materials_2018/New_2017_FRIP%20L1_Home_Study_Book_4_Refereeing_v1.0.pdf.
13. Assessment of decision-making performance and in-game physical exertion of Australian football umpires
14. Williams, A.M., and Jackson, R.C. (2019). Decision making in match officials and judges. Anticipation and Decision Making in Sport, Routledge.10.4324/9781315146270 ↗
15. MacMahon, C., Mascarenhas, D., Plessner, H., Pizzera, A., Oudejans, R., and Raab, M. (2015). Sports Officials and Officiating: Science and Practice, Routledge.10.4324/9780203700525 ↗
16. Gaze coordination of groups in dynamic events—A tool to facilitate analyses of simultaneous gazes within a team10.3389/fpsyg.2021.656388 ↗
17. Eyes wide shut: Implied social presence, eye tracking and attention10.3758/s13414-010-0042-1 ↗
18. Kassner, M., Patera, W., and Bulling, A. Pupil: An open source platform for pervasive eye tracking and mobile gaze-based interaction. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication (UbiComp ’14 Adjunct).10.1145/2638728.2641695 ↗
19. Duchowski, A.T. (2007). Eye Tracking Methodology. Theory and Practice, Springer.
20. Measuring dwell time percentage from head-mounted eye-tracking data–comparison of a frame-by-frame and a fixation-by-fixation analysis10.1080/00140139.2014.990524 ↗
21. How far ahead do we look when required to step on specific locations in the travel path during locomotion?10.1007/s00221-002-1246-y ↗
22. The visual control of bicycle steering: The effects of speed and path width10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.025 ↗
23. Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.880 ↗
24. What do we see out of the corner of our eye? The role of visual pivots and gaze anchors in sport10.1080/1750984X.2019.1582082 ↗
25. Eye tracking in high-performance sports: Evaluation of its application in expert athletes10.2478/ijcss-2018-0011 ↗
26. Finding the happy medium: An analysis of gaze behavior strategies in a representative task design of soccer penalties10.1080/10413200.2013.816892 ↗
27. Fixation strategy influences the ability to focus attention on two spatially separate objects10.1371/journal.pone.0065673 ↗