Employing Finite Element Analysis and Robust Control Concepts in Mechatronic System Design-Flexible Manipulator Case Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper deals with development of a methodology for mechatronic system design using state-of-the-art model-based system engineering methods. A simple flexible robotic arm is considered as a benchmark problem for the evaluation of various techniques used in the phases of modelling, analysis, control system design, validation, and implementation. The flexible nature of the mechanical structure introduces inherently oscillatory dynamics in the target bandwidth range, which complicates all the above-mentioned design steps. This paper demonstrates the process of deriving a complex nonlinear model of the flexible arm setup. An initial idea about the plant dynamics is acquired from analytical modelling using the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory. A more thorough understanding is subsequently acquired from finite element analysis. Linearisation and order reduction are the next steps necessary for the derivation of a simplified control-relevant model. A time-dependent variable parameter of load mass position is considered and a robust controller is subsequently designed in order to fulfil certain performance criteria for all the admissible plant configurations. This is performed using a recent H-infinity loop shaping method for fixed structure controller design. The results are validated by means of a physical plant, comparing the experimental data with the model predictions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems · Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics · Advanced Control Systems Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
NTIS Research Centre, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, 30614 Pilsen, Czechia
Reden B.V., 7555 RJ Hengelo, The Netherlands
Open Engineering S.A., 4031 Liège, Belgium
Funding
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme · European Regional Development Fund
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Ljung, L. (1999). System Identification: Theory for the User, Pearson. [2nd ed.].10.1002/047134608X.W1046 ↗
2. Pintelon, R., and Schoukens, J. (2012). System Identification, A Frequency Domain Approach, Wiley.10.1002/9781118287422 ↗
3. Söderström, T., and Stoica, P. (1989). System Identification, Prentice Hall.
4. Building blocks for a digital twin of additive manufacturing10.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.039 ↗
5. Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474 ↗
6. Innovations in digital modelling for next generation manufacturing system design10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.045 ↗
7. Integrating the Digital Twin of the manufacturing system into a decision support system for improving the order management process10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.192 ↗
8. Zienkiewicz, O., Taylor, R., and Zhu, J. (2013). The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, Elsevier Science. The Finite Element Method.
9. Hughes, T. (2000). The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Dover Publications. Dover Civil and Mechanical Engineering.
10. (2021, March 04). REXYGEN-Programming Automation Devices without Hand Coding. Available online: www.rexygen.com.
11. Frequency weighted H2 optimization of multi-mode input shaper10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109202 ↗
12. Goubej, M., Meeusen, S., Mooren, N., and Oomen, T. (2019, January 10–13). Iterative learning control in high-performance motion systems: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Zaragoza, Spain.10.1109/ETFA.2019.8868996 ↗
13. Goubej, M., and Schlegel, M. (2019, January 11–14). PI Plus Repetitive Control Design: H-infinity Regions Approach. Proceedings of the 2019 22nd International Conference on Process Control (PC19), Strbske Pleso, Slovakia.10.1109/PC.2019.8815312 ↗
14. Acceleration Feedback in PID Controlled Elastic Drive Systems10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.068 ↗
15. H-infinity Controller Design Methods Applied to One Joint of a Flexible Industrial Manipulator10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00143 ↗
16. A Benchmark Problem for Robust Feedback Control of a Flexible Manipulator10.1109/TCST.2008.2006755 ↗
17. Harada, K., Yoshida, E., and Yokoi, K. (2010). Motion Planning for Humanoid Robots, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84996-220-9 ↗
18. Boscariol, P., and Richiedei, D. (2020). Optimization of Motion Planning and Control for Automatic Machines, Robots and Multibody Systems. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10144982 ↗
19. Szewczyk, R., Zieliński, C., and Kaliczyńska, M. (2020). The Use of Facial Expressions Identified from the Level of the EEG Signal for Controlling a Mobile Vehicle Based on a State Machine. Automation 2020: Towards Industry of the Future, Springer International Publishing.
20. Morin, D. (2008). Introduction to Classical Mechanics: With Problems and Solutions, Cambridge University Press.
21. Oñate, E. (2013). Structural Analysis with the Finite Element Method. Linear Statics: Volume 2: Beams, Plates and Shells, Springer Science & Business Media.
22. Hutton, D.V. (2004). Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis, McGraw-Hill Science.
23. Dynamics of flexible-link and flexible-joint manipulator carrying a payload with rotary inertia10.1016/S0094-114X(99)00043-9 ↗
24. Effects of System Parameters and Controlled Torque on the Dynamics of Rigid-Flexible Robotic Manipulator10.2991/jrnal.2016.3.2.11 ↗
25. Muhammad, A.K., Okamoto, S., and Lee, J.H. (2014, January 22–24). Computer simulations on vibration control of a flexible single-link manipulator using finite-element method. Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium of Artificial Life and Robotics, Beppu, Japan.10.1007/s10015-014-0186-5 ↗
26. Parametric Study of Double Link Flexible Manipulator10.13189/ujme.2014.020701 ↗
27. A comparison of model reduction techniques from structural dynamics, numerical mathematics and systems and control10.1016/j.jsv.2013.03.025 ↗
28. Dynamic Simulation of Planar Flexible Link Manipulators using Adaptive Modal Integration10.1023/A:1015271000518 ↗
29. Bruls, O. (2005). Integrated Simulation and Reduced-Order Modeling of Controlled Flexible Multibody Systems. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Liège].
30. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters10.1137/0111030 ↗
31. Gumussoy, S., and Overton, M.L. (2008, January 11–13). Fixed-order H-infinity controller design via HIFOO, a specialized nonsmooth optimization package. Proceedings of the 2008 American Control Conference, Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ACC.2008.4586909 ↗
32. Design of PI Controllers: H-infinity Region Approach10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.07.122 ↗
33. Goubej, M., Schlegel, M., and Vyhlídal, T. (2021). Robust Controller Design for Feedback Architectures with Signal Shapers. IFAC-PapersOnLine, IFAC World Congress 2020.10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.461 ↗
34. Brabec, M. (2020). PID Controller Design Based on H-Infinity Optimization Method-MSc Thesis, University of West Bohemia.
35. Structural Dynamic Modeling: Tales of Sin and Redemption
36. Goubej, M. (2016, January 12–15). Fundamental performance limitations in PID controlled elastic two-mass systems. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Banff, AL, Canada.10.1109/AIM.2016.7576871 ↗
37. Čech, M., Beltman, A., and Ozols, K. (2019, January 10–13). I-MECH—Smart System Integration for Mechatronic Applications. Proceedings of the 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Zaragoza, Spain.10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869465 ↗