Digital Twin Lean Intralogistics: Research Implications
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents research implications related to the analysis of current trends occurring in the industry and resulting from the analysis of trends in literature. A new trend is noticeable in the range of computer simulations using digital twin technologies in the optimization of intralogistics processes, the implementation of which is based on Lean philosophy. This article shows the connection of Industry 4.0 with Lean in the context of Digital Twin (simulation) in the area of intralogistics. A three-step methodology of literature research was developed and described. In accordance with the adopted research methodology, research questions were indicated and a detailed list of selection criteria was developed. The research methods included brainstorming and statistical analysis. The research results are presented in three sections: the results of the trend analysis, the results of the quantitative literature research, and the results of the complementary research. The research results confirm the existence of a new trend and form the basis for formulating objectives for further research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Economic and Technological Systems Analysis · Engineering Technology and Methodologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. (2018, April 13). Twitter. Available online: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/984882630947753984.
2. Liker, J.K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer, McGraw-Hill Education.
3. Cempel, C. (2005). Nowoczesne Zagadnienia Metodologii i Filozofii Badań (Eng. Modern Issues of Methodology and Research Philosophy), ITEi.
4. Integration of Industrie 4.0 in lean manufacturing learning factories10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.008 ↗
5. Hermann, M., Pentek, T., and Otto, B. (2016, January 5–8). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences HICSS, Koloa, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.2016.488 ↗
6. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Crown Business.
7. Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., and Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry, Forschungsunio. Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group.10.3390/sci4030026 ↗
8. Past, state-of-the-art and future of intralogistics in relation to megatrends
9. Self-organization of changeable intralogistics systems at the ESB Logistics Learning Factory10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.031 ↗
10. Trott, M., Auf der Landwehr, M., and von Viebahn, C. (2019). A new Simulation Approach for Scheduling Consolidation Activities in Intralogistics—Optimising Material Flow Processes in Industrial Practice. Simulation in Produktion Und Logistik herausgegeben von Matthias Putz and Andreas Schlegel, Verlag Wissenschaftliche Scripten.
11. Hompel, M., and Heidenblut, V. (2008). Taschen-Lexikon Logistik, Springer.
12. (2020, April 21). Intralogistics. Available online: wynright.com/intralogistics.
13. Muther, R., and Hales, L. (2015). Systematic Layout Planning, Management & Industrial Research Publications. [4th ed.].
14. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 ↗
15. Industry 4.0 Implies Lean Manufacturing: Research Activities in Industry 4.0 Function as Enablers for Lean Manufacturing
16. (2020, April 21). Drive Optimized Decision-Making: The Closed-Loop Digital Twin with IoT. Available online: https://blogs.sw.siemens.com/mindsphere/drive-optimized-decision-making-the-closed-loop-digital-twin-with-iot/.
17. Buchanan, D.A., and Bryman, A. (2009). Producing a systematic review. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, Sage Publications Ltd.
18. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews, Keele University. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401.