Dog Identification Method Based on Muzzle Pattern Image
Source abstract
Abstract
Currently, invasive and external radio frequency identification (RFID) devices and pet tags are widely used for dog identification. However, social problems such as abandoning and losing dogs are constantly increasing. A more effective alternative to the existing identification method is required and the biometrics can be the alternative. This paper proposes an effective dog muzzle recognition method to identify individual dogs. The proposed method consists of preprocessing, feature extraction, matching, and postprocessing. For preprocessing, proposed resize and histogram equalization are used. For feature extraction algorithm, Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), Binary Robust Invariant Scaling Keypoints (BRISK) and Oriented FAST, and Rotated BRIEF (ORB) are applied and compared. For matching, Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighbors (FLANN) is used for SIFT and SURF, and hamming distance are used for BRISK and ORB. For postprocessing, two techniques to reduce incorrect matches are proposed. The proposed method was evaluated with 55 dog muzzle pattern images acquired from 11 dogs and 990 images augmented by the image deformation (i.e., angle, illumination, noise, affine transform). The best Equal Error Rate (EER) of the proposed method was 0.35%, and ORB was the most appropriate for the dog muzzle pattern recognition.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · Biometric Identification and Security · Food Supply Chain Traceability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Sejong 339 705, Korea
Funding
Rural Development Administration
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2020). A Survey on the Protection and Welfare of Pets in 2019, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
2. An Introduction to Biometric Recognition10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818349 ↗
3. Ng, R.Y.F., Tay, Y.H., and Mok, K.M. (2008, January 26–28). A review of iris recognition algorithms. Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Information Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/ITSIM.2008.4631656 ↗
4. Yang, W., Wang, S., Hu, J., Zheng, G., and Valli, C. (2019). Security and Accuracy of Fingerprint-Based Biometrics: A Review. Symmetry, 11.10.3390/sym11020141 ↗
5. Face recognition: A literature review
6. Development process of animal image recognition technology and its application in modern cow and pig industry
7. Noncooperative bovine iris recognition via SIFT10.1016/j.neucom.2012.08.068 ↗
8. A new cow identification system based on iris analysis and recognition
9. Trokielewicz, M., and Szadkowski, M. (2017, January 1–4). Iris and periocular recognition in arabian race horses using deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB), Denver, CO, USA.10.1109/BTAS.2017.8272736 ↗
10. Biometric Recognition for Pet Animal10.4236/jsea.2014.75044 ↗
11. The Identification of the Bovine by Means of Nose-Prints10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(22)94150-5 ↗
12. Breed differences and intra-breed genetic variability of dermatoglyphic pattern of cattle10.1111/j.1439-0388.1993.tb00751.x ↗
13. Identification of beef cattle by analyzing images of their muzzle patterns lifted on paper
14. Using Muzzle Pattern Recognition as a Biometric Approach for Cattle Identification10.13031/2013.23121 ↗
15. Beef cattle identification based on muzzle pattern using a matching refinement technique in the SIFT method10.1016/j.compag.2013.09.002 ↗
16. Cattle Identification Using Muzzle Print Images Based on Texture Features Approach
17. Awad, A.I., Zawbaa, H.M., Mahmoud, H.A., Nabi, E.H.H.A., Fayed, R.H., and Hassanien, A.E. (2013, January 8–11). A robust cattle identification scheme using muzzle print images. Proceedings of the 2013 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Krakow, Poland.10.1007/978-3-642-40597-6_12 ↗
18. Noviyanto, A., and Arymurthy, A.M. (2012, January 2–4). Automatic cattle identification based on muzzle photo using speed-up robust features approach. Proceedings of the 3rd European conference of computer science, ECCS, Paris, France.
19. Tong, H., Li, M., Zhang, H., and Zhang, C. (2004, January 27–30). Blur detection for digital images using wavelet transform. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8763), Taipei, Taiwan.
20. Rybak, Ł., and Dudczyk, J. (2020). A Geometrical Divide of Data Particle in Gravitational Classification of Moons and Circles Data Sets. Entropy, 22.10.3390/e22101088 ↗
21. Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms10.1007/BF03178082 ↗
22. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94 ↗
23. Tareen, S.A.K., and Saleem, Z. (2018, January 3–4). A comparative analysis of SIFT, SURF, KAZE, AKAZE, ORB, and BRISK. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET), Sukkur, Pakistan.10.1109/ICOMET.2018.8346440 ↗
24. Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., and Van Gool, L. (2006). Surf: Speeded up robust features. Computer Vision—ECCV 2006, Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer Vision, Graz, Austria, 7–13 May 2006, Springer.10.1007/11744023_32 ↗
25. Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., and Bradski, G. (2011, January 6–13). ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544 ↗
26. Leutenegger, S., Chli, M., and Siegwart, R.Y. (2011, January 6–13). BRISK: Binary Robust invariant scalable keypoints. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126542 ↗
27. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography10.1145/358669.358692 ↗
28. Performance evaluation of fingerprint verification systems10.1109/TPAMI.2006.20 ↗
29. Poh, N., and Bengio, S. (2004). Evidences of Equal Error Rate Reduction in Biometric Authentication Fusion, IDIAP.
30. FVC2000: Fingerprint verification competition10.1109/34.990140 ↗