Strain Rate Dependent Behavior of Vinyl Nitrile Helmet Foam in Compression and Combined Compression and Shear
Source abstract
Abstract
Vinyl nitrile foams are polymeric closed-cell foam commonly used for energy absorption in helmets. However, their impact behavior has never been described in isolation. This study aims to characterize the strain rate dependent behavior of three VN foams in compression and combined compression and shear. Vinyl nitrile samples of density 97.5, 125, and 183 kg/m3 were submitted to quasi-static compression (0.01 s−1) and impacts in compression and combined compression and shear (loading direction of 45°). For impacts, a drop test rig was used, and a method was developed to account for strain rate variation during impactor deceleration. Young’s modulus and stress at plateau were correlated with foam density in both compression and combined loading. Vinyl nitrile foams were strain rate dependent: The absorbed energy at the onset of densification was two to four times higher at 100 s−1 than at 0.01 s−1. In combined loading, the compressive stress at yield was reduced by 43% at a high strain rate. Compared to expanded polypropylene, vinyl nitrile foams transmitted less stress at the onset of densification for equivalent absorbed energy and presented a larger ratio between the compression and shear stresses in combined loading (0.37 at yield). This larger ratio between the compression and shear stresses might explain why vinyl nitrile helmet liners are thought to be better at reducing head rotational acceleration than expanded polypropylene helmet liners.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Street West, Montréal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
Research Center, Department of Traumatology and Acute Care, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, 5400 Gouin Blvd, Montréal, QC H4J 1C5, Canada
CCM, 3400 Raymond-Lasnier St., Montreal, QC H4R 3L3, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Compressive properties of helmet materials subjected to dynamic impact loading of various energies10.1080/17461390802438763 ↗
2. Meehan, A. (2017). Influence of VN Foam Liner Density on Impact Attenuation of an Ice Hockey Helmet, University of Ottawa.
3. Ashare, A., and Ziejewski, M. (2014). For ASTM F-08: Protective Capacity of Ice Hockey Player Helmets against Puck Impacts. Mechanism of Concussion in Sports, ASTM International.10.1520/STP1552-EB ↗
4. Impact Performance of Modern Football Helmets10.1007/s10439-011-0384-4 ↗
5. Characterization of polymeric structural foams under compressive impact loading by means of energy-absorption diagram10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-9 ↗
6. Gibson, L.J., and Ashby, M.F. (1999). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press.
7. Investigation of the dynamic stress–strain response of compressible polymeric foam using a non-parametric analysis10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.01.007 ↗
8. Dynamic compressive strength and crushing properties of expanded polystyrene foam for different strain rates and different temperatures10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.08.005 ↗
9. Bailly, N., Llari, M., Donnadieu, T., Masson, C., and Arnoux, P.-J. (2018). Numerical Reconstruction of Traumatic Brain Injury in Skiing and Snowboarding. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.10.1249/MSS.0000000000001701 ↗
10. A New Laboratory Rig for Evaluating Helmets Subject to Oblique Impacts10.1080/15389580309879 ↗
11. Oblique impact testing of bicycle helmets10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.05.005 ↗
12. Development of the STAR evaluation system for football helmets: Integrating player head impact exposure and risk of concussion10.1007/s10439-011-0322-5 ↗
13. Biaxial crushing of honeycombs—Part 1: Experiments10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00224-8 ↗
14. Multi-axial yield behaviour of polymer foams10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-1 ↗
15. Compressive response of circular cell polycarbonate honeycombs under inplane biaxial static and dynamic loading. Part I: Experiments10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00011-8 ↗
16. Quasi-static crush behavior of aluminum honeycomb specimens under compression dominant combined loads10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.02.002 ↗
17. Determination of mechanical properties of PVC foam using a modified Arcan fixture10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.010 ↗
18. Effect of polymer foam anisotropy on energy absorption during combined shear-compression loading10.1177/0021955X17720156 ↗
19. Impact behavior of honeycombs under combined shear-compression. Part I: Experiments10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.11.005 ↗
20. Shear and compressive impact of polypropylene bead foam
21. Dynamic crush behaviors of aluminum honeycomb specimens under compression dominant inclined loads10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.02.003 ↗
22. Deformation response of EPS foam under combined compression-shear loading. Part II: High strain rate dynamic tests10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.015 ↗
23. Modelling of the strain rate dependent deformation behaviour of rigid polyurethane foams10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.07.007 ↗
24. Dynamic compressive behaviour of cellular materials: A review of phenomenon, mechanism and modelling10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.006 ↗
25. Duncan, O., Allen, T., Foster, L., Gatt, R., Grima, J.N., and Alderson, A. (2018, January 26–29). Controlling Density and Modulus in Auxetic Foam Fabrications—Implications for Impact and Indentation Testing. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, Brisbane, Australia.10.3390/proceedings2060250 ↗
26. Mechanical performance of polystyrene foam (EPS): Experimental and numerical analysis10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.001 ↗
27. Fabrication of Auxetic Foam Sheets for Sports Applications10.1002/pssb.201700596 ↗
28. Hockey STAR: A Methodology for Assessing the Biomechanical Performance of Hockey Helmets10.1007/s10439-015-1278-7 ↗
29. (2020, March 25). Least-Squares Fitting—MATLAB & Simulink. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/curvefit/least-squares-fitting.html.
30. Evaluation of cushioning properties of plastic foams from compressive measurements10.1002/pen.760211505 ↗
31. Energy absorption characteristics of polymeric foams used as cushioning materials10.1002/pen.760300210 ↗
32. Polypropylene foam behaviour under dynamic loadings: Strain rate, density and microstructure effects10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.007 ↗
33. Compressive Strain at the Onset of Densification of Cellular Solids10.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗
34. Mills, N. (2007). Polymer Foams Handbook: Engineering and Biomechanics Applications and Design Guide, Butterworth-Heinemann.
35. Investigation of strain-rate effect on the compressive behaviour of closed-cell aluminium foam by 3D image-based modelling10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.109 ↗
36. Determination of the constitutive relation and critical condition for the shock compression of cellular solids10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.04.004 ↗
37. Burbank, S.D., and Smith, L.V. (2012). Dynamic characterization of rigid foam used in finite element sports ball simulations. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part P J. Sports Eng. Technol.10.1177/1754337112441112 ↗
38. Validation of a Finite Element Modeling Process for Auxetic Structures under Impact10.1002/pssb.201900197 ↗
39. Load–compression behavior of flexible foams10.1002/app.1969.070131106 ↗
40. Mechanical models of cellular solids: Parameters identification from experimental tests10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.012 ↗
41. Altair (2015). Altair Engineering RADIOSS Theory Manual, 14.0 Version, Large Displacement Finite Element Analysis PART 2, Altair Engineering, Inc.
42. Hallquist, J.O. (2007). LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
43. Croop, B., Lobo, H., and DatapointLabs (2009, January 14–15). Selecting material models for the simulation of foams in LS-DYNA. Proceedings of the 7th European LS-Dyna Conference, Salzburg, Austria.