journal article·2019-08-05Open access

The Spatial Perspective in Post-Earthquake Evaluation to Improve Mitigation Strategies: Geostatistical Analysis of the Seismic Damage Applied to a Real Case Study

Salvador García-Ayllón, Antonio Tomás, José Luis Ródenas

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 15

Abstract

The analysis of damage in cities after an earthquake to implement mitigation strategies of seismic risk is a complex job that is usually full of uncertainties. Numerous variables affect the final result of the observable damage in a set of buildings in an urban area. The use of methodologies capable of providing global explanations beyond the traditional unidisciplinary approach of disciplines, such as structural analysis, earthquake engineering, geotechnics, or seismology, can be very useful for improving the behavior of our cities against earthquakes. This article presents geostatistical post-earthquake analysis, an innovative approach in this field of research based on GIS spatial statistical tools to evaluate the importance of the different variables after an earthquake that may have caused damage in a city. This new framework will be applied to analyze, from a geostatistical perspective, the damage levels observed in the city of Lorca (Spain) after the earthquake of 2011; a case study where various studies have proposed different measures to mitigate the impact of future earthquakes as a consequence of focusing on different phenomena as the main variable for the damage produced. A bivariate GIS assessment will allow spatial correlation of the problems detected from a statistical point of view (inadequate design of buildings, age of the real estate stock, inefficient urban planning configurations, geological risk, etc.) and the different levels of damage that the technicians who participated in the post-earthquake phase evaluated in the city. The results obtained will allow one to hierarchize the importance of the different detected phenomena to prepare the city better against future earthquakes and to elaborate an improved seismic mitigation strategy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Land Use and Ecosystem Services

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Cartagena, Campus Alfonso XIII, 30203 Cartagena, Spain

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, Z., Hsu, T.-Y., Wei, H.-H., Chen, J.-H., Zhang, Z., Hsu, T.-Y., Wei, H.-H., and Chen, J.-H. (2019). Development of a Data-Mining Technique for Regional-Scale Evaluation of Building Seismic Vulnerability. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9071502 ↗
2. Ji, J., Yang, M., Jiang, L., He, J., Teng, Z., Liu, Y., Song, H., Ji, J., Yang, M., and Jiang, L. (2019). Output-Only Parameters Identification of Earthquake-Excited Building Structures with Least Squares and Input Modification Process. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9040696 ↗
3. Suarez, E., Roldán, A., Gallego, A., Benavent-Climent, A., Suarez, E., Roldán, A., Gallego, A., and Benavent-Climent, A. (2017). Entropy Analysis for Damage Quantification of Hysteretic Dampers Used as Seismic Protection of Buildings. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7060628 ↗
4. Soil liquefaction in seasonally frozen ground during the 2016 Mw6.6 Akto earthquake10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.024 ↗
5. The earthquakes network: Retrieving the empirical seismological laws10.1016/j.physa.2016.12.003 ↗
6. García-Ayllón, S., and Tomás, A. (2014). The new sismimur plan: Seismic urban planning in the region of Murcia (Spain) after the earthquake of May 11, 2011. Int. J. Saf. Secur. Eng., 4.10.2495/SAFE-V4-N2-116-134 ↗
7. Urban water infrastructure planning of regeneration works in the city of Lorca after the earthquake of 2011 and floods of 2012
8. Tranfer function amplitude minimization for structures with tuned mass dampers considering soil-structure interaction10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.035 ↗
9. Advances in seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buidings applied in the city of Lorca (Spain) 2011 Earthquake
10. Seismic design of low-rise buildings based on frequent earthquake response spectrum10.1016/j.jobe.2018.11.005 ↗
11. Ródenas, J., García-Ayllón, S., Tomás, A., Ródenas, J.L., García-Ayllón, S., and Tomás, A. (2018). Estimation of the Buildings Seismic Vulnerability: A Methodological Proposal for Planning Ante-Earthquake Scenarios in Urban Areas. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8071208 ↗
12. Tomás, A., Ródenas, J.L., and García-Ayllón, S. (2017). Proposal for new values of behaviour modifiers for seismic vulnerability evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings applied to Lorca (Spain) using damage data from the 2011 earthquake. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 15.10.1007/s10518-017-0100-3 ↗
13. Accelerating geostatistical seismic inversion using TensorFlow: A heterogeneous distributed deep learning framework10.1016/j.cageo.2018.12.007 ↗
14. Tectonic and seismic implications of an intersegment rupture: The damaging May 11th 2011 Mw 5.2 Lorca, Spain, earthquake
15. Would RC wide-beam buildings in Spain have survived Lorca earthquake (11-05-2011)?10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.020 ↗
16. Comparing observed damages and losses with modelled ones using a probabilistic approach: The Lorca 2011 case10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.008 ↗
17. Ministerio de Fomento de España (2002). Norma Sismorresistente Española NCSE-02.
18. Field observations and interpretation of the structural performance of constructions after the 11 May 2011 Lorca earthquake10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.040 ↗
19. Reassessment of intensity estimates from vulnerability and damage distributions: The 2011 Lorca earthquake10.1007/s10518-016-9913-8 ↗
20. Significance of directivity effects during the 2011 Lorca earthquake in Spain10.1007/s10518-017-0301-9 ↗
21. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Soft Story Irregular Buildings Using Pushover Analysis10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.103 ↗
22. Evaluación probabilista del riesgo sísmico en Lorca mediante simulaciones de escenarios10.1016/j.rimni.2014.11.001 ↗
23. Tang, Y., and Huang, S. (2019). Assessing seismic vulnerability of urban road networks by a Bayesian network approach. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ.10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.003 ↗
24. Seismic vulnerability assessment for the historical areas of the Timisoara city, Romania10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.03.013 ↗
25. Huh, J., Tran, Q., Haldar, A., Park, I., Ahn, J.-H., Huh, J., Tran, Q.H., Haldar, A., Park, I., and Ahn, J.-H. (2017). Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Shallow Two-Story Underground RC Box Structure. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7070735 ↗
26. Asteris, P.G., Moropoulou, A., Skentou, A.D., Apostolopoulou, M., Mohebkhah, A., Cavaleri, L., Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Asteris, P.G., and Moropoulou, A. (2019). Stochastic Vulnerability Assessment of Masonry Structures: Concepts, Modeling and Restoration Aspects. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9020243 ↗
27. Evaluación sísmica de los edificios de mampostería típicos de Barcelona aplicando la metodología Risk-UE10.1016/j.rimni.2012.03.007 ↗
28. Martinez-Pagan, P., Navarro, M., and Perez-Cuevas, J. (2014). Shear Wave Velocity Structure for Seismic Microzonation of Lorca town (SE Spain) from MASW Analysis. Near Surf. Geophys., 12.10.3997/2214-4609.20131351 ↗
29. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis: Software Tools, Methods and Applications edited by Manfred, M. Fischer and Arthur Getis10.1111/j.1467-9787.2012.00768_8.x ↗
30. Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x ↗
31. The integration of spatial analysis and gis10.1016/0198-9715(92)90050-2 ↗
32. Getis, A., Ord, J.K., Longley, P., and Batty, M. (1996). Local spatial statistics: An overview, John Wiley & Sons.
33. Seismic assessment of a three-story wood building with an integrated CLT-lightframe system using RTHS10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.025 ↗
34. Seismic response of support-isolated secondary structures in a multistorey structure10.1016/0141-0296(93)90037-5 ↗
35. Shear-wave velocity structure from MASW and SPAC methods: The case of Adra town, SE Spain10.3997/1873-0604.2018012 ↗